Linux-RISC-V Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / Atom feed
* [PATCH v4 0/4] Raspberry Pi 4 DMA addressing support
@ 2019-09-06 12:06 Nicolas Saenz Julienne
  2019-09-06 12:06 ` [PATCH v4 1/4] arm64: mm: use arm64_dma_phys_limit instead of calling max_zone_dma_phys() Nicolas Saenz Julienne
                   ` (3 more replies)
  0 siblings, 4 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Nicolas Saenz Julienne @ 2019-09-06 12:06 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: catalin.marinas, hch, wahrenst, marc.zyngier, robh+dt,
	linux-arm-kernel, linux-mm, linux-riscv
  Cc: f.fainelli, will, linux-kernel, mbrugger, linux-rpi-kernel,
	phill, robin.murphy, nsaenzjulienne, m.szyprowski

Hi all,
this series attempts to address some issues we found while bringing up
the new Raspberry Pi 4 in arm64 and it's intended to serve as a follow
up of these discussions:
v3: https://lkml.org/lkml/2019/9/2/589
v2: https://lkml.org/lkml/2019/8/20/767
v1: https://lkml.org/lkml/2019/7/31/922
RFC: https://lkml.org/lkml/2019/7/17/476

The new Raspberry Pi 4 has up to 4GB of memory but most peripherals can
only address the first GB: their DMA address range is
0xc0000000-0xfc000000 which is aliased to the first GB of physical
memory 0x00000000-0x3c000000. Note that only some peripherals have these
limitations: the PCIe, V3D, GENET, and 40-bit DMA channels have a wider
view of the address space by virtue of being hooked up trough a second
interconnect.

Part of this is solved on arm32 by setting up the machine specific
'.dma_zone_size = SZ_1G', which takes care of reserving the coherent
memory area at the right spot. That said no buffer bouncing (needed for
dma streaming) is available at the moment, but that's a story for
another series.

Unfortunately there is no such thing as 'dma_zone_size' in arm64. Only
ZONE_DMA32 is created which is interpreted by dma-direct and the arm64
arch code as if all peripherals where be able to address the first 4GB
of memory.

In the light of this, the series implements the following changes:

- Create both DMA zones in arm64, ZONE_DMA will contain the first 1G
  area and ZONE_DMA32 the rest of the 32 bit addressable memory. So far
  the RPi4 is the only arm64 device with such DMA addressing limitations
  so this hardcoded solution was deemed preferable.

- Properly set ARCH_ZONE_DMA_BITS.

- Reserve the CMA area in a place suitable for all peripherals.

This series has been tested on multiple devices both by checking the
zones setup matches the expectations and by double-checking physical
addresses on pages allocated on the three relevant areas GFP_DMA,
GFP_DMA32, GFP_KERNEL:

- On an RPi4 with variations on the ram memory size. But also forcing
  the situation where all three memory zones are nonempty by setting a 3G
  ZONE_DMA32 ceiling on a 4G setup. Both with and without NUMA support.

- On a Synquacer box[1] with 32G of memory.

- On an ACPI based Huawei TaiShan server[2] with 256G of memory.

- On a QEMU virtual machine running arm64's OpenSUSE Tumbleweed.

That's all.

Regards,
Nicolas

[1] https://www.96boards.org/product/developerbox/
[2] https://e.huawei.com/en/products/cloud-computing-dc/servers/taishan-server/taishan-2280-v2

---

Changes in v4:
- Rebased to linux-next
- Fix issue when NUMA=n and ZONE_DMA=n
- Merge two max_zone_dma*_phys() functions

Changes in v3:
- Fixed ZONE_DMA's size to 1G
- Update mmzone.h's comment to match changes in arm64
- Remove all dma-direct patches

Changes in v2:
- Update comment to reflect new zones split
- ZONE_DMA will never be left empty
- Try another approach merging both ZONE_DMA comments into one
- Address Christoph's comments
- If this approach doesn't get much traction I'll just drop the patch
  from the series as it's not really essential

Nicolas Saenz Julienne (4):
  arm64: mm: use arm64_dma_phys_limit instead of calling
    max_zone_dma_phys()
  arm64: rename variables used to calculate ZONE_DMA32's size
  arm64: use both ZONE_DMA and ZONE_DMA32
  mm: refresh ZONE_DMA and ZONE_DMA32 comments in 'enum zone_type'

 arch/arm64/Kconfig            |  4 ++
 arch/arm64/include/asm/page.h |  2 +
 arch/arm64/mm/init.c          | 71 +++++++++++++++++++++++++----------
 include/linux/mmzone.h        | 45 ++++++++++++----------
 4 files changed, 83 insertions(+), 39 deletions(-)

-- 
2.23.0


_______________________________________________
linux-riscv mailing list
linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-riscv

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v4 1/4] arm64: mm: use arm64_dma_phys_limit instead of calling max_zone_dma_phys()
  2019-09-06 12:06 [PATCH v4 0/4] Raspberry Pi 4 DMA addressing support Nicolas Saenz Julienne
@ 2019-09-06 12:06 ` Nicolas Saenz Julienne
  2019-09-06 12:06 ` [PATCH v4 2/4] arm64: rename variables used to calculate ZONE_DMA32's size Nicolas Saenz Julienne
                   ` (2 subsequent siblings)
  3 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Nicolas Saenz Julienne @ 2019-09-06 12:06 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: catalin.marinas, hch, wahrenst, marc.zyngier, robh+dt,
	linux-arm-kernel, linux-mm, linux-riscv, linux-kernel
  Cc: f.fainelli, will, mbrugger, linux-rpi-kernel, phill,
	robin.murphy, nsaenzjulienne, m.szyprowski

By the time we call zones_sizes_init() arm64_dma_phys_limit already
contains the result of max_zone_dma_phys(). We use the variable instead
of calling the function directly to save some precious cpu time.

Signed-off-by: Nicolas Saenz Julienne <nsaenzjulienne@suse.de>
Reviewed-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
---
 arch/arm64/mm/init.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/arch/arm64/mm/init.c b/arch/arm64/mm/init.c
index f3c795278def..6112d6c90fa8 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/mm/init.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/mm/init.c
@@ -181,7 +181,7 @@ static void __init zone_sizes_init(unsigned long min, unsigned long max)
 	unsigned long max_zone_pfns[MAX_NR_ZONES]  = {0};
 
 #ifdef CONFIG_ZONE_DMA32
-	max_zone_pfns[ZONE_DMA32] = PFN_DOWN(max_zone_dma_phys());
+	max_zone_pfns[ZONE_DMA32] = PFN_DOWN(arm64_dma_phys_limit);
 #endif
 	max_zone_pfns[ZONE_NORMAL] = max;
 
-- 
2.23.0


_______________________________________________
linux-riscv mailing list
linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-riscv

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v4 2/4] arm64: rename variables used to calculate ZONE_DMA32's size
  2019-09-06 12:06 [PATCH v4 0/4] Raspberry Pi 4 DMA addressing support Nicolas Saenz Julienne
  2019-09-06 12:06 ` [PATCH v4 1/4] arm64: mm: use arm64_dma_phys_limit instead of calling max_zone_dma_phys() Nicolas Saenz Julienne
@ 2019-09-06 12:06 ` Nicolas Saenz Julienne
  2019-09-06 12:06 ` [PATCH v4 3/4] arm64: use both ZONE_DMA and ZONE_DMA32 Nicolas Saenz Julienne
  2019-09-06 12:06 ` [PATCH v4 4/4] mm: refresh ZONE_DMA and ZONE_DMA32 comments in 'enum zone_type' Nicolas Saenz Julienne
  3 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Nicolas Saenz Julienne @ 2019-09-06 12:06 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: catalin.marinas, hch, wahrenst, marc.zyngier, robh+dt,
	linux-arm-kernel, linux-mm, linux-riscv, linux-kernel
  Cc: f.fainelli, will, mbrugger, linux-rpi-kernel, phill,
	robin.murphy, nsaenzjulienne, m.szyprowski

Let the name indicate that they are used to calculate ZONE_DMA32's size
as opposed to ZONE_DMA.

Signed-off-by: Nicolas Saenz Julienne <nsaenzjulienne@suse.de>
Reviewed-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
---
 arch/arm64/mm/init.c | 30 +++++++++++++++---------------
 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/arm64/mm/init.c b/arch/arm64/mm/init.c
index 098c0f5bedf6..8e9bc64c5878 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/mm/init.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/mm/init.c
@@ -56,7 +56,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(physvirt_offset);
 struct page *vmemmap __ro_after_init;
 EXPORT_SYMBOL(vmemmap);
 
-phys_addr_t arm64_dma_phys_limit __ro_after_init;
+phys_addr_t arm64_dma32_phys_limit __ro_after_init;
 
 #ifdef CONFIG_KEXEC_CORE
 /*
@@ -174,7 +174,7 @@ static void __init reserve_elfcorehdr(void)
  * currently assumes that for memory starting above 4G, 32-bit devices will
  * use a DMA offset.
  */
-static phys_addr_t __init max_zone_dma_phys(void)
+static phys_addr_t __init max_zone_dma32_phys(void)
 {
 	phys_addr_t offset = memblock_start_of_DRAM() & GENMASK_ULL(63, 32);
 	return min(offset + (1ULL << 32), memblock_end_of_DRAM());
@@ -187,7 +187,7 @@ static void __init zone_sizes_init(unsigned long min, unsigned long max)
 	unsigned long max_zone_pfns[MAX_NR_ZONES]  = {0};
 
 #ifdef CONFIG_ZONE_DMA32
-	max_zone_pfns[ZONE_DMA32] = PFN_DOWN(arm64_dma_phys_limit);
+	max_zone_pfns[ZONE_DMA32] = PFN_DOWN(arm64_dma32_phys_limit);
 #endif
 	max_zone_pfns[ZONE_NORMAL] = max;
 
@@ -200,16 +200,16 @@ static void __init zone_sizes_init(unsigned long min, unsigned long max)
 {
 	struct memblock_region *reg;
 	unsigned long zone_size[MAX_NR_ZONES], zhole_size[MAX_NR_ZONES];
-	unsigned long max_dma = min;
+	unsigned long max_dma32 = min;
 
 	memset(zone_size, 0, sizeof(zone_size));
 
 	/* 4GB maximum for 32-bit only capable devices */
 #ifdef CONFIG_ZONE_DMA32
-	max_dma = PFN_DOWN(arm64_dma_phys_limit);
-	zone_size[ZONE_DMA32] = max_dma - min;
+	max_dma32 = PFN_DOWN(arm64_dma32_phys_limit);
+	zone_size[ZONE_DMA32] = max_dma32 - min;
 #endif
-	zone_size[ZONE_NORMAL] = max - max_dma;
+	zone_size[ZONE_NORMAL] = max - max_dma32;
 
 	memcpy(zhole_size, zone_size, sizeof(zhole_size));
 
@@ -221,14 +221,14 @@ static void __init zone_sizes_init(unsigned long min, unsigned long max)
 			continue;
 
 #ifdef CONFIG_ZONE_DMA32
-		if (start < max_dma) {
-			unsigned long dma_end = min(end, max_dma);
+		if (start < max_dma32) {
+			unsigned long dma_end = min(end, max_dma32);
 			zhole_size[ZONE_DMA32] -= dma_end - start;
 		}
 #endif
-		if (end > max_dma) {
+		if (end > max_dma32) {
 			unsigned long normal_end = min(end, max);
-			unsigned long normal_start = max(start, max_dma);
+			unsigned long normal_start = max(start, max_dma32);
 			zhole_size[ZONE_NORMAL] -= normal_end - normal_start;
 		}
 	}
@@ -420,9 +420,9 @@ void __init arm64_memblock_init(void)
 
 	/* 4GB maximum for 32-bit only capable devices */
 	if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_ZONE_DMA32))
-		arm64_dma_phys_limit = max_zone_dma_phys();
+		arm64_dma32_phys_limit = max_zone_dma32_phys();
 	else
-		arm64_dma_phys_limit = PHYS_MASK + 1;
+		arm64_dma32_phys_limit = PHYS_MASK + 1;
 
 	reserve_crashkernel();
 
@@ -430,7 +430,7 @@ void __init arm64_memblock_init(void)
 
 	high_memory = __va(memblock_end_of_DRAM() - 1) + 1;
 
-	dma_contiguous_reserve(arm64_dma_phys_limit);
+	dma_contiguous_reserve(arm64_dma32_phys_limit);
 }
 
 void __init bootmem_init(void)
@@ -534,7 +534,7 @@ static void __init free_unused_memmap(void)
 void __init mem_init(void)
 {
 	if (swiotlb_force == SWIOTLB_FORCE ||
-	    max_pfn > (arm64_dma_phys_limit >> PAGE_SHIFT))
+	    max_pfn > (arm64_dma32_phys_limit >> PAGE_SHIFT))
 		swiotlb_init(1);
 	else
 		swiotlb_force = SWIOTLB_NO_FORCE;
-- 
2.23.0


_______________________________________________
linux-riscv mailing list
linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-riscv

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v4 3/4] arm64: use both ZONE_DMA and ZONE_DMA32
  2019-09-06 12:06 [PATCH v4 0/4] Raspberry Pi 4 DMA addressing support Nicolas Saenz Julienne
  2019-09-06 12:06 ` [PATCH v4 1/4] arm64: mm: use arm64_dma_phys_limit instead of calling max_zone_dma_phys() Nicolas Saenz Julienne
  2019-09-06 12:06 ` [PATCH v4 2/4] arm64: rename variables used to calculate ZONE_DMA32's size Nicolas Saenz Julienne
@ 2019-09-06 12:06 ` Nicolas Saenz Julienne
  2019-09-08 21:27   ` Catalin Marinas
  2019-09-06 12:06 ` [PATCH v4 4/4] mm: refresh ZONE_DMA and ZONE_DMA32 comments in 'enum zone_type' Nicolas Saenz Julienne
  3 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread
From: Nicolas Saenz Julienne @ 2019-09-06 12:06 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: catalin.marinas, hch, wahrenst, marc.zyngier, robh+dt,
	linux-arm-kernel, linux-mm, linux-riscv, Will Deacon
  Cc: f.fainelli, linux-kernel, mbrugger, linux-rpi-kernel, phill,
	robin.murphy, nsaenzjulienne, m.szyprowski

So far all arm64 devices have supported 32 bit DMA masks for their
peripherals. This is not true anymore for the Raspberry Pi 4 as most of
it's peripherals can only address the first GB of memory on a total of
up to 4 GB.

This goes against ZONE_DMA32's intent, as it's expected for ZONE_DMA32
to be addressable with a 32 bit mask. So it was decided to re-introduce
ZONE_DMA in arm64.

ZONE_DMA will contain the lower 1G of memory, which is currently the
memory area addressable by any peripheral on an arm64 device.
ZONE_DMA32 will contain the rest of the 32 bit addressable memory.

Signed-off-by: Nicolas Saenz Julienne <nsaenzjulienne@suse.de>

---

Changes in v4:
- Fixed issue when NUMA=n and ZONE_DMA=n
- Merged two max_zone_dma*_phys() functions

Changes in v3:
- Used fixed size ZONE_DMA
- Fix check befor swiotlb_init()

Changes in v2:
- Update comment to reflect new zones split
- ZONE_DMA will never be left empty

 arch/arm64/Kconfig            |  4 +++
 arch/arm64/include/asm/page.h |  2 ++
 arch/arm64/mm/init.c          | 51 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------
 3 files changed, 44 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/arm64/Kconfig b/arch/arm64/Kconfig
index 6b6362b83004..2dbe0165bd15 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/Kconfig
+++ b/arch/arm64/Kconfig
@@ -267,6 +267,10 @@ config GENERIC_CSUM
 config GENERIC_CALIBRATE_DELAY
 	def_bool y
 
+config ZONE_DMA
+	bool "Support DMA zone" if EXPERT
+	default y
+
 config ZONE_DMA32
 	bool "Support DMA32 zone" if EXPERT
 	default y
diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/page.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/page.h
index d39ddb258a04..7b8c98830101 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/page.h
+++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/page.h
@@ -38,4 +38,6 @@ extern int pfn_valid(unsigned long);
 
 #include <asm-generic/getorder.h>
 
+#define ARCH_ZONE_DMA_BITS 30
+
 #endif
diff --git a/arch/arm64/mm/init.c b/arch/arm64/mm/init.c
index 8e9bc64c5878..95ee7e839c75 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/mm/init.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/mm/init.c
@@ -56,6 +56,13 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(physvirt_offset);
 struct page *vmemmap __ro_after_init;
 EXPORT_SYMBOL(vmemmap);
 
+/*
+ * We create both ZONE_DMA and ZONE_DMA32. ZONE_DMA covers the first 1G of
+ * memory as some devices, namely the Raspberry Pi 4, have peripherals with
+ * this limited view of the memory. ZONE_DMA32 will cover the rest of the 32
+ * bit addressable memory area.
+ */
+phys_addr_t arm64_dma_phys_limit __ro_after_init;
 phys_addr_t arm64_dma32_phys_limit __ro_after_init;
 
 #ifdef CONFIG_KEXEC_CORE
@@ -169,15 +176,16 @@ static void __init reserve_elfcorehdr(void)
 {
 }
 #endif /* CONFIG_CRASH_DUMP */
+
 /*
- * Return the maximum physical address for ZONE_DMA32 (DMA_BIT_MASK(32)). It
- * currently assumes that for memory starting above 4G, 32-bit devices will
- * use a DMA offset.
+ * Return the maximum physical address for a zone with a given address size
+ * limit. It currently assumes that for memory starting above 4G, 32-bit
+ * devices will use a DMA offset.
  */
-static phys_addr_t __init max_zone_dma32_phys(void)
+static phys_addr_t __init max_zone_phys(unsigned int zone_bits)
 {
 	phys_addr_t offset = memblock_start_of_DRAM() & GENMASK_ULL(63, 32);
-	return min(offset + (1ULL << 32), memblock_end_of_DRAM());
+	return min(offset + (1ULL << zone_bits), memblock_end_of_DRAM());
 }
 
 #ifdef CONFIG_NUMA
@@ -186,6 +194,9 @@ static void __init zone_sizes_init(unsigned long min, unsigned long max)
 {
 	unsigned long max_zone_pfns[MAX_NR_ZONES]  = {0};
 
+#ifdef CONFIG_ZONE_DMA
+	max_zone_pfns[ZONE_DMA] = PFN_DOWN(arm64_dma_phys_limit);
+#endif
 #ifdef CONFIG_ZONE_DMA32
 	max_zone_pfns[ZONE_DMA32] = PFN_DOWN(arm64_dma32_phys_limit);
 #endif
@@ -201,13 +212,18 @@ static void __init zone_sizes_init(unsigned long min, unsigned long max)
 	struct memblock_region *reg;
 	unsigned long zone_size[MAX_NR_ZONES], zhole_size[MAX_NR_ZONES];
 	unsigned long max_dma32 = min;
+	unsigned long max_dma = min;
 
 	memset(zone_size, 0, sizeof(zone_size));
 
-	/* 4GB maximum for 32-bit only capable devices */
+#ifdef CONFIG_ZONE_DMA
+	max_dma = PFN_DOWN(arm64_dma_phys_limit);
+	zone_size[ZONE_DMA] = max_dma - min;
+	max_dma32 = max_dma;
+#endif
 #ifdef CONFIG_ZONE_DMA32
 	max_dma32 = PFN_DOWN(arm64_dma32_phys_limit);
-	zone_size[ZONE_DMA32] = max_dma32 - min;
+	zone_size[ZONE_DMA32] = max_dma32 - max_dma;
 #endif
 	zone_size[ZONE_NORMAL] = max - max_dma32;
 
@@ -219,11 +235,17 @@ static void __init zone_sizes_init(unsigned long min, unsigned long max)
 
 		if (start >= max)
 			continue;
-
+#ifdef CONFIG_ZONE_DMA
+		if (start < max_dma) {
+			unsigned long dma_end = min_not_zero(end, max_dma);
+			zhole_size[ZONE_DMA] -= dma_end - start;
+		}
+#endif
 #ifdef CONFIG_ZONE_DMA32
 		if (start < max_dma32) {
-			unsigned long dma_end = min(end, max_dma32);
-			zhole_size[ZONE_DMA32] -= dma_end - start;
+			unsigned long dma32_end = min(end, max_dma32);
+			unsigned long dma32_start = max(start, max_dma);
+			zhole_size[ZONE_DMA32] -= dma32_end - dma32_start;
 		}
 #endif
 		if (end > max_dma32) {
@@ -418,9 +440,11 @@ void __init arm64_memblock_init(void)
 
 	early_init_fdt_scan_reserved_mem();
 
-	/* 4GB maximum for 32-bit only capable devices */
+	if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_ZONE_DMA))
+		arm64_dma_phys_limit = max_zone_phys(ARCH_ZONE_DMA_BITS);
+
 	if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_ZONE_DMA32))
-		arm64_dma32_phys_limit = max_zone_dma32_phys();
+		arm64_dma32_phys_limit = max_zone_phys(32);
 	else
 		arm64_dma32_phys_limit = PHYS_MASK + 1;
 
@@ -430,7 +454,7 @@ void __init arm64_memblock_init(void)
 
 	high_memory = __va(memblock_end_of_DRAM() - 1) + 1;
 
-	dma_contiguous_reserve(arm64_dma32_phys_limit);
+	dma_contiguous_reserve(arm64_dma_phys_limit ? : arm64_dma32_phys_limit);
 }
 
 void __init bootmem_init(void)
@@ -534,6 +558,7 @@ static void __init free_unused_memmap(void)
 void __init mem_init(void)
 {
 	if (swiotlb_force == SWIOTLB_FORCE ||
+	    max_pfn > (arm64_dma_phys_limit >> PAGE_SHIFT) ||
 	    max_pfn > (arm64_dma32_phys_limit >> PAGE_SHIFT))
 		swiotlb_init(1);
 	else
-- 
2.23.0


_______________________________________________
linux-riscv mailing list
linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-riscv

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v4 4/4] mm: refresh ZONE_DMA and ZONE_DMA32 comments in 'enum zone_type'
  2019-09-06 12:06 [PATCH v4 0/4] Raspberry Pi 4 DMA addressing support Nicolas Saenz Julienne
                   ` (2 preceding siblings ...)
  2019-09-06 12:06 ` [PATCH v4 3/4] arm64: use both ZONE_DMA and ZONE_DMA32 Nicolas Saenz Julienne
@ 2019-09-06 12:06 ` Nicolas Saenz Julienne
  3 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Nicolas Saenz Julienne @ 2019-09-06 12:06 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: catalin.marinas, hch, wahrenst, marc.zyngier, robh+dt,
	linux-arm-kernel, linux-mm, linux-riscv, Paul Walmsley,
	Palmer Dabbelt, Albert Ou
  Cc: f.fainelli, will, linux-kernel, mbrugger, linux-rpi-kernel,
	phill, robin.murphy, nsaenzjulienne, m.szyprowski

These zones usage has evolved with time and the comments were outdated.
This joins both ZONE_DMA and ZONE_DMA32 explanation and gives up to date
examples on how they are used on different architectures.

Signed-off-by: Nicolas Saenz Julienne <nsaenzjulienne@suse.de>
Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Reviewed-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>

---

Changes in v3:
- Update comment to match changes in arm64

Changes in v2:
- Try another approach merging both ZONE_DMA comments into one
- Address Christoph's comments
- If this approach doesn't get much traction I'll just drop the patch
  from the series as it's not really essential

 include/linux/mmzone.h | 45 ++++++++++++++++++++++++------------------
 1 file changed, 26 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)

diff --git a/include/linux/mmzone.h b/include/linux/mmzone.h
index 3f38c30d2f13..bf1b916c9ecb 100644
--- a/include/linux/mmzone.h
+++ b/include/linux/mmzone.h
@@ -357,33 +357,40 @@ struct per_cpu_nodestat {
 #endif /* !__GENERATING_BOUNDS.H */
 
 enum zone_type {
-#ifdef CONFIG_ZONE_DMA
 	/*
-	 * ZONE_DMA is used when there are devices that are not able
-	 * to do DMA to all of addressable memory (ZONE_NORMAL). Then we
-	 * carve out the portion of memory that is needed for these devices.
-	 * The range is arch specific.
+	 * ZONE_DMA and ZONE_DMA32 are used when there are peripherals not able
+	 * to DMA to all of the addressable memory (ZONE_NORMAL).
+	 * On architectures where this area covers the whole 32 bit address
+	 * space ZONE_DMA32 is used. ZONE_DMA is left for the ones with smaller
+	 * DMA addressing constraints. This distinction is important as a 32bit
+	 * DMA mask is assumed when ZONE_DMA32 is defined. Some 64-bit
+	 * platforms may need both zones as they support peripherals with
+	 * different DMA addressing limitations.
+	 *
+	 * Some examples:
+	 *
+	 *  - i386 and x86_64 have a fixed 16M ZONE_DMA and ZONE_DMA32 for the
+	 *    rest of the lower 4G.
+	 *
+	 *  - arm only uses ZONE_DMA, the size, up to 4G, may vary depending on
+	 *    the specific device.
+	 *
+	 *  - arm64 has a fixed 1G ZONE_DMA and ZONE_DMA32 for the rest of the
+	 *    lower 4G.
 	 *
-	 * Some examples
+	 *  - powerpc only uses ZONE_DMA, the size, up to 2G, may vary
+	 *    depending on the specific device.
 	 *
-	 * Architecture		Limit
-	 * ---------------------------
-	 * parisc, ia64, sparc	<4G
-	 * s390, powerpc	<2G
-	 * arm			Various
-	 * alpha		Unlimited or 0-16MB.
+	 *  - s390 uses ZONE_DMA fixed to the lower 2G.
 	 *
-	 * i386, x86_64 and multiple other arches
-	 * 			<16M.
+	 *  - ia64 and riscv only use ZONE_DMA32.
+	 *
+	 *  - parisc uses neither.
 	 */
+#ifdef CONFIG_ZONE_DMA
 	ZONE_DMA,
 #endif
 #ifdef CONFIG_ZONE_DMA32
-	/*
-	 * x86_64 needs two ZONE_DMAs because it supports devices that are
-	 * only able to do DMA to the lower 16M but also 32 bit devices that
-	 * can only do DMA areas below 4G.
-	 */
 	ZONE_DMA32,
 #endif
 	/*
-- 
2.23.0


_______________________________________________
linux-riscv mailing list
linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-riscv

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH v4 3/4] arm64: use both ZONE_DMA and ZONE_DMA32
  2019-09-06 12:06 ` [PATCH v4 3/4] arm64: use both ZONE_DMA and ZONE_DMA32 Nicolas Saenz Julienne
@ 2019-09-08 21:27   ` Catalin Marinas
  2019-09-09  8:46     ` Nicolas Saenz Julienne
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread
From: Catalin Marinas @ 2019-09-08 21:27 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Nicolas Saenz Julienne
  Cc: f.fainelli, mbrugger, marc.zyngier, robin.murphy, linux-kernel,
	linux-mm, robh+dt, wahrenst, m.szyprowski, linux-riscv, phill,
	Will Deacon, hch, linux-arm-kernel, linux-rpi-kernel

On Fri, Sep 06, 2019 at 02:06:14PM +0200, Nicolas Saenz Julienne wrote:
> @@ -430,7 +454,7 @@ void __init arm64_memblock_init(void)
>  
>  	high_memory = __va(memblock_end_of_DRAM() - 1) + 1;
>  
> -	dma_contiguous_reserve(arm64_dma32_phys_limit);
> +	dma_contiguous_reserve(arm64_dma_phys_limit ? : arm64_dma32_phys_limit);
>  }
>  
>  void __init bootmem_init(void)
> @@ -534,6 +558,7 @@ static void __init free_unused_memmap(void)
>  void __init mem_init(void)
>  {
>  	if (swiotlb_force == SWIOTLB_FORCE ||
> +	    max_pfn > (arm64_dma_phys_limit >> PAGE_SHIFT) ||
>  	    max_pfn > (arm64_dma32_phys_limit >> PAGE_SHIFT))
>  		swiotlb_init(1);

So here we want to initialise the swiotlb only if we need bounce
buffers. Prior to this patch, we assumed that swiotlb is needed if
max_pfn is beyond the reach of 32-bit devices. With ZONE_DMA, we need to
lower this limit to arm64_dma_phys_limit.

If ZONE_DMA is enabled, just comparing max_pfn with arm64_dma_phys_limit
is sufficient since the dma32 one limit always higher. However, if
ZONE_DMA is disabled, arm64_dma_phys_limit is 0, so we may initialise
swiotlb unnecessarily. I guess you need a similar check to the
dma_contiguous_reserve() above.

With that:

Reviewed-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>

Unless there are other objections, I can queue this series for 5.5 in a
few weeks time (too late for 5.4).

-- 
Catalin

_______________________________________________
linux-riscv mailing list
linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-riscv

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH v4 3/4] arm64: use both ZONE_DMA and ZONE_DMA32
  2019-09-08 21:27   ` Catalin Marinas
@ 2019-09-09  8:46     ` Nicolas Saenz Julienne
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Nicolas Saenz Julienne @ 2019-09-09  8:46 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Catalin Marinas
  Cc: linux-rpi-kernel, f.fainelli, marc.zyngier, Will Deacon,
	linux-kernel, robh+dt, linux-mm, mbrugger, wahrenst, linux-riscv,
	phill, robin.murphy, hch, linux-arm-kernel, m.szyprowski

[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1571 bytes --]

On Sun, 2019-09-08 at 22:27 +0100, Catalin Marinas wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 06, 2019 at 02:06:14PM +0200, Nicolas Saenz Julienne wrote:
> > @@ -430,7 +454,7 @@ void __init arm64_memblock_init(void)
> >  
> >  	high_memory = __va(memblock_end_of_DRAM() - 1) + 1;
> >  
> > -	dma_contiguous_reserve(arm64_dma32_phys_limit);
> > +	dma_contiguous_reserve(arm64_dma_phys_limit ? : arm64_dma32_phys_limit);
> >  }
> >  
> >  void __init bootmem_init(void)
> > @@ -534,6 +558,7 @@ static void __init free_unused_memmap(void)
> >  void __init mem_init(void)
> >  {
> >  	if (swiotlb_force == SWIOTLB_FORCE ||
> > +	    max_pfn > (arm64_dma_phys_limit >> PAGE_SHIFT) ||
> >  	    max_pfn > (arm64_dma32_phys_limit >> PAGE_SHIFT))
> >  		swiotlb_init(1);
> 
> So here we want to initialise the swiotlb only if we need bounce
> buffers. Prior to this patch, we assumed that swiotlb is needed if
> max_pfn is beyond the reach of 32-bit devices. With ZONE_DMA, we need to
> lower this limit to arm64_dma_phys_limit.
>
> If ZONE_DMA is enabled, just comparing max_pfn with arm64_dma_phys_limit
> is sufficient since the dma32 one limit always higher. However, if
> ZONE_DMA is disabled, arm64_dma_phys_limit is 0, so we may initialise
> swiotlb unnecessarily. I guess you need a similar check to the
> dma_contiguous_reserve() above.

Of course.

> 
> With that:
> 
> Reviewed-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
> 
> Unless there are other objections, I can queue this series for 5.5 in a
> few weeks time (too late for 5.4).

Thanks!


[-- Attachment #1.2: This is a digitally signed message part --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 488 bytes --]

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 161 bytes --]

_______________________________________________
linux-riscv mailing list
linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-riscv

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread

end of thread, back to index

Thread overview: 7+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2019-09-06 12:06 [PATCH v4 0/4] Raspberry Pi 4 DMA addressing support Nicolas Saenz Julienne
2019-09-06 12:06 ` [PATCH v4 1/4] arm64: mm: use arm64_dma_phys_limit instead of calling max_zone_dma_phys() Nicolas Saenz Julienne
2019-09-06 12:06 ` [PATCH v4 2/4] arm64: rename variables used to calculate ZONE_DMA32's size Nicolas Saenz Julienne
2019-09-06 12:06 ` [PATCH v4 3/4] arm64: use both ZONE_DMA and ZONE_DMA32 Nicolas Saenz Julienne
2019-09-08 21:27   ` Catalin Marinas
2019-09-09  8:46     ` Nicolas Saenz Julienne
2019-09-06 12:06 ` [PATCH v4 4/4] mm: refresh ZONE_DMA and ZONE_DMA32 comments in 'enum zone_type' Nicolas Saenz Julienne

Linux-RISC-V Archive on lore.kernel.org

Archives are clonable:
	git clone --mirror https://lore.kernel.org/linux-riscv/0 linux-riscv/git/0.git

	# If you have public-inbox 1.1+ installed, you may
	# initialize and index your mirror using the following commands:
	public-inbox-init -V2 linux-riscv linux-riscv/ https://lore.kernel.org/linux-riscv \
		linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org infradead-linux-riscv@archiver.kernel.org
	public-inbox-index linux-riscv


Newsgroup available over NNTP:
	nntp://nntp.lore.kernel.org/org.infradead.lists.linux-riscv


AGPL code for this site: git clone https://public-inbox.org/ public-inbox