From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C593AC4332F for ; Fri, 14 Oct 2022 18:19:10 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post: List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:References: Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description: Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID: List-Owner; bh=xBGQdnFUojn176Gh5/81jFhAl80qKTxJjgwY1vBQPV8=; b=EO2hOx22zzHNKa ubU2Z5tdPmznLn3QRpv6vpX7YWl9NZLe1/+g16ArCaIOXaIYd2fJR1XLq3EQTDfZVQZVGCmmpht83 XWkWCp8izHBDgRSOdVxq2ix7bO6TU2Hfvm5pEbG76+/1vGg7KBdl04dPNZ3UKC0hpRGaEHuY2N8jw wOCeEmgxJDwiUPjnr6D6HwSrfshvEtvS/nysL+tE3ARGlgRks9bXgUApT9VXUE8J/jmQv0iFP4HtH K6bKk9YcTgEtPQCjtg5Jo/soNYg1pdewx4Uum20IzomPQT1zGEbGTlQe3SYfNdB3rWsWwkA3nqWm7 itCiFi6pxt2ZI7d87LLA==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.94.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1ojPGo-00FbqQ-ET; Fri, 14 Oct 2022 18:18:54 +0000 Received: from dfw.source.kernel.org ([139.178.84.217]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.94.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1ojPGl-00Fbq3-DB for linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org; Fri, 14 Oct 2022 18:18:53 +0000 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (relay.kernel.org [52.25.139.140]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by dfw.source.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BE76F6135D; Fri, 14 Oct 2022 18:18:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 2E6A3C433C1; Fri, 14 Oct 2022 18:18:48 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1665771530; bh=xhDZYuIfFit/fN9G1ayXFPbjVvKWBMTddCQP4agZCgg=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=uUjdDo/FIO2c2TWy2gQGmHrFQmI9RUlLMdHcne8S4UiRRtmN04rjp0Zv0+f1ulme/ 9sVov1o5n2EftCKQreF5JEjM4c5gj115uSb3JrTCcP6ltuaTA0hZYCnGRQelBlG+Mi vsAsfpR679NNq5yR59kUifIPz26Z+5baVMiN2mhd+uh7fjKritIA77kQTjQmuhQQ8+ cup1aJEywU33DCEQialckHlt388GpFGT/OECEZF/xRSGRWl+lLnjYoPHE25sKqcFD8 LXu5TtrmMJE/ld0c+pl9ChN3mC14NxLedVhb67dhouLZc/xPzewBKAavvy1nzAmjXl LPFajUsw7wHTw== Date: Fri, 14 Oct 2022 19:18:46 +0100 From: Conor Dooley To: Palmer Dabbelt , konstantin@linuxfoundation.org Cc: linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org, Conor Dooley Subject: Re: RISC-V Patchwork Message-ID: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20221014_111851_564774_840207FD X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 46.72 ) X-BeenThere: linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "linux-riscv" Errors-To: linux-riscv-bounces+linux-riscv=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org On Fri, Oct 14, 2022 at 09:15:04AM -0700, Palmer Dabbelt wrote: > On Thu, 13 Oct 2022 16:29:35 PDT (-0700), Conor Dooley wrote: > > On Thu, Oct 13, 2022 at 04:14:39PM -0700, Palmer Dabbelt wrote: > > > On Tue, 11 Oct 2022 09:07:45 PDT (-0700), Conor Dooley wrote: > > > > Hey, > > > > > > > > As one or two people have already noticed, we've resurrected the > > > > patchwork for the RISC-V list @ > > > > https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-riscv/list/ > > > > > > > > The patchwork bot should let people know when their patches have been > > > > applied. Hopefully it'll help people track what the status of their > > > > patches are a little better and try to prevent stuff falling through > > > > the cracks in Palmer's inbox. > > > > > > > > As an FYI, the statuses that are intended to be used are: > > > > - New: No action has been taken yet > > > > - Under Review: The maintainer is waiting for review comments from others > > > > - Changes Requested: Either the maintainer or a reviewer requested > > > > changes in the patch. The patch author is expected to submit a new > > > > version > > > > - Superseded: There's a new version of the patch available > > > > - Not Applicable: The patch is not intended for the RISC-V tree > > > > - Accepted: The patch has been applied > > > > - Rejected: The patch has been rejected, with reasons stated in an > > > > email > > > > > > > > I reset patchwork and marked all patches as archived so we would have a > > > > fresh start. If your patch has been archived & not applied by the end of > > > > this merge window, feel free to resend it. > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > Conor. > > > > > > > > @Palmer: hopefully I did the scissors thing correctly.. > > > > > > b4 doesn't like it, but my old scripts just picked up the whole thing as a > > > patch. I tossed the above bits, LMK if something went off the rails. > > > > I just copied the suggested scissors format from the git-mailinfo man > > page and pasted that. I didn't know this prior to 5 mins ago, but > > `b4 mbox` splits it on the scissors line, into a patch and an email > > inside the mbox - but for w/e reason, `git am` (or `b4 shazam`) then > > seems to try and apply the email instead of the patch? Or else pasting > > the patch into mutt was a terrible idea? Maybe it's worth mentioning to > > Konstantin that things get messed up here, I'll do it tomorrow if I > > remember. > > If the man pages suggest doing this but the tools fail then it's worth > fixing something, even if it's just the man page ;) Konstantin, perhaps you can shed some light on what's happening here? FWIW I see this on 0.10.0-dev-d8d41. Thanks, Conor. > > > Unlikely I'll ever really send many more patches with this format so w/e > > at the end of the day. > > Thanks, > > Conor. > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- >8 -- > > > > From f886e8a9def4bd3f2fa8a0a4d7e92c94fe72ea72 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 > > > > From: Conor Dooley > > > > Date: Tue, 11 Oct 2022 16:49:53 +0100 > > > > Subject: [PATCH] MAINTAINERS: add RISC-V's patchwork > > > > > > > > The RISC-V patchwork instance on kernel.org has had some necromancy > > > > performed on it & will be used going forward. The statuses that are > > > > intended to be used are: > > > > - New: No action has been taken yet > > > > - Under Review: The maintainer is waiting for review comments from others > > > > - Changes Requested: Either the maintainer or a reviewer requested > > > > changes in the patch. The patch author is expected to submit a new > > > > version > > > > - Superseded: There's a new version of the patch available > > > > - Not Applicable: The patch is not intended for the RISC-V tree > > > > - Accepted: The patch has been applied > > > > - Rejected: The patch has been rejected, with reasons stated in an > > > > email > > > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Conor Dooley > > > > --- > > > > MAINTAINERS | 1 + > > > > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) > > > > > > > > diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS > > > > index 8a5012ba6ff9..e2882dc703d8 100644 > > > > --- a/MAINTAINERS > > > > +++ b/MAINTAINERS > > > > @@ -17516,6 +17516,7 @@ M: Palmer Dabbelt > > > > M: Albert Ou > > > > L: linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org > > > > S: Supported > > > > +Q: https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-riscv/list/ > > > > P: Documentation/riscv/patch-acceptance.rst > > > > T: git git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/riscv/linux.git > > > > F: arch/riscv/ > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > linux-riscv mailing list > > > linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org > > > http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-riscv > > > > > _______________________________________________ > linux-riscv mailing list > linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org > http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-riscv _______________________________________________ linux-riscv mailing list linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-riscv