linux-riscv.lists.infradead.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
To: Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@dabbelt.com>
Cc: aou@eecs.berkeley.edu, alex@ghiti.fr, linux-mm@kvack.org,
	mpe@ellerman.id.au, Anup Patel <Anup.Patel@wdc.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Atish Patra <Atish.Patra@wdc.com>,
	paulus@samba.org, zong.li@sifive.com,
	Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@sifive.com>,
	linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 1/4] riscv: Move kernel mapping to vmalloc zone
Date: Wed, 22 Jul 2020 12:21:16 +1000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <bb461dde0df3eaf0bed949eebf0657b227431bb3.camel@kernel.crashing.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <mhng-cd9a74ea-2edf-47e4-aade-b090f1a069f1@palmerdabbelt-glaptop1>

On Tue, 2020-07-21 at 16:48 -0700, Palmer Dabbelt wrote:
> > Why ? Branch distance limits ? You can't use trampolines ?
> 
> Nothing fundamental, it's just that we don't have a large code model in the C
> compiler.  As a result all the global symbols are resolved as 32-bit
> PC-relative accesses.  We could fix this with a fast large code model, but then
> the kernel would need to relax global symbol references in modules and we don't
> even do that for the simple code models we have now.  FWIW, some of the
> proposed large code models are essentially just split-PLT/GOT and therefor
> don't require relaxation, but at that point we're essentially PIC until we
> have more that 2GiB of kernel text -- and even then, we keep all the
> performance issues.

My memory might be out of date but I *think* we do it on powerpc
without going to a large code model, but just having the in-kernel
linker insert trampolines.

Cheers,
Ben.



_______________________________________________
linux-riscv mailing list
linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-riscv

  reply	other threads:[~2020-07-22  2:22 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-06-07  7:59 [PATCH v5 0/4] vmalloc kernel mapping and relocatable kernel Alexandre Ghiti
2020-06-07  7:59 ` [PATCH v5 1/4] riscv: Move kernel mapping to vmalloc zone Alexandre Ghiti
2020-06-11 21:34   ` Atish Patra
2020-06-12 12:30     ` Alex Ghiti
2020-07-09  5:05   ` Palmer Dabbelt
2020-07-09  8:15     ` Zong Li
2020-07-09 11:11     ` Alex Ghiti
2020-07-21 18:36       ` Alex Ghiti
2020-07-21 19:05         ` Palmer Dabbelt
2020-07-21 23:12           ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2020-07-21 23:48             ` Palmer Dabbelt
2020-07-22  2:21               ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt [this message]
2020-07-22  4:50                 ` Michael Ellerman
2020-07-22  5:46                   ` Palmer Dabbelt
2020-07-22  9:43           ` Arnd Bergmann
2020-07-22 19:52             ` Palmer Dabbelt
2020-07-22 20:22               ` Arnd Bergmann
2020-07-22 21:05                 ` Atish Patra
2020-07-24  7:20                   ` Arnd Bergmann
2020-07-23  5:32           ` Alex Ghiti
2020-07-21 23:11         ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2020-07-21 23:36           ` Palmer Dabbelt
2020-07-23  5:36             ` Alex Ghiti
2020-07-23  5:21           ` Alex Ghiti
2020-07-23 22:33             ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2020-07-24  8:14               ` Arnd Bergmann
2020-06-07  7:59 ` [PATCH v5 2/4] riscv: Introduce CONFIG_RELOCATABLE Alexandre Ghiti
2020-06-10 14:10   ` Jerome Forissier
2020-06-11 19:43     ` Alex Ghiti
2020-06-07  7:59 ` [PATCH v5 3/4] powerpc: Move script to check relocations at compile time in scripts/ Alexandre Ghiti
2020-06-07  7:59 ` [PATCH v5 4/4] riscv: Check relocations at compile time Alexandre Ghiti
2020-07-08  4:21 ` [PATCH v5 0/4] vmalloc kernel mapping and relocatable kernel Alex Ghiti

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=bb461dde0df3eaf0bed949eebf0657b227431bb3.camel@kernel.crashing.org \
    --to=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
    --cc=Anup.Patel@wdc.com \
    --cc=Atish.Patra@wdc.com \
    --cc=alex@ghiti.fr \
    --cc=aou@eecs.berkeley.edu \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
    --cc=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
    --cc=palmer@dabbelt.com \
    --cc=paul.walmsley@sifive.com \
    --cc=paulus@samba.org \
    --cc=zong.li@sifive.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).