From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AB60BC433EF for ; Tue, 26 Jul 2022 08:14:16 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post: List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:Cc:To:Subject:Message-ID:Date:From: In-Reply-To:References:MIME-Version:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description: Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID: List-Owner; bh=O9skazMjyv1AJG+a8GhFQbcga5S5k3e1tlIXNSDlOdA=; b=SbAG8RSiumJa4T Q85EhFtA/cw1v8XowraW8vw3mUKblez0nENHg6UyXii7TAScTsvgRk44sesDrPR34AK4ndTch1hO3 7hvzu6JLJm2bC9KPXtZqGW7NqwU3oaGO4XuwZ9PsjiPNdYrQcplo5fIwEQefH0NwImylf4zyr6vsO RWT3krlx6VvlMP4fLDiO6OouzqJMl/RJmNsV2ZWYCciw6hpYj16CmFGCmT55XepGBXhBAmTFP/H3t /sj6FMH7qvbPH/G3Hn37DjCl6w7Xav9RrCwD5zW5xwiO1f/JEacOiPlTJ1Iq1EGBEYbXjBq/Tt9bU 3lnPSTHrstH0tcp4VYiA==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.94.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1oGFhe-009zIj-OV; Tue, 26 Jul 2022 08:14:06 +0000 Received: from mail-yw1-x112c.google.com ([2607:f8b0:4864:20::112c]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.94.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1oGFgI-009y5W-KH for linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org; Tue, 26 Jul 2022 08:12:44 +0000 Received: by mail-yw1-x112c.google.com with SMTP id 00721157ae682-31f434f2884so20917387b3.6 for ; Tue, 26 Jul 2022 01:12:40 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=atishpatra.org; s=google; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=nCX2ALCWALFGybcMGwSCyXmdfN3GI/+m4dDqSmPpw10=; b=s0G272QfIh9/l63hjHAAeg/H9EPmVwACwS37tb+LwxjryHa4mlQWqrwvINvSIIEoW/ Z5YvAD93ZwX3PpzFcVYHu2JNnjVTJEbu9Utqrz3Y4iFYljnNLzmhkxMNWfU/cW+IHO08 BtMqsqCC7Au9eyjhgIOU+Pk7NDXHMOQRmVzOs= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=nCX2ALCWALFGybcMGwSCyXmdfN3GI/+m4dDqSmPpw10=; b=VL3SOHXAlKRQpFwzQc0GaW6jnSU2GTDyFbIPUJV2uC9KHYuhAgIWOFzNONV4kKlahY fhtZiD/DN8A/8QIzJYrQTdAowWTWX1tlahIy7+o3SxDyMM3wmM666phOW03k/2JkOrZY 9KQSLR6sILAmrA+tmCtzdhAxQvvInDGcbCillr+j1Qe3qkd4AX8Sg0B0Fw7S5CSkgkxo qeaYY5Pl5sDOfpubhBAP9wV5tNUQfMhekz0mNBElUuKJGMNTF13XQ6CYxb/PuRx2Ec1e KD7UhYia4WfTbqLzHWoPaVAghIios3YatyJxzzyZN2Zk8s8vgQKC6r7LXhQdQYu3QtEh sHDw== X-Gm-Message-State: AJIora/CmGr/uJ8MVAnUtUf45gh/HWuw13tykWAynGtU6GgUIudcLTDJ SyS+R16evBg46zhifYZPzaUPtND2YSbDZT+BwVbJnUvIyQ== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGRyM1s8Apd3hvFA44J5aJBKOXCo+fbuaspIcsLZraEzhnuLtGz3y8ZMjuWlDz61tH0RApEnIjJf8dPeiNTkr3bt800= X-Received: by 2002:a0d:ebc8:0:b0:31f:4f08:63aa with SMTP id u191-20020a0debc8000000b0031f4f0863aamr352109ywe.145.1658823159618; Tue, 26 Jul 2022 01:12:39 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20220715175155.3567243-1-mail@conchuod.ie> <96972ad8-d146-3bc2-0e49-ffe88580bbee@microchip.com> <20220725091346.GA20370@willie-the-truck> <28e38506-8fce-9000-c211-199a7aa69910@microchip.com> In-Reply-To: <28e38506-8fce-9000-c211-199a7aa69910@microchip.com> From: Atish Patra Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2022 01:12:28 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 0/2] Fix RISC-V's arch-topology reporting To: Conor Dooley Cc: "will@kernel.org" , Paul Walmsley , Palmer Dabbelt , Palmer Dabbelt , Albert Ou , Sudeep Holla , "catalin.marinas@arm.com" , Greg Kroah-Hartman , "Rafael J. Wysocki" , Daire McNamara , Niklas Cassel , Damien Le Moal , Geert Uytterhoeven , Zong Li , Emil Renner Berhing , Jonas Hahnfeld , Guo Ren , Anup Patel , =?UTF-8?Q?Heiko_St=C3=BCbner?= , Philipp Tomsich , Rob Herring , Marc Zyngier , Viresh Kumar , linux-riscv , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List" , "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" , Brice Goglin X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20220726_011242_694590_D3F7AFA9 X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 26.47 ) X-BeenThere: linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "linux-riscv" Errors-To: linux-riscv-bounces+linux-riscv=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org On Mon, Jul 25, 2022 at 2:20 AM wrote: > > On 25/07/2022 10:13, Will Deacon wrote: > > On Sat, Jul 23, 2022 at 11:22:01AM +0000, Conor.Dooley@microchip.com wrote: > >> On 15/07/2022 18:51, Conor Dooley wrote: > >> > >> Hey, > >> > >> Not got any feedback on the smpboot changes from the RISC-V side. > >> I tested it on polarfire, the d1 (with both SMP & !SMP set iirc) > >> & on the u540. It all looked good to me. > >> > >> I'd like to have this fixed for v5.20, but there isn't too much > >> time left before the mw. Not too sure about the cross-tree changes, > >> does it need an immutable branch or could it go through driver-core? > >> Catalin suggested removing the CC stable from patch 1/2 & adding it > >> as a dependency for the 2/2 patch - but obviously that's up to the > >> committer to sort out. > > > > I'm finalising the arm64 queue today, so I don't really want to pull in > > additional changes beyond critical fixes at this point, I'm afraid. I was > > half-expecting a pull request from the riscv side last week but I didn't > > see anything. > > Yeah, that's fair. It's late in the game for cross-tree messing. > I know Palmer has been p busy recently. > > > FWIW, if there's still no movement by -rc1, then I'm happy to queue all > > of this on its own branch in the arm64 tree for 5.21. > > Hopefully someone on the riscv side will have confirmed what I am doing > is sane by then. > > > > > Let me know. > > I will, thanks! Sorry for the delayed response here. I was planning to test the series last week itself but got dragged into something else and a qemu bug for NUMA. Thanks for the fixes. I have tested this on Qemu(removing the topology node) for the following configurations. SMP, !SMP, NUMA (2 sockets) FWIW, Tested-by: Atish Patra -- Regards, Atish _______________________________________________ linux-riscv mailing list linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-riscv