linux-riscv.lists.infradead.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Song Shuai <suagrfillet@gmail.com>
To: guoren@kernel.org, rostedt@goodmis.org, mhiramat@kernel.org,
	mark.rutland@arm.com, paul.walmsley@sifive.com,
	palmer@dabbelt.com, aou@eecs.berkeley.edu
Cc: linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Song Shuai <suagrfillet@gmail.com>
Subject: [PATCH v4 0/2] riscv/ftrace: make function graph use ftrace directly
Date: Sun, 20 Nov 2022 16:42:28 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20221120084230.910152-1-suagrfillet@gmail.com> (raw)

In RISC-V architecture, when we enable the ftrace_graph tracer on some
functions, the function tracings on other functions will suffer extra
graph tracing work. In essence, graph_ops isn't limited by its func_hash
due to the global ftrace_graph_[regs]_call label. That should be corrected.

What inspires me is the commit 0c0593b45c9b ("x86/ftrace: Make function
graph use ftrace directly") that uses graph_ops::func function to install
return_hooker and makes the function called against its func_hash.

This series of patches makes function graph use ftrace directly for riscv.

If FTRACE_WITH_REGS isn't defined, ftrace_caller keeps ftrace_graph_call
so that it can be replaced with the calling of prepare_ftrace_return by
the enable/disable helper.

As for defining FTRACE_WITH_REGS, ftrace_caller is adjusted to save the
necessary regs against the pt_regs layout, so it can reasonably call the
graph_ops::func function - ftrace_graph_func. And ftrace_graph_[regs]_call
and its enable/disable helper aren't needed.

The tests generated by CONFIG_FTRACE_STARTUP_TEST have passed in the local
qemu-system-riscv64 virt machine. The following is the log during startup.

```
Nov 15 03:07:13 stage4 kernel: Testing tracer function: PASSED
Nov 15 03:07:13 stage4 kernel: Testing dynamic ftrace: PASSED
Nov 15 03:07:13 stage4 kernel: Testing dynamic ftrace ops #1: 
Nov 15 03:07:13 stage4 kernel: (1 0 1 0 0)  
Nov 15 03:07:13 stage4 kernel: (1 1 2 0 0)  
Nov 15 03:07:13 stage4 kernel: (2 1 3 0 365) 
Nov 15 03:07:13 stage4 kernel: (2 2 4 0 399) 
Nov 15 03:07:13 stage4 kernel: (3 2 4 0 146071) 
Nov 15 03:07:13 stage4 kernel: (3 3 5 0 146105) PASSED
Nov 15 03:07:13 stage4 kernel: Testing dynamic ftrace ops #2: 
Nov 15 03:07:13 stage4 kernel: (1 0 1 589 0)  
Nov 15 03:07:13 stage4 kernel: (1 1 2 635 0)  
Nov 15 03:07:13 stage4 kernel: (2 1 3 1 2)  
Nov 15 03:07:13 stage4 kernel: (2 2 4 125 126) 
Nov 15 03:07:13 stage4 kernel: (3 2 4 146001 146078) 
Nov 15 03:07:13 stage4 kernel: (3 3 5 146035 146112) PASSED
Nov 15 03:07:13 stage4 kernel: Testing ftrace recursion: PASSED
Nov 15 03:07:13 stage4 kernel: Testing ftrace recursion safe: PASSED
Nov 15 03:07:13 stage4 kernel: Testing ftrace regs: PASSED
Nov 15 03:07:13 stage4 kernel: Testing tracer nop: PASSED
Nov 15 03:07:13 stage4 kernel: Testing tracer irqsoff: PASSED
Nov 15 03:07:13 stage4 kernel: Testing tracer wakeup:
Nov 15 03:07:13 stage4 kernel: sched: DL replenish lagged too much
Nov 15 03:07:13 stage4 kernel: PASSED
Nov 15 03:07:13 stage4 kernel: Testing tracer wakeup_rt: PASSED
Nov 15 03:07:13 stage4 kernel: Testing tracer wakeup_dl: PASSED
Nov 15 03:07:13 stage4 kernel: Testing tracer function_graph: PASSED
```

Note that the changes of mcount-dyn.S conflicts with this unmerged
commit (riscv: entry: consolidate general regs saving/restoring).
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-riscv/20221103075047.1634923-15-guoren@kernel.org

Changes since v3:
- separate parameters preparation as PREPARE_ARGS [Guo Ren]
v3 link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-riscv/20221118173217.888077-1-suagrfillet@gmail.com/

Changes since v2:
- line up the comments [Andrew]
- rename SAVE_ALL as SAVE_ABI_REGS [Guo Ren]
- consolidate the modifications of mcount-dyn.S into one patch [Guo Ren]
- adapt this series based on [riscv: ftrace: Fixup ftrace detour code][1] [Guo Ren]

[1]: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-riscv/20220921034910.3142465-1-guoren@kernel.org/
v2 Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-riscv/20221116031305.286634-1-suagrfillet@gmail.com/

Changes since v1:
- fix the checkpatch warnings in patch 1
v1 Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-riscv/20221115061525.112757-1-suagrfillet@gmail.com

Song Shuai (2):
  riscv/ftrace: add ftrace_graph_func
  riscv/ftrace: make ftrace_caller call ftrace_graph_func

 arch/riscv/include/asm/ftrace.h |  13 ++-
 arch/riscv/kernel/ftrace.c      |  30 +++----
 arch/riscv/kernel/mcount-dyn.S  | 142 +++++++++++++++++++++++---------
 3 files changed, 128 insertions(+), 57 deletions(-)

-- 
2.20.1


_______________________________________________
linux-riscv mailing list
linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-riscv

             reply	other threads:[~2022-11-20  8:42 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-11-20  8:42 Song Shuai [this message]
2022-11-20  8:42 ` [PATCH v4 1/2] riscv/ftrace: add ftrace_graph_func Song Shuai
2022-11-20  8:42 ` [PATCH v4 2/2] riscv/ftrace: make ftrace_caller call ftrace_graph_func Song Shuai

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20221120084230.910152-1-suagrfillet@gmail.com \
    --to=suagrfillet@gmail.com \
    --cc=aou@eecs.berkeley.edu \
    --cc=guoren@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=mhiramat@kernel.org \
    --cc=palmer@dabbelt.com \
    --cc=paul.walmsley@sifive.com \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).