From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.3 required=3.0 tests=DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SIGNED_OFF_BY, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4B203C32750 for ; Tue, 13 Aug 2019 16:43:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 208F120663 for ; Tue, 13 Aug 2019 16:43:05 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=lists.infradead.org header.i=@lists.infradead.org header.b="TCS5DaDG" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 208F120663 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=lst.de Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-riscv-bounces+infradead-linux-riscv=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20170209; h=Sender: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:Cc:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post: List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:References: Message-ID:Subject:To:From:Date:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description: Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID: List-Owner; bh=6qo6U6IvSAjpWNnQpARPU91zDv9J8pCVcgvEpTzmYD0=; b=TCS5DaDG8H4AGN woiAp/In78bsiMrk+vuy3lDw78bsPgXZ+28nkQx8NuObVcKCgU7Q5Csg94ayapk8oMoe5QFUoFwvV /n7uB+Y3Sh8K2UVvlkYVgviKvYoaBcbA9T6zuUVxFfSEuu69UuVYBxWrRH1++PhHMRuhbdKexZDdi wmr5sIHwzwTJeGP4P6Un+qebuJL75EYSqO3LzEXYf2Ilb6IkfvY98EHxMpNoPXTJ+M6HhkAZ09gor XUL76Unl6K7yh91UzTTyny8F7mLysijI3OXBMIUS3j7EPNDxUYCSAIb+DzmVCEIpBREyxFz8A+pIe fJ+gnrtp4oMA7vOj6iIA==; Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1hxZt2-0001Qs-0F; Tue, 13 Aug 2019 16:43:04 +0000 Received: from verein.lst.de ([213.95.11.211]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.92 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1hxZsz-0001QD-0J for linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org; Tue, 13 Aug 2019 16:43:02 +0000 Received: by verein.lst.de (Postfix, from userid 2407) id 6435568B02; Tue, 13 Aug 2019 18:42:57 +0200 (CEST) Date: Tue, 13 Aug 2019 18:42:57 +0200 From: Christoph Hellwig To: Paul Walmsley Subject: Re: [PATCH 02/15] riscv: use CSR_SATP instead of the legacy sptbr name in switch_mm Message-ID: <20190813164257.GA10019@lst.de> References: <20190813154747.24256-1-hch@lst.de> <20190813154747.24256-3-hch@lst.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-11-01) X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20190813_094301_197885_1E9BA95E X-CRM114-Status: UNSURE ( 9.51 ) X-CRM114-Notice: Please train this message. X-BeenThere: linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Damien Le Moal , Palmer Dabbelt , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Atish Patra , linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org, Christoph Hellwig Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "linux-riscv" Errors-To: linux-riscv-bounces+infradead-linux-riscv=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org On Tue, Aug 13, 2019 at 09:36:23AM -0700, Paul Walmsley wrote: > On Tue, 13 Aug 2019, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > > > Switch to our own constant for the satp register instead of using > > the old name from a legacy version of the privileged spec. > > > > Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig > > Reviewed-by: Atish Patra > > Didn't you want us to replace this with Bin Meng's patch? > > https://lore.kernel.org/linux-riscv/20190807151316.GB16432@infradead.org/ > > If so, probably best just to drop this one and state a dependency. Either way is fine with me. But until you have a branch with either one applied I'm going to keep resending my patch, as random dependencies on uncommitted patches don't work. _______________________________________________ linux-riscv mailing list linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-riscv