From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.5 required=3.0 tests=DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_PASS, URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_MUTT autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8F3D9C43381 for ; Fri, 29 Mar 2019 20:24:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 56BBD218A5 for ; Fri, 29 Mar 2019 20:24:34 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=lists.infradead.org header.i=@lists.infradead.org header.b="pp26DBmT"; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (1024-bit key) header.d=alien8.de header.i=@alien8.de header.b="Oi+QWpnm" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 56BBD218A5 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=alien8.de Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-riscv-bounces+infradead-linux-riscv=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20170209; h=Sender: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:Cc:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post: List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:References: Message-ID:Subject:To:From:Date:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description: Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID: List-Owner; bh=xWOkI4PVcDyTNiU1z/ilitN2n7uaBcSlGj9R2QXbEEI=; b=pp26DBmTp95MmB h7x4GVnAjx4Kn4zDzIu3lQqaJ51O2lq2EuySAl4ah9HPIovGzkXxtc0e9RpJQk4+QViN1V+etmFJK gs0dwP57jStzKHPbvobPj+pAivnNgs40pcySm6ceQtVjaeto5Hlt2EYEIqKMIIQb8tvf9wi1KMqwo wlgr+VAVIAImNCjVzjkNbjlSVo98VAWce8FLWBJl1egBTliCPCl3rgTncbB6hSiiBj/JYyoAANuiE CtSPX1Ey4nOyYQKwszi3j2I6IYYN0lO8C1JfsdTZQ3OLYcRHuc53f+vAHnm9ycDVjQZizfhVplEka 7Np1zHP+9gqisYXRG6MA==; Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1h9y3A-0000w3-CG; Fri, 29 Mar 2019 20:24:28 +0000 Received: from mail.skyhub.de ([5.9.137.197]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.90_1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1h9y37-0000v0-J8 for linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org; Fri, 29 Mar 2019 20:24:27 +0000 Received: from zn.tnic (p200300EC2F148A00E59BAD4CF0BA983E.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [IPv6:2003:ec:2f14:8a00:e59b:ad4c:f0ba:983e]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.skyhub.de (SuperMail on ZX Spectrum 128k) with ESMTPSA id 168FD1EC00FF; Fri, 29 Mar 2019 21:24:14 +0100 (CET) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=alien8.de; s=dkim; t=1553891054; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:in-reply-to: references:references; bh=WCNTVbcKj6aP3VoHv0OOak5vhWNJhjZVZAm5pLFuQlM=; b=Oi+QWpnm5zcoX4nxl5tVGQlHyIlVjYA7H9QRTD8Fl7FGN5VX8HnNnidUEEmamM1X3cJUWM HJ4W7eRCcgm9RCfNkQJDqjYIP6C8jonsNcxLdJhdmac3ZTa5AiBgzV4CTyFcZWhc14SAmm K1/31p0/51t089gTs/2Zycos2e6WFSk= Date: Fri, 29 Mar 2019 21:24:16 +0100 From: Borislav Petkov To: Rob Herring Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] edac: sifive: Add DT documentation for SiFive L2 cache Controller Message-ID: <20190329202416.GI21152@zn.tnic> References: <1552382461-13051-1-git-send-email-yash.shah@sifive.com> <1552382461-13051-2-git-send-email-yash.shah@sifive.com> <20190328131657.GA9056@bogus> <20190329142739.GG21152@zn.tnic> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13) X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20190329_132425_782461_80991377 X-CRM114-Status: UNSURE ( 9.95 ) X-CRM114-Notice: Please train this message. X-BeenThere: linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Mark Rutland , devicetree@vger.kernel.org, Albert Ou , Palmer Dabbelt , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , Yash Shah , James Morse , Paul Walmsley , linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org, Mauro Carvalho Chehab , linux-edac@vger.kernel.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "linux-riscv" Errors-To: linux-riscv-bounces+infradead-linux-riscv=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org On Fri, Mar 29, 2019 at 02:41:05PM -0500, Rob Herring wrote: > DT dictates aligning with what the h/w looks like which has little to > do with OS driver design. Ok, then, where does this goal for doing a driver or compilation unit per IP block come from? Because everytime an ARM EDAC driver pops up, we are having the same discussion. > I never said you should change EDAC and I outlined how things should > be handled if it is one driver. Ok, we will add that to the EDAC driver design document we're currently working on. > DT and OS subsystems are independent things. I can't tell you how to > design the subsystem and you can't dictate DT design (based on EDAC > design). I don't think I've ever intentionally or unintentionally dictated DT design - all I've opposed to is having multiple EDAC drivers on ARM. -- Regards/Gruss, Boris. Good mailing practices for 400: avoid top-posting and trim the reply. _______________________________________________ linux-riscv mailing list linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-riscv