From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.3 required=3.0 tests=DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SIGNED_OFF_BY, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 45141C433FF for ; Tue, 13 Aug 2019 16:52:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 193912067D for ; Tue, 13 Aug 2019 16:52:04 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=lists.infradead.org header.i=@lists.infradead.org header.b="m+m/sdet"; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key) header.d=sifive.com header.i=@sifive.com header.b="XgpQDDJM" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 193912067D Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=sifive.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-riscv-bounces+infradead-linux-riscv=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20170209; h=Sender: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:Cc:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post: List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:MIME-Version:References:Message-ID: In-Reply-To:Subject:To:From:Date:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description: Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID: List-Owner; bh=Vb+QbBGMwVrLzRltm+P0i0bqV0klVB0lujhhNr9+DdI=; b=m+m/sdet4dJ+y1 tJOOquWHf7tvZkKIqDhVIxhkuxw2iNZlX3jRv7YxLSyj6pSpA4Wsn5KLCZbify9SH8EYPUczaHyPN DK2vLUc9SYNJahSknjILJYEUybQISlaE5ahKyXNS4i3lvJ+k/RjmKCW3rpFS2yRBkvM47DJG3+EUT yplvxBXmzcslScfe8JEnF6+d3NpfeZKtd3+pFPpNsDAC1E1+1cQMe1T6uNBUBwhMSrR4PQQi6AqX2 /E0PEQfAFwObNnbF/suxeZyA/dQscBzDaS3aLWXEoXFPfRgoJWcAsl/arJuaN2ECIzJdHmuBJzRre lxzknVYh9iK0sa2FnlFw==; Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1hxa1j-0004lA-4k; Tue, 13 Aug 2019 16:52:03 +0000 Received: from mail-ot1-x342.google.com ([2607:f8b0:4864:20::342]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.92 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1hxa1f-0004kS-P1 for linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org; Tue, 13 Aug 2019 16:52:01 +0000 Received: by mail-ot1-x342.google.com with SMTP id b1so6975557otp.6 for ; Tue, 13 Aug 2019 09:51:59 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sifive.com; s=google; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:message-id:references :user-agent:mime-version; bh=uC6dDZKAip16b+mn3qV8AFtyarHS2Wtjrk4sIs9wXF4=; b=XgpQDDJMv+/ruzPLaeBUwtQGSgQA4L3nxrBQ917gPpnuR6cUFXgim3kBcEa/w5jutY 1I9/+H2KPKPtxKPxy/8FlBxrLF+MmPmdZbuhYc8EDkrwdyqA6hVQoM95f8HcbpUpb1Qx hZTvovsZfKBhDBxViQTvA8wfBcIFktwAJqiyuK92QW91ND+gAjrkFS95swU6Mb77+JJT dWsfs+8qZJV00w+zYAJRBgLNShd42ftbjk5b5cCzZ2Wio/qFC7MchhHVkiLc0/4EM54U 4yszi7PJ41btEdlzVWQp+FYSYj7QgFW35VAqKh4gbuBkIL4TFcY3xDlkKtl0imc5VzCp WJbA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:message-id :references:user-agent:mime-version; bh=uC6dDZKAip16b+mn3qV8AFtyarHS2Wtjrk4sIs9wXF4=; b=jPutUTEM+sxgiyAHmLjvPq4JBV3jFgzyM7GIPjPLPaiPKQVqegqlvx9LSILURpHFJt CD3I9oWLDV50MPVrCEiHBIe2jhJQBXaHodkRaJGgZL28gXzoNoUdu/ANoyZ3IRn/OYCK 243GlXRf/kkY+QpvqSOgCg5gzm1UvBYp+j0IJotPB3MMPMS0mek3cZ/caY7VcC0S4mA3 VRmswrGY+VSAWtWozr+po9vIhIHfb0YqYvFlLUW4pV1hv9a2oX/MGZHOiCCDounZlFB1 0jZmZQ3cF+f323zn/CyeT0uspBMqKbrZi1M3wTY4PBxAasFo1sYIPYLHFVosC8lsEAvc 9uxw== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAXAwJ5gkMK3DcWSVd+3vjnusUHzvHO2Z0pod2OQLDH6LggbchaK l/cHkvMnV03ThGjk6rCUR/J59A== X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqwPHBJM6jvKxBo1VW6csfTWhlFi+l+kj3B6joswy7ZnX59kuzbPWX+o7X/YHb6OhVNwnoh/Yw== X-Received: by 2002:a5d:9747:: with SMTP id c7mr8146194ioo.244.1565715118854; Tue, 13 Aug 2019 09:51:58 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (c-73-95-159-87.hsd1.co.comcast.net. [73.95.159.87]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id e26sm85862802iod.10.2019.08.13.09.51.58 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Tue, 13 Aug 2019 09:51:58 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 13 Aug 2019 09:51:56 -0700 (PDT) From: Paul Walmsley X-X-Sender: paulw@viisi.sifive.com To: Christoph Hellwig Subject: Re: [PATCH 02/15] riscv: use CSR_SATP instead of the legacy sptbr name in switch_mm In-Reply-To: <20190813164257.GA10019@lst.de> Message-ID: References: <20190813154747.24256-1-hch@lst.de> <20190813154747.24256-3-hch@lst.de> <20190813164257.GA10019@lst.de> User-Agent: Alpine 2.21.9999 (DEB 301 2018-08-15) MIME-Version: 1.0 X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20190813_095159_816867_516F540C X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 12.02 ) X-BeenThere: linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Atish Patra , Damien Le Moal , Palmer Dabbelt , linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "linux-riscv" Errors-To: linux-riscv-bounces+infradead-linux-riscv=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org On Tue, 13 Aug 2019, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > On Tue, Aug 13, 2019 at 09:36:23AM -0700, Paul Walmsley wrote: > > On Tue, 13 Aug 2019, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > > > > > Switch to our own constant for the satp register instead of using > > > the old name from a legacy version of the privileged spec. > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig > > > Reviewed-by: Atish Patra > > > > Didn't you want us to replace this with Bin Meng's patch? > > > > https://lore.kernel.org/linux-riscv/20190807151316.GB16432@infradead.org/ > > > > If so, probably best just to drop this one and state a dependency. > > Either way is fine with me. But until you have a branch with > either one applied I'm going to keep resending my patch, as random > dependencies on uncommitted patches don't work. If you're going to resend a patch, it's better to resend the other one that you've explicitly endorsed in favor of your own. - Paul _______________________________________________ linux-riscv mailing list linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-riscv