linux-riscv.lists.infradead.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Zhangjin Wu <falcon@tinylab.org>
To: thomas@t-8ch.de, w@1wt.eu
Cc: falcon@tinylab.org, arnd@arndb.de, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v3 0/3] tools/nolibc: add a new syscall helper
Date: Wed,  7 Jun 2023 19:28:58 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <cover.1686135913.git.falcon@tinylab.org> (raw)

Willy, Thomas

This is the revision of the v2 syscall helpers [1], it is based on
20230606-nolibc-rv32+stkp7a of [2]. It doesn't conflict with the v4 of
-ENOSYS patchset [3], so, it is ok to simply merge both of them.

This revision mainly applied Thomas' method, removed the __syscall()
helper and replaced it with __sysret() instead, because __syscall()
looks like _syscall() and syscall(), it may mixlead the developers.

Changes from v2 -> v3:

* tools/nolibc: sys.h: add a syscall return helper

  * The __syscall() is removed.

  * Align the code style of __sysret() with the others, and use
    __inline__ instead of inline (like stdlib.h) to let it work with
    the default -std=c89 in tools/testing/selftests/nolibc/Makefile

* tools/nolibc: unistd.h: apply __sysret() helper

  As v2.

* tools/nolibc: sys.h: apply __sysret() helper

  replaced __syscall() with __sysret() and merged two separated patches of v2 to one.

Did run-user tests for rv32 (with [3]), rv64 and arm64.

BTW, two questions for Thomas,

* This commit 659a49abc9c2 ("tools/nolibc: validate C89 compatibility")
  enables -std=c89, why not gnu11 used by kernel ? ;-)

* Do we need to tune the order of the macros in unistd.h like this:

    #define _syscall(N, ...) __sysret(my_syscall##N(__VA_ARGS__))
    #define _syscall_n(N, ...) _syscall(N, __VA_ARGS__)
    #define __syscall_narg(_0, _1, _2, _3, _4, _5, _6, N, ...) N
    #define _sycall_narg(...) __syscall_narg(__VA_ARGS__, 6, 5, 4, 3, 2, 1, 0)
    #define syscall(...) _syscall_n(_sycall_narg(__VA_ARGS__), ##__VA_ARGS__)

  Before, It works but seems not put in using order:

    #define _syscall(N, ...) __sysret(my_syscall##N(__VA_ARGS__))
    #define _sycall_narg(...) __syscall_narg(__VA_ARGS__, 6, 5, 4, 3, 2, 1, 0)
    #define __syscall_narg(_0, _1, _2, _3, _4, _5, _6, N, ...) N
    #define _syscall_n(N, ...) _syscall(N, __VA_ARGS__)
    #define syscall(...) _syscall_n(_sycall_narg(__VA_ARGS__), ##__VA_ARGS__)

Thanks.

Best regards,
Zhangjin

---
[1]: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-riscv/cover.1686036862.git.falcon@tinylab.org/
[2]: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/wtarreau/nolibc.git
[3]: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-riscv/cover.1686128703.git.falcon@tinylab.org/T/#t

Zhangjin Wu (3):
  tools/nolibc: sys.h: add a syscall return helper
  tools/nolibc: unistd.h: apply __sysret() helper
  tools/nolibc: sys.h: apply __sysret() helper

 tools/include/nolibc/sys.h    | 364 +++++-----------------------------
 tools/include/nolibc/unistd.h |  11 +-
 2 files changed, 55 insertions(+), 320 deletions(-)

-- 
2.25.1


_______________________________________________
linux-riscv mailing list
linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-riscv

             reply	other threads:[~2023-06-07 11:29 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-06-07 11:28 Zhangjin Wu [this message]
2023-06-07 11:30 ` [PATCH v3 1/3] tools/nolibc: sys.h: add a syscall return helper Zhangjin Wu
2023-06-07 11:31 ` [PATCH v3 2/3] tools/nolibc: unistd.h: apply __sysret() helper Zhangjin Wu
2023-06-07 11:32 ` [PATCH v3 3/3] tools/nolibc: sys.h: " Zhangjin Wu
2023-06-07 21:41 ` [PATCH v3 0/3] tools/nolibc: add a new syscall helper Thomas Weißschuh
2023-06-08 10:10   ` Zhangjin Wu

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=cover.1686135913.git.falcon@tinylab.org \
    --to=falcon@tinylab.org \
    --cc=arnd@arndb.de \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=thomas@t-8ch.de \
    --cc=w@1wt.eu \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).