From: Atish Patra <Atish.Patra@wdc.com>
To: "hch@lst.de" <hch@lst.de>
Cc: "linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org"
<linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org>,
"palmer@sifive.com" <palmer@sifive.com>,
"paul.walmsley@sifive.com" <paul.walmsley@sifive.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/6] riscv: cleanup send_ipi_mask
Date: Tue, 27 Aug 2019 18:45:16 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <c59ea6fa44620fce82e38e1b611077aa7872d554.camel@wdc.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190826112827.GA15002@lst.de>
On Mon, 2019-08-26 at 13:28 +0200, hch@lst.de wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 24, 2019 at 12:11:15AM +0000, Atish Patra wrote:
> > Isn't that less optimized than previous one ?
> >
> > This will iterate all the cpus set in mask twice during every ipi
> > sent.
> > For now, we won't see any different. As we have more number of cpus
> > in
> > RISC-V (hopefully one day ;) ;)), this may affect the performance.
>
> By then we are hopefully done with using the SBI IPI code :) The
> native
> IPI code this refactor is preparing for won't need the hartid
> translation for example. The point of this patch isn't really to
> micro-optimize, but to make the code clear and obvious.
ok. Sounds good to me.
Reviewed-by: Atish Patra <atish.patra@wdc.com>
--
Regards,
Atish
_______________________________________________
linux-riscv mailing list
linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-riscv
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-08-27 18:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-08-21 14:58 misc riscv cleanups Christoph Hellwig
2019-08-21 14:58 ` [PATCH 1/6] riscv: refactor the IPI code Christoph Hellwig
2019-08-24 1:03 ` Atish Patra
2019-09-05 8:44 ` Paul Walmsley
2019-08-21 14:58 ` [PATCH 2/6] riscv: cleanup send_ipi_mask Christoph Hellwig
2019-08-24 0:11 ` Atish Patra
2019-08-26 11:28 ` hch
2019-08-27 18:45 ` Atish Patra [this message]
2019-09-05 8:46 ` Paul Walmsley
2019-08-21 14:58 ` [PATCH 3/6] riscv: optimize send_ipi_single Christoph Hellwig
2019-08-24 0:26 ` Atish Patra
2019-08-26 11:29 ` hch
2019-08-27 18:48 ` Atish Patra
2019-09-05 8:48 ` Paul Walmsley
2019-08-21 14:58 ` [PATCH 4/6] riscv: cleanup riscv_cpuid_to_hartid_mask Christoph Hellwig
2019-08-24 0:03 ` Atish Patra
2019-09-05 8:50 ` Paul Walmsley
2019-08-21 14:58 ` [PATCH 5/6] riscv: don't use the rdtime(h) pseudo-instructions Christoph Hellwig
2019-08-24 0:37 ` Atish Patra
2019-08-24 0:43 ` Atish Patra
2019-08-26 11:30 ` hch
2019-08-27 18:50 ` Atish Patra
2019-09-05 8:55 ` Paul Walmsley
2019-08-21 14:58 ` [PATCH 6/6] riscv: move the TLB flush logic out of line Christoph Hellwig
2019-08-24 0:03 ` Atish Patra
2019-09-05 8:58 ` Paul Walmsley
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=c59ea6fa44620fce82e38e1b611077aa7872d554.camel@wdc.com \
--to=atish.patra@wdc.com \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=palmer@sifive.com \
--cc=paul.walmsley@sifive.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).