From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.5 required=3.0 tests=DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,INCLUDES_PATCH,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_SANE_2 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AAF19C3A59D for ; Thu, 22 Aug 2019 09:26:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 811BB233A0 for ; Thu, 22 Aug 2019 09:26:46 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=lists.infradead.org header.i=@lists.infradead.org header.b="ZeS7Z/kk" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 811BB233A0 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=kernel.org Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-riscv-bounces+infradead-linux-riscv=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20170209; h=Sender: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:Cc:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post: List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:MIME-Version:References:In-Reply-To: Message-ID:Subject:To:From:Date:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description: Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID: List-Owner; bh=NAv5PRbMjJ5Qwt8kSmG/LkawEcMXmw7m2P41FMXbg34=; b=ZeS7Z/kkVFlaQ9 qS6Ez0s6jEgSkUY9VmBnGTcYt/dXumkDpqJTIEWVFW16Dw8uXNhHApiLdxgqszfvbLCdgwD4JNYin v7QNMWU+RlnGchtTE3sKffiqtQIa09HAFvn6WYJynjPtGW/r601NrIqI+38x59IKRvV+Uokf/uDyM EGZ6ckul3/LsL5nGekhk2fctfy4IBEvX/UFseT6werbPepCbVmxpbwPAPupEup/M6Wh2Z+wa46IGB DNRpfvxEBB2aq5GfS44weyyyRNJILQnW5HGYGiMimND4uuIfY1mF9g4hXjnpn0m7KFEDhM6679DaP /BPaw/3pK/7zIlKqQ3Tw==; Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1i0jMh-00039c-4s; Thu, 22 Aug 2019 09:26:43 +0000 Received: from [177.133.63.56] (helo=coco.lan) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtpsa (Exim 4.92 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1i0jMf-00037g-FT; Thu, 22 Aug 2019 09:26:41 +0000 Date: Thu, 22 Aug 2019 06:26:35 -0300 From: Mauro Carvalho Chehab To: Christoph Hellwig Subject: Re: [PATCH] riscv: move sifive_l2_cache.c to drivers/soc Message-ID: <20190822062635.00f6e507@coco.lan> In-Reply-To: <20190819062619.GA20211@lst.de> References: <20190818082935.14869-1-hch@lst.de> <20190819060904.GA4841@zn.tnic> <20190819062619.GA20211@lst.de> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.17.3 (GTK+ 2.24.32; x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu) MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: palmer@sifive.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Yash Shah , Borislav Petkov , paul.walmsley@sifive.com, linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org, linux-edac@vger.kernel.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "linux-riscv" Errors-To: linux-riscv-bounces+infradead-linux-riscv=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org Em Mon, 19 Aug 2019 08:26:19 +0200 Christoph Hellwig escreveu: > On Mon, Aug 19, 2019 at 08:09:04AM +0200, Borislav Petkov wrote: > > On Sun, Aug 18, 2019 at 10:29:35AM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > > > The sifive_l2_cache.c is in no way related to RISC-V architecture > > > memory management. It is a little stub driver working around the fact > > > that the EDAC maintainers prefer their drivers to be structured in a > > > certain way > > > > That changed recently so I guess we can do the per-IP block driver after > > all, if people would still prefer it. > > That would seem like the best idea. But I don't really know this code > well enough myself, and I really need to get this code out of the > forced on RISC-V codebase as some SOCs I'm working with simply don't > have the memory for it.. > > So unless someone signs up to do a per-IP block edac drivers instead > very quickly I'd still like to see something like this go into 5.4 > for now. I'm wandering if we should at least add an entry for this one at MAINTAINERS, pointing it to the EDAC mailing list. Something like: diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS index 7dfe381c8b43..1c3bc5aa3af0 100644 --- a/MAINTAINERS +++ b/MAINTAINERS @@ -5906,6 +5906,7 @@ M: Yash Shah L: linux-edac@vger.kernel.org S: Supported F: drivers/edac/sifive_edac.c +F: drivers/soc/sifive/ EDAC-SKYLAKE M: Tony Luck Thanks, Mauro _______________________________________________ linux-riscv mailing list linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-riscv