linux-riscv.lists.infradead.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Thomas Weißschuh" <thomas@t-8ch.de>
To: Zhangjin Wu <falcon@tinylab.org>
Cc: w@1wt.eu, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	 linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org, palmer@dabbelt.com,
	 paul.walmsley@sifive.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 13/13] tools/nolibc: sys_gettimeofday: riscv: use __NR_clock_gettime64 for rv32
Date: Fri, 26 May 2023 09:38:04 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <29e4b23d-27cb-4101-bfe9-c6b412222578@t-8ch.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <e35cf1de35fdb0a236064ff645ae4734d32bacd4.1684949845.git.falcon@tinylab.org>

On 2023-05-25 02:03:32+0800, Zhangjin Wu wrote:
> rv32 uses the generic include/uapi/asm-generic/unistd.h and it has no
> __NR_gettimeofday and __NR_clock_gettime after kernel commit d4c08b9776b3
> ("riscv: Use latest system call ABI"), use __NR_clock_gettime64 instead.
> 
> This code is based on src/time/gettimeofday.c of musl and
> sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/clock_gettime.c of glibc.
> 
> Both __NR_clock_gettime and __NR_clock_gettime64 are added for
> sys_gettimeofday() for they share most of the code.
> 
> Notes:
> 
> * Both tv and tz are not directly passed to kernel clock_gettime*
>   syscalls, so, it isn't able to check the pointer automatically with the
>   get_user/put_user helpers just like kernel gettimeofday syscall does.
>   instead, we emulate (but not completely) such checks in our new
>   __NR_clock_gettime* branch of nolibc.
> 
> * kernel clock_gettime* syscalls can not get tz info, just like musl and
>   glibc do, we set tz to zero to avoid a random number.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Zhangjin Wu <falcon@tinylab.org>
> ---
>  tools/include/nolibc/sys.h | 46 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 46 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/tools/include/nolibc/sys.h b/tools/include/nolibc/sys.h
> index 2642b380c6aa..ad38cc3856be 100644
> --- a/tools/include/nolibc/sys.h
> +++ b/tools/include/nolibc/sys.h
> @@ -26,6 +26,7 @@
>  
>  #include "arch.h"
>  #include "errno.h"
> +#include "string.h"
>  #include "types.h"
>  
>  
> @@ -51,6 +52,11 @@
>   * should not be placed here.
>   */
>  
> +/*
> + * This is the first address past the end of the text segment (the program code).
> + */
> +
> +extern char etext;
>  
>  /*
>   * int brk(void *addr);
> @@ -554,7 +560,47 @@ long getpagesize(void)
>  static __attribute__((unused))
>  int sys_gettimeofday(struct timeval *tv, struct timezone *tz)
>  {
> +#ifdef __NR_gettimeofday
>  	return my_syscall2(__NR_gettimeofday, tv, tz);
> +#elif defined(__NR_clock_gettime) || defined(__NR_clock_gettime64)
> +#ifdef __NR_clock_gettime
> +	struct timespec ts;
> +#else
> +	struct timespec64 ts;
> +#define __NR_clock_gettime __NR_clock_gettime64
> +#endif
> +	int ret;
> +
> +	/* make sure tv pointer is at least after code segment */
> +	if (tv != NULL && (char *)tv <= &etext)
> +		return -EFAULT;

To me the weird etext comparisions don't seem to be worth it, to be
honest.

> +
> +	/* set tz to zero to avoid random number */
> +	if (tz != NULL) {
> +		if ((char *)tz > &etext)
> +			memset(tz, 0, sizeof(struct timezone));
> +		else
> +			return -EFAULT;
> +	}
> +
> +	if (tv == NULL)
> +		return 0;
> +
> +	ret = my_syscall2(__NR_clock_gettime, CLOCK_REALTIME, &ts);
> +	if (ret)
> +		return ret;
> +
> +	tv->tv_sec = (time_t) ts.tv_sec;
> +#ifdef __NR_clock_gettime64

Nitpick:

While this ifdef works and is correct its logic is a bit indirect.
If it is copied to some other function in the future it may be incorrect
there.

Without the #ifdef the compiler should still be able to optimize the
code away.

> +	if (tv->tv_sec != ts.tv_sec)
> +		return -EOVERFLOW;
> +#endif
> +
> +	tv->tv_usec = ts.tv_nsec / 1000;
> +	return 0;
> +#else
> +#error None of __NR_gettimeofday, __NR_clock_gettime and __NR_clock_gettime64 defined, cannot implement sys_gettimeofday()
> +#endif
>  }
>  
>  static __attribute__((unused))
> -- 
> 2.25.1
> 

_______________________________________________
linux-riscv mailing list
linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-riscv

  reply	other threads:[~2023-05-26  7:38 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 60+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-05-24 17:33 [PATCH 00/13] tools/nolibc: riscv: Add full rv32 support Zhangjin Wu
2023-05-24 17:41 ` [PATCH 01/13] Revert "tools/nolibc: riscv: Support __NR_llseek for rv32" Zhangjin Wu
2023-05-24 17:44 ` [PATCH 02/13] Revert "selftests/nolibc: Fix up compile error " Zhangjin Wu
2023-05-24 17:48 ` [PATCH 04/13] selftests/nolibc: syscall_args: use __NR_statx for rv32 Zhangjin Wu
2023-05-24 19:49   ` Thomas Weißschuh
2023-05-25  7:20     ` Zhangjin Wu
2023-05-26  9:21   ` Arnd Bergmann
2023-05-26 10:06     ` Willy Tarreau
2023-05-27  0:58     ` Zhangjin Wu
2023-05-24 17:50 ` [PATCH 05/13] selftests/nolibc: riscv: customize makefile " Zhangjin Wu
2023-05-26  6:57   ` Thomas Weißschuh
2023-05-26  9:20     ` Zhangjin Wu
2023-05-24 17:52 ` [PATCH 06/13] selftests/nolibc: allow specify a bios for qemu Zhangjin Wu
2023-05-26  7:00   ` Thomas Weißschuh
2023-05-26 10:25     ` Zhangjin Wu
2023-05-26 10:36       ` Conor Dooley
2023-05-26 13:38         ` Zhangjin Wu
2023-05-26 15:08           ` Conor Dooley
2023-05-28  7:52     ` Willy Tarreau
2023-05-24 17:54 ` [PATCH 07/13] selftests/nolibc: remove the duplicated gettimeofday_bad2 Zhangjin Wu
2023-05-24 17:55 ` [PATCH 08/13] tools/nolibc: sys_lseek: riscv: use __NR_llseek for rv32 Zhangjin Wu
2023-05-24 17:57 ` [PATCH 09/13] tools/nolibc: sys_poll: riscv: use __NR_ppoll_time64 " Zhangjin Wu
2023-05-26  7:15   ` Thomas Weißschuh
2023-05-26  9:34     ` Arnd Bergmann
2023-05-28  8:25       ` Zhangjin Wu
2023-05-28  8:48         ` Arnd Bergmann
2023-05-28 10:29         ` Willy Tarreau
2023-05-28 10:55           ` Arnd Bergmann
2023-05-28 11:03             ` Willy Tarreau
2023-05-24 17:58 ` [PATCH 10/13] tools/nolibc: ppoll/ppoll_time64: add a missing argument Zhangjin Wu
2023-05-24 17:59 ` [PATCH 11/13] tools/nolibc: sys_select: riscv: use __NR_pselect6_time64 for rv32 Zhangjin Wu
2023-05-24 20:22   ` Thomas Weißschuh
2023-05-25  7:10     ` Zhangjin Wu
2023-05-25  7:22       ` Thomas Weißschuh
2023-05-26  1:50         ` Zhangjin Wu
2023-05-26  9:19   ` Arnd Bergmann
2023-05-26 11:00     ` [PATCH 00/13] tools/nolibc: riscv: Add full rv32 support Zhangjin Wu
2023-05-26 11:13       ` Arnd Bergmann
2023-05-24 18:02 ` [PATCH 12/13] tools/nolibc: sys_wait4: riscv: use __NR_waitid for rv32 Zhangjin Wu
2023-05-24 18:03 ` [PATCH 13/13] tools/nolibc: sys_gettimeofday: riscv: use __NR_clock_gettime64 " Zhangjin Wu
2023-05-26  7:38   ` Thomas Weißschuh [this message]
2023-05-27  1:26     ` Zhangjin Wu
2023-05-27  3:39       ` Zhangjin Wu
2023-05-27  5:12       ` Willy Tarreau
2023-05-24 18:24 ` [PATCH 00/13] tools/nolibc: riscv: Add full rv32 support Zhangjin Wu
2023-05-24 18:28 ` [PATCH 03/13] selftests/nolibc: print name instead of number for EOVERFLOW Zhangjin Wu
2023-05-24 17:46   ` Zhangjin Wu
2023-05-24 20:23   ` Thomas Weißschuh
2023-05-28  7:59 ` [PATCH 00/13] tools/nolibc: riscv: Add full rv32 support Willy Tarreau
2023-05-28  8:42   ` Thomas Weißschuh
2023-05-28  9:41     ` Thomas Weißschuh
2023-05-28 10:17       ` Willy Tarreau
2023-05-28 10:39   ` Zhangjin Wu
2023-05-28 11:33     ` Willy Tarreau
2023-05-28 12:52       ` Zhangjin Wu
2023-05-28 13:45     ` Thomas Weißschuh 
2023-05-28 18:39       ` Zhangjin Wu
2023-05-29  8:45         ` Thomas Weißschuh
2023-05-29 11:31           ` Willy Tarreau
2023-05-30 10:06             ` Zhangjin Wu

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=29e4b23d-27cb-4101-bfe9-c6b412222578@t-8ch.de \
    --to=thomas@t-8ch.de \
    --cc=falcon@tinylab.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=palmer@dabbelt.com \
    --cc=paul.walmsley@sifive.com \
    --cc=w@1wt.eu \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).