From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.5 required=3.0 tests=DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_PASS, URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_MUTT autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 03246C10F0E for ; Fri, 12 Apr 2019 05:51:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CA2452082E for ; Fri, 12 Apr 2019 05:51:58 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=lists.infradead.org header.i=@lists.infradead.org header.b="SGfNy+xT" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org CA2452082E Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=lst.de Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-riscv-bounces+infradead-linux-riscv=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20170209; h=Sender: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:Cc:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post: List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:References: Message-ID:Subject:To:From:Date:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description: Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID: List-Owner; bh=7LotFfVkDSyHNj7pv6aWG3VNSWo027Q0idW6IJRxKTc=; b=SGfNy+xTK/g7it 71kRSAGeXIliP0KefIfMcs0t1ffunBjX4/0z/5toi5Bt34+Ixtd8sbO0I8r4fS05aWDfnsznAwymN 7CiVKh1qkffX3LZzxCCXkW8T3lpgR1T36zlC/k9356hrS5D2zdUHiPmqSQj+3k6gIIZcgas6ADKif 27TJu/aZHW6N0HN1N+lAi0tp/goK4KV63RzX8731hCduMtO+Of1s3puN4jyVMId5oo4JesxDtmDvz JGi6zd62M+di5l/ZMTzrynbgrMl2wX3FDcxwIS2en1f5Yvm9CGawiv4PHtb8BKDuNElVwMtdx7ww8 gj8WVk6ERcY+/qWWnHCQ==; Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1hEp6T-0008KQ-NL; Fri, 12 Apr 2019 05:51:57 +0000 Received: from verein.lst.de ([213.95.11.211] helo=newverein.lst.de) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.90_1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1hEp6Q-0008K6-8h for linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org; Fri, 12 Apr 2019 05:51:56 +0000 Received: by newverein.lst.de (Postfix, from userid 2407) id EC65668AFE; Fri, 12 Apr 2019 07:51:39 +0200 (CEST) Date: Fri, 12 Apr 2019 07:51:39 +0200 From: Christoph Hellwig To: Palmer Dabbelt Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/9] riscv: remove CONFIG_RISCV_ISA_A Message-ID: <20190412055139.GB32149@lst.de> References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-11-01) X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20190411_225154_460125_C1FD57D3 X-CRM114-Status: UNSURE ( 7.55 ) X-CRM114-Notice: Please train this message. X-BeenThere: linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: schwab@suse.de, linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org, Christoph Hellwig Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "linux-riscv" Errors-To: linux-riscv-bounces+infradead-linux-riscv=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org On Thu, Apr 11, 2019 at 06:23:23PM -0700, Palmer Dabbelt wrote: > On Thu, 11 Apr 2019 05:21:23 PDT (-0700), schwab@suse.de wrote: >> On Apr 11 2019, Christoph Hellwig wrote: >> >>> This option is always enabled, and not supporting the A extensions would >>> create a complete ABI trainwreck, so there is point in even slightly >> >> +no > > Sorry, but I can't parse your answer. Do you agree with or disagree with > the proposed patch? They way I understood it it is that he wants me to insert a no into the sentence above where it is missing to make sense: ".., so there is _no_ point in even slightly.." _______________________________________________ linux-riscv mailing list linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-riscv