From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6A831C433FE for ; Wed, 26 Oct 2022 16:52:20 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post: List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:References: Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description: Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID: List-Owner; bh=J8IDVFdtTjvO+iDGpyqffj0JzE5ASVnlrknj3CrKmB0=; b=OVALSwbMjbz89+ VcCp4eRa+xzQr1aW335Qo+LNmVrY9w8reydr8nWyjLQOSrhbOWUR4N3khsPHCjH0orJUjmYgQQm/o 7gRStfvTJX7uAnuqcaBfryF4ME5EKuZWA4pco0rU1O5t7eKG+FR1vANeX0lA4Vnc80M6r6PSSJ0jz LIIk8fvucXmv71lwQZ3pm3sJaK8wIfNVfhhnzMLRMZMyIqxhL7wy/93G89B2JqlnpEsyVXA1zt3Wt QZftrsVwyHbrBl4KMGDusRpC/wAKR5QkY+zU027GH+r5VY06vnLR8zfydIpWyLY+3VjoDlfqAEMVt 2bw/NdGNTrVjrOsYS0cw==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.94.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1onjdR-00AE17-Hd; Wed, 26 Oct 2022 16:52:09 +0000 Received: from dfw.source.kernel.org ([2604:1380:4641:c500::1]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.94.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1onjdP-00AE0G-2X for linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org; Wed, 26 Oct 2022 16:52:08 +0000 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (relay.kernel.org [52.25.139.140]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by dfw.source.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 71AF761FB9; Wed, 26 Oct 2022 16:52:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 0C790C433D6; Wed, 26 Oct 2022 16:52:02 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1666803123; bh=28DDrSEJ5f+i4DOtzEKESJVKi7mor0LeaIw0+zUUyJM=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=FAXDYcLWZ9PW7EylF6jqjf+/xEb461VvPj7qt5XG8KA3kF8uVV+v4uvbtErJvLucX 1/Huq2ygJSMZgDJfjwrGQQSQKkSFk/1xmXBJw7TNJTmUDnAQk8gStYR9gRYh2B94xI vJ0lbMWkCzUkqE8/wz2aoAHchcO1djhQpuSiT9k1W8+XmL9PbvweEx4SNEfcYFSRxc 8lKZpxMgKVMaCO7ghrBtNI6XEFWNVBX/eMjnFcNbz3AztwmIUJsAAZJmd0vmc3KrVZ Vbnvg4p4xjSu6CWLJr21XQSaP29DCRtkYhNYUsB0JRZkTTwWfWpK1BuxpO64rGEJSO 1r1TuKf5bWDtA== Date: Wed, 26 Oct 2022 17:52:00 +0100 From: Conor Dooley To: linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org Cc: palmer@dabbelt.com, Conor Dooley Subject: Re: RISC-V Patchwork Message-ID: References: <20221011160744.2167025-1-conor@kernel.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20221011160744.2167025-1-conor@kernel.org> X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20221026_095207_215680_0E0DBD01 X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 22.59 ) X-BeenThere: linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "linux-riscv" Errors-To: linux-riscv-bounces+linux-riscv=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org On Tue, Oct 11, 2022 at 05:07:45PM +0100, Conor Dooley wrote: > Hey, > > As one or two people have already noticed, we've resurrected the > patchwork for the RISC-V list @ > https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-riscv/list/ > > The patchwork bot should let people know when their patches have been > applied. Hopefully it'll help people track what the status of their > patches are a little better and try to prevent stuff falling through > the cracks in Palmer's inbox. > > As an FYI, the statuses that are intended to be used are: > - New: No action has been taken yet > - Under Review: The maintainer is waiting for review comments from others We had the first patchwork sync meeting thing today & one of the things that came up was the lack of granularity of the "Under Review" status. Currently, things that Palmer needs to look at were marked as "Under Review" & delegated to him. There's no way with that "strategy" to determine at a glance which patches were low-hanging fruit or important fixes etc, versus things that need his input to progress but are not applicable yet. Since the number of statuses that mean a patch shows up in the "Action Required" state is rather limited, we're going to try modifying the use of "New" and "Under Review". What we will give a go is: - New & no delegate: No action has been taken yet & the patch is not likely to land for the upcoming release nor is a fix. - New & delegated to Palmer: The patch is not likely to land for the upcoming release nor is a fix, but Palmer's input on it is required to make progress. - Under Review & delegated to Palmer: Trivial changes, urgent fixes for this release & content that is likely ready to be merged for this window. - Under Review & no delegate: Fixes or content that is likely to be ready for this window, but is waiting for review comments from others. Hopefully I've accurately captured what was said, scream if I have not. A new status was also adopted: - Needs Ack: The patch is not intended for the RISC-V tree, but an Ack from Palmer is needed. If anyone wants to come along to the patchwork sync calls, check out Palmer's invite email: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-riscv/mhng-775d4068-6c1e-48a4-a1dc-b4a76ff26bb3@palmer-ri-x1c9a/ > - Changes Requested: Either the maintainer or a reviewer requested > changes in the patch. The patch author is expected to submit a new > version > - Superseded: There's a new version of the patch available > - Not Applicable: The patch is not intended for the RISC-V tree > - Accepted: The patch has been applied > - Rejected: The patch has been rejected, with reasons stated in an > email _______________________________________________ linux-riscv mailing list linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-riscv