From: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
To: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>,
"Peter Zijlstra \(Intel\)" <peterz@infradead.org>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@sifive.com>,
Atish Patra <atish.patra@wdc.com>,
linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org,
Morten Rasmussen <morten.rasmussen@arm.com>,
Jeffrey Hugo <jhugo@codeaurora.org>,
Anup Patel <anup@brainfault.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
devicetree@vger.kernel.org, Albert Ou <aou@eecs.berkeley.edu>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@sifive.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Jeremy Linton <jeremy.linton@arm.com>,
Otto Sabart <ottosabart@seberm.com>,
Andreas Schwab <schwab@suse.de>
Subject: Re: [RFT PATCH v5 3/5] cpu-topology: Move cpu topology code to common code.
Date: Fri, 24 May 2019 10:38:41 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190524093754.GA3432@fuggles.cambridge.arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190524085720.GA13121@e107155-lin>
On Fri, May 24, 2019 at 09:57:40AM +0100, Sudeep Holla wrote:
> On Fri, May 24, 2019 at 10:13:33AM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > On Thu, May 23, 2019 at 05:06:50PM -0700, Atish Patra wrote:
> > > Both RISC-V & ARM64 are using cpu-map device tree to describe
> > > their cpu topology. It's better to move the relevant code to
> > > a common place instead of duplicate code.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Atish Patra <atish.patra@wdc.com>
> > > Tested-by: Jeffrey Hugo <jhugo@codeaurora.org>
> > > ---
> > > arch/arm64/include/asm/topology.h | 23 ---
> > > arch/arm64/kernel/topology.c | 303 +-----------------------------
> > > drivers/base/arch_topology.c | 296 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > > include/linux/arch_topology.h | 28 +++
> > > include/linux/topology.h | 1 +
> > > 5 files changed, 329 insertions(+), 322 deletions(-)
> >
> > What, now _I_ have to maintain drivers/base/arch_topology.c? That's
> > nice for everyone else, but not me :(
> >
> > Ugh.
> >
> > Anyway, what are you wanting to happen to this series? I think we need
> > some ARM people to sign off on it before I can take the whole thing,
> > right?
> >
>
> Greg, I am ready to take ownership. Juri the original author of this file
> agreed and I have been reviewing this file since Juri first wrote it.
> I am happy to submit a patch assuming maintainership for this file, was
> just waiting to hear from you when I asked explicitly you and Juri in
> last version of the patch when Will wanted someone from ARM to be reviewer
> of this file at-least. I am happy to take over as reviewer or maintainer
> which ever you prefer.
Yes, please just include this update to MAINTAINERS as part of the series.
I'll ack it.
Will
_______________________________________________
linux-riscv mailing list
linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-riscv
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-05-24 9:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-05-24 0:06 [RFT PATCH v5 0/5] Unify CPU topology across ARM & RISC-V Atish Patra
2019-05-24 0:06 ` [RFT PATCH v5 1/5] Documentation: DT: arm: add support for sockets defining package boundaries Atish Patra
2019-05-24 0:06 ` [RFT PATCH v5 2/5] dt-binding: cpu-topology: Move cpu-map to a common binding Atish Patra
2019-05-24 0:06 ` [RFT PATCH v5 3/5] cpu-topology: Move cpu topology code to common code Atish Patra
2019-05-24 8:13 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2019-05-24 8:57 ` Sudeep Holla
2019-05-24 9:38 ` Will Deacon [this message]
2019-05-29 10:48 ` Sudeep Holla
2019-05-29 17:24 ` Atish Patra
2019-05-24 0:06 ` [RFT PATCH v5 4/5] arm: Use common cpu_topology structure and functions Atish Patra
2019-05-29 15:10 ` Sudeep Holla
2019-05-24 0:06 ` [RFT PATCH v5 5/5] RISC-V: Parse cpu topology during boot Atish Patra
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190524093754.GA3432@fuggles.cambridge.arm.com \
--to=will.deacon@arm.com \
--cc=anup@brainfault.org \
--cc=aou@eecs.berkeley.edu \
--cc=atish.patra@wdc.com \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=jeremy.linton@arm.com \
--cc=jhugo@codeaurora.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=morten.rasmussen@arm.com \
--cc=ottosabart@seberm.com \
--cc=palmer@sifive.com \
--cc=paul.walmsley@sifive.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rafael@kernel.org \
--cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=schwab@suse.de \
--cc=sudeep.holla@arm.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).