From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.3 required=3.0 tests=DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_PASS, USER_AGENT_MUTT autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D8368C43387 for ; Tue, 15 Jan 2019 20:52:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A019E20657 for ; Tue, 15 Jan 2019 20:52:52 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=lists.infradead.org header.i=@lists.infradead.org header.b="Sj9xmTLa" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org A019E20657 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=infradead.org Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-riscv-bounces+infradead-linux-riscv=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20170209; h=Sender: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:Cc:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post: List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:References: Message-ID:Subject:To:From:Date:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description: Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID: List-Owner; bh=l6CjSZ/7gAinJhGMOpfoP9XVBAMyGrv/jYLCQ7IjsW8=; b=Sj9xmTLaOusWOn 9SdAR4UZSkNjHRewRDcZxmOfj1fMxatHx2w1gSX8SJcj0lat+OTXa9eNbcldyLDD9Qdqh84kSnflc DdU9jH6WoghTC8W7r/hQbOmdtxOwB8j0/LfCVkYpOaD90gQYu7HVqYD3YRh1G5cGLN+o1g2BC/G4v L3udrLkmv4lzo3GJquQ5aSZbcAhyYvnXQMZueOHG3WCh1ms3s0caLhWEE/oK6ARpjC1JPp+j7nCja Lc2D7BqH/5fpJRm1ieGevxHPXvdkFw1VVoYZ9NraAbY4O6dPP12tx83wMl+xMS66X1ZKGA5C3o/Dn jZwER7U+hpfPQsWR6C9A==; Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1gjVhb-0006oT-7Y; Tue, 15 Jan 2019 20:52:51 +0000 Received: from hch by bombadil.infradead.org with local (Exim 4.90_1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1gjVhY-0006ns-JI; Tue, 15 Jan 2019 20:52:48 +0000 Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2019 12:52:48 -0800 From: Christoph Hellwig To: Mike Kravetz Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] Hugetlbfs support for riscv Message-ID: <20190115205248.GA21340@infradead.org> References: <20181210062146.24951-1-aghiti@upmem.com> <91664ec7-d148-1c0a-8d1a-82815c5c7f6a@oracle.com> <20190115160429.GA29683@infradead.org> <5454277c-410d-f24e-882e-02442af8a719@oracle.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <5454277c-410d-f24e-882e-02442af8a719@oracle.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.9.2 (2017-12-15) X-BeenThere: linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: mingo@kernel.org, aou@eecs.berkeley.edu, catalin.marinas@arm.com, palmer@sifive.com, ndesaulniers@google.com, Alexandre Ghiti , Christoph Hellwig , atish.patra@wdc.com, linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "linux-riscv" Errors-To: linux-riscv-bounces+infradead-linux-riscv=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org On Tue, Jan 15, 2019 at 11:25:07AM -0800, Mike Kravetz wrote: > I would actually prefer that this be a separate patch. Why? > - The functionality is arch independent and not specific to riscv. > - This functionality was intended in commit 944d9fec8d7a ("hugetlb: > add support for gigantic page allocation at runtime"). However, > there was no need to tie the functionality to CMA or (MEMORY_ISOLATION > && COMPACTION). > > I don't care enough to insist the patch be separate. Just seems like > it should be separate to me. Oh, I agree it should be a separate patch. But it would be nice to merge it together with the RISC-V hugetlb support, so that it can depend on the patch instead of the current somewhat odd Kconfig dependencies. _______________________________________________ linux-riscv mailing list linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-riscv