linux-riscv.lists.infradead.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Emil Renner Berthing <emil.renner.berthing@canonical.com>
To: "Uwe Kleine-König" <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Cc: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>,
	Wan Jiabing <wanjiabing@vivo.com>,
	kernel@pengutronix.de,  linux-pwm@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org,
	 Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@dabbelt.com>,
	Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@sifive.com>,
	 Yash Shah <yash.shah@sifive.com>,
	Atish Patra <atishp@atishpatra.org>,
	 "Wesley W. Terpstra" <wesley@sifive.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 7/7] pwm: sifive: Shut down hardware only after pwmchip_remove() completed
Date: Fri, 22 Jul 2022 19:45:32 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAJM55Z_+AOmyFs-QgaQdnk4m7SN=JMcszjG+mtANzBcWkGYBkQ@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220721103129.304697-7-u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>

On Thu, 21 Jul 2022 at 12:32, Uwe Kleine-König
<u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de> wrote:
> The PWMs are expected to be functional until pwmchip_remove() is called.
> So disable the clks only afterwards.
>
> Fixes: 9e37a53eb051 ("pwm: sifive: Add a driver for SiFive SoC PWM")
> Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>

Hi Uwe,

You didn't send a cover letter so unsure which mail to respond to, but
I tested this series with

https://lore.kernel.org/linux-riscv/20220705210143.315151-1-emil.renner.berthing@canonical.com/

..and everything keeps working, so

Tested-by: Emil Renner Berhing <emil.renner.berthing@canonical.com>

/Emil
> ---
>  drivers/pwm/pwm-sifive.c | 5 +++--
>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/pwm/pwm-sifive.c b/drivers/pwm/pwm-sifive.c
> index da40ade0ebdf..2d4fa5e5fdd4 100644
> --- a/drivers/pwm/pwm-sifive.c
> +++ b/drivers/pwm/pwm-sifive.c
> @@ -308,6 +308,9 @@ static int pwm_sifive_remove(struct platform_device *dev)
>         struct pwm_device *pwm;
>         int ch;
>
> +       pwmchip_remove(&ddata->chip);
> +       clk_notifier_unregister(ddata->clk, &ddata->notifier);
> +
>         for (ch = 0; ch < ddata->chip.npwm; ch++) {
>                 pwm = &ddata->chip.pwms[ch];
>                 if (pwm->state.enabled)
> @@ -315,8 +318,6 @@ static int pwm_sifive_remove(struct platform_device *dev)
>         }
>
>         clk_unprepare(ddata->clk);
> -       pwmchip_remove(&ddata->chip);
> -       clk_notifier_unregister(ddata->clk, &ddata->notifier);
>
>         return 0;
>  }
> --
> 2.36.1
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> linux-riscv mailing list
> linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org
> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-riscv

_______________________________________________
linux-riscv mailing list
linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-riscv

  reply	other threads:[~2022-07-22 17:46 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-07-21 10:31 [PATCH 1/7] pwm: sifive: Simplify offset calculation for PWMCMP registers Uwe Kleine-König
2022-07-21 10:31 ` [PATCH 2/7] pwm: sifive: Fold pwm_sifive_enable() into its only caller Uwe Kleine-König
2022-07-21 10:31 ` [PATCH 3/7] pwm: sifive: Reduce time the controller lock is held Uwe Kleine-König
2022-07-21 10:31 ` [PATCH 4/7] pwm: sifive: Enable clk only after period check in .apply() Uwe Kleine-König
2022-07-21 10:31 ` [PATCH 5/7] pwm: sifive: Simplify clk handling Uwe Kleine-König
2022-07-21 10:31 ` [PATCH 6/7] pwm: sifive: Ensure the clk is enabled exactly one per running PWM Uwe Kleine-König
2022-07-21 20:45   ` Uwe Kleine-König
2022-07-28 17:10     ` Thierry Reding
2022-07-21 10:31 ` [PATCH 7/7] pwm: sifive: Shut down hardware only after pwmchip_remove() completed Uwe Kleine-König
2022-07-22 17:45   ` Emil Renner Berthing [this message]
2022-07-28 17:12     ` Thierry Reding
2022-07-28 17:45       ` Conor.Dooley
2022-07-28 17:12 ` [PATCH 1/7] pwm: sifive: Simplify offset calculation for PWMCMP registers Thierry Reding

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='CAJM55Z_+AOmyFs-QgaQdnk4m7SN=JMcszjG+mtANzBcWkGYBkQ@mail.gmail.com' \
    --to=emil.renner.berthing@canonical.com \
    --cc=atishp@atishpatra.org \
    --cc=kernel@pengutronix.de \
    --cc=linux-pwm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=palmer@dabbelt.com \
    --cc=paul.walmsley@sifive.com \
    --cc=thierry.reding@gmail.com \
    --cc=u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de \
    --cc=wanjiabing@vivo.com \
    --cc=wesley@sifive.com \
    --cc=yash.shah@sifive.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).