From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.3 required=3.0 tests=DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, MENTIONS_GIT_HOSTING,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E9019C432C0 for ; Wed, 20 Nov 2019 07:52:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B981320872 for ; Wed, 20 Nov 2019 07:52:05 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=lists.infradead.org header.i=@lists.infradead.org header.b="okjE/qTH"; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key) header.d=sifive.com header.i=@sifive.com header.b="PVO9AuwS" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org B981320872 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=sifive.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-riscv-bounces+infradead-linux-riscv=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20170209; h=Sender: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:Cc:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post: List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:MIME-Version:References:Message-ID: In-Reply-To:Subject:To:From:Date:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description: Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID: List-Owner; bh=HaQYYghaPln88Iqf53XQCKast/QDa4QbGkXjyEsjmeU=; b=okjE/qTHwp8oxh IPn0gL/6aRR5zoM9TDLgxurDKxmZLgYw4UrHqL68dJk6KM+9zaMZCRdPV0MJ7i2gmoXtkTF3vBVYD ZlRD/g/R3n7Azy7QkI0p7nmF2sO8CRB3ArwvRQnNKmDphKQjhMF6cOG8p6ct6PEOHCeYHw9Xr5cKg aBx3jt2GMX2QY7YAM4gW94C9DiclbQKfmMG/C5aXvG/FSPg5fO1aIqCzYWwRVd3kWXfKuGfYYxGGc bjSCVaxTj71+HTwLcijuRZp1CF9TvXWkLmlu4WYrRzkbg6uffOA8z/YNVYHqLvt0vko05OQ8GvtLT J62FSW6s2dOgs0XiflIg==; Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92.3 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1iXKmS-0006sc-TV; Wed, 20 Nov 2019 07:52:04 +0000 Received: from mail-il1-x144.google.com ([2607:f8b0:4864:20::144]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.92.3 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1iXKmO-0006rP-RA for linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org; Wed, 20 Nov 2019 07:52:02 +0000 Received: by mail-il1-x144.google.com with SMTP id r9so976395ilq.10 for ; Tue, 19 Nov 2019 23:51:58 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sifive.com; s=google; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:message-id:references :user-agent:mime-version; bh=6RukAU4yfanIMPunVIfuS2B5y73IXuIqDOCI0UMmxkk=; b=PVO9AuwSNDQnHRLBSNzM0TSp1Zp1SdvCGoDnpyhmu7WVv0zg4E3qxBP4Ve8/VNVG/L BJmtp+MAp8ki3sJjxVhqCnYJUW3LpbQPAm1HaL9HR3wJXMRgD4/iSvOifSbhpC6diMhi r3+Oa7d3zgcFZ4mXlPNh7SlvSrOqWurTkEbpC2SQId3okyPF7qjTOnKhCUqT97c96TI1 4qtDVgfX49hd739zROfni6i/j3qulUrIk78hpZ51UVpieMlW2GGzTtHCtxDkLrUluVHL xB0JPsoUmT/qRMPc9f7NUhpxDibstRYWiLpPC7tEkaOOLYe+0eAutu6AFiXn8s82sA/w N90A== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:message-id :references:user-agent:mime-version; bh=6RukAU4yfanIMPunVIfuS2B5y73IXuIqDOCI0UMmxkk=; b=ewNA80JPs8kWR8/ruUAU+cb401O2YF3ExevOIZcFca+YDteLJw48ZJiq3t0kbfXilR qwIHbsn6nSsvM+OwcRwPOMGTW+vK5zUIOI3gyhI/cYryeb2SYKL8VGDyfmKm9rHmma1e cbnSpcX6jTKswl/ZZQ0On9RxvkTL9TQJlFad+cMJ/mDoXyXx1yUw16MYapDxxX0BUIII xtMAfuYjyXxyIxHuBceLX3F7gHeFehTWoI/kRDxMQ2tfkwNvvHPAve4IESamvSjMC6Ze gjP53E90HkBR9XuV0j12X8jpwOdWoQ5SqzQfh3SxmNlbgQj4U5OdLeXNL+W+ngpYvrfq Bz1Q== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAVCr3GT//986okKOrbrzFMi2OwB6FPV+NnKFU7bJyBQLIcKDdud K3ePq/SoYG6WB7WPX7XuzgHuGA== X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqxyj22gfdW5UAgMeF5MFaHfqP5hvYnwkk6L0UAliggkFBPMDJLq5pqDqo0MB5NpTRnfUdsUjw== X-Received: by 2002:a92:7e18:: with SMTP id z24mr2049781ilc.276.1574236317557; Tue, 19 Nov 2019 23:51:57 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost (67-0-26-4.albq.qwest.net. [67.0.26.4]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id f2sm4719623iog.30.2019.11.19.23.51.56 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Tue, 19 Nov 2019 23:51:57 -0800 (PST) Date: Tue, 19 Nov 2019 23:51:56 -0800 (PST) From: Paul Walmsley X-X-Sender: paulw@viisi.sifive.com To: Atish Patra Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/4] Add support for SBI v0.2 In-Reply-To: <20191118224539.2171-1-atish.patra@wdc.com> Message-ID: References: <20191118224539.2171-1-atish.patra@wdc.com> User-Agent: Alpine 2.21.9999 (DEB 301 2018-08-15) MIME-Version: 1.0 X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20191119_235201_004030_976D44FC X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 12.89 ) X-BeenThere: linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Albert Ou , Anup Patel , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Mike Rapoport , Alexios Zavras , Jonathan Behrens , Palmer Dabbelt , Mao Han , Gary Guo , linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org, Christoph Hellwig , Allison Randal Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "linux-riscv" Errors-To: linux-riscv-bounces+infradead-linux-riscv=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org Hi Atish, On Mon, 18 Nov 2019, Atish Patra wrote: > The Supervisor Binary Interface(SBI) specification[1] now defines a > base extension that provides extendability to add future extensions > while maintaining backward compatibility with previous versions. > The new version is defined as 0.2 and older version is marked as 0.1. > > This series adds support v0.2 and a unified calling convention > implementation between 0.1 and 0.2. It also adds minimal SBI functions > from 0.2 as well to keep the series lean. > > [1] https://github.com/riscv/riscv-sbi-doc/blob/master/riscv-sbi.adoc > > The base support for SBI v0.2 is already available in OpenSBI v0.5. > This series needs following additional patches in OpenSBI. > > http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/opensbi/2019-November/000704.html > > Tested on both BBL, OpenSBI with/without the above patch series. Just based on a quick look: All of the patches in this series add warnings reported by 'scripts/checkpatch.pl --strict'. Could you please fix and repost? Also: could you rebase these patches on top of the current RISC-V for-next branch? There are some significant conflicts after Christoph's nommu work. We'll wait to send these upstream until the SBI v0.2 spec is frozen, but in the meantime, it'll be good to get these into the experimental branch. thanks, - Paul _______________________________________________ linux-riscv mailing list linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-riscv