linux-riscv.lists.infradead.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Anup Patel <anup@brainfault.org>
To: Aurelien Jarno <aurelien@aurel32.net>
Cc: Carlos Eduardo de Paula <me@carlosedp.com>,
	David Abdurachmanov <david.abdurachmanov@gmail.com>,
	Paul Walmsley <paul@pwsan.com>,
	Vincent Chen <vincent.chen@sifive.com>,
	Romain Dolbeau <romain.dolbeau@european-processor-initiative.eu>,
	linux-riscv <linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: Error on loading some network Kernel modules
Date: Sat, 1 Feb 2020 13:22:22 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAAhSdy03C==7PmuXE441BtDJH8H07rOH-u+-_sZJG70tbTrJcA@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200131201118.GA4121429@aurel32.net>

On Sat, Feb 1, 2020 at 1:41 AM Aurelien Jarno <aurelien@aurel32.net> wrote:
>
> On 2020-01-30 17:20, David Abdurachmanov wrote:
> > On Thu, Jan 30, 2020 at 4:00 AM Paul Walmsley <paul@pwsan.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > On Tue, 28 Jan 2020, Carlos Eduardo de Paula wrote:
> > >
> > > > I currently run stock Kernel 5.5.0-rc7 on my Unleashed board with most
> > > > network features I need baked into the kernel instead of modules.
> > > >
> > > > I tried building a kernel with these network features as modules but
> > > > when loading some of them I got this error:
> > > >
> > > > root@unleashed:~# uname -a
> > > > Linux unleashed 5.5.0-rc7-dirty #4 SMP Fri Jan 24 18:16:43 -02 2020
> > > > riscv64 GNU/Linux
> > > >
> > > > root@unleashed:~# modprobe br_netfilter
> > > > [  139.290533] br_netfilter: target ffffffe0000422d8 can not be
> > > > addressed by the 32-bit offset from PC = 000000003dfd6deb
> > >
> > > This is a known issue:
> > >
> > > https://lore.kernel.org/linux-riscv/1572281840733.3517@european-processor-initiative.eu/
> > >
> > > https://lore.kernel.org/linux-riscv/20191029105055.GA20736@aurel32.net/#r
> > >
> > > Vincent is looking into it and I expect there will be a fix soon.
> > >
> >
> > Is this patch solving the problem?
> >
> > https://github.com/bjoto/linux/commit/8a56d1c8e8e91c1bc3893946d52b9217c96e1589
>
> I have just tried that patch on top of a 5.4.13 kernel, and I confirm it
> fixes the issue. Thanks!

I guess this patch was lost over time.

First of all we need to rebase this patch on latest kernel.

The MODULES_xyz defines are totally redundant and create
confusion because with these defines it seems we are creating
separate virtual memory region for modules which is not true.
In fact, the patch only tries to ensure that modules are allocated
from the end-of VMALLOC region.

I suggest to drop all MODULES_xyz defines and implement
module_alloc() as follows:

void *module_alloc(unsigned long size)
{
return __vmalloc_node_range(size, 1, VMALLOC_END - SZ_128M,
VMALLOC_END, GFP_KERNEL,
PAGE_KERNEL_EXEC, 0,
NUMA_NO_NODE,
__builtin_return_address(0));
}

Maybe we can even have a kconfig options for MODULES_SIZE
which can be used in-place of SZ_128M in above code.

Should I send a patch on latest kernel ??

Regards,
Anup


  reply	other threads:[~2020-02-01  7:52 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-01-28 19:22 Error on loading some network Kernel modules Carlos Eduardo de Paula
2020-01-30  3:00 ` Paul Walmsley
2020-01-30 16:20   ` David Abdurachmanov
2020-01-31 14:12     ` Carlos Eduardo de Paula
2020-01-31 20:11     ` Aurelien Jarno
2020-02-01  7:52       ` Anup Patel [this message]
2020-02-01 13:59         ` Alex Ghiti
2020-02-02 14:10           ` Anup Patel
2020-02-02 15:21             ` Troy Benjegerdes
2020-02-02 16:27           ` Romain Dolbeau
2020-02-03 10:04             ` Vincent Chen
2020-02-04  3:55               ` Zong Li
2020-02-04  6:50                 ` Alex Ghiti
2020-02-04  7:19                   ` Zong Li
2020-02-04  9:32                     ` Alexandre Ghiti
2020-02-04 10:46                       ` Vincent Chen
2020-02-04 11:30                         ` Anup Patel
2020-02-04 14:03                           ` Vincent Chen
2020-02-04 19:10                             ` Alex Ghiti
     [not found]                             ` <a55f265e-71b2-5ebb-b079-6345007a442e@ghiti.fr>
2020-02-05  3:22                               ` Vincent Chen
2020-02-05  4:24                                 ` Anup Patel
2020-02-05 10:37                                   ` Vincent Chen
2020-02-07 14:39                                     ` Vincent Chen
2020-02-07 14:51                                       ` Vincent Chen
2020-02-10  6:37                                         ` Alex Ghiti
2020-02-10  9:53                                           ` Vincent Chen
2020-02-19  6:46                                             ` Alex Ghiti
2020-02-19  7:30                                               ` Vincent Chen
2020-02-04 17:48                           ` Romain Dolbeau
2020-02-03 20:57             ` Alex Ghiti

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='CAAhSdy03C==7PmuXE441BtDJH8H07rOH-u+-_sZJG70tbTrJcA@mail.gmail.com' \
    --to=anup@brainfault.org \
    --cc=aurelien@aurel32.net \
    --cc=david.abdurachmanov@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=me@carlosedp.com \
    --cc=paul@pwsan.com \
    --cc=romain.dolbeau@european-processor-initiative.eu \
    --cc=vincent.chen@sifive.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).