Re: [RFC PATCH 4/8] powerpc: add CPU field to struct thread_info

From: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org>
To: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Keith Packard <keithpac@amazon.com>,
	 Russell King <linux@armlinux.org.uk>,
	Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
	Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
	Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>,
	 Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu>,
	Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>,
	 Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@sifive.com>,
	Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@dabbelt.com>,
	 Albert Ou <aou@eecs.berkeley.edu>,
	Heiko Carstens <hca@linux.ibm.com>,
	 Vasily Gorbik <gor@linux.ibm.com>,
	Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>,
	 Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
	 Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>,
	 Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
	 Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
	Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
	"open list:LINUX FOR POWERPC (32-BIT AND 64-BIT)"
	<linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org>,
	 linux-riscv <linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org>,
	 "open list:S390" <linux-s390@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 4/8] powerpc: add CPU field to struct thread_info
Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2021 15:18:45 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAMj1kXFXtbD3=L+QvCnwbyFr-qbWivZ0wRGT0N4LNxANPD8x4g@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87pmst1rn9.fsf@mpe.ellerman.id.au>

On Tue, 28 Sept 2021 at 02:16, Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> wrote:
>
> Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> writes:
> > Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org> writes:
> >> On Tue, 14 Sept 2021 at 14:11, Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> The CPU field will be moved back into thread_info even when
> >>> THREAD_INFO_IN_TASK is enabled, so add it back to powerpc's definition
> >>> of struct thread_info.
> >>>
> >>> Signed-off-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org>
> >>
> >> Michael,
> >>
> >> Do you have any objections or issues with this patch or the subsequent
> >> ones cleaning up the task CPU kludge for ppc32? Christophe indicated
> >> that he was happy with it.
> >
> > No objections, it looks good to me, thanks for cleaning up that horror :)
> >
> > It didn't apply cleanly to master so I haven't tested it at all, if you can point me at a
> > git tree with the dependencies I'd be happy to run some tests over it.
>
> Actually I realised I can just drop the last patch.
>
> So that looks fine, passes my standard quick build & boot on qemu tests,
> and builds with/without stack protector enabled.
>

Thanks.

Do you have any opinion on how this series should be merged? Kees Cook
is willing to take them via his cross-arch tree, or you could carry
them if you prefer. Taking it via multiple trees at the same time is
going to be tricky, or take two cycles, with I'd prefer to avoid.

-- 
Ard.

_______________________________________________
linux-riscv mailing list
linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-riscv