From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.3 required=3.0 tests=DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_PASS, URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_MUTT autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C31EDC43387 for ; Tue, 15 Jan 2019 15:40:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 94C3120657 for ; Tue, 15 Jan 2019 15:40:25 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=lists.infradead.org header.i=@lists.infradead.org header.b="HrCtH00F" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 94C3120657 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=infradead.org Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-riscv-bounces+infradead-linux-riscv=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20170209; h=Sender: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:Cc:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post: List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:References: Message-ID:Subject:To:From:Date:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description: Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID: List-Owner; bh=UPPoFg9iLMCrgp8Vw8irJps7D2RdWpnWqLXiJPeZTZc=; b=HrCtH00FqS3NWV OuqMfNC17eu0Iw4mJ66/CcO8zQtZqlZF+0vPSeoCQZRveGNWwWHMDw8rCBFj6+DMJVBjJnkZ5r9EX xk3R6mLKtjWATNEYPIzJUHHP3KHk5K2NFhd9IvnvJahz9qRazoxG1OrmjiRMvXF/POodyp915aDH/ y+wPFUI++yqg220VI7DiCdIj6bCnVZboS9If4Isad8bPF2MjRQbRxIxpNnUYNpA2BNvOqAiVZfi0R LVUwupg9sza0tjDYURN6+sfMe+5tL5HVvO4XSdfBs7pxA0LwfDeeSZot+SVkGb8pCweGPGHjlzWZl KJWQ7Iqr8rJuY17KkeVg==; Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1gjQpD-0006uK-96; Tue, 15 Jan 2019 15:40:23 +0000 Received: from hch by bombadil.infradead.org with local (Exim 4.90_1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1gjQoO-0005GD-1M; Tue, 15 Jan 2019 15:39:32 +0000 Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2019 07:39:31 -0800 From: Christoph Hellwig To: =?iso-8859-1?Q?Bj=F6rn_T=F6pel?= Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 1/3] riscv: set HAVE_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS Message-ID: <20190115153931.GF26443@infradead.org> References: <20190115083518.10149-1-bjorn.topel@gmail.com> <20190115083518.10149-2-bjorn.topel@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20190115083518.10149-2-bjorn.topel@gmail.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.9.2 (2017-12-15) X-BeenThere: linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org, palmer@sifive.com, daniel@iogearbox.net, davidlee@sifive.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "linux-riscv" Errors-To: linux-riscv-bounces+infradead-linux-riscv=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org Hmm, while the RISC-V spec requires misaligned load/store support, who says they are efficient? Maybe add a little comment that says on which cpus they are efficient. _______________________________________________ linux-riscv mailing list linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-riscv