From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.3 required=3.0 tests=DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7D34CC432C0 for ; Mon, 25 Nov 2019 02:49:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4B08420679 for ; Mon, 25 Nov 2019 02:49:02 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=lists.infradead.org header.i=@lists.infradead.org header.b="Op5flgIk"; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key) header.d=sifive.com header.i=@sifive.com header.b="BqbheMcM" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 4B08420679 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=sifive.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-riscv-bounces+infradead-linux-riscv=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20170209; h=Sender: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:Cc:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post: List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:MIME-Version:References:Message-ID: In-Reply-To:Subject:To:From:Date:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description: Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID: List-Owner; bh=7gH2UFKk7faqEyOK1qR0w797oMIJaGQ1EeLWCWsphdQ=; b=Op5flgIk+8S7R1 1BAQzjwZj2v91asIdMGbXum6iDPumAbq/uKoTR+seIGeftQ9fY8yqYlS1jrZ7STHNWjh4NbLmq+H3 8xw0GQd4UwgX16YBptWFn6Gn12AbzZrjL+l/fgYHVsS6vU0Zw4EQ8I5jl7GmrlQ3/IRTE6ko+1rrJ asu+XLsV9ncz8I4tnbE8JZiNK2W0TprJmF9ru+NeBBOz9grVpNUGnLn43L3Yef8q7Lzdo1RWDSDM7 wUOlxMfIylhDxUEp4o7Ea2n7UvRlJliU/pvmD2bozoxBqVVTlzJXa6uusBtexmtm13kTsX2AIjF+1 GU5/J1Mb4rvQ38o1+2LA==; Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92.3 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1iZ4Qv-000814-Dn; Mon, 25 Nov 2019 02:49:01 +0000 Received: from mail-io1-xd43.google.com ([2607:f8b0:4864:20::d43]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.92.3 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1iZ4Qs-00080S-Hu for linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org; Mon, 25 Nov 2019 02:49:00 +0000 Received: by mail-io1-xd43.google.com with SMTP id u24so12760155iob.5 for ; Sun, 24 Nov 2019 18:48:56 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sifive.com; s=google; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:message-id:references :user-agent:mime-version; bh=JfC2mJ/tM0Gtil8eGoDF2rqsQ/Szyy5PK2H9MiBjWaY=; b=BqbheMcM+/+8L5FUajWmcRC1Jt2EFb2gJwq13R2AdKWr4u92cpi/Qku/FU9A2Eu+bw ynY6/cjU7Rtcg/TUulvsuyxfJbeMQqKE1Bx0d7bCGvwzC63FW/yS2hxaeTiWMC9Jp2uG vRibYDUPgmnMbpZYvsxjswCE6r9A/t7AaQPMd6/EzO+s01YSFOmtqZTeGwp1lgVm3eze y4DKreOlFHLvcUqPFKdhUhm4W51onBLMZZ1FAIwmxhjItpmYJcYkwxB7IFMbDBVSFV4x Eq8vviYfv3npRjVahtOivSpmld1ch/YnzuGoNXuN7vLSX7IIiNcR7DRQrKJ8lN3coW9m T7RA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:message-id :references:user-agent:mime-version; bh=JfC2mJ/tM0Gtil8eGoDF2rqsQ/Szyy5PK2H9MiBjWaY=; b=YSRM0N/+oVLZO9TFuT6OnLHJ67HQw/E305zFCchIhAVq1AS8oF2W6UEFFNTSqAPSGc gq45jXIFJOE18JSt4KpfbfqDMe0H7nMVW7yekstolyIBYlb32OG809BCWYUSntV1NYf8 8/9SD47cdLXwVULHXNaUSgQ5eapCyD+AsTSdgQ8EIWzHFiDgq06z2tv4B4dIZFP/Ducg EWHbiVmSUKU3jSHCVRhP7S/o1ojg5MiDbYzvXSusNEKWg2ZhY9yZwllwiFWztLjDkWlP 7eOeaDZ8jA95Dc0U7Pmw9GugzL7M8iSrxHBjf3LcbhrA0gAuPTHb78WAYSFSrZIb561e tQ7Q== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAV/21z1Q1y2hx3oOAvCrjjKrLAXzzzEbSKlUT/Iaaj5j4yKGkV+ zhEYb2aPgZHBDPZ6UhSIWcqngw== X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqxgFYzEUsZQS6ILtiWRgw3rG7t6lwifkA15Te4VPLhoWxbBdRnWhS7ZYmL1Y/h4E9NFkL+lqw== X-Received: by 2002:a02:aa0c:: with SMTP id r12mr26180623jam.75.1574650136249; Sun, 24 Nov 2019 18:48:56 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost ([64.62.168.194]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id w2sm1790189ilg.51.2019.11.24.18.48.55 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Sun, 24 Nov 2019 18:48:55 -0800 (PST) Date: Sun, 24 Nov 2019 18:48:54 -0800 (PST) From: Paul Walmsley X-X-Sender: paulw@viisi.sifive.com To: Dan Williams Subject: Re: [PATCH] Documentation: riscv: add patch acceptance guidelines In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: <20191123092552.1438bc95@lwn.net> User-Agent: Alpine 2.21.9999 (DEB 301 2018-08-15) MIME-Version: 1.0 X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20191124_184858_720916_CDEFD328 X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 10.20 ) X-BeenThere: linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: krste@berkeley.edu, aou@eecs.berkeley.edu, waterman@eecs.berkeley.edu, Jonathan Corbet , Linux Doc Mailing List , Linux Kernel Mailing List , palmer@dabbelt.com, linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "linux-riscv" Errors-To: linux-riscv-bounces+infradead-linux-riscv=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org On Sat, 23 Nov 2019, Dan Williams wrote: > I'm open to updating the headers to make a section heading that > matches what you're trying to convey, however that header definition > should be globally agreed upon. I don't want the document that tries > to clarify per-subsystem behaviours itself to have per-subsystem > permutations. I think we, subsystem maintainers, at least need to be > able to agree on the topics we disagree on. Unless you're planning to, say, follow up with some kind of automated process working across all of the profile documents in such a way that it would make technical sense for the different sections to be standardized, I personally don't see any need at all for profile document standardization. As far as I can tell, these documents are meant for humans, rather than computers, to read. And in the absence of a strong technical rationale to limit how maintainers express themselves here, I don't think it's justified. - Paul _______________________________________________ linux-riscv mailing list linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-riscv