linux-riscv.lists.infradead.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Stafford Horne <shorne@gmail.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: "Guo Ren" <guoren@kernel.org>,
	"Christoph Müllner" <christophm30@gmail.com>,
	"Palmer Dabbelt" <palmer@dabbelt.com>,
	"Anup Patel" <anup@brainfault.org>,
	linux-riscv <linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org>,
	"Linux Kernel Mailing List" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"Guo Ren" <guoren@linux.alibaba.com>,
	"Catalin Marinas" <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
	"Will Deacon" <will.deacon@arm.com>,
	"Arnd Bergmann" <arnd@arndb.de>,
	jonas@southpole.se, stefan.kristiansson@saunalahti.fi
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH] locking: Generic ticket-lock
Date: Thu, 15 Apr 2021 05:47:34 +0900	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210414204734.GJ3288043@lianli.shorne-pla.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <YHbBBuVFNnI4kjj3@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>

On Wed, Apr 14, 2021 at 12:16:38PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 14, 2021 at 11:05:24AM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> 
> > That made me look at the qspinlock code, and queued_spin_*lock() uses
> > atomic_try_cmpxchg_acquire(), which means any arch that uses qspinlock
> > and has RCpc atomics will give us massive pain.
> > 
> > Current archs using qspinlock are: x86, arm64, power, sparc64, mips and
> > openrisc (WTF?!).
> > 
> > Of those, x86 and sparc are TSO archs with SC atomics, arm64 has RCsc
> > atomics, power has RCtso atomics (and is the arch we all hate for having
> > RCtso locks).
> > 
> > Now MIPS has all sorts of ill specified barriers, but last time looked
> > at it it didn't actually use any of that and stuck to using smp_mb(), so
> > it will have RCsc atomics.
> > 
> > /me goes look at wth openrisc is..  doesn't even appear to have
> > asm/barrier.h :-/ Looking at wikipedia it also doesn't appear to
> > actually have hardware ...

Yes, not hardware available to consumers directoy, my development is done on
FPGAs.

> FWIW this is broken, anything SMP *MUST* define mb(), at the very least.

Oh, thats right, something missed, when we developed qspinlocks we discussed
this and my point there was that l.swa/l.lwa implied a mem flush
l.msync/barrier.  But mb still needs to be added.

> > I'm thinking openrisc is a prime candidate for this ticket_lock.h we're
> > all talking about.
> 
> How's this then? Compile tested only on openrisc/simple_smp_defconfig.

I did my testing with this FPGA build SoC:

 https://github.com/stffrdhrn/de0_nano-multicore

Note, the CPU timer sync logic uses mb() and is a bit flaky.  So missing mb()
might be a reason.  I thought we had defined mb() and l.msync, but it seems to
have gotten lost.

With that said I could test out this ticket-lock implementation.  How would I
tell if its better than qspinlock?

> ---
>  arch/openrisc/Kconfig                      |  1 -
>  arch/openrisc/include/asm/Kbuild           |  5 +-
>  arch/openrisc/include/asm/spinlock.h       |  3 +-
>  arch/openrisc/include/asm/spinlock_types.h |  2 +-
>  include/asm-generic/qspinlock.h            | 30 +++++++++++
>  include/asm-generic/ticket-lock-types.h    | 11 ++++
>  include/asm-generic/ticket-lock.h          | 86 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  7 files changed, 131 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/openrisc/Kconfig b/arch/openrisc/Kconfig
> index 591acc5990dc..1858cf309f1f 100644
> --- a/arch/openrisc/Kconfig
> +++ b/arch/openrisc/Kconfig
> @@ -32,7 +32,6 @@ config OPENRISC
>  	select HAVE_DEBUG_STACKOVERFLOW
>  	select OR1K_PIC
>  	select CPU_NO_EFFICIENT_FFS if !OPENRISC_HAVE_INST_FF1
> -	select ARCH_USE_QUEUED_SPINLOCKS
>  	select ARCH_USE_QUEUED_RWLOCKS
>  	select OMPIC if SMP
>  	select ARCH_WANT_FRAME_POINTERS
> diff --git a/arch/openrisc/include/asm/Kbuild b/arch/openrisc/include/asm/Kbuild
> index ca5987e11053..cb260e7d73db 100644
> --- a/arch/openrisc/include/asm/Kbuild
> +++ b/arch/openrisc/include/asm/Kbuild
> @@ -1,9 +1,8 @@
>  # SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
>  generic-y += extable.h
>  generic-y += kvm_para.h
> -generic-y += mcs_spinlock.h
> -generic-y += qspinlock_types.h
> -generic-y += qspinlock.h
> +generic-y += ticket-lock.h
> +generic-y += ticket-lock-types.h
>  generic-y += qrwlock_types.h
>  generic-y += qrwlock.h
>  generic-y += user.h
> diff --git a/arch/openrisc/include/asm/spinlock.h b/arch/openrisc/include/asm/spinlock.h
> index a8940bdfcb7e..0b839ed1f3a0 100644
> --- a/arch/openrisc/include/asm/spinlock.h
> +++ b/arch/openrisc/include/asm/spinlock.h
> @@ -15,8 +15,7 @@
>  #ifndef __ASM_OPENRISC_SPINLOCK_H
>  #define __ASM_OPENRISC_SPINLOCK_H
>  
> -#include <asm/qspinlock.h>
> -
> +#include <asm/ticket-lock.h>
>  #include <asm/qrwlock.h>
>  
>  #define arch_read_lock_flags(lock, flags) arch_read_lock(lock)
> diff --git a/arch/openrisc/include/asm/spinlock_types.h b/arch/openrisc/include/asm/spinlock_types.h
> index 7c6fb1208c88..58ea31fa65ce 100644
> --- a/arch/openrisc/include/asm/spinlock_types.h
> +++ b/arch/openrisc/include/asm/spinlock_types.h
> @@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
>  #ifndef _ASM_OPENRISC_SPINLOCK_TYPES_H
>  #define _ASM_OPENRISC_SPINLOCK_TYPES_H
>  
> -#include <asm/qspinlock_types.h>
> +#include <asm/ticket-lock-types.h>
>  #include <asm/qrwlock_types.h>
>  
>  #endif /* _ASM_OPENRISC_SPINLOCK_TYPES_H */
> diff --git a/include/asm-generic/qspinlock.h b/include/asm-generic/qspinlock.h
> index d74b13825501..a7a1296b0b4d 100644
> --- a/include/asm-generic/qspinlock.h
> +++ b/include/asm-generic/qspinlock.h
> @@ -2,6 +2,36 @@
>  /*
>   * Queued spinlock
>   *
> + * A 'generic' spinlock implementation that is based on MCS locks. An
> + * architecture that's looking for a 'generic' spinlock, please first consider
> + * ticket-lock.h and only come looking here when you've considered all the
> + * constraints below and can show your hardware does actually perform better
> + * with qspinlock.
> + *
> + *
> + * It relies on atomic_*_release()/atomic_*_acquire() to be RCsc (or no weaker
> + * than RCtso if you're power), where regular code only expects atomic_t to be
> + * RCpc.
> + *
> + * It relies on a far greater (compared to ticket-lock.h) set of atomic
> + * operations to behave well together, please audit them carefully to ensure
> + * they all have forward progress. Many atomic operations may default to
> + * cmpxchg() loops which will not have good forward progress properties on
> + * LL/SC architectures.
> + *
> + * One notable example is atomic_fetch_or_acquire(), which x86 cannot (cheaply)
> + * do. Carefully read the patches that introduced queued_fetch_set_pending_acquire().
> + *
> + * It also heavily relies on mixed size atomic operations, in specific it
> + * requires architectures to have xchg16; something which many LL/SC
> + * architectures need to implement as a 32bit and+or in order to satisfy the
> + * forward progress guarantees mentioned above.
> + *
> + * Further reading on mixed size atomics that might be relevant:
> + *
> + *   http://www.cl.cam.ac.uk/~pes20/popl17/mixed-size.pdf
> + *
> + *
>   * (C) Copyright 2013-2015 Hewlett-Packard Development Company, L.P.
>   * (C) Copyright 2015 Hewlett-Packard Enterprise Development LP
>   *
> diff --git a/include/asm-generic/ticket-lock-types.h b/include/asm-generic/ticket-lock-types.h
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..829759aedda8
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/include/asm-generic/ticket-lock-types.h
> @@ -0,0 +1,11 @@
> +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 */
> +
> +#ifndef __ASM_GENERIC_TICKET_LOCK_TYPES_H
> +#define __ASM_GENERIC_TICKET_LOCK_TYPES_H
> +
> +#include <linux/types.h>
> +typedef atomic_t arch_spinlock_t;
> +
> +#define __ARCH_SPIN_LOCK_UNLOCKED	ATOMIC_INIT(0)
> +
> +#endif /* __ASM_GENERIC_TICKET_LOCK_TYPES_H */
> diff --git a/include/asm-generic/ticket-lock.h b/include/asm-generic/ticket-lock.h
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..3f0d53e21a37
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/include/asm-generic/ticket-lock.h
> @@ -0,0 +1,86 @@
> +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 */
> +
> +/*
> + * 'Generic' ticket-lock implementation.
> + *
> + * It relies on atomic_fetch_add() having well defined forward progress
> + * guarantees under contention. If your architecture cannot provide this, stick
> + * to a test-and-set lock.
> + *
> + * It also relies on atomic_fetch_add() being safe vs smp_store_release() on a
> + * sub-word of the value. This is generally true for anything LL/SC although
> + * you'd be hard pressed to find anything useful in architecture specifications
> + * about this. If your architecture cannot do this you might be better off with
> + * a test-and-set.
> + *
> + * It further assumes atomic_*_release() + atomic_*_acquire() is RCpc and hence
> + * uses atomic_fetch_add() which is SC to create an RCsc lock.
> + *
> + * The implementation uses smp_cond_load_acquire() to spin, so if the
> + * architecture has WFE like instructions to sleep instead of poll for word
> + * modifications be sure to implement that (see ARM64 for example).
> + *
> + */
> +
> +#ifndef __ASM_GENERIC_TICKET_LOCK_H
> +#define __ASM_GENERIC_TICKET_LOCK_H
> +
> +#include <linux/atomic.h>
> +#include <asm/ticket-lock-types.h>
> +
> +static __always_inline void ticket_lock(arch_spinlock_t *lock)
> +{
> +	u32 val = atomic_fetch_add(1<<16, lock); /* SC, gives us RCsc */
> +	u16 ticket = val >> 16;
> +
> +	if (ticket == (u16)val)
> +		return;
> +
> +	atomic_cond_read_acquire(lock, ticket == (u16)VAL);
> +}
> +
> +static __always_inline bool ticket_trylock(arch_spinlock_t *lock)
> +{
> +	u32 old = atomic_read(lock);
> +
> +	if ((old >> 16) != (old & 0xffff))
> +		return false;
> +
> +	return atomic_try_cmpxchg(lock, &old, old + (1<<16)); /* SC, for RCsc */
> +}
> +
> +static __always_inline void ticket_unlock(arch_spinlock_t *lock)
> +{
> +	u16 *ptr = (u16 *)lock + __is_defined(__BIG_ENDIAN);
> +	u32 val = atomic_read(lock);
> +
> +	smp_store_release(ptr, (u16)val + 1);
> +}
> +
> +static __always_inline int ticket_is_locked(arch_spinlock_t *lock)
> +{
> +	u32 val = atomic_read(lock);
> +
> +	return ((val >> 16) != (val & 0xffff));
> +}
> +
> +static __always_inline int ticket_is_contended(arch_spinlock_t *lock)
> +{
> +	u32 val = atomic_read(lock);
> +
> +	return (s16)((val >> 16) - (val & 0xffff)) > 1;
> +}
> +
> +static __always_inline int ticket_value_unlocked(arch_spinlock_t lock)
> +{
> +	return !ticket_is_locked(&lock);
> +}
> +
> +#define arch_spin_lock(l)		ticket_lock(l)
> +#define arch_spin_trylock(l)		ticket_trylock(l)
> +#define arch_spin_unlock(l)		ticket_unlock(l)
> +#define arch_spin_is_locked(l)		ticket_is_locked(l)
> +#define arch_spin_is_contended(l)	ticket_is_contended(l)
> +#define arch_spin_value_unlocked(l)	ticket_value_unlocked(l)
> +
> +#endif /* __ASM_GENERIC_TICKET_LOCK_H */

_______________________________________________
linux-riscv mailing list
linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-riscv

  parent reply	other threads:[~2021-04-14 20:48 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 46+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-03-24 10:14 [PATCH] riscv: locks: introduce ticket-based spinlock implementation guoren
2021-03-24 11:09 ` Peter Zijlstra
2021-03-24 12:10   ` Guo Ren
     [not found] ` <CAM4kBBK7_s9U2vJbq68yC8WdDEfPQTaCOvn1xds3Si5B-Wpw+A@mail.gmail.com>
2021-03-24 12:23   ` Peter Zijlstra
2021-03-24 12:24   ` Guo Ren
2021-03-24 12:31     ` Peter Zijlstra
2021-03-24 12:28 ` Anup Patel
2021-03-24 12:37   ` Peter Zijlstra
2021-03-24 12:53     ` Anup Patel
2021-04-11 21:11       ` Palmer Dabbelt
2021-04-12 13:32         ` Christoph Müllner
2021-04-12 14:51           ` Peter Zijlstra
2021-04-12 21:21             ` Christoph Müllner
2021-04-12 17:33           ` Palmer Dabbelt
2021-04-12 21:54             ` Christoph Müllner
2021-04-13  8:03               ` Peter Zijlstra
2021-04-13  8:17                 ` Peter Zijlstra
2021-04-14  2:26                   ` Guo Ren
2021-04-14  7:08                     ` Peter Zijlstra
2021-04-14  9:05                       ` Peter Zijlstra
2021-04-14 10:16                         ` [RFC][PATCH] locking: Generic ticket-lock Peter Zijlstra
2021-04-14 12:39                           ` Guo Ren
2021-04-14 12:55                             ` Peter Zijlstra
2021-04-14 13:08                               ` Peter Zijlstra
2021-04-14 15:59                               ` David Laight
2021-04-14 12:45                           ` Peter Zijlstra
2021-04-14 21:02                             ` Stafford Horne
2021-04-14 20:47                           ` Stafford Horne [this message]
2021-04-15  8:09                             ` Peter Zijlstra
2021-04-15  9:02                               ` Catalin Marinas
2021-04-15  9:22                                 ` Will Deacon
2021-04-15  9:24                                 ` Peter Zijlstra
2021-04-19 17:35                           ` Will Deacon
2021-04-23  6:44                           ` Palmer Dabbelt
2021-04-13  9:22                 ` [PATCH] riscv: locks: introduce ticket-based spinlock implementation Christoph Müllner
2021-04-13  9:30                   ` Catalin Marinas
2021-04-13  9:55                     ` Christoph Müllner
2021-04-14  0:23                     ` Guo Ren
2021-04-14  9:17                       ` Catalin Marinas
2021-04-13  9:35                   ` Peter Zijlstra
2021-04-13 10:25                     ` Christoph Müllner
2021-04-13 10:45                       ` Catalin Marinas
2021-04-13 10:54                         ` David Laight
2021-04-14  5:54                           ` Guo Ren
2021-04-13 11:04                         ` Christoph Müllner
2021-04-13 13:19                       ` Guo Ren

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20210414204734.GJ3288043@lianli.shorne-pla.net \
    --to=shorne@gmail.com \
    --cc=anup@brainfault.org \
    --cc=arnd@arndb.de \
    --cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
    --cc=christophm30@gmail.com \
    --cc=guoren@kernel.org \
    --cc=guoren@linux.alibaba.com \
    --cc=jonas@southpole.se \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=palmer@dabbelt.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=stefan.kristiansson@saunalahti.fi \
    --cc=will.deacon@arm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).