linux-riscv.lists.infradead.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: arnd@arndb.de (Arnd Bergmann)
To: linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH] riscv: add asm/unistd.h UAPI header
Date: Mon, 5 Nov 2018 21:56:15 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAK8P3a3JcztCSYBuu5ZJXaV83VNLv_1v3v-EKMR+tC1oOsQesw@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20181105142602.25750-1-david.abdurachmanov@gmail.com>

On 11/5/18, David Abdurachmanov <david.abdurachmanov@gmail.com> wrote:
> Marcin Juszkiewicz reported issues while generating syscall table for riscv
> using 4.20-rc1. The patch refactors our unistd.h files to match some other
> architectures.
>
> - Add asm/unistd.h UAPI header, which has __ARCH_WANT_NEW_STAT
> - Remove asm/syscalls.h UAPI header and merge to asm/unistd.h
> - Adjust kernel asm/unistd.h
>
> So now asm/unistd.h UAPI header should show all syscalls for riscv.
>
> Before this, Makefile simply put `#include <asm-generic/unistd.h>` into
> generated asm/unistd.h UAPI header thus user didn't see:
>
> - __NR_riscv_flush_icache
> - __NR_newfstatat
> - __NR_fstat
>
> which are supported by riscv kernel.
>
> Signed-off-by: David Abdurachmanov <david.abdurachmanov@gmail.com>
> Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
> Cc: Marcin Juszkiewicz <marcin.juszkiewicz@linaro.org>
> Cc: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>

Thanks for addressing this, your patch correctly fixes riscv64, and
I should have noticed the mistake when I originally merged the
broken patch.

However, looking closer I found another problem with the original
patch that your fix does not address:

__ARCH_WANT_NEW_STAT should only be set on 64-bit
architectures.

For a 32-bit architecture, we only want __ARCH_WANT_STAT64 if
any. For 64-bit architectures with compat mode, we still need to
set __ARCH_WANT_STAT64 from the non-uapi file so we get
the syscall implementation.

If we don't care about the riscv32 ABI changing yet, we can
decide to leave out __ARCH_WANT_STAT64 here, and require
glibc to implement it using statx() like any new architecture.
stat64 is not y2038 safe, and statx replaces it because of that.

> Fixes: 67314ec7b025

That line should be formatted as

Fixes: 67314ec7b025 ("RISC-V: Request newstat syscalls")

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
To: David Abdurachmanov <david.abdurachmanov@gmail.com>
Cc: aou@eecs.berkeley.edu, palmer@sifive.com,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Marcin Juszkiewicz <marcin.juszkiewicz@linaro.org>,
	linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org,
	Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] riscv: add asm/unistd.h UAPI header
Date: Mon, 5 Nov 2018 21:56:15 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAK8P3a3JcztCSYBuu5ZJXaV83VNLv_1v3v-EKMR+tC1oOsQesw@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
Message-ID: <20181105205615.N9D1wTrNKYnehtYoq_3dWZ1TL1JKuyZtE6YljLHGrcw@z> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20181105142602.25750-1-david.abdurachmanov@gmail.com>

On 11/5/18, David Abdurachmanov <david.abdurachmanov@gmail.com> wrote:
> Marcin Juszkiewicz reported issues while generating syscall table for riscv
> using 4.20-rc1. The patch refactors our unistd.h files to match some other
> architectures.
>
> - Add asm/unistd.h UAPI header, which has __ARCH_WANT_NEW_STAT
> - Remove asm/syscalls.h UAPI header and merge to asm/unistd.h
> - Adjust kernel asm/unistd.h
>
> So now asm/unistd.h UAPI header should show all syscalls for riscv.
>
> Before this, Makefile simply put `#include <asm-generic/unistd.h>` into
> generated asm/unistd.h UAPI header thus user didn't see:
>
> - __NR_riscv_flush_icache
> - __NR_newfstatat
> - __NR_fstat
>
> which are supported by riscv kernel.
>
> Signed-off-by: David Abdurachmanov <david.abdurachmanov@gmail.com>
> Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
> Cc: Marcin Juszkiewicz <marcin.juszkiewicz@linaro.org>
> Cc: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>

Thanks for addressing this, your patch correctly fixes riscv64, and
I should have noticed the mistake when I originally merged the
broken patch.

However, looking closer I found another problem with the original
patch that your fix does not address:

__ARCH_WANT_NEW_STAT should only be set on 64-bit
architectures.

For a 32-bit architecture, we only want __ARCH_WANT_STAT64 if
any. For 64-bit architectures with compat mode, we still need to
set __ARCH_WANT_STAT64 from the non-uapi file so we get
the syscall implementation.

If we don't care about the riscv32 ABI changing yet, we can
decide to leave out __ARCH_WANT_STAT64 here, and require
glibc to implement it using statx() like any new architecture.
stat64 is not y2038 safe, and statx replaces it because of that.

> Fixes: 67314ec7b025

That line should be formatted as

Fixes: 67314ec7b025 ("RISC-V: Request newstat syscalls")

_______________________________________________
linux-riscv mailing list
linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-riscv

  parent reply	other threads:[~2018-11-05 20:56 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-11-05 14:26 [PATCH] riscv: add asm/unistd.h UAPI header David Abdurachmanov
2018-11-05 14:26 ` David Abdurachmanov
2018-11-05 14:43 ` David Abdurachmanov
2018-11-05 14:43   ` David Abdurachmanov
2018-11-05 16:02 ` Marcin Juszkiewicz
2018-11-05 16:02   ` Marcin Juszkiewicz
2018-11-05 20:56 ` Arnd Bergmann [this message]
2018-11-05 20:56   ` Arnd Bergmann
2018-11-07  0:08   ` Palmer Dabbelt
2018-11-07  0:08     ` Palmer Dabbelt
2018-11-07 18:30     ` David Abdurachmanov
2018-11-07 18:30       ` David Abdurachmanov
2018-11-07 21:09       ` Arnd Bergmann
2018-11-07 21:09         ` Arnd Bergmann
2018-11-08  2:10         ` Palmer Dabbelt
2018-11-08  2:10           ` Palmer Dabbelt
2018-11-08 10:30           ` Arnd Bergmann
2018-11-08 10:30             ` Arnd Bergmann
2018-11-08 16:57             ` Palmer Dabbelt
2018-11-08 16:57               ` Palmer Dabbelt
2018-11-08 10:38           ` David Abdurachmanov
2018-11-08 10:38             ` David Abdurachmanov
2018-11-08 16:57             ` Palmer Dabbelt
2018-11-08 16:57               ` Palmer Dabbelt

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=CAK8P3a3JcztCSYBuu5ZJXaV83VNLv_1v3v-EKMR+tC1oOsQesw@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=arnd@arndb.de \
    --cc=linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).