linux-riscv.lists.infradead.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [PATCH V2] mm: Introduce GFP_PGTABLE
@ 2019-01-16  6:21 Anshuman Khandual
  2019-01-16  6:55 ` Mike Rapoport
                   ` (2 more replies)
  0 siblings, 3 replies; 17+ messages in thread
From: Anshuman Khandual @ 2019-01-16  6:21 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-mm, akpm, linux-kernel, linuxppc-dev, linux-arm-kernel,
	linux-sh, kvmarm, linux-riscv
  Cc: mark.rutland, mhocko, peterz, catalin.marinas, dave.hansen,
	will.deacon, aneesh.kumar, linux, mingo, rientjes, palmer,
	greentime, marc.zyngier, rppt, shakeelb, kirill, tglx, vbabka,
	ard.biesheuvel, steve.capper, christoffer.dall, james.morse, mpe,
	robin.murphy

All architectures have been defining their own PGALLOC_GFP as (GFP_KERNEL |
__GFP_ZERO) and using it for allocating page table pages. This causes some
code duplication which can be easily avoided. GFP_KERNEL allocated and
cleared out pages (__GFP_ZERO) are required for page tables on any given
architecture. This creates a new generic GFP flag flag which can be used
for any page table page allocation. Does not cause any functional change.

GFP_PGTABLE is being added into include/asm-generic/pgtable.h which is the
generic page tabe header just to prevent it's potential misuse as a general
allocation flag if included in include/linux/gfp.h.

Signed-off-by: Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@arm.com>
---
Build tested on arm, arm64, powerpc, powerpc64le and x86.
Boot tested on arm64 and x86.

Changes in V2:

- Moved GFP_PGTABLE into include/asm-generic/pgtable.h
- On X86 added __GFP_ACCOUNT into GFP_PGTABLE at various places
- Replaced possible flags on riscv and nds32 with GFP_PGTABLE

Original V1: https://lkml.org/lkml/2019/1/12/54 

 arch/arm/include/asm/pgalloc.h               |  8 +++-----
 arch/arm/mm/mmu.c                            |  2 +-
 arch/arm64/include/asm/pgalloc.h             |  9 ++++-----
 arch/arm64/mm/mmu.c                          |  2 +-
 arch/arm64/mm/pgd.c                          |  4 ++--
 arch/nds32/include/asm/pgalloc.h             |  3 +--
 arch/powerpc/include/asm/book3s/64/pgalloc.h |  6 +++---
 arch/powerpc/include/asm/pgalloc.h           |  2 --
 arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_64_mmu_hv.c          |  2 +-
 arch/powerpc/mm/pgtable-frag.c               |  4 ++--
 arch/riscv/include/asm/pgalloc.h             |  8 +++-----
 arch/sh/mm/pgtable.c                         |  6 ++----
 arch/unicore32/include/asm/pgalloc.h         |  6 ++----
 arch/x86/kernel/espfix_64.c                  |  6 ++----
 arch/x86/mm/pgtable.c                        | 15 +++++++--------
 include/asm-generic/pgtable.h                |  2 ++
 virt/kvm/arm/mmu.c                           |  2 +-
 17 files changed, 37 insertions(+), 50 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/arm/include/asm/pgalloc.h b/arch/arm/include/asm/pgalloc.h
index 17ab72f..72be6f5 100644
--- a/arch/arm/include/asm/pgalloc.h
+++ b/arch/arm/include/asm/pgalloc.h
@@ -57,8 +57,6 @@ static inline void pud_populate(struct mm_struct *mm, pud_t *pud, pmd_t *pmd)
 extern pgd_t *pgd_alloc(struct mm_struct *mm);
 extern void pgd_free(struct mm_struct *mm, pgd_t *pgd);
 
-#define PGALLOC_GFP	(GFP_KERNEL | __GFP_ZERO)
-
 static inline void clean_pte_table(pte_t *pte)
 {
 	clean_dcache_area(pte + PTE_HWTABLE_PTRS, PTE_HWTABLE_SIZE);
@@ -85,7 +83,7 @@ pte_alloc_one_kernel(struct mm_struct *mm)
 {
 	pte_t *pte;
 
-	pte = (pte_t *)__get_free_page(PGALLOC_GFP);
+	pte = (pte_t *)__get_free_page(GFP_PGTABLE);
 	if (pte)
 		clean_pte_table(pte);
 
@@ -98,9 +96,9 @@ pte_alloc_one(struct mm_struct *mm)
 	struct page *pte;
 
 #ifdef CONFIG_HIGHPTE
-	pte = alloc_pages(PGALLOC_GFP | __GFP_HIGHMEM, 0);
+	pte = alloc_pages(GFP_PGTABLE | __GFP_HIGHMEM, 0);
 #else
-	pte = alloc_pages(PGALLOC_GFP, 0);
+	pte = alloc_pages(GFP_PGTABLE, 0);
 #endif
 	if (!pte)
 		return NULL;
diff --git a/arch/arm/mm/mmu.c b/arch/arm/mm/mmu.c
index f5cc1cc..6d47784 100644
--- a/arch/arm/mm/mmu.c
+++ b/arch/arm/mm/mmu.c
@@ -733,7 +733,7 @@ static void __init *early_alloc(unsigned long sz)
 
 static void *__init late_alloc(unsigned long sz)
 {
-	void *ptr = (void *)__get_free_pages(PGALLOC_GFP, get_order(sz));
+	void *ptr = (void *)__get_free_pages(GFP_PGTABLE, get_order(sz));
 
 	if (!ptr || !pgtable_page_ctor(virt_to_page(ptr)))
 		BUG();
diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/pgalloc.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/pgalloc.h
index 52fa47c..d5c75bf 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/pgalloc.h
+++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/pgalloc.h
@@ -26,14 +26,13 @@
 
 #define check_pgt_cache()		do { } while (0)
 
-#define PGALLOC_GFP	(GFP_KERNEL | __GFP_ZERO)
 #define PGD_SIZE	(PTRS_PER_PGD * sizeof(pgd_t))
 
 #if CONFIG_PGTABLE_LEVELS > 2
 
 static inline pmd_t *pmd_alloc_one(struct mm_struct *mm, unsigned long addr)
 {
-	return (pmd_t *)__get_free_page(PGALLOC_GFP);
+	return (pmd_t *)__get_free_page(GFP_PGTABLE);
 }
 
 static inline void pmd_free(struct mm_struct *mm, pmd_t *pmdp)
@@ -62,7 +61,7 @@ static inline void __pud_populate(pud_t *pudp, phys_addr_t pmdp, pudval_t prot)
 
 static inline pud_t *pud_alloc_one(struct mm_struct *mm, unsigned long addr)
 {
-	return (pud_t *)__get_free_page(PGALLOC_GFP);
+	return (pud_t *)__get_free_page(GFP_PGTABLE);
 }
 
 static inline void pud_free(struct mm_struct *mm, pud_t *pudp)
@@ -93,7 +92,7 @@ extern void pgd_free(struct mm_struct *mm, pgd_t *pgdp);
 static inline pte_t *
 pte_alloc_one_kernel(struct mm_struct *mm)
 {
-	return (pte_t *)__get_free_page(PGALLOC_GFP);
+	return (pte_t *)__get_free_page(GFP_PGTABLE);
 }
 
 static inline pgtable_t
@@ -101,7 +100,7 @@ pte_alloc_one(struct mm_struct *mm)
 {
 	struct page *pte;
 
-	pte = alloc_pages(PGALLOC_GFP, 0);
+	pte = alloc_pages(GFP_PGTABLE, 0);
 	if (!pte)
 		return NULL;
 	if (!pgtable_page_ctor(pte)) {
diff --git a/arch/arm64/mm/mmu.c b/arch/arm64/mm/mmu.c
index b6f5aa5..07b1c0f 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/mm/mmu.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/mm/mmu.c
@@ -372,7 +372,7 @@ static void __create_pgd_mapping(pgd_t *pgdir, phys_addr_t phys,
 
 static phys_addr_t pgd_pgtable_alloc(void)
 {
-	void *ptr = (void *)__get_free_page(PGALLOC_GFP);
+	void *ptr = (void *)__get_free_page(GFP_PGTABLE);
 	if (!ptr || !pgtable_page_ctor(virt_to_page(ptr)))
 		BUG();
 
diff --git a/arch/arm64/mm/pgd.c b/arch/arm64/mm/pgd.c
index 289f911..5b28e2b 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/mm/pgd.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/mm/pgd.c
@@ -31,9 +31,9 @@ static struct kmem_cache *pgd_cache __ro_after_init;
 pgd_t *pgd_alloc(struct mm_struct *mm)
 {
 	if (PGD_SIZE == PAGE_SIZE)
-		return (pgd_t *)__get_free_page(PGALLOC_GFP);
+		return (pgd_t *)__get_free_page(GFP_PGTABLE);
 	else
-		return kmem_cache_alloc(pgd_cache, PGALLOC_GFP);
+		return kmem_cache_alloc(pgd_cache, GFP_PGTABLE);
 }
 
 void pgd_free(struct mm_struct *mm, pgd_t *pgd)
diff --git a/arch/nds32/include/asm/pgalloc.h b/arch/nds32/include/asm/pgalloc.h
index 3c5fee5..e1137ce 100644
--- a/arch/nds32/include/asm/pgalloc.h
+++ b/arch/nds32/include/asm/pgalloc.h
@@ -27,8 +27,7 @@ static inline pte_t *pte_alloc_one_kernel(struct mm_struct *mm)
 	pte_t *pte;
 
 	pte =
-	    (pte_t *) __get_free_page(GFP_KERNEL | __GFP_RETRY_MAYFAIL |
-				      __GFP_ZERO);
+	    (pte_t *) __get_free_page(GFP_PGTABLE | __GFP_RETRY_MAYFAIL);
 
 	return pte;
 }
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/book3s/64/pgalloc.h b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/book3s/64/pgalloc.h
index 9c11732..71704e5 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/book3s/64/pgalloc.h
+++ b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/book3s/64/pgalloc.h
@@ -52,11 +52,11 @@ void pte_frag_destroy(void *pte_frag);
 static inline pgd_t *radix__pgd_alloc(struct mm_struct *mm)
 {
 #ifdef CONFIG_PPC_64K_PAGES
-	return (pgd_t *)__get_free_page(pgtable_gfp_flags(mm, PGALLOC_GFP));
+	return (pgd_t *)__get_free_page(pgtable_gfp_flags(mm, GFP_PGTABLE));
 #else
 	struct page *page;
-	page = alloc_pages(pgtable_gfp_flags(mm, PGALLOC_GFP | __GFP_RETRY_MAYFAIL),
-				4);
+	page = alloc_pages(pgtable_gfp_flags(mm, GFP_PGTABLE |
+				__GFP_RETRY_MAYFAIL), 4);
 	if (!page)
 		return NULL;
 	return (pgd_t *) page_address(page);
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/pgalloc.h b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/pgalloc.h
index e11f030..3b11e8b 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/pgalloc.h
+++ b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/pgalloc.h
@@ -18,8 +18,6 @@ static inline gfp_t pgtable_gfp_flags(struct mm_struct *mm, gfp_t gfp)
 }
 #endif /* MODULE */
 
-#define PGALLOC_GFP (GFP_KERNEL | __GFP_ZERO)
-
 #ifdef CONFIG_PPC_BOOK3S
 #include <asm/book3s/pgalloc.h>
 #else
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_64_mmu_hv.c b/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_64_mmu_hv.c
index bd2dcfb..b419878 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_64_mmu_hv.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_64_mmu_hv.c
@@ -97,7 +97,7 @@ int kvmppc_allocate_hpt(struct kvm_hpt_info *info, u32 order)
 	}
 
 	if (!hpt)
-		hpt = __get_free_pages(GFP_KERNEL|__GFP_ZERO|__GFP_RETRY_MAYFAIL
+		hpt = __get_free_pages(GFP_PGTABLE | __GFP_RETRY_MAYFAIL
 				       |__GFP_NOWARN, order - PAGE_SHIFT);
 
 	if (!hpt)
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/mm/pgtable-frag.c b/arch/powerpc/mm/pgtable-frag.c
index a7b0521..211aaa7 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/mm/pgtable-frag.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/mm/pgtable-frag.c
@@ -58,7 +58,7 @@ static pte_t *__alloc_for_ptecache(struct mm_struct *mm, int kernel)
 	struct page *page;
 
 	if (!kernel) {
-		page = alloc_page(PGALLOC_GFP | __GFP_ACCOUNT);
+		page = alloc_page(GFP_PGTABLE | __GFP_ACCOUNT);
 		if (!page)
 			return NULL;
 		if (!pgtable_page_ctor(page)) {
@@ -66,7 +66,7 @@ static pte_t *__alloc_for_ptecache(struct mm_struct *mm, int kernel)
 			return NULL;
 		}
 	} else {
-		page = alloc_page(PGALLOC_GFP);
+		page = alloc_page(GFP_PGTABLE);
 		if (!page)
 			return NULL;
 	}
diff --git a/arch/riscv/include/asm/pgalloc.h b/arch/riscv/include/asm/pgalloc.h
index 94043cf..7ff1cd7 100644
--- a/arch/riscv/include/asm/pgalloc.h
+++ b/arch/riscv/include/asm/pgalloc.h
@@ -69,8 +69,7 @@ static inline void pgd_free(struct mm_struct *mm, pgd_t *pgd)
 
 static inline pmd_t *pmd_alloc_one(struct mm_struct *mm, unsigned long addr)
 {
-	return (pmd_t *)__get_free_page(
-		GFP_KERNEL | __GFP_RETRY_MAYFAIL | __GFP_ZERO);
+	return (pmd_t *)__get_free_page(GFP_PGTABLE | __GFP_RETRY_MAYFAIL);
 }
 
 static inline void pmd_free(struct mm_struct *mm, pmd_t *pmd)
@@ -84,15 +83,14 @@ static inline void pmd_free(struct mm_struct *mm, pmd_t *pmd)
 
 static inline pte_t *pte_alloc_one_kernel(struct mm_struct *mm)
 {
-	return (pte_t *)__get_free_page(
-		GFP_KERNEL | __GFP_RETRY_MAYFAIL | __GFP_ZERO);
+	return (pte_t *)__get_free_page(GFP_PGTABLE | __GFP_RETRY_MAYFAIL);
 }
 
 static inline struct page *pte_alloc_one(struct mm_struct *mm)
 {
 	struct page *pte;
 
-	pte = alloc_page(GFP_KERNEL | __GFP_RETRY_MAYFAIL | __GFP_ZERO);
+	pte = alloc_page(GFP_PGTABLE | __GFP_RETRY_MAYFAIL);
 	if (likely(pte != NULL))
 		pgtable_page_ctor(pte);
 	return pte;
diff --git a/arch/sh/mm/pgtable.c b/arch/sh/mm/pgtable.c
index 5c8f924..324732dc5 100644
--- a/arch/sh/mm/pgtable.c
+++ b/arch/sh/mm/pgtable.c
@@ -2,8 +2,6 @@
 #include <linux/mm.h>
 #include <linux/slab.h>
 
-#define PGALLOC_GFP GFP_KERNEL | __GFP_ZERO
-
 static struct kmem_cache *pgd_cachep;
 #if PAGETABLE_LEVELS > 2
 static struct kmem_cache *pmd_cachep;
@@ -32,7 +30,7 @@ void pgtable_cache_init(void)
 
 pgd_t *pgd_alloc(struct mm_struct *mm)
 {
-	return kmem_cache_alloc(pgd_cachep, PGALLOC_GFP);
+	return kmem_cache_alloc(pgd_cachep, GFP_PGTABLE);
 }
 
 void pgd_free(struct mm_struct *mm, pgd_t *pgd)
@@ -48,7 +46,7 @@ void pud_populate(struct mm_struct *mm, pud_t *pud, pmd_t *pmd)
 
 pmd_t *pmd_alloc_one(struct mm_struct *mm, unsigned long address)
 {
-	return kmem_cache_alloc(pmd_cachep, PGALLOC_GFP);
+	return kmem_cache_alloc(pmd_cachep, GFP_PGTABLE);
 }
 
 void pmd_free(struct mm_struct *mm, pmd_t *pmd)
diff --git a/arch/unicore32/include/asm/pgalloc.h b/arch/unicore32/include/asm/pgalloc.h
index 7cceabe..a3506e5 100644
--- a/arch/unicore32/include/asm/pgalloc.h
+++ b/arch/unicore32/include/asm/pgalloc.h
@@ -28,8 +28,6 @@ extern void free_pgd_slow(struct mm_struct *mm, pgd_t *pgd);
 #define pgd_alloc(mm)			get_pgd_slow(mm)
 #define pgd_free(mm, pgd)		free_pgd_slow(mm, pgd)
 
-#define PGALLOC_GFP	(GFP_KERNEL | __GFP_ZERO)
-
 /*
  * Allocate one PTE table.
  */
@@ -38,7 +36,7 @@ pte_alloc_one_kernel(struct mm_struct *mm)
 {
 	pte_t *pte;
 
-	pte = (pte_t *)__get_free_page(PGALLOC_GFP);
+	pte = (pte_t *)__get_free_page(GFP_PGTABLE);
 	if (pte)
 		clean_dcache_area(pte, PTRS_PER_PTE * sizeof(pte_t));
 
@@ -50,7 +48,7 @@ pte_alloc_one(struct mm_struct *mm)
 {
 	struct page *pte;
 
-	pte = alloc_pages(PGALLOC_GFP, 0);
+	pte = alloc_pages(GFP_PGTABLE, 0);
 	if (!pte)
 		return NULL;
 	if (!PageHighMem(pte)) {
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/espfix_64.c b/arch/x86/kernel/espfix_64.c
index aebd0d5..dae28cc 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/espfix_64.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/espfix_64.c
@@ -57,8 +57,6 @@
 # error "Need more virtual address space for the ESPFIX hack"
 #endif
 
-#define PGALLOC_GFP (GFP_KERNEL | __GFP_ZERO)
-
 /* This contains the *bottom* address of the espfix stack */
 DEFINE_PER_CPU_READ_MOSTLY(unsigned long, espfix_stack);
 DEFINE_PER_CPU_READ_MOSTLY(unsigned long, espfix_waddr);
@@ -172,7 +170,7 @@ void init_espfix_ap(int cpu)
 	pud_p = &espfix_pud_page[pud_index(addr)];
 	pud = *pud_p;
 	if (!pud_present(pud)) {
-		struct page *page = alloc_pages_node(node, PGALLOC_GFP, 0);
+		struct page *page = alloc_pages_node(node, GFP_PGTABLE, 0);
 
 		pmd_p = (pmd_t *)page_address(page);
 		pud = __pud(__pa(pmd_p) | (PGTABLE_PROT & ptemask));
@@ -184,7 +182,7 @@ void init_espfix_ap(int cpu)
 	pmd_p = pmd_offset(&pud, addr);
 	pmd = *pmd_p;
 	if (!pmd_present(pmd)) {
-		struct page *page = alloc_pages_node(node, PGALLOC_GFP, 0);
+		struct page *page = alloc_pages_node(node, GFP_PGTABLE, 0);
 
 		pte_p = (pte_t *)page_address(page);
 		pmd = __pmd(__pa(pte_p) | (PGTABLE_PROT & ptemask));
diff --git a/arch/x86/mm/pgtable.c b/arch/x86/mm/pgtable.c
index 7bd0170..a5b1672 100644
--- a/arch/x86/mm/pgtable.c
+++ b/arch/x86/mm/pgtable.c
@@ -13,19 +13,17 @@ phys_addr_t physical_mask __ro_after_init = (1ULL << __PHYSICAL_MASK_SHIFT) - 1;
 EXPORT_SYMBOL(physical_mask);
 #endif
 
-#define PGALLOC_GFP (GFP_KERNEL_ACCOUNT | __GFP_ZERO)
-
 #ifdef CONFIG_HIGHPTE
 #define PGALLOC_USER_GFP __GFP_HIGHMEM
 #else
 #define PGALLOC_USER_GFP 0
 #endif
 
-gfp_t __userpte_alloc_gfp = PGALLOC_GFP | PGALLOC_USER_GFP;
+gfp_t __userpte_alloc_gfp = GFP_PGTABLE | __GFP_ACCOUNT | PGALLOC_USER_GFP;
 
 pte_t *pte_alloc_one_kernel(struct mm_struct *mm)
 {
-	return (pte_t *)__get_free_page(PGALLOC_GFP & ~__GFP_ACCOUNT);
+	return (pte_t *)__get_free_page(GFP_PGTABLE);
 }
 
 pgtable_t pte_alloc_one(struct mm_struct *mm)
@@ -235,7 +233,7 @@ static int preallocate_pmds(struct mm_struct *mm, pmd_t *pmds[], int count)
 {
 	int i;
 	bool failed = false;
-	gfp_t gfp = PGALLOC_GFP;
+	gfp_t gfp = GFP_PGTABLE | __GFP_ACCOUNT;
 
 	if (mm == &init_mm)
 		gfp &= ~__GFP_ACCOUNT;
@@ -401,14 +399,14 @@ static inline pgd_t *_pgd_alloc(void)
 	 * We allocate one page for pgd.
 	 */
 	if (!SHARED_KERNEL_PMD)
-		return (pgd_t *)__get_free_pages(PGALLOC_GFP,
+		return (pgd_t *)__get_free_pages(GFP_PGTABLE | __GFP_ACCOUNT,
 						 PGD_ALLOCATION_ORDER);
 
 	/*
 	 * Now PAE kernel is not running as a Xen domain. We can allocate
 	 * a 32-byte slab for pgd to save memory space.
 	 */
-	return kmem_cache_alloc(pgd_cache, PGALLOC_GFP);
+	return kmem_cache_alloc(pgd_cache, GFP_PGTABLE | __GFP_ACCOUNT);
 }
 
 static inline void _pgd_free(pgd_t *pgd)
@@ -422,7 +420,8 @@ static inline void _pgd_free(pgd_t *pgd)
 
 static inline pgd_t *_pgd_alloc(void)
 {
-	return (pgd_t *)__get_free_pages(PGALLOC_GFP, PGD_ALLOCATION_ORDER);
+	return (pgd_t *)__get_free_pages(GFP_PGTABLE | __GFP_ACCOUNT,
+						PGD_ALLOCATION_ORDER);
 }
 
 static inline void _pgd_free(pgd_t *pgd)
diff --git a/include/asm-generic/pgtable.h b/include/asm-generic/pgtable.h
index 05e61e6..3d9cde6 100644
--- a/include/asm-generic/pgtable.h
+++ b/include/asm-generic/pgtable.h
@@ -1186,4 +1186,6 @@ static inline bool arch_has_pfn_modify_check(void)
 #define mm_pmd_folded(mm)	__is_defined(__PAGETABLE_PMD_FOLDED)
 #endif
 
+#define GFP_PGTABLE	(GFP_KERNEL | __GFP_ZERO)
+
 #endif /* _ASM_GENERIC_PGTABLE_H */
diff --git a/virt/kvm/arm/mmu.c b/virt/kvm/arm/mmu.c
index fbdf3ac..f60a5b8 100644
--- a/virt/kvm/arm/mmu.c
+++ b/virt/kvm/arm/mmu.c
@@ -143,7 +143,7 @@ static int mmu_topup_memory_cache(struct kvm_mmu_memory_cache *cache,
 	if (cache->nobjs >= min)
 		return 0;
 	while (cache->nobjs < max) {
-		page = (void *)__get_free_page(PGALLOC_GFP);
+		page = (void *)__get_free_page(GFP_PGTABLE);
 		if (!page)
 			return -ENOMEM;
 		cache->objects[cache->nobjs++] = page;
-- 
2.7.4


_______________________________________________
linux-riscv mailing list
linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-riscv

^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH V2] mm: Introduce GFP_PGTABLE
  2019-01-16  6:21 [PATCH V2] mm: Introduce GFP_PGTABLE Anshuman Khandual
@ 2019-01-16  6:55 ` Mike Rapoport
  2019-01-16 12:53   ` Anshuman Khandual
  2019-01-16  6:57 ` Michal Hocko
  2019-01-16  7:10 ` Christophe Leroy
  2 siblings, 1 reply; 17+ messages in thread
From: Mike Rapoport @ 2019-01-16  6:55 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Anshuman Khandual
  Cc: mark.rutland, mhocko, linux-sh, peterz, catalin.marinas,
	dave.hansen, will.deacon, linux-kernel, linux-mm, linux-riscv,
	kvmarm, mpe, linux, mingo, vbabka, rientjes, palmer, greentime,
	marc.zyngier, rppt, shakeelb, kirill, tglx, linux-arm-kernel,
	ard.biesheuvel, robin.murphy, steve.capper, christoffer.dall,
	james.morse, aneesh.kumar, akpm, linuxppc-dev

On Wed, Jan 16, 2019 at 11:51:32AM +0530, Anshuman Khandual wrote:
> All architectures have been defining their own PGALLOC_GFP as (GFP_KERNEL |
> __GFP_ZERO) and using it for allocating page table pages. This causes some
> code duplication which can be easily avoided. GFP_KERNEL allocated and
> cleared out pages (__GFP_ZERO) are required for page tables on any given
> architecture. This creates a new generic GFP flag flag which can be used
> for any page table page allocation. Does not cause any functional change.
> 
> GFP_PGTABLE is being added into include/asm-generic/pgtable.h which is the
> generic page tabe header just to prevent it's potential misuse as a general
> allocation flag if included in include/linux/gfp.h.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@arm.com>
> ---
> Build tested on arm, arm64, powerpc, powerpc64le and x86.
> Boot tested on arm64 and x86.
> 
> Changes in V2:
> 
> - Moved GFP_PGTABLE into include/asm-generic/pgtable.h
> - On X86 added __GFP_ACCOUNT into GFP_PGTABLE at various places
> - Replaced possible flags on riscv and nds32 with GFP_PGTABLE
> 
> Original V1: https://lkml.org/lkml/2019/1/12/54 
> 
>  arch/arm/include/asm/pgalloc.h               |  8 +++-----
>  arch/arm/mm/mmu.c                            |  2 +-
>  arch/arm64/include/asm/pgalloc.h             |  9 ++++-----
>  arch/arm64/mm/mmu.c                          |  2 +-
>  arch/arm64/mm/pgd.c                          |  4 ++--
>  arch/nds32/include/asm/pgalloc.h             |  3 +--
>  arch/powerpc/include/asm/book3s/64/pgalloc.h |  6 +++---
>  arch/powerpc/include/asm/pgalloc.h           |  2 --
>  arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_64_mmu_hv.c          |  2 +-
>  arch/powerpc/mm/pgtable-frag.c               |  4 ++--
>  arch/riscv/include/asm/pgalloc.h             |  8 +++-----
>  arch/sh/mm/pgtable.c                         |  6 ++----
>  arch/unicore32/include/asm/pgalloc.h         |  6 ++----
>  arch/x86/kernel/espfix_64.c                  |  6 ++----
>  arch/x86/mm/pgtable.c                        | 15 +++++++--------
>  include/asm-generic/pgtable.h                |  2 ++
>  virt/kvm/arm/mmu.c                           |  2 +-
>  17 files changed, 37 insertions(+), 50 deletions(-)

I wonder, what about the other arches? Do they use different GFP flags?
 
> diff --git a/arch/arm/include/asm/pgalloc.h b/arch/arm/include/asm/pgalloc.h
> index 17ab72f..72be6f5 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/include/asm/pgalloc.h
> +++ b/arch/arm/include/asm/pgalloc.h
> @@ -57,8 +57,6 @@ static inline void pud_populate(struct mm_struct *mm, pud_t *pud, pmd_t *pmd)
>  extern pgd_t *pgd_alloc(struct mm_struct *mm);
>  extern void pgd_free(struct mm_struct *mm, pgd_t *pgd);
> 
> -#define PGALLOC_GFP	(GFP_KERNEL | __GFP_ZERO)
> -
>  static inline void clean_pte_table(pte_t *pte)
>  {
>  	clean_dcache_area(pte + PTE_HWTABLE_PTRS, PTE_HWTABLE_SIZE);
> @@ -85,7 +83,7 @@ pte_alloc_one_kernel(struct mm_struct *mm)
>  {
>  	pte_t *pte;
> 
> -	pte = (pte_t *)__get_free_page(PGALLOC_GFP);
> +	pte = (pte_t *)__get_free_page(GFP_PGTABLE);
>  	if (pte)
>  		clean_pte_table(pte);
> 
> @@ -98,9 +96,9 @@ pte_alloc_one(struct mm_struct *mm)
>  	struct page *pte;
> 
>  #ifdef CONFIG_HIGHPTE
> -	pte = alloc_pages(PGALLOC_GFP | __GFP_HIGHMEM, 0);
> +	pte = alloc_pages(GFP_PGTABLE | __GFP_HIGHMEM, 0);
>  #else
> -	pte = alloc_pages(PGALLOC_GFP, 0);
> +	pte = alloc_pages(GFP_PGTABLE, 0);
>  #endif
>  	if (!pte)
>  		return NULL;
> diff --git a/arch/arm/mm/mmu.c b/arch/arm/mm/mmu.c
> index f5cc1cc..6d47784 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/mm/mmu.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/mm/mmu.c
> @@ -733,7 +733,7 @@ static void __init *early_alloc(unsigned long sz)
> 
>  static void *__init late_alloc(unsigned long sz)
>  {
> -	void *ptr = (void *)__get_free_pages(PGALLOC_GFP, get_order(sz));
> +	void *ptr = (void *)__get_free_pages(GFP_PGTABLE, get_order(sz));
> 
>  	if (!ptr || !pgtable_page_ctor(virt_to_page(ptr)))
>  		BUG();
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/pgalloc.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/pgalloc.h
> index 52fa47c..d5c75bf 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/pgalloc.h
> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/pgalloc.h
> @@ -26,14 +26,13 @@
> 
>  #define check_pgt_cache()		do { } while (0)
> 
> -#define PGALLOC_GFP	(GFP_KERNEL | __GFP_ZERO)
>  #define PGD_SIZE	(PTRS_PER_PGD * sizeof(pgd_t))
> 
>  #if CONFIG_PGTABLE_LEVELS > 2
> 
>  static inline pmd_t *pmd_alloc_one(struct mm_struct *mm, unsigned long addr)
>  {
> -	return (pmd_t *)__get_free_page(PGALLOC_GFP);
> +	return (pmd_t *)__get_free_page(GFP_PGTABLE);
>  }
> 
>  static inline void pmd_free(struct mm_struct *mm, pmd_t *pmdp)
> @@ -62,7 +61,7 @@ static inline void __pud_populate(pud_t *pudp, phys_addr_t pmdp, pudval_t prot)
> 
>  static inline pud_t *pud_alloc_one(struct mm_struct *mm, unsigned long addr)
>  {
> -	return (pud_t *)__get_free_page(PGALLOC_GFP);
> +	return (pud_t *)__get_free_page(GFP_PGTABLE);
>  }
> 
>  static inline void pud_free(struct mm_struct *mm, pud_t *pudp)
> @@ -93,7 +92,7 @@ extern void pgd_free(struct mm_struct *mm, pgd_t *pgdp);
>  static inline pte_t *
>  pte_alloc_one_kernel(struct mm_struct *mm)
>  {
> -	return (pte_t *)__get_free_page(PGALLOC_GFP);
> +	return (pte_t *)__get_free_page(GFP_PGTABLE);
>  }
> 
>  static inline pgtable_t
> @@ -101,7 +100,7 @@ pte_alloc_one(struct mm_struct *mm)
>  {
>  	struct page *pte;
> 
> -	pte = alloc_pages(PGALLOC_GFP, 0);
> +	pte = alloc_pages(GFP_PGTABLE, 0);
>  	if (!pte)
>  		return NULL;
>  	if (!pgtable_page_ctor(pte)) {
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/mm/mmu.c b/arch/arm64/mm/mmu.c
> index b6f5aa5..07b1c0f 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/mm/mmu.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/mm/mmu.c
> @@ -372,7 +372,7 @@ static void __create_pgd_mapping(pgd_t *pgdir, phys_addr_t phys,
> 
>  static phys_addr_t pgd_pgtable_alloc(void)
>  {
> -	void *ptr = (void *)__get_free_page(PGALLOC_GFP);
> +	void *ptr = (void *)__get_free_page(GFP_PGTABLE);
>  	if (!ptr || !pgtable_page_ctor(virt_to_page(ptr)))
>  		BUG();
> 
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/mm/pgd.c b/arch/arm64/mm/pgd.c
> index 289f911..5b28e2b 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/mm/pgd.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/mm/pgd.c
> @@ -31,9 +31,9 @@ static struct kmem_cache *pgd_cache __ro_after_init;
>  pgd_t *pgd_alloc(struct mm_struct *mm)
>  {
>  	if (PGD_SIZE == PAGE_SIZE)
> -		return (pgd_t *)__get_free_page(PGALLOC_GFP);
> +		return (pgd_t *)__get_free_page(GFP_PGTABLE);
>  	else
> -		return kmem_cache_alloc(pgd_cache, PGALLOC_GFP);
> +		return kmem_cache_alloc(pgd_cache, GFP_PGTABLE);
>  }
> 
>  void pgd_free(struct mm_struct *mm, pgd_t *pgd)
> diff --git a/arch/nds32/include/asm/pgalloc.h b/arch/nds32/include/asm/pgalloc.h
> index 3c5fee5..e1137ce 100644
> --- a/arch/nds32/include/asm/pgalloc.h
> +++ b/arch/nds32/include/asm/pgalloc.h
> @@ -27,8 +27,7 @@ static inline pte_t *pte_alloc_one_kernel(struct mm_struct *mm)
>  	pte_t *pte;
> 
>  	pte =
> -	    (pte_t *) __get_free_page(GFP_KERNEL | __GFP_RETRY_MAYFAIL |
> -				      __GFP_ZERO);
> +	    (pte_t *) __get_free_page(GFP_PGTABLE | __GFP_RETRY_MAYFAIL);
> 
>  	return pte;
>  }
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/book3s/64/pgalloc.h b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/book3s/64/pgalloc.h
> index 9c11732..71704e5 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/book3s/64/pgalloc.h
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/book3s/64/pgalloc.h
> @@ -52,11 +52,11 @@ void pte_frag_destroy(void *pte_frag);
>  static inline pgd_t *radix__pgd_alloc(struct mm_struct *mm)
>  {
>  #ifdef CONFIG_PPC_64K_PAGES
> -	return (pgd_t *)__get_free_page(pgtable_gfp_flags(mm, PGALLOC_GFP));
> +	return (pgd_t *)__get_free_page(pgtable_gfp_flags(mm, GFP_PGTABLE));
>  #else
>  	struct page *page;
> -	page = alloc_pages(pgtable_gfp_flags(mm, PGALLOC_GFP | __GFP_RETRY_MAYFAIL),
> -				4);
> +	page = alloc_pages(pgtable_gfp_flags(mm, GFP_PGTABLE |
> +				__GFP_RETRY_MAYFAIL), 4);
>  	if (!page)
>  		return NULL;
>  	return (pgd_t *) page_address(page);
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/pgalloc.h b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/pgalloc.h
> index e11f030..3b11e8b 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/pgalloc.h
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/pgalloc.h
> @@ -18,8 +18,6 @@ static inline gfp_t pgtable_gfp_flags(struct mm_struct *mm, gfp_t gfp)
>  }
>  #endif /* MODULE */
> 
> -#define PGALLOC_GFP (GFP_KERNEL | __GFP_ZERO)
> -
>  #ifdef CONFIG_PPC_BOOK3S
>  #include <asm/book3s/pgalloc.h>
>  #else
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_64_mmu_hv.c b/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_64_mmu_hv.c
> index bd2dcfb..b419878 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_64_mmu_hv.c
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_64_mmu_hv.c
> @@ -97,7 +97,7 @@ int kvmppc_allocate_hpt(struct kvm_hpt_info *info, u32 order)
>  	}
> 
>  	if (!hpt)
> -		hpt = __get_free_pages(GFP_KERNEL|__GFP_ZERO|__GFP_RETRY_MAYFAIL
> +		hpt = __get_free_pages(GFP_PGTABLE | __GFP_RETRY_MAYFAIL
>  				       |__GFP_NOWARN, order - PAGE_SHIFT);
> 
>  	if (!hpt)
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/mm/pgtable-frag.c b/arch/powerpc/mm/pgtable-frag.c
> index a7b0521..211aaa7 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/mm/pgtable-frag.c
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/mm/pgtable-frag.c
> @@ -58,7 +58,7 @@ static pte_t *__alloc_for_ptecache(struct mm_struct *mm, int kernel)
>  	struct page *page;
> 
>  	if (!kernel) {
> -		page = alloc_page(PGALLOC_GFP | __GFP_ACCOUNT);
> +		page = alloc_page(GFP_PGTABLE | __GFP_ACCOUNT);
>  		if (!page)
>  			return NULL;
>  		if (!pgtable_page_ctor(page)) {
> @@ -66,7 +66,7 @@ static pte_t *__alloc_for_ptecache(struct mm_struct *mm, int kernel)
>  			return NULL;
>  		}
>  	} else {
> -		page = alloc_page(PGALLOC_GFP);
> +		page = alloc_page(GFP_PGTABLE);
>  		if (!page)
>  			return NULL;
>  	}
> diff --git a/arch/riscv/include/asm/pgalloc.h b/arch/riscv/include/asm/pgalloc.h
> index 94043cf..7ff1cd7 100644
> --- a/arch/riscv/include/asm/pgalloc.h
> +++ b/arch/riscv/include/asm/pgalloc.h
> @@ -69,8 +69,7 @@ static inline void pgd_free(struct mm_struct *mm, pgd_t *pgd)
> 
>  static inline pmd_t *pmd_alloc_one(struct mm_struct *mm, unsigned long addr)
>  {
> -	return (pmd_t *)__get_free_page(
> -		GFP_KERNEL | __GFP_RETRY_MAYFAIL | __GFP_ZERO);
> +	return (pmd_t *)__get_free_page(GFP_PGTABLE | __GFP_RETRY_MAYFAIL);
>  }
> 
>  static inline void pmd_free(struct mm_struct *mm, pmd_t *pmd)
> @@ -84,15 +83,14 @@ static inline void pmd_free(struct mm_struct *mm, pmd_t *pmd)
> 
>  static inline pte_t *pte_alloc_one_kernel(struct mm_struct *mm)
>  {
> -	return (pte_t *)__get_free_page(
> -		GFP_KERNEL | __GFP_RETRY_MAYFAIL | __GFP_ZERO);
> +	return (pte_t *)__get_free_page(GFP_PGTABLE | __GFP_RETRY_MAYFAIL);
>  }
> 
>  static inline struct page *pte_alloc_one(struct mm_struct *mm)
>  {
>  	struct page *pte;
> 
> -	pte = alloc_page(GFP_KERNEL | __GFP_RETRY_MAYFAIL | __GFP_ZERO);
> +	pte = alloc_page(GFP_PGTABLE | __GFP_RETRY_MAYFAIL);
>  	if (likely(pte != NULL))
>  		pgtable_page_ctor(pte);
>  	return pte;
> diff --git a/arch/sh/mm/pgtable.c b/arch/sh/mm/pgtable.c
> index 5c8f924..324732dc5 100644
> --- a/arch/sh/mm/pgtable.c
> +++ b/arch/sh/mm/pgtable.c
> @@ -2,8 +2,6 @@
>  #include <linux/mm.h>
>  #include <linux/slab.h>
> 
> -#define PGALLOC_GFP GFP_KERNEL | __GFP_ZERO
> -
>  static struct kmem_cache *pgd_cachep;
>  #if PAGETABLE_LEVELS > 2
>  static struct kmem_cache *pmd_cachep;
> @@ -32,7 +30,7 @@ void pgtable_cache_init(void)
> 
>  pgd_t *pgd_alloc(struct mm_struct *mm)
>  {
> -	return kmem_cache_alloc(pgd_cachep, PGALLOC_GFP);
> +	return kmem_cache_alloc(pgd_cachep, GFP_PGTABLE);
>  }
> 
>  void pgd_free(struct mm_struct *mm, pgd_t *pgd)
> @@ -48,7 +46,7 @@ void pud_populate(struct mm_struct *mm, pud_t *pud, pmd_t *pmd)
> 
>  pmd_t *pmd_alloc_one(struct mm_struct *mm, unsigned long address)
>  {
> -	return kmem_cache_alloc(pmd_cachep, PGALLOC_GFP);
> +	return kmem_cache_alloc(pmd_cachep, GFP_PGTABLE);
>  }
> 
>  void pmd_free(struct mm_struct *mm, pmd_t *pmd)
> diff --git a/arch/unicore32/include/asm/pgalloc.h b/arch/unicore32/include/asm/pgalloc.h
> index 7cceabe..a3506e5 100644
> --- a/arch/unicore32/include/asm/pgalloc.h
> +++ b/arch/unicore32/include/asm/pgalloc.h
> @@ -28,8 +28,6 @@ extern void free_pgd_slow(struct mm_struct *mm, pgd_t *pgd);
>  #define pgd_alloc(mm)			get_pgd_slow(mm)
>  #define pgd_free(mm, pgd)		free_pgd_slow(mm, pgd)
> 
> -#define PGALLOC_GFP	(GFP_KERNEL | __GFP_ZERO)
> -
>  /*
>   * Allocate one PTE table.
>   */
> @@ -38,7 +36,7 @@ pte_alloc_one_kernel(struct mm_struct *mm)
>  {
>  	pte_t *pte;
> 
> -	pte = (pte_t *)__get_free_page(PGALLOC_GFP);
> +	pte = (pte_t *)__get_free_page(GFP_PGTABLE);
>  	if (pte)
>  		clean_dcache_area(pte, PTRS_PER_PTE * sizeof(pte_t));
> 
> @@ -50,7 +48,7 @@ pte_alloc_one(struct mm_struct *mm)
>  {
>  	struct page *pte;
> 
> -	pte = alloc_pages(PGALLOC_GFP, 0);
> +	pte = alloc_pages(GFP_PGTABLE, 0);
>  	if (!pte)
>  		return NULL;
>  	if (!PageHighMem(pte)) {
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/espfix_64.c b/arch/x86/kernel/espfix_64.c
> index aebd0d5..dae28cc 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/espfix_64.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/espfix_64.c
> @@ -57,8 +57,6 @@
>  # error "Need more virtual address space for the ESPFIX hack"
>  #endif
> 
> -#define PGALLOC_GFP (GFP_KERNEL | __GFP_ZERO)
> -
>  /* This contains the *bottom* address of the espfix stack */
>  DEFINE_PER_CPU_READ_MOSTLY(unsigned long, espfix_stack);
>  DEFINE_PER_CPU_READ_MOSTLY(unsigned long, espfix_waddr);
> @@ -172,7 +170,7 @@ void init_espfix_ap(int cpu)
>  	pud_p = &espfix_pud_page[pud_index(addr)];
>  	pud = *pud_p;
>  	if (!pud_present(pud)) {
> -		struct page *page = alloc_pages_node(node, PGALLOC_GFP, 0);
> +		struct page *page = alloc_pages_node(node, GFP_PGTABLE, 0);
> 
>  		pmd_p = (pmd_t *)page_address(page);
>  		pud = __pud(__pa(pmd_p) | (PGTABLE_PROT & ptemask));
> @@ -184,7 +182,7 @@ void init_espfix_ap(int cpu)
>  	pmd_p = pmd_offset(&pud, addr);
>  	pmd = *pmd_p;
>  	if (!pmd_present(pmd)) {
> -		struct page *page = alloc_pages_node(node, PGALLOC_GFP, 0);
> +		struct page *page = alloc_pages_node(node, GFP_PGTABLE, 0);
> 
>  		pte_p = (pte_t *)page_address(page);
>  		pmd = __pmd(__pa(pte_p) | (PGTABLE_PROT & ptemask));
> diff --git a/arch/x86/mm/pgtable.c b/arch/x86/mm/pgtable.c
> index 7bd0170..a5b1672 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/mm/pgtable.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/mm/pgtable.c
> @@ -13,19 +13,17 @@ phys_addr_t physical_mask __ro_after_init = (1ULL << __PHYSICAL_MASK_SHIFT) - 1;
>  EXPORT_SYMBOL(physical_mask);
>  #endif
> 
> -#define PGALLOC_GFP (GFP_KERNEL_ACCOUNT | __GFP_ZERO)
> -
>  #ifdef CONFIG_HIGHPTE
>  #define PGALLOC_USER_GFP __GFP_HIGHMEM
>  #else
>  #define PGALLOC_USER_GFP 0
>  #endif
> 
> -gfp_t __userpte_alloc_gfp = PGALLOC_GFP | PGALLOC_USER_GFP;
> +gfp_t __userpte_alloc_gfp = GFP_PGTABLE | __GFP_ACCOUNT | PGALLOC_USER_GFP;
> 
>  pte_t *pte_alloc_one_kernel(struct mm_struct *mm)
>  {
> -	return (pte_t *)__get_free_page(PGALLOC_GFP & ~__GFP_ACCOUNT);
> +	return (pte_t *)__get_free_page(GFP_PGTABLE);
>  }
> 
>  pgtable_t pte_alloc_one(struct mm_struct *mm)
> @@ -235,7 +233,7 @@ static int preallocate_pmds(struct mm_struct *mm, pmd_t *pmds[], int count)
>  {
>  	int i;
>  	bool failed = false;
> -	gfp_t gfp = PGALLOC_GFP;
> +	gfp_t gfp = GFP_PGTABLE | __GFP_ACCOUNT;
> 
>  	if (mm == &init_mm)
>  		gfp &= ~__GFP_ACCOUNT;
> @@ -401,14 +399,14 @@ static inline pgd_t *_pgd_alloc(void)
>  	 * We allocate one page for pgd.
>  	 */
>  	if (!SHARED_KERNEL_PMD)
> -		return (pgd_t *)__get_free_pages(PGALLOC_GFP,
> +		return (pgd_t *)__get_free_pages(GFP_PGTABLE | __GFP_ACCOUNT,
>  						 PGD_ALLOCATION_ORDER);
> 
>  	/*
>  	 * Now PAE kernel is not running as a Xen domain. We can allocate
>  	 * a 32-byte slab for pgd to save memory space.
>  	 */
> -	return kmem_cache_alloc(pgd_cache, PGALLOC_GFP);
> +	return kmem_cache_alloc(pgd_cache, GFP_PGTABLE | __GFP_ACCOUNT);
>  }
> 
>  static inline void _pgd_free(pgd_t *pgd)
> @@ -422,7 +420,8 @@ static inline void _pgd_free(pgd_t *pgd)
> 
>  static inline pgd_t *_pgd_alloc(void)
>  {
> -	return (pgd_t *)__get_free_pages(PGALLOC_GFP, PGD_ALLOCATION_ORDER);
> +	return (pgd_t *)__get_free_pages(GFP_PGTABLE | __GFP_ACCOUNT,
> +						PGD_ALLOCATION_ORDER);
>  }
> 
>  static inline void _pgd_free(pgd_t *pgd)
> diff --git a/include/asm-generic/pgtable.h b/include/asm-generic/pgtable.h
> index 05e61e6..3d9cde6 100644
> --- a/include/asm-generic/pgtable.h
> +++ b/include/asm-generic/pgtable.h
> @@ -1186,4 +1186,6 @@ static inline bool arch_has_pfn_modify_check(void)
>  #define mm_pmd_folded(mm)	__is_defined(__PAGETABLE_PMD_FOLDED)
>  #endif
> 
> +#define GFP_PGTABLE	(GFP_KERNEL | __GFP_ZERO)
> +
>  #endif /* _ASM_GENERIC_PGTABLE_H */
> diff --git a/virt/kvm/arm/mmu.c b/virt/kvm/arm/mmu.c
> index fbdf3ac..f60a5b8 100644
> --- a/virt/kvm/arm/mmu.c
> +++ b/virt/kvm/arm/mmu.c
> @@ -143,7 +143,7 @@ static int mmu_topup_memory_cache(struct kvm_mmu_memory_cache *cache,
>  	if (cache->nobjs >= min)
>  		return 0;
>  	while (cache->nobjs < max) {
> -		page = (void *)__get_free_page(PGALLOC_GFP);
> +		page = (void *)__get_free_page(GFP_PGTABLE);
>  		if (!page)
>  			return -ENOMEM;
>  		cache->objects[cache->nobjs++] = page;
> -- 
> 2.7.4
> 

-- 
Sincerely yours,
Mike.


_______________________________________________
linux-riscv mailing list
linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-riscv

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH V2] mm: Introduce GFP_PGTABLE
  2019-01-16  6:21 [PATCH V2] mm: Introduce GFP_PGTABLE Anshuman Khandual
  2019-01-16  6:55 ` Mike Rapoport
@ 2019-01-16  6:57 ` Michal Hocko
  2019-01-16 12:30   ` Matthew Wilcox
  2019-01-16  7:10 ` Christophe Leroy
  2 siblings, 1 reply; 17+ messages in thread
From: Michal Hocko @ 2019-01-16  6:57 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Anshuman Khandual
  Cc: mark.rutland, linux-sh, peterz, catalin.marinas, dave.hansen,
	will.deacon, linux-kernel, linux-mm, linux-riscv, kvmarm, mpe,
	linux, mingo, vbabka, rientjes, palmer, greentime, marc.zyngier,
	rppt, shakeelb, kirill, tglx, linux-arm-kernel, ard.biesheuvel,
	robin.murphy, steve.capper, christoffer.dall, james.morse,
	aneesh.kumar, akpm, linuxppc-dev

On Wed 16-01-19 11:51:32, Anshuman Khandual wrote:
> All architectures have been defining their own PGALLOC_GFP as (GFP_KERNEL |
> __GFP_ZERO) and using it for allocating page table pages. This causes some
> code duplication which can be easily avoided. GFP_KERNEL allocated and
> cleared out pages (__GFP_ZERO) are required for page tables on any given
> architecture. This creates a new generic GFP flag flag which can be used
> for any page table page allocation. Does not cause any functional change.
> 
> GFP_PGTABLE is being added into include/asm-generic/pgtable.h which is the
> generic page tabe header just to prevent it's potential misuse as a general
> allocation flag if included in include/linux/gfp.h.

I haven't reviewed the patch yet but I am wondering whether this is
really worth it without going all the way down to unify the common code
and remove much more code duplication. Or is this not possible for some
reason?

> Signed-off-by: Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@arm.com>
> ---
> Build tested on arm, arm64, powerpc, powerpc64le and x86.
> Boot tested on arm64 and x86.
> 
> Changes in V2:
> 
> - Moved GFP_PGTABLE into include/asm-generic/pgtable.h
> - On X86 added __GFP_ACCOUNT into GFP_PGTABLE at various places
> - Replaced possible flags on riscv and nds32 with GFP_PGTABLE
> 
> Original V1: https://lkml.org/lkml/2019/1/12/54 
> 
>  arch/arm/include/asm/pgalloc.h               |  8 +++-----
>  arch/arm/mm/mmu.c                            |  2 +-
>  arch/arm64/include/asm/pgalloc.h             |  9 ++++-----
>  arch/arm64/mm/mmu.c                          |  2 +-
>  arch/arm64/mm/pgd.c                          |  4 ++--
>  arch/nds32/include/asm/pgalloc.h             |  3 +--
>  arch/powerpc/include/asm/book3s/64/pgalloc.h |  6 +++---
>  arch/powerpc/include/asm/pgalloc.h           |  2 --
>  arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_64_mmu_hv.c          |  2 +-
>  arch/powerpc/mm/pgtable-frag.c               |  4 ++--
>  arch/riscv/include/asm/pgalloc.h             |  8 +++-----
>  arch/sh/mm/pgtable.c                         |  6 ++----
>  arch/unicore32/include/asm/pgalloc.h         |  6 ++----
>  arch/x86/kernel/espfix_64.c                  |  6 ++----
>  arch/x86/mm/pgtable.c                        | 15 +++++++--------
>  include/asm-generic/pgtable.h                |  2 ++
>  virt/kvm/arm/mmu.c                           |  2 +-
>  17 files changed, 37 insertions(+), 50 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/arm/include/asm/pgalloc.h b/arch/arm/include/asm/pgalloc.h
> index 17ab72f..72be6f5 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/include/asm/pgalloc.h
> +++ b/arch/arm/include/asm/pgalloc.h
> @@ -57,8 +57,6 @@ static inline void pud_populate(struct mm_struct *mm, pud_t *pud, pmd_t *pmd)
>  extern pgd_t *pgd_alloc(struct mm_struct *mm);
>  extern void pgd_free(struct mm_struct *mm, pgd_t *pgd);
>  
> -#define PGALLOC_GFP	(GFP_KERNEL | __GFP_ZERO)
> -
>  static inline void clean_pte_table(pte_t *pte)
>  {
>  	clean_dcache_area(pte + PTE_HWTABLE_PTRS, PTE_HWTABLE_SIZE);
> @@ -85,7 +83,7 @@ pte_alloc_one_kernel(struct mm_struct *mm)
>  {
>  	pte_t *pte;
>  
> -	pte = (pte_t *)__get_free_page(PGALLOC_GFP);
> +	pte = (pte_t *)__get_free_page(GFP_PGTABLE);
>  	if (pte)
>  		clean_pte_table(pte);
>  
> @@ -98,9 +96,9 @@ pte_alloc_one(struct mm_struct *mm)
>  	struct page *pte;
>  
>  #ifdef CONFIG_HIGHPTE
> -	pte = alloc_pages(PGALLOC_GFP | __GFP_HIGHMEM, 0);
> +	pte = alloc_pages(GFP_PGTABLE | __GFP_HIGHMEM, 0);
>  #else
> -	pte = alloc_pages(PGALLOC_GFP, 0);
> +	pte = alloc_pages(GFP_PGTABLE, 0);
>  #endif
>  	if (!pte)
>  		return NULL;
> diff --git a/arch/arm/mm/mmu.c b/arch/arm/mm/mmu.c
> index f5cc1cc..6d47784 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/mm/mmu.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/mm/mmu.c
> @@ -733,7 +733,7 @@ static void __init *early_alloc(unsigned long sz)
>  
>  static void *__init late_alloc(unsigned long sz)
>  {
> -	void *ptr = (void *)__get_free_pages(PGALLOC_GFP, get_order(sz));
> +	void *ptr = (void *)__get_free_pages(GFP_PGTABLE, get_order(sz));
>  
>  	if (!ptr || !pgtable_page_ctor(virt_to_page(ptr)))
>  		BUG();
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/pgalloc.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/pgalloc.h
> index 52fa47c..d5c75bf 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/pgalloc.h
> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/pgalloc.h
> @@ -26,14 +26,13 @@
>  
>  #define check_pgt_cache()		do { } while (0)
>  
> -#define PGALLOC_GFP	(GFP_KERNEL | __GFP_ZERO)
>  #define PGD_SIZE	(PTRS_PER_PGD * sizeof(pgd_t))
>  
>  #if CONFIG_PGTABLE_LEVELS > 2
>  
>  static inline pmd_t *pmd_alloc_one(struct mm_struct *mm, unsigned long addr)
>  {
> -	return (pmd_t *)__get_free_page(PGALLOC_GFP);
> +	return (pmd_t *)__get_free_page(GFP_PGTABLE);
>  }
>  
>  static inline void pmd_free(struct mm_struct *mm, pmd_t *pmdp)
> @@ -62,7 +61,7 @@ static inline void __pud_populate(pud_t *pudp, phys_addr_t pmdp, pudval_t prot)
>  
>  static inline pud_t *pud_alloc_one(struct mm_struct *mm, unsigned long addr)
>  {
> -	return (pud_t *)__get_free_page(PGALLOC_GFP);
> +	return (pud_t *)__get_free_page(GFP_PGTABLE);
>  }
>  
>  static inline void pud_free(struct mm_struct *mm, pud_t *pudp)
> @@ -93,7 +92,7 @@ extern void pgd_free(struct mm_struct *mm, pgd_t *pgdp);
>  static inline pte_t *
>  pte_alloc_one_kernel(struct mm_struct *mm)
>  {
> -	return (pte_t *)__get_free_page(PGALLOC_GFP);
> +	return (pte_t *)__get_free_page(GFP_PGTABLE);
>  }
>  
>  static inline pgtable_t
> @@ -101,7 +100,7 @@ pte_alloc_one(struct mm_struct *mm)
>  {
>  	struct page *pte;
>  
> -	pte = alloc_pages(PGALLOC_GFP, 0);
> +	pte = alloc_pages(GFP_PGTABLE, 0);
>  	if (!pte)
>  		return NULL;
>  	if (!pgtable_page_ctor(pte)) {
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/mm/mmu.c b/arch/arm64/mm/mmu.c
> index b6f5aa5..07b1c0f 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/mm/mmu.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/mm/mmu.c
> @@ -372,7 +372,7 @@ static void __create_pgd_mapping(pgd_t *pgdir, phys_addr_t phys,
>  
>  static phys_addr_t pgd_pgtable_alloc(void)
>  {
> -	void *ptr = (void *)__get_free_page(PGALLOC_GFP);
> +	void *ptr = (void *)__get_free_page(GFP_PGTABLE);
>  	if (!ptr || !pgtable_page_ctor(virt_to_page(ptr)))
>  		BUG();
>  
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/mm/pgd.c b/arch/arm64/mm/pgd.c
> index 289f911..5b28e2b 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/mm/pgd.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/mm/pgd.c
> @@ -31,9 +31,9 @@ static struct kmem_cache *pgd_cache __ro_after_init;
>  pgd_t *pgd_alloc(struct mm_struct *mm)
>  {
>  	if (PGD_SIZE == PAGE_SIZE)
> -		return (pgd_t *)__get_free_page(PGALLOC_GFP);
> +		return (pgd_t *)__get_free_page(GFP_PGTABLE);
>  	else
> -		return kmem_cache_alloc(pgd_cache, PGALLOC_GFP);
> +		return kmem_cache_alloc(pgd_cache, GFP_PGTABLE);
>  }
>  
>  void pgd_free(struct mm_struct *mm, pgd_t *pgd)
> diff --git a/arch/nds32/include/asm/pgalloc.h b/arch/nds32/include/asm/pgalloc.h
> index 3c5fee5..e1137ce 100644
> --- a/arch/nds32/include/asm/pgalloc.h
> +++ b/arch/nds32/include/asm/pgalloc.h
> @@ -27,8 +27,7 @@ static inline pte_t *pte_alloc_one_kernel(struct mm_struct *mm)
>  	pte_t *pte;
>  
>  	pte =
> -	    (pte_t *) __get_free_page(GFP_KERNEL | __GFP_RETRY_MAYFAIL |
> -				      __GFP_ZERO);
> +	    (pte_t *) __get_free_page(GFP_PGTABLE | __GFP_RETRY_MAYFAIL);
>  
>  	return pte;
>  }
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/book3s/64/pgalloc.h b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/book3s/64/pgalloc.h
> index 9c11732..71704e5 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/book3s/64/pgalloc.h
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/book3s/64/pgalloc.h
> @@ -52,11 +52,11 @@ void pte_frag_destroy(void *pte_frag);
>  static inline pgd_t *radix__pgd_alloc(struct mm_struct *mm)
>  {
>  #ifdef CONFIG_PPC_64K_PAGES
> -	return (pgd_t *)__get_free_page(pgtable_gfp_flags(mm, PGALLOC_GFP));
> +	return (pgd_t *)__get_free_page(pgtable_gfp_flags(mm, GFP_PGTABLE));
>  #else
>  	struct page *page;
> -	page = alloc_pages(pgtable_gfp_flags(mm, PGALLOC_GFP | __GFP_RETRY_MAYFAIL),
> -				4);
> +	page = alloc_pages(pgtable_gfp_flags(mm, GFP_PGTABLE |
> +				__GFP_RETRY_MAYFAIL), 4);
>  	if (!page)
>  		return NULL;
>  	return (pgd_t *) page_address(page);
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/pgalloc.h b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/pgalloc.h
> index e11f030..3b11e8b 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/pgalloc.h
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/pgalloc.h
> @@ -18,8 +18,6 @@ static inline gfp_t pgtable_gfp_flags(struct mm_struct *mm, gfp_t gfp)
>  }
>  #endif /* MODULE */
>  
> -#define PGALLOC_GFP (GFP_KERNEL | __GFP_ZERO)
> -
>  #ifdef CONFIG_PPC_BOOK3S
>  #include <asm/book3s/pgalloc.h>
>  #else
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_64_mmu_hv.c b/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_64_mmu_hv.c
> index bd2dcfb..b419878 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_64_mmu_hv.c
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_64_mmu_hv.c
> @@ -97,7 +97,7 @@ int kvmppc_allocate_hpt(struct kvm_hpt_info *info, u32 order)
>  	}
>  
>  	if (!hpt)
> -		hpt = __get_free_pages(GFP_KERNEL|__GFP_ZERO|__GFP_RETRY_MAYFAIL
> +		hpt = __get_free_pages(GFP_PGTABLE | __GFP_RETRY_MAYFAIL
>  				       |__GFP_NOWARN, order - PAGE_SHIFT);
>  
>  	if (!hpt)
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/mm/pgtable-frag.c b/arch/powerpc/mm/pgtable-frag.c
> index a7b0521..211aaa7 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/mm/pgtable-frag.c
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/mm/pgtable-frag.c
> @@ -58,7 +58,7 @@ static pte_t *__alloc_for_ptecache(struct mm_struct *mm, int kernel)
>  	struct page *page;
>  
>  	if (!kernel) {
> -		page = alloc_page(PGALLOC_GFP | __GFP_ACCOUNT);
> +		page = alloc_page(GFP_PGTABLE | __GFP_ACCOUNT);
>  		if (!page)
>  			return NULL;
>  		if (!pgtable_page_ctor(page)) {
> @@ -66,7 +66,7 @@ static pte_t *__alloc_for_ptecache(struct mm_struct *mm, int kernel)
>  			return NULL;
>  		}
>  	} else {
> -		page = alloc_page(PGALLOC_GFP);
> +		page = alloc_page(GFP_PGTABLE);
>  		if (!page)
>  			return NULL;
>  	}
> diff --git a/arch/riscv/include/asm/pgalloc.h b/arch/riscv/include/asm/pgalloc.h
> index 94043cf..7ff1cd7 100644
> --- a/arch/riscv/include/asm/pgalloc.h
> +++ b/arch/riscv/include/asm/pgalloc.h
> @@ -69,8 +69,7 @@ static inline void pgd_free(struct mm_struct *mm, pgd_t *pgd)
>  
>  static inline pmd_t *pmd_alloc_one(struct mm_struct *mm, unsigned long addr)
>  {
> -	return (pmd_t *)__get_free_page(
> -		GFP_KERNEL | __GFP_RETRY_MAYFAIL | __GFP_ZERO);
> +	return (pmd_t *)__get_free_page(GFP_PGTABLE | __GFP_RETRY_MAYFAIL);
>  }
>  
>  static inline void pmd_free(struct mm_struct *mm, pmd_t *pmd)
> @@ -84,15 +83,14 @@ static inline void pmd_free(struct mm_struct *mm, pmd_t *pmd)
>  
>  static inline pte_t *pte_alloc_one_kernel(struct mm_struct *mm)
>  {
> -	return (pte_t *)__get_free_page(
> -		GFP_KERNEL | __GFP_RETRY_MAYFAIL | __GFP_ZERO);
> +	return (pte_t *)__get_free_page(GFP_PGTABLE | __GFP_RETRY_MAYFAIL);
>  }
>  
>  static inline struct page *pte_alloc_one(struct mm_struct *mm)
>  {
>  	struct page *pte;
>  
> -	pte = alloc_page(GFP_KERNEL | __GFP_RETRY_MAYFAIL | __GFP_ZERO);
> +	pte = alloc_page(GFP_PGTABLE | __GFP_RETRY_MAYFAIL);
>  	if (likely(pte != NULL))
>  		pgtable_page_ctor(pte);
>  	return pte;
> diff --git a/arch/sh/mm/pgtable.c b/arch/sh/mm/pgtable.c
> index 5c8f924..324732dc5 100644
> --- a/arch/sh/mm/pgtable.c
> +++ b/arch/sh/mm/pgtable.c
> @@ -2,8 +2,6 @@
>  #include <linux/mm.h>
>  #include <linux/slab.h>
>  
> -#define PGALLOC_GFP GFP_KERNEL | __GFP_ZERO
> -
>  static struct kmem_cache *pgd_cachep;
>  #if PAGETABLE_LEVELS > 2
>  static struct kmem_cache *pmd_cachep;
> @@ -32,7 +30,7 @@ void pgtable_cache_init(void)
>  
>  pgd_t *pgd_alloc(struct mm_struct *mm)
>  {
> -	return kmem_cache_alloc(pgd_cachep, PGALLOC_GFP);
> +	return kmem_cache_alloc(pgd_cachep, GFP_PGTABLE);
>  }
>  
>  void pgd_free(struct mm_struct *mm, pgd_t *pgd)
> @@ -48,7 +46,7 @@ void pud_populate(struct mm_struct *mm, pud_t *pud, pmd_t *pmd)
>  
>  pmd_t *pmd_alloc_one(struct mm_struct *mm, unsigned long address)
>  {
> -	return kmem_cache_alloc(pmd_cachep, PGALLOC_GFP);
> +	return kmem_cache_alloc(pmd_cachep, GFP_PGTABLE);
>  }
>  
>  void pmd_free(struct mm_struct *mm, pmd_t *pmd)
> diff --git a/arch/unicore32/include/asm/pgalloc.h b/arch/unicore32/include/asm/pgalloc.h
> index 7cceabe..a3506e5 100644
> --- a/arch/unicore32/include/asm/pgalloc.h
> +++ b/arch/unicore32/include/asm/pgalloc.h
> @@ -28,8 +28,6 @@ extern void free_pgd_slow(struct mm_struct *mm, pgd_t *pgd);
>  #define pgd_alloc(mm)			get_pgd_slow(mm)
>  #define pgd_free(mm, pgd)		free_pgd_slow(mm, pgd)
>  
> -#define PGALLOC_GFP	(GFP_KERNEL | __GFP_ZERO)
> -
>  /*
>   * Allocate one PTE table.
>   */
> @@ -38,7 +36,7 @@ pte_alloc_one_kernel(struct mm_struct *mm)
>  {
>  	pte_t *pte;
>  
> -	pte = (pte_t *)__get_free_page(PGALLOC_GFP);
> +	pte = (pte_t *)__get_free_page(GFP_PGTABLE);
>  	if (pte)
>  		clean_dcache_area(pte, PTRS_PER_PTE * sizeof(pte_t));
>  
> @@ -50,7 +48,7 @@ pte_alloc_one(struct mm_struct *mm)
>  {
>  	struct page *pte;
>  
> -	pte = alloc_pages(PGALLOC_GFP, 0);
> +	pte = alloc_pages(GFP_PGTABLE, 0);
>  	if (!pte)
>  		return NULL;
>  	if (!PageHighMem(pte)) {
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/espfix_64.c b/arch/x86/kernel/espfix_64.c
> index aebd0d5..dae28cc 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/espfix_64.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/espfix_64.c
> @@ -57,8 +57,6 @@
>  # error "Need more virtual address space for the ESPFIX hack"
>  #endif
>  
> -#define PGALLOC_GFP (GFP_KERNEL | __GFP_ZERO)
> -
>  /* This contains the *bottom* address of the espfix stack */
>  DEFINE_PER_CPU_READ_MOSTLY(unsigned long, espfix_stack);
>  DEFINE_PER_CPU_READ_MOSTLY(unsigned long, espfix_waddr);
> @@ -172,7 +170,7 @@ void init_espfix_ap(int cpu)
>  	pud_p = &espfix_pud_page[pud_index(addr)];
>  	pud = *pud_p;
>  	if (!pud_present(pud)) {
> -		struct page *page = alloc_pages_node(node, PGALLOC_GFP, 0);
> +		struct page *page = alloc_pages_node(node, GFP_PGTABLE, 0);
>  
>  		pmd_p = (pmd_t *)page_address(page);
>  		pud = __pud(__pa(pmd_p) | (PGTABLE_PROT & ptemask));
> @@ -184,7 +182,7 @@ void init_espfix_ap(int cpu)
>  	pmd_p = pmd_offset(&pud, addr);
>  	pmd = *pmd_p;
>  	if (!pmd_present(pmd)) {
> -		struct page *page = alloc_pages_node(node, PGALLOC_GFP, 0);
> +		struct page *page = alloc_pages_node(node, GFP_PGTABLE, 0);
>  
>  		pte_p = (pte_t *)page_address(page);
>  		pmd = __pmd(__pa(pte_p) | (PGTABLE_PROT & ptemask));
> diff --git a/arch/x86/mm/pgtable.c b/arch/x86/mm/pgtable.c
> index 7bd0170..a5b1672 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/mm/pgtable.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/mm/pgtable.c
> @@ -13,19 +13,17 @@ phys_addr_t physical_mask __ro_after_init = (1ULL << __PHYSICAL_MASK_SHIFT) - 1;
>  EXPORT_SYMBOL(physical_mask);
>  #endif
>  
> -#define PGALLOC_GFP (GFP_KERNEL_ACCOUNT | __GFP_ZERO)
> -
>  #ifdef CONFIG_HIGHPTE
>  #define PGALLOC_USER_GFP __GFP_HIGHMEM
>  #else
>  #define PGALLOC_USER_GFP 0
>  #endif
>  
> -gfp_t __userpte_alloc_gfp = PGALLOC_GFP | PGALLOC_USER_GFP;
> +gfp_t __userpte_alloc_gfp = GFP_PGTABLE | __GFP_ACCOUNT | PGALLOC_USER_GFP;
>  
>  pte_t *pte_alloc_one_kernel(struct mm_struct *mm)
>  {
> -	return (pte_t *)__get_free_page(PGALLOC_GFP & ~__GFP_ACCOUNT);
> +	return (pte_t *)__get_free_page(GFP_PGTABLE);
>  }
>  
>  pgtable_t pte_alloc_one(struct mm_struct *mm)
> @@ -235,7 +233,7 @@ static int preallocate_pmds(struct mm_struct *mm, pmd_t *pmds[], int count)
>  {
>  	int i;
>  	bool failed = false;
> -	gfp_t gfp = PGALLOC_GFP;
> +	gfp_t gfp = GFP_PGTABLE | __GFP_ACCOUNT;
>  
>  	if (mm == &init_mm)
>  		gfp &= ~__GFP_ACCOUNT;
> @@ -401,14 +399,14 @@ static inline pgd_t *_pgd_alloc(void)
>  	 * We allocate one page for pgd.
>  	 */
>  	if (!SHARED_KERNEL_PMD)
> -		return (pgd_t *)__get_free_pages(PGALLOC_GFP,
> +		return (pgd_t *)__get_free_pages(GFP_PGTABLE | __GFP_ACCOUNT,
>  						 PGD_ALLOCATION_ORDER);
>  
>  	/*
>  	 * Now PAE kernel is not running as a Xen domain. We can allocate
>  	 * a 32-byte slab for pgd to save memory space.
>  	 */
> -	return kmem_cache_alloc(pgd_cache, PGALLOC_GFP);
> +	return kmem_cache_alloc(pgd_cache, GFP_PGTABLE | __GFP_ACCOUNT);
>  }
>  
>  static inline void _pgd_free(pgd_t *pgd)
> @@ -422,7 +420,8 @@ static inline void _pgd_free(pgd_t *pgd)
>  
>  static inline pgd_t *_pgd_alloc(void)
>  {
> -	return (pgd_t *)__get_free_pages(PGALLOC_GFP, PGD_ALLOCATION_ORDER);
> +	return (pgd_t *)__get_free_pages(GFP_PGTABLE | __GFP_ACCOUNT,
> +						PGD_ALLOCATION_ORDER);
>  }
>  
>  static inline void _pgd_free(pgd_t *pgd)
> diff --git a/include/asm-generic/pgtable.h b/include/asm-generic/pgtable.h
> index 05e61e6..3d9cde6 100644
> --- a/include/asm-generic/pgtable.h
> +++ b/include/asm-generic/pgtable.h
> @@ -1186,4 +1186,6 @@ static inline bool arch_has_pfn_modify_check(void)
>  #define mm_pmd_folded(mm)	__is_defined(__PAGETABLE_PMD_FOLDED)
>  #endif
>  
> +#define GFP_PGTABLE	(GFP_KERNEL | __GFP_ZERO)
> +
>  #endif /* _ASM_GENERIC_PGTABLE_H */
> diff --git a/virt/kvm/arm/mmu.c b/virt/kvm/arm/mmu.c
> index fbdf3ac..f60a5b8 100644
> --- a/virt/kvm/arm/mmu.c
> +++ b/virt/kvm/arm/mmu.c
> @@ -143,7 +143,7 @@ static int mmu_topup_memory_cache(struct kvm_mmu_memory_cache *cache,
>  	if (cache->nobjs >= min)
>  		return 0;
>  	while (cache->nobjs < max) {
> -		page = (void *)__get_free_page(PGALLOC_GFP);
> +		page = (void *)__get_free_page(GFP_PGTABLE);
>  		if (!page)
>  			return -ENOMEM;
>  		cache->objects[cache->nobjs++] = page;
> -- 
> 2.7.4
> 

-- 
Michal Hocko
SUSE Labs

_______________________________________________
linux-riscv mailing list
linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-riscv

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH V2] mm: Introduce GFP_PGTABLE
  2019-01-16  6:21 [PATCH V2] mm: Introduce GFP_PGTABLE Anshuman Khandual
  2019-01-16  6:55 ` Mike Rapoport
  2019-01-16  6:57 ` Michal Hocko
@ 2019-01-16  7:10 ` Christophe Leroy
  2019-01-16 12:39   ` Anshuman Khandual
  2 siblings, 1 reply; 17+ messages in thread
From: Christophe Leroy @ 2019-01-16  7:10 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Anshuman Khandual, linux-mm, akpm, linux-kernel, linuxppc-dev,
	linux-arm-kernel, linux-sh, kvmarm, linux-riscv
  Cc: mark.rutland, mhocko, peterz, catalin.marinas, dave.hansen,
	will.deacon, aneesh.kumar, linux, mingo, rientjes, palmer,
	greentime, marc.zyngier, rppt, shakeelb, kirill, tglx, vbabka,
	ard.biesheuvel, steve.capper, christoffer.dall, james.morse,
	robin.murphy



Le 16/01/2019 à 07:21, Anshuman Khandual a écrit :
> All architectures have been defining their own PGALLOC_GFP as (GFP_KERNEL |
> __GFP_ZERO) and using it for allocating page table pages. This causes some
> code duplication which can be easily avoided. GFP_KERNEL allocated and
> cleared out pages (__GFP_ZERO) are required for page tables on any given
> architecture. This creates a new generic GFP flag flag which can be used
> for any page table page allocation. Does not cause any functional change.
> 
> GFP_PGTABLE is being added into include/asm-generic/pgtable.h which is the
> generic page tabe header just to prevent it's potential misuse as a general
> allocation flag if included in include/linux/gfp.h.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@arm.com>
> ---
> Build tested on arm, arm64, powerpc, powerpc64le and x86.
> Boot tested on arm64 and x86.
> 
> Changes in V2:
> 
> - Moved GFP_PGTABLE into include/asm-generic/pgtable.h
> - On X86 added __GFP_ACCOUNT into GFP_PGTABLE at various places
> - Replaced possible flags on riscv and nds32 with GFP_PGTABLE

Could also replace the flags in 
arch/powerpc/include/asm/nohash/64/pgalloc.h with GFP_PGTABLE in 
pte_alloc_one_kernel() and pte_alloc_one()

Christophe

> 
> Original V1: https://lkml.org/lkml/2019/1/12/54
> 
>   arch/arm/include/asm/pgalloc.h               |  8 +++-----
>   arch/arm/mm/mmu.c                            |  2 +-
>   arch/arm64/include/asm/pgalloc.h             |  9 ++++-----
>   arch/arm64/mm/mmu.c                          |  2 +-
>   arch/arm64/mm/pgd.c                          |  4 ++--
>   arch/nds32/include/asm/pgalloc.h             |  3 +--
>   arch/powerpc/include/asm/book3s/64/pgalloc.h |  6 +++---
>   arch/powerpc/include/asm/pgalloc.h           |  2 --
>   arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_64_mmu_hv.c          |  2 +-
>   arch/powerpc/mm/pgtable-frag.c               |  4 ++--
>   arch/riscv/include/asm/pgalloc.h             |  8 +++-----
>   arch/sh/mm/pgtable.c                         |  6 ++----
>   arch/unicore32/include/asm/pgalloc.h         |  6 ++----
>   arch/x86/kernel/espfix_64.c                  |  6 ++----
>   arch/x86/mm/pgtable.c                        | 15 +++++++--------
>   include/asm-generic/pgtable.h                |  2 ++
>   virt/kvm/arm/mmu.c                           |  2 +-
>   17 files changed, 37 insertions(+), 50 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/arm/include/asm/pgalloc.h b/arch/arm/include/asm/pgalloc.h
> index 17ab72f..72be6f5 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/include/asm/pgalloc.h
> +++ b/arch/arm/include/asm/pgalloc.h
> @@ -57,8 +57,6 @@ static inline void pud_populate(struct mm_struct *mm, pud_t *pud, pmd_t *pmd)
>   extern pgd_t *pgd_alloc(struct mm_struct *mm);
>   extern void pgd_free(struct mm_struct *mm, pgd_t *pgd);
>   
> -#define PGALLOC_GFP	(GFP_KERNEL | __GFP_ZERO)
> -
>   static inline void clean_pte_table(pte_t *pte)
>   {
>   	clean_dcache_area(pte + PTE_HWTABLE_PTRS, PTE_HWTABLE_SIZE);
> @@ -85,7 +83,7 @@ pte_alloc_one_kernel(struct mm_struct *mm)
>   {
>   	pte_t *pte;
>   
> -	pte = (pte_t *)__get_free_page(PGALLOC_GFP);
> +	pte = (pte_t *)__get_free_page(GFP_PGTABLE);
>   	if (pte)
>   		clean_pte_table(pte);
>   
> @@ -98,9 +96,9 @@ pte_alloc_one(struct mm_struct *mm)
>   	struct page *pte;
>   
>   #ifdef CONFIG_HIGHPTE
> -	pte = alloc_pages(PGALLOC_GFP | __GFP_HIGHMEM, 0);
> +	pte = alloc_pages(GFP_PGTABLE | __GFP_HIGHMEM, 0);
>   #else
> -	pte = alloc_pages(PGALLOC_GFP, 0);
> +	pte = alloc_pages(GFP_PGTABLE, 0);
>   #endif
>   	if (!pte)
>   		return NULL;
> diff --git a/arch/arm/mm/mmu.c b/arch/arm/mm/mmu.c
> index f5cc1cc..6d47784 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/mm/mmu.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/mm/mmu.c
> @@ -733,7 +733,7 @@ static void __init *early_alloc(unsigned long sz)
>   
>   static void *__init late_alloc(unsigned long sz)
>   {
> -	void *ptr = (void *)__get_free_pages(PGALLOC_GFP, get_order(sz));
> +	void *ptr = (void *)__get_free_pages(GFP_PGTABLE, get_order(sz));
>   
>   	if (!ptr || !pgtable_page_ctor(virt_to_page(ptr)))
>   		BUG();
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/pgalloc.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/pgalloc.h
> index 52fa47c..d5c75bf 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/pgalloc.h
> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/pgalloc.h
> @@ -26,14 +26,13 @@
>   
>   #define check_pgt_cache()		do { } while (0)
>   
> -#define PGALLOC_GFP	(GFP_KERNEL | __GFP_ZERO)
>   #define PGD_SIZE	(PTRS_PER_PGD * sizeof(pgd_t))
>   
>   #if CONFIG_PGTABLE_LEVELS > 2
>   
>   static inline pmd_t *pmd_alloc_one(struct mm_struct *mm, unsigned long addr)
>   {
> -	return (pmd_t *)__get_free_page(PGALLOC_GFP);
> +	return (pmd_t *)__get_free_page(GFP_PGTABLE);
>   }
>   
>   static inline void pmd_free(struct mm_struct *mm, pmd_t *pmdp)
> @@ -62,7 +61,7 @@ static inline void __pud_populate(pud_t *pudp, phys_addr_t pmdp, pudval_t prot)
>   
>   static inline pud_t *pud_alloc_one(struct mm_struct *mm, unsigned long addr)
>   {
> -	return (pud_t *)__get_free_page(PGALLOC_GFP);
> +	return (pud_t *)__get_free_page(GFP_PGTABLE);
>   }
>   
>   static inline void pud_free(struct mm_struct *mm, pud_t *pudp)
> @@ -93,7 +92,7 @@ extern void pgd_free(struct mm_struct *mm, pgd_t *pgdp);
>   static inline pte_t *
>   pte_alloc_one_kernel(struct mm_struct *mm)
>   {
> -	return (pte_t *)__get_free_page(PGALLOC_GFP);
> +	return (pte_t *)__get_free_page(GFP_PGTABLE);
>   }
>   
>   static inline pgtable_t
> @@ -101,7 +100,7 @@ pte_alloc_one(struct mm_struct *mm)
>   {
>   	struct page *pte;
>   
> -	pte = alloc_pages(PGALLOC_GFP, 0);
> +	pte = alloc_pages(GFP_PGTABLE, 0);
>   	if (!pte)
>   		return NULL;
>   	if (!pgtable_page_ctor(pte)) {
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/mm/mmu.c b/arch/arm64/mm/mmu.c
> index b6f5aa5..07b1c0f 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/mm/mmu.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/mm/mmu.c
> @@ -372,7 +372,7 @@ static void __create_pgd_mapping(pgd_t *pgdir, phys_addr_t phys,
>   
>   static phys_addr_t pgd_pgtable_alloc(void)
>   {
> -	void *ptr = (void *)__get_free_page(PGALLOC_GFP);
> +	void *ptr = (void *)__get_free_page(GFP_PGTABLE);
>   	if (!ptr || !pgtable_page_ctor(virt_to_page(ptr)))
>   		BUG();
>   
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/mm/pgd.c b/arch/arm64/mm/pgd.c
> index 289f911..5b28e2b 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/mm/pgd.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/mm/pgd.c
> @@ -31,9 +31,9 @@ static struct kmem_cache *pgd_cache __ro_after_init;
>   pgd_t *pgd_alloc(struct mm_struct *mm)
>   {
>   	if (PGD_SIZE == PAGE_SIZE)
> -		return (pgd_t *)__get_free_page(PGALLOC_GFP);
> +		return (pgd_t *)__get_free_page(GFP_PGTABLE);
>   	else
> -		return kmem_cache_alloc(pgd_cache, PGALLOC_GFP);
> +		return kmem_cache_alloc(pgd_cache, GFP_PGTABLE);
>   }
>   
>   void pgd_free(struct mm_struct *mm, pgd_t *pgd)
> diff --git a/arch/nds32/include/asm/pgalloc.h b/arch/nds32/include/asm/pgalloc.h
> index 3c5fee5..e1137ce 100644
> --- a/arch/nds32/include/asm/pgalloc.h
> +++ b/arch/nds32/include/asm/pgalloc.h
> @@ -27,8 +27,7 @@ static inline pte_t *pte_alloc_one_kernel(struct mm_struct *mm)
>   	pte_t *pte;
>   
>   	pte =
> -	    (pte_t *) __get_free_page(GFP_KERNEL | __GFP_RETRY_MAYFAIL |
> -				      __GFP_ZERO);
> +	    (pte_t *) __get_free_page(GFP_PGTABLE | __GFP_RETRY_MAYFAIL);
>   
>   	return pte;
>   }
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/book3s/64/pgalloc.h b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/book3s/64/pgalloc.h
> index 9c11732..71704e5 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/book3s/64/pgalloc.h
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/book3s/64/pgalloc.h
> @@ -52,11 +52,11 @@ void pte_frag_destroy(void *pte_frag);
>   static inline pgd_t *radix__pgd_alloc(struct mm_struct *mm)
>   {
>   #ifdef CONFIG_PPC_64K_PAGES
> -	return (pgd_t *)__get_free_page(pgtable_gfp_flags(mm, PGALLOC_GFP));
> +	return (pgd_t *)__get_free_page(pgtable_gfp_flags(mm, GFP_PGTABLE));
>   #else
>   	struct page *page;
> -	page = alloc_pages(pgtable_gfp_flags(mm, PGALLOC_GFP | __GFP_RETRY_MAYFAIL),
> -				4);
> +	page = alloc_pages(pgtable_gfp_flags(mm, GFP_PGTABLE |
> +				__GFP_RETRY_MAYFAIL), 4);
>   	if (!page)
>   		return NULL;
>   	return (pgd_t *) page_address(page);
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/pgalloc.h b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/pgalloc.h
> index e11f030..3b11e8b 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/pgalloc.h
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/pgalloc.h
> @@ -18,8 +18,6 @@ static inline gfp_t pgtable_gfp_flags(struct mm_struct *mm, gfp_t gfp)
>   }
>   #endif /* MODULE */
>   
> -#define PGALLOC_GFP (GFP_KERNEL | __GFP_ZERO)
> -
>   #ifdef CONFIG_PPC_BOOK3S
>   #include <asm/book3s/pgalloc.h>
>   #else
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_64_mmu_hv.c b/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_64_mmu_hv.c
> index bd2dcfb..b419878 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_64_mmu_hv.c
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_64_mmu_hv.c
> @@ -97,7 +97,7 @@ int kvmppc_allocate_hpt(struct kvm_hpt_info *info, u32 order)
>   	}
>   
>   	if (!hpt)
> -		hpt = __get_free_pages(GFP_KERNEL|__GFP_ZERO|__GFP_RETRY_MAYFAIL
> +		hpt = __get_free_pages(GFP_PGTABLE | __GFP_RETRY_MAYFAIL
>   				       |__GFP_NOWARN, order - PAGE_SHIFT);
>   
>   	if (!hpt)
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/mm/pgtable-frag.c b/arch/powerpc/mm/pgtable-frag.c
> index a7b0521..211aaa7 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/mm/pgtable-frag.c
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/mm/pgtable-frag.c
> @@ -58,7 +58,7 @@ static pte_t *__alloc_for_ptecache(struct mm_struct *mm, int kernel)
>   	struct page *page;
>   
>   	if (!kernel) {
> -		page = alloc_page(PGALLOC_GFP | __GFP_ACCOUNT);
> +		page = alloc_page(GFP_PGTABLE | __GFP_ACCOUNT);
>   		if (!page)
>   			return NULL;
>   		if (!pgtable_page_ctor(page)) {
> @@ -66,7 +66,7 @@ static pte_t *__alloc_for_ptecache(struct mm_struct *mm, int kernel)
>   			return NULL;
>   		}
>   	} else {
> -		page = alloc_page(PGALLOC_GFP);
> +		page = alloc_page(GFP_PGTABLE);
>   		if (!page)
>   			return NULL;
>   	}
> diff --git a/arch/riscv/include/asm/pgalloc.h b/arch/riscv/include/asm/pgalloc.h
> index 94043cf..7ff1cd7 100644
> --- a/arch/riscv/include/asm/pgalloc.h
> +++ b/arch/riscv/include/asm/pgalloc.h
> @@ -69,8 +69,7 @@ static inline void pgd_free(struct mm_struct *mm, pgd_t *pgd)
>   
>   static inline pmd_t *pmd_alloc_one(struct mm_struct *mm, unsigned long addr)
>   {
> -	return (pmd_t *)__get_free_page(
> -		GFP_KERNEL | __GFP_RETRY_MAYFAIL | __GFP_ZERO);
> +	return (pmd_t *)__get_free_page(GFP_PGTABLE | __GFP_RETRY_MAYFAIL);
>   }
>   
>   static inline void pmd_free(struct mm_struct *mm, pmd_t *pmd)
> @@ -84,15 +83,14 @@ static inline void pmd_free(struct mm_struct *mm, pmd_t *pmd)
>   
>   static inline pte_t *pte_alloc_one_kernel(struct mm_struct *mm)
>   {
> -	return (pte_t *)__get_free_page(
> -		GFP_KERNEL | __GFP_RETRY_MAYFAIL | __GFP_ZERO);
> +	return (pte_t *)__get_free_page(GFP_PGTABLE | __GFP_RETRY_MAYFAIL);
>   }
>   
>   static inline struct page *pte_alloc_one(struct mm_struct *mm)
>   {
>   	struct page *pte;
>   
> -	pte = alloc_page(GFP_KERNEL | __GFP_RETRY_MAYFAIL | __GFP_ZERO);
> +	pte = alloc_page(GFP_PGTABLE | __GFP_RETRY_MAYFAIL);
>   	if (likely(pte != NULL))
>   		pgtable_page_ctor(pte);
>   	return pte;
> diff --git a/arch/sh/mm/pgtable.c b/arch/sh/mm/pgtable.c
> index 5c8f924..324732dc5 100644
> --- a/arch/sh/mm/pgtable.c
> +++ b/arch/sh/mm/pgtable.c
> @@ -2,8 +2,6 @@
>   #include <linux/mm.h>
>   #include <linux/slab.h>
>   
> -#define PGALLOC_GFP GFP_KERNEL | __GFP_ZERO
> -
>   static struct kmem_cache *pgd_cachep;
>   #if PAGETABLE_LEVELS > 2
>   static struct kmem_cache *pmd_cachep;
> @@ -32,7 +30,7 @@ void pgtable_cache_init(void)
>   
>   pgd_t *pgd_alloc(struct mm_struct *mm)
>   {
> -	return kmem_cache_alloc(pgd_cachep, PGALLOC_GFP);
> +	return kmem_cache_alloc(pgd_cachep, GFP_PGTABLE);
>   }
>   
>   void pgd_free(struct mm_struct *mm, pgd_t *pgd)
> @@ -48,7 +46,7 @@ void pud_populate(struct mm_struct *mm, pud_t *pud, pmd_t *pmd)
>   
>   pmd_t *pmd_alloc_one(struct mm_struct *mm, unsigned long address)
>   {
> -	return kmem_cache_alloc(pmd_cachep, PGALLOC_GFP);
> +	return kmem_cache_alloc(pmd_cachep, GFP_PGTABLE);
>   }
>   
>   void pmd_free(struct mm_struct *mm, pmd_t *pmd)
> diff --git a/arch/unicore32/include/asm/pgalloc.h b/arch/unicore32/include/asm/pgalloc.h
> index 7cceabe..a3506e5 100644
> --- a/arch/unicore32/include/asm/pgalloc.h
> +++ b/arch/unicore32/include/asm/pgalloc.h
> @@ -28,8 +28,6 @@ extern void free_pgd_slow(struct mm_struct *mm, pgd_t *pgd);
>   #define pgd_alloc(mm)			get_pgd_slow(mm)
>   #define pgd_free(mm, pgd)		free_pgd_slow(mm, pgd)
>   
> -#define PGALLOC_GFP	(GFP_KERNEL | __GFP_ZERO)
> -
>   /*
>    * Allocate one PTE table.
>    */
> @@ -38,7 +36,7 @@ pte_alloc_one_kernel(struct mm_struct *mm)
>   {
>   	pte_t *pte;
>   
> -	pte = (pte_t *)__get_free_page(PGALLOC_GFP);
> +	pte = (pte_t *)__get_free_page(GFP_PGTABLE);
>   	if (pte)
>   		clean_dcache_area(pte, PTRS_PER_PTE * sizeof(pte_t));
>   
> @@ -50,7 +48,7 @@ pte_alloc_one(struct mm_struct *mm)
>   {
>   	struct page *pte;
>   
> -	pte = alloc_pages(PGALLOC_GFP, 0);
> +	pte = alloc_pages(GFP_PGTABLE, 0);
>   	if (!pte)
>   		return NULL;
>   	if (!PageHighMem(pte)) {
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/espfix_64.c b/arch/x86/kernel/espfix_64.c
> index aebd0d5..dae28cc 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/espfix_64.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/espfix_64.c
> @@ -57,8 +57,6 @@
>   # error "Need more virtual address space for the ESPFIX hack"
>   #endif
>   
> -#define PGALLOC_GFP (GFP_KERNEL | __GFP_ZERO)
> -
>   /* This contains the *bottom* address of the espfix stack */
>   DEFINE_PER_CPU_READ_MOSTLY(unsigned long, espfix_stack);
>   DEFINE_PER_CPU_READ_MOSTLY(unsigned long, espfix_waddr);
> @@ -172,7 +170,7 @@ void init_espfix_ap(int cpu)
>   	pud_p = &espfix_pud_page[pud_index(addr)];
>   	pud = *pud_p;
>   	if (!pud_present(pud)) {
> -		struct page *page = alloc_pages_node(node, PGALLOC_GFP, 0);
> +		struct page *page = alloc_pages_node(node, GFP_PGTABLE, 0);
>   
>   		pmd_p = (pmd_t *)page_address(page);
>   		pud = __pud(__pa(pmd_p) | (PGTABLE_PROT & ptemask));
> @@ -184,7 +182,7 @@ void init_espfix_ap(int cpu)
>   	pmd_p = pmd_offset(&pud, addr);
>   	pmd = *pmd_p;
>   	if (!pmd_present(pmd)) {
> -		struct page *page = alloc_pages_node(node, PGALLOC_GFP, 0);
> +		struct page *page = alloc_pages_node(node, GFP_PGTABLE, 0);
>   
>   		pte_p = (pte_t *)page_address(page);
>   		pmd = __pmd(__pa(pte_p) | (PGTABLE_PROT & ptemask));
> diff --git a/arch/x86/mm/pgtable.c b/arch/x86/mm/pgtable.c
> index 7bd0170..a5b1672 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/mm/pgtable.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/mm/pgtable.c
> @@ -13,19 +13,17 @@ phys_addr_t physical_mask __ro_after_init = (1ULL << __PHYSICAL_MASK_SHIFT) - 1;
>   EXPORT_SYMBOL(physical_mask);
>   #endif
>   
> -#define PGALLOC_GFP (GFP_KERNEL_ACCOUNT | __GFP_ZERO)
> -
>   #ifdef CONFIG_HIGHPTE
>   #define PGALLOC_USER_GFP __GFP_HIGHMEM
>   #else
>   #define PGALLOC_USER_GFP 0
>   #endif
>   
> -gfp_t __userpte_alloc_gfp = PGALLOC_GFP | PGALLOC_USER_GFP;
> +gfp_t __userpte_alloc_gfp = GFP_PGTABLE | __GFP_ACCOUNT | PGALLOC_USER_GFP;
>   
>   pte_t *pte_alloc_one_kernel(struct mm_struct *mm)
>   {
> -	return (pte_t *)__get_free_page(PGALLOC_GFP & ~__GFP_ACCOUNT);
> +	return (pte_t *)__get_free_page(GFP_PGTABLE);
>   }
>   
>   pgtable_t pte_alloc_one(struct mm_struct *mm)
> @@ -235,7 +233,7 @@ static int preallocate_pmds(struct mm_struct *mm, pmd_t *pmds[], int count)
>   {
>   	int i;
>   	bool failed = false;
> -	gfp_t gfp = PGALLOC_GFP;
> +	gfp_t gfp = GFP_PGTABLE | __GFP_ACCOUNT;
>   
>   	if (mm == &init_mm)
>   		gfp &= ~__GFP_ACCOUNT;
> @@ -401,14 +399,14 @@ static inline pgd_t *_pgd_alloc(void)
>   	 * We allocate one page for pgd.
>   	 */
>   	if (!SHARED_KERNEL_PMD)
> -		return (pgd_t *)__get_free_pages(PGALLOC_GFP,
> +		return (pgd_t *)__get_free_pages(GFP_PGTABLE | __GFP_ACCOUNT,
>   						 PGD_ALLOCATION_ORDER);
>   
>   	/*
>   	 * Now PAE kernel is not running as a Xen domain. We can allocate
>   	 * a 32-byte slab for pgd to save memory space.
>   	 */
> -	return kmem_cache_alloc(pgd_cache, PGALLOC_GFP);
> +	return kmem_cache_alloc(pgd_cache, GFP_PGTABLE | __GFP_ACCOUNT);
>   }
>   
>   static inline void _pgd_free(pgd_t *pgd)
> @@ -422,7 +420,8 @@ static inline void _pgd_free(pgd_t *pgd)
>   
>   static inline pgd_t *_pgd_alloc(void)
>   {
> -	return (pgd_t *)__get_free_pages(PGALLOC_GFP, PGD_ALLOCATION_ORDER);
> +	return (pgd_t *)__get_free_pages(GFP_PGTABLE | __GFP_ACCOUNT,
> +						PGD_ALLOCATION_ORDER);
>   }
>   
>   static inline void _pgd_free(pgd_t *pgd)
> diff --git a/include/asm-generic/pgtable.h b/include/asm-generic/pgtable.h
> index 05e61e6..3d9cde6 100644
> --- a/include/asm-generic/pgtable.h
> +++ b/include/asm-generic/pgtable.h
> @@ -1186,4 +1186,6 @@ static inline bool arch_has_pfn_modify_check(void)
>   #define mm_pmd_folded(mm)	__is_defined(__PAGETABLE_PMD_FOLDED)
>   #endif
>   
> +#define GFP_PGTABLE	(GFP_KERNEL | __GFP_ZERO)
> +
>   #endif /* _ASM_GENERIC_PGTABLE_H */
> diff --git a/virt/kvm/arm/mmu.c b/virt/kvm/arm/mmu.c
> index fbdf3ac..f60a5b8 100644
> --- a/virt/kvm/arm/mmu.c
> +++ b/virt/kvm/arm/mmu.c
> @@ -143,7 +143,7 @@ static int mmu_topup_memory_cache(struct kvm_mmu_memory_cache *cache,
>   	if (cache->nobjs >= min)
>   		return 0;
>   	while (cache->nobjs < max) {
> -		page = (void *)__get_free_page(PGALLOC_GFP);
> +		page = (void *)__get_free_page(GFP_PGTABLE);
>   		if (!page)
>   			return -ENOMEM;
>   		cache->objects[cache->nobjs++] = page;
> 

_______________________________________________
linux-riscv mailing list
linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-riscv

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH V2] mm: Introduce GFP_PGTABLE
  2019-01-16  6:57 ` Michal Hocko
@ 2019-01-16 12:30   ` Matthew Wilcox
  2019-01-16 12:34     ` Peter Zijlstra
                       ` (3 more replies)
  0 siblings, 4 replies; 17+ messages in thread
From: Matthew Wilcox @ 2019-01-16 12:30 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Michal Hocko
  Cc: mark.rutland, linux-sh, peterz, catalin.marinas, dave.hansen,
	will.deacon, christoffer.dall, linux-mm, linux-riscv, kvmarm,
	mpe, greentime, linux, mingo, vbabka, rientjes, palmer,
	Anshuman Khandual, marc.zyngier, rppt, shakeelb, kirill, tglx,
	linux-arm-kernel, ard.biesheuvel, robin.murphy, steve.capper,
	linux-kernel, james.morse, aneesh.kumar, akpm, linuxppc-dev

On Wed, Jan 16, 2019 at 07:57:03AM +0100, Michal Hocko wrote:
> On Wed 16-01-19 11:51:32, Anshuman Khandual wrote:
> > All architectures have been defining their own PGALLOC_GFP as (GFP_KERNEL |
> > __GFP_ZERO) and using it for allocating page table pages. This causes some
> > code duplication which can be easily avoided. GFP_KERNEL allocated and
> > cleared out pages (__GFP_ZERO) are required for page tables on any given
> > architecture. This creates a new generic GFP flag flag which can be used
> > for any page table page allocation. Does not cause any functional change.
> > 
> > GFP_PGTABLE is being added into include/asm-generic/pgtable.h which is the
> > generic page tabe header just to prevent it's potential misuse as a general
> > allocation flag if included in include/linux/gfp.h.
> 
> I haven't reviewed the patch yet but I am wondering whether this is
> really worth it without going all the way down to unify the common code
> and remove much more code duplication. Or is this not possible for some
> reason?

Exactly what I suggested doing in response to v1.

Also, the approach taken here is crazy.  x86 has a feature that no other
architecture has bothered to implement yet -- accounting page tables
to the process.  Yet instead of spreading that goodness to all other
architectures, Anshuman has gone to more effort to avoid doing that.

_______________________________________________
linux-riscv mailing list
linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-riscv

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH V2] mm: Introduce GFP_PGTABLE
  2019-01-16 12:30   ` Matthew Wilcox
@ 2019-01-16 12:34     ` Peter Zijlstra
  2019-01-16 12:44     ` Michal Hocko
                       ` (2 subsequent siblings)
  3 siblings, 0 replies; 17+ messages in thread
From: Peter Zijlstra @ 2019-01-16 12:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Matthew Wilcox
  Cc: mark.rutland, christoffer.dall, linux-sh, catalin.marinas,
	dave.hansen, will.deacon, Michal Hocko, linux-mm, linux-riscv,
	kvmarm, mpe, greentime, linux, mingo, vbabka, rientjes, palmer,
	Anshuman Khandual, marc.zyngier, rppt, shakeelb, kirill, tglx,
	linux-arm-kernel, ard.biesheuvel, robin.murphy, steve.capper,
	linux-kernel, james.morse, aneesh.kumar, akpm, linuxppc-dev

On Wed, Jan 16, 2019 at 04:30:18AM -0800, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 16, 2019 at 07:57:03AM +0100, Michal Hocko wrote:
> > On Wed 16-01-19 11:51:32, Anshuman Khandual wrote:
> > > All architectures have been defining their own PGALLOC_GFP as (GFP_KERNEL |
> > > __GFP_ZERO) and using it for allocating page table pages. This causes some
> > > code duplication which can be easily avoided. GFP_KERNEL allocated and
> > > cleared out pages (__GFP_ZERO) are required for page tables on any given
> > > architecture. This creates a new generic GFP flag flag which can be used
> > > for any page table page allocation. Does not cause any functional change.
> > > 
> > > GFP_PGTABLE is being added into include/asm-generic/pgtable.h which is the
> > > generic page tabe header just to prevent it's potential misuse as a general
> > > allocation flag if included in include/linux/gfp.h.
> > 
> > I haven't reviewed the patch yet but I am wondering whether this is
> > really worth it without going all the way down to unify the common code
> > and remove much more code duplication. Or is this not possible for some
> > reason?
> 
> Exactly what I suggested doing in response to v1.
> 
> Also, the approach taken here is crazy.  x86 has a feature that no other
> architecture has bothered to implement yet -- accounting page tables
> to the process.  Yet instead of spreading that goodness to all other
> architectures, Anshuman has gone to more effort to avoid doing that.

Also, s390 (of course, who else) has a fun custom page-table allocator
for reasons that don't apply to many other archs.

_______________________________________________
linux-riscv mailing list
linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-riscv

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH V2] mm: Introduce GFP_PGTABLE
  2019-01-16  7:10 ` Christophe Leroy
@ 2019-01-16 12:39   ` Anshuman Khandual
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 17+ messages in thread
From: Anshuman Khandual @ 2019-01-16 12:39 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Christophe Leroy, linux-mm, akpm, linux-kernel, linuxppc-dev,
	linux-arm-kernel, linux-sh, kvmarm, linux-riscv
  Cc: mark.rutland, mhocko, peterz, catalin.marinas, dave.hansen,
	will.deacon, aneesh.kumar, linux, mingo, rientjes, palmer,
	greentime, marc.zyngier, rppt, shakeelb, kirill, tglx, vbabka,
	ard.biesheuvel, steve.capper, christoffer.dall, james.morse,
	robin.murphy



On 01/16/2019 12:40 PM, Christophe Leroy wrote:
> 
> 
> Le 16/01/2019 à 07:21, Anshuman Khandual a écrit :
>> All architectures have been defining their own PGALLOC_GFP as (GFP_KERNEL |
>> __GFP_ZERO) and using it for allocating page table pages. This causes some
>> code duplication which can be easily avoided. GFP_KERNEL allocated and
>> cleared out pages (__GFP_ZERO) are required for page tables on any given
>> architecture. This creates a new generic GFP flag flag which can be used
>> for any page table page allocation. Does not cause any functional change.
>>
>> GFP_PGTABLE is being added into include/asm-generic/pgtable.h which is the
>> generic page tabe header just to prevent it's potential misuse as a general
>> allocation flag if included in include/linux/gfp.h.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@arm.com>
>> ---
>> Build tested on arm, arm64, powerpc, powerpc64le and x86.
>> Boot tested on arm64 and x86.
>>
>> Changes in V2:
>>
>> - Moved GFP_PGTABLE into include/asm-generic/pgtable.h
>> - On X86 added __GFP_ACCOUNT into GFP_PGTABLE at various places
>> - Replaced possible flags on riscv and nds32 with GFP_PGTABLE
> 
> Could also replace the flags in arch/powerpc/include/asm/nohash/64/pgalloc.h with GFP_PGTABLE in pte_alloc_one_kernel() and pte_alloc_one()

Sure will do.

_______________________________________________
linux-riscv mailing list
linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-riscv

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH V2] mm: Introduce GFP_PGTABLE
  2019-01-16 12:30   ` Matthew Wilcox
  2019-01-16 12:34     ` Peter Zijlstra
@ 2019-01-16 12:44     ` Michal Hocko
  2019-01-16 13:27       ` Anshuman Khandual
  2019-01-16 13:12     ` Anshuman Khandual
  2019-01-17  9:56     ` Michael Ellerman
  3 siblings, 1 reply; 17+ messages in thread
From: Michal Hocko @ 2019-01-16 12:44 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Matthew Wilcox
  Cc: mark.rutland, linux-sh, peterz, catalin.marinas, dave.hansen,
	will.deacon, christoffer.dall, linux-mm, linux-riscv, kvmarm,
	mpe, greentime, linux, mingo, vbabka, rientjes, palmer,
	Anshuman Khandual, marc.zyngier, rppt, shakeelb, kirill, tglx,
	linux-arm-kernel, ard.biesheuvel, robin.murphy, steve.capper,
	linux-kernel, james.morse, aneesh.kumar, akpm, linuxppc-dev

On Wed 16-01-19 04:30:18, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 16, 2019 at 07:57:03AM +0100, Michal Hocko wrote:
> > On Wed 16-01-19 11:51:32, Anshuman Khandual wrote:
> > > All architectures have been defining their own PGALLOC_GFP as (GFP_KERNEL |
> > > __GFP_ZERO) and using it for allocating page table pages. This causes some
> > > code duplication which can be easily avoided. GFP_KERNEL allocated and
> > > cleared out pages (__GFP_ZERO) are required for page tables on any given
> > > architecture. This creates a new generic GFP flag flag which can be used
> > > for any page table page allocation. Does not cause any functional change.
> > > 
> > > GFP_PGTABLE is being added into include/asm-generic/pgtable.h which is the
> > > generic page tabe header just to prevent it's potential misuse as a general
> > > allocation flag if included in include/linux/gfp.h.
> > 
> > I haven't reviewed the patch yet but I am wondering whether this is
> > really worth it without going all the way down to unify the common code
> > and remove much more code duplication. Or is this not possible for some
> > reason?
> 
> Exactly what I suggested doing in response to v1.
> 
> Also, the approach taken here is crazy.  x86 has a feature that no other
> architecture has bothered to implement yet -- accounting page tables
> to the process.  Yet instead of spreading that goodness to all other
> architectures, Anshuman has gone to more effort to avoid doing that.

Yes, I believe the only reason this is x86 only is that each arch would
have to be tweaked separately. So a cleanup in _that_ regard would be
helpful. There is no real reason to have ptes accounted only for x86.
There might be some exceptions but well, our asm-generic allows to opt
in for generic implementation or override it with a special one. The
later should be an exception rather than the rule.
-- 
Michal Hocko
SUSE Labs

_______________________________________________
linux-riscv mailing list
linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-riscv

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH V2] mm: Introduce GFP_PGTABLE
  2019-01-16  6:55 ` Mike Rapoport
@ 2019-01-16 12:53   ` Anshuman Khandual
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 17+ messages in thread
From: Anshuman Khandual @ 2019-01-16 12:53 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Mike Rapoport
  Cc: mark.rutland, mhocko, linux-sh, peterz, catalin.marinas,
	dave.hansen, will.deacon, linux-kernel, linux-mm, linux-riscv,
	kvmarm, mpe, linux, mingo, vbabka, rientjes, palmer, greentime,
	marc.zyngier, rppt, shakeelb, kirill, tglx, linux-arm-kernel,
	ard.biesheuvel, robin.murphy, steve.capper, christoffer.dall,
	james.morse, aneesh.kumar, akpm, linuxppc-dev



On 01/16/2019 12:25 PM, Mike Rapoport wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 16, 2019 at 11:51:32AM +0530, Anshuman Khandual wrote:
>> All architectures have been defining their own PGALLOC_GFP as (GFP_KERNEL |
>> __GFP_ZERO) and using it for allocating page table pages. This causes some
>> code duplication which can be easily avoided. GFP_KERNEL allocated and
>> cleared out pages (__GFP_ZERO) are required for page tables on any given
>> architecture. This creates a new generic GFP flag flag which can be used
>> for any page table page allocation. Does not cause any functional change.
>>
>> GFP_PGTABLE is being added into include/asm-generic/pgtable.h which is the
>> generic page tabe header just to prevent it's potential misuse as a general
>> allocation flag if included in include/linux/gfp.h.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@arm.com>
>> ---
>> Build tested on arm, arm64, powerpc, powerpc64le and x86.
>> Boot tested on arm64 and x86.
>>
>> Changes in V2:
>>
>> - Moved GFP_PGTABLE into include/asm-generic/pgtable.h
>> - On X86 added __GFP_ACCOUNT into GFP_PGTABLE at various places
>> - Replaced possible flags on riscv and nds32 with GFP_PGTABLE
>>
>> Original V1: https://lkml.org/lkml/2019/1/12/54 
>>
>>  arch/arm/include/asm/pgalloc.h               |  8 +++-----
>>  arch/arm/mm/mmu.c                            |  2 +-
>>  arch/arm64/include/asm/pgalloc.h             |  9 ++++-----
>>  arch/arm64/mm/mmu.c                          |  2 +-
>>  arch/arm64/mm/pgd.c                          |  4 ++--
>>  arch/nds32/include/asm/pgalloc.h             |  3 +--
>>  arch/powerpc/include/asm/book3s/64/pgalloc.h |  6 +++---
>>  arch/powerpc/include/asm/pgalloc.h           |  2 --
>>  arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_64_mmu_hv.c          |  2 +-
>>  arch/powerpc/mm/pgtable-frag.c               |  4 ++--
>>  arch/riscv/include/asm/pgalloc.h             |  8 +++-----
>>  arch/sh/mm/pgtable.c                         |  6 ++----
>>  arch/unicore32/include/asm/pgalloc.h         |  6 ++----
>>  arch/x86/kernel/espfix_64.c                  |  6 ++----
>>  arch/x86/mm/pgtable.c                        | 15 +++++++--------
>>  include/asm-generic/pgtable.h                |  2 ++
>>  virt/kvm/arm/mmu.c                           |  2 +-
>>  17 files changed, 37 insertions(+), 50 deletions(-)
> I wonder, what about the other arches? Do they use different GFP flags?
>  

Some of them as listed below use (GFP_KERNEL | __GFP_ZERO) which I will fix
next time around. Some how was focused on removing PGALLOC_GFP that missed
the other ones.

arch/powerpc/include/asm/nohash/64/pgalloc.h
arch/alpha/include/asm/pgalloc.h
arch/alpha/mm/init.c
arch/csky/include/asm/pgalloc.h
arch/arc/include/asm/pgalloc.h
........
........

But then there are those which use GFP_KERNEL alone without __GFP_ZERO like
pmd_alloc_one() in arch/sparc/include/asm/pgalloc_64.h cannot be replaced
with this patch as it does not intend to change functionality.

_______________________________________________
linux-riscv mailing list
linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-riscv

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH V2] mm: Introduce GFP_PGTABLE
  2019-01-16 12:30   ` Matthew Wilcox
  2019-01-16 12:34     ` Peter Zijlstra
  2019-01-16 12:44     ` Michal Hocko
@ 2019-01-16 13:12     ` Anshuman Khandual
  2019-01-16 13:18       ` Matthew Wilcox
  2019-01-17  9:56     ` Michael Ellerman
  3 siblings, 1 reply; 17+ messages in thread
From: Anshuman Khandual @ 2019-01-16 13:12 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Matthew Wilcox, Michal Hocko
  Cc: mark.rutland, linux-sh, peterz, catalin.marinas, dave.hansen,
	will.deacon, linux-kernel, linux-mm, linux-riscv, kvmarm, mpe,
	linux, mingo, vbabka, rientjes, palmer, greentime, marc.zyngier,
	rppt, shakeelb, kirill, tglx, linux-arm-kernel, ard.biesheuvel,
	robin.murphy, steve.capper, christoffer.dall, james.morse,
	aneesh.kumar, akpm, linuxppc-dev



On 01/16/2019 06:00 PM, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 16, 2019 at 07:57:03AM +0100, Michal Hocko wrote:
>> On Wed 16-01-19 11:51:32, Anshuman Khandual wrote:
>>> All architectures have been defining their own PGALLOC_GFP as (GFP_KERNEL |
>>> __GFP_ZERO) and using it for allocating page table pages. This causes some
>>> code duplication which can be easily avoided. GFP_KERNEL allocated and
>>> cleared out pages (__GFP_ZERO) are required for page tables on any given
>>> architecture. This creates a new generic GFP flag flag which can be used
>>> for any page table page allocation. Does not cause any functional change.
>>>
>>> GFP_PGTABLE is being added into include/asm-generic/pgtable.h which is the
>>> generic page tabe header just to prevent it's potential misuse as a general
>>> allocation flag if included in include/linux/gfp.h.
>>
>> I haven't reviewed the patch yet but I am wondering whether this is
>> really worth it without going all the way down to unify the common code
>> and remove much more code duplication. Or is this not possible for some
>> reason?
> 
> Exactly what I suggested doing in response to v1.
> 
> Also, the approach taken here is crazy.  x86 has a feature that no other
> architecture has bothered to implement yet -- accounting page tables
> to the process.  Yet instead of spreading that goodness to all other
> architectures, Anshuman has gone to more effort to avoid doing that.
> 

The basic objective for this patch is to create a common minimum allocation
flag that can be used by architectures but that still allows archs to add
on additional constraints if they see fit. This patch does not intend to
change functionality for any arch.

Yes. There is opportunity for further clean up and consolidation like the
one you mentioned about accounting. Uses pages tables should have
__GFP_ACCOUNT and kernel ones should not. IIUC unfortunately not all arch
implement this right now. It is something which should not be arch specific.
Accounting semantics should be common for all archs. A default function
switching between GFP_PGTABLE for kernel and GFP_PGTABLE | __GFP_ACCOUNT
looking into mm_struct can help here.

Then there is __GFP_RETRY_MAYFAIL. Some archs use it for multi order page
allocation but some use for a single page as well.

If there is an agreement on __GFP_ACCOUNT and __GFP_RETRY_MAYFAIL we can
clean this up further.

_______________________________________________
linux-riscv mailing list
linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-riscv

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH V2] mm: Introduce GFP_PGTABLE
  2019-01-16 13:12     ` Anshuman Khandual
@ 2019-01-16 13:18       ` Matthew Wilcox
  2019-01-16 13:33         ` Michal Hocko
  2019-01-16 13:47         ` Christophe Leroy
  0 siblings, 2 replies; 17+ messages in thread
From: Matthew Wilcox @ 2019-01-16 13:18 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Anshuman Khandual
  Cc: mark.rutland, linux-sh, peterz, catalin.marinas, dave.hansen,
	will.deacon, linux-kernel, linux-mm, linux-riscv, kvmarm, mpe,
	linux, mingo, vbabka, rientjes, palmer, greentime, marc.zyngier,
	rppt, shakeelb, kirill, tglx, Michal Hocko, linux-arm-kernel,
	ard.biesheuvel, robin.murphy, steve.capper, christoffer.dall,
	james.morse, aneesh.kumar, akpm, linuxppc-dev

On Wed, Jan 16, 2019 at 06:42:22PM +0530, Anshuman Khandual wrote:
> On 01/16/2019 06:00 PM, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> > On Wed, Jan 16, 2019 at 07:57:03AM +0100, Michal Hocko wrote:
> >> On Wed 16-01-19 11:51:32, Anshuman Khandual wrote:
> >>> All architectures have been defining their own PGALLOC_GFP as (GFP_KERNEL |
> >>> __GFP_ZERO) and using it for allocating page table pages. This causes some
> >>> code duplication which can be easily avoided. GFP_KERNEL allocated and
> >>> cleared out pages (__GFP_ZERO) are required for page tables on any given
> >>> architecture. This creates a new generic GFP flag flag which can be used
> >>> for any page table page allocation. Does not cause any functional change.
> >>>
> >>> GFP_PGTABLE is being added into include/asm-generic/pgtable.h which is the
> >>> generic page tabe header just to prevent it's potential misuse as a general
> >>> allocation flag if included in include/linux/gfp.h.
> >>
> >> I haven't reviewed the patch yet but I am wondering whether this is
> >> really worth it without going all the way down to unify the common code
> >> and remove much more code duplication. Or is this not possible for some
> >> reason?
> > 
> > Exactly what I suggested doing in response to v1.
> > 
> > Also, the approach taken here is crazy.  x86 has a feature that no other
> > architecture has bothered to implement yet -- accounting page tables
> > to the process.  Yet instead of spreading that goodness to all other
> > architectures, Anshuman has gone to more effort to avoid doing that.
> 
> The basic objective for this patch is to create a common minimum allocation
> flag that can be used by architectures but that still allows archs to add
> on additional constraints if they see fit. This patch does not intend to
> change functionality for any arch.

I disagree with your objective.  Making more code common is a great idea,
but this patch is too unambitious.  We should be heading towards one or
two page table allocation functions instead of having every architecture do
its own thing.

So start there.  Move the x86 function into common code and convert one
other architecture to use it too.

_______________________________________________
linux-riscv mailing list
linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-riscv

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH V2] mm: Introduce GFP_PGTABLE
  2019-01-16 12:44     ` Michal Hocko
@ 2019-01-16 13:27       ` Anshuman Khandual
  2019-01-16 13:36         ` Michal Hocko
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 17+ messages in thread
From: Anshuman Khandual @ 2019-01-16 13:27 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Michal Hocko, Matthew Wilcox
  Cc: mark.rutland, linux-sh, peterz, catalin.marinas, dave.hansen,
	will.deacon, linux-kernel, linux-mm, linux-riscv, kvmarm, mpe,
	linux, mingo, vbabka, rientjes, palmer, greentime, marc.zyngier,
	rppt, shakeelb, kirill, tglx, linux-arm-kernel, ard.biesheuvel,
	robin.murphy, steve.capper, christoffer.dall, james.morse,
	aneesh.kumar, akpm, linuxppc-dev



On 01/16/2019 06:14 PM, Michal Hocko wrote:
> On Wed 16-01-19 04:30:18, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
>> On Wed, Jan 16, 2019 at 07:57:03AM +0100, Michal Hocko wrote:
>>> On Wed 16-01-19 11:51:32, Anshuman Khandual wrote:
>>>> All architectures have been defining their own PGALLOC_GFP as (GFP_KERNEL |
>>>> __GFP_ZERO) and using it for allocating page table pages. This causes some
>>>> code duplication which can be easily avoided. GFP_KERNEL allocated and
>>>> cleared out pages (__GFP_ZERO) are required for page tables on any given
>>>> architecture. This creates a new generic GFP flag flag which can be used
>>>> for any page table page allocation. Does not cause any functional change.
>>>>
>>>> GFP_PGTABLE is being added into include/asm-generic/pgtable.h which is the
>>>> generic page tabe header just to prevent it's potential misuse as a general
>>>> allocation flag if included in include/linux/gfp.h.
>>>
>>> I haven't reviewed the patch yet but I am wondering whether this is
>>> really worth it without going all the way down to unify the common code
>>> and remove much more code duplication. Or is this not possible for some
>>> reason?
>>
>> Exactly what I suggested doing in response to v1.
>>
>> Also, the approach taken here is crazy.  x86 has a feature that no other
>> architecture has bothered to implement yet -- accounting page tables
>> to the process.  Yet instead of spreading that goodness to all other
>> architectures, Anshuman has gone to more effort to avoid doing that.
> 
> Yes, I believe the only reason this is x86 only is that each arch would
> have to be tweaked separately. So a cleanup in _that_ regard would be
> helpful. There is no real reason to have ptes accounted only for x86.
> There might be some exceptions but well, our asm-generic allows to opt
> in for generic implementation or override it with a special one. The
> later should be an exception rather than the rule.

Fair enough. So we seem to have agreement over __GFP_ACCOUNT for user page
tables but not for the kernel. But should we accommodate __GFP_RETRY_MAYFAIL
or drop them altogether (including multi order allocation requests) ?

_______________________________________________
linux-riscv mailing list
linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-riscv

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH V2] mm: Introduce GFP_PGTABLE
  2019-01-16 13:18       ` Matthew Wilcox
@ 2019-01-16 13:33         ` Michal Hocko
  2019-01-16 13:47         ` Christophe Leroy
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 17+ messages in thread
From: Michal Hocko @ 2019-01-16 13:33 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Matthew Wilcox
  Cc: mark.rutland, linux-sh, peterz, catalin.marinas, dave.hansen,
	will.deacon, christoffer.dall, linux-mm, linux-riscv, kvmarm,
	mpe, greentime, linux, mingo, vbabka, rientjes, palmer,
	Anshuman Khandual, marc.zyngier, rppt, shakeelb, kirill, tglx,
	linux-arm-kernel, ard.biesheuvel, robin.murphy, steve.capper,
	linux-kernel, james.morse, aneesh.kumar, akpm, linuxppc-dev

On Wed 16-01-19 05:18:27, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 16, 2019 at 06:42:22PM +0530, Anshuman Khandual wrote:
> > On 01/16/2019 06:00 PM, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> > > On Wed, Jan 16, 2019 at 07:57:03AM +0100, Michal Hocko wrote:
> > >> On Wed 16-01-19 11:51:32, Anshuman Khandual wrote:
> > >>> All architectures have been defining their own PGALLOC_GFP as (GFP_KERNEL |
> > >>> __GFP_ZERO) and using it for allocating page table pages. This causes some
> > >>> code duplication which can be easily avoided. GFP_KERNEL allocated and
> > >>> cleared out pages (__GFP_ZERO) are required for page tables on any given
> > >>> architecture. This creates a new generic GFP flag flag which can be used
> > >>> for any page table page allocation. Does not cause any functional change.
> > >>>
> > >>> GFP_PGTABLE is being added into include/asm-generic/pgtable.h which is the
> > >>> generic page tabe header just to prevent it's potential misuse as a general
> > >>> allocation flag if included in include/linux/gfp.h.
> > >>
> > >> I haven't reviewed the patch yet but I am wondering whether this is
> > >> really worth it without going all the way down to unify the common code
> > >> and remove much more code duplication. Or is this not possible for some
> > >> reason?
> > > 
> > > Exactly what I suggested doing in response to v1.
> > > 
> > > Also, the approach taken here is crazy.  x86 has a feature that no other
> > > architecture has bothered to implement yet -- accounting page tables
> > > to the process.  Yet instead of spreading that goodness to all other
> > > architectures, Anshuman has gone to more effort to avoid doing that.
> > 
> > The basic objective for this patch is to create a common minimum allocation
> > flag that can be used by architectures but that still allows archs to add
> > on additional constraints if they see fit. This patch does not intend to
> > change functionality for any arch.
> 
> I disagree with your objective.  Making more code common is a great idea,
> but this patch is too unambitious.  We should be heading towards one or
> two page table allocation functions instead of having every architecture do
> its own thing.
> 
> So start there.  Move the x86 function into common code and convert one
> other architecture to use it too.

Agreed!

-- 
Michal Hocko
SUSE Labs

_______________________________________________
linux-riscv mailing list
linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-riscv

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH V2] mm: Introduce GFP_PGTABLE
  2019-01-16 13:27       ` Anshuman Khandual
@ 2019-01-16 13:36         ` Michal Hocko
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 17+ messages in thread
From: Michal Hocko @ 2019-01-16 13:36 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Anshuman Khandual
  Cc: mark.rutland, linux-sh, peterz, catalin.marinas, dave.hansen,
	will.deacon, linux-kernel, linux-mm, linux-riscv, kvmarm, mpe,
	linux, Matthew Wilcox, mingo, vbabka, rientjes, palmer,
	greentime, marc.zyngier, rppt, shakeelb, kirill, tglx,
	linux-arm-kernel, ard.biesheuvel, robin.murphy, steve.capper,
	christoffer.dall, james.morse, aneesh.kumar, akpm, linuxppc-dev

On Wed 16-01-19 18:57:13, Anshuman Khandual wrote:
> 
> 
> On 01/16/2019 06:14 PM, Michal Hocko wrote:
> > On Wed 16-01-19 04:30:18, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> >> On Wed, Jan 16, 2019 at 07:57:03AM +0100, Michal Hocko wrote:
> >>> On Wed 16-01-19 11:51:32, Anshuman Khandual wrote:
> >>>> All architectures have been defining their own PGALLOC_GFP as (GFP_KERNEL |
> >>>> __GFP_ZERO) and using it for allocating page table pages. This causes some
> >>>> code duplication which can be easily avoided. GFP_KERNEL allocated and
> >>>> cleared out pages (__GFP_ZERO) are required for page tables on any given
> >>>> architecture. This creates a new generic GFP flag flag which can be used
> >>>> for any page table page allocation. Does not cause any functional change.
> >>>>
> >>>> GFP_PGTABLE is being added into include/asm-generic/pgtable.h which is the
> >>>> generic page tabe header just to prevent it's potential misuse as a general
> >>>> allocation flag if included in include/linux/gfp.h.
> >>>
> >>> I haven't reviewed the patch yet but I am wondering whether this is
> >>> really worth it without going all the way down to unify the common code
> >>> and remove much more code duplication. Or is this not possible for some
> >>> reason?
> >>
> >> Exactly what I suggested doing in response to v1.
> >>
> >> Also, the approach taken here is crazy.  x86 has a feature that no other
> >> architecture has bothered to implement yet -- accounting page tables
> >> to the process.  Yet instead of spreading that goodness to all other
> >> architectures, Anshuman has gone to more effort to avoid doing that.
> > 
> > Yes, I believe the only reason this is x86 only is that each arch would
> > have to be tweaked separately. So a cleanup in _that_ regard would be
> > helpful. There is no real reason to have ptes accounted only for x86.
> > There might be some exceptions but well, our asm-generic allows to opt
> > in for generic implementation or override it with a special one. The
> > later should be an exception rather than the rule.
> 
> Fair enough. So we seem to have agreement over __GFP_ACCOUNT for user page
> tables but not for the kernel. But should we accommodate __GFP_RETRY_MAYFAIL
> or drop them altogether (including multi order allocation requests) ?

__GFP_RETRY_MAYFAIL is a leftover from __GFP_REPEAT times and from my
recollection it was pointless there. Or do we have any pte allocations
which are costly high order or that would rather fail than OOM kill and
retry.

Really there is no reason to preserve some code just because it is
written that way.

Anyway, as Mathew already pointed out. There is no real reason to
convert all arches at once. If you carve out a common implementation and
make it arch generic then you can go once arch at the time a reuse the
generic implementation. If there are still some arches which differ only
by __GFP_RETRY_MAYFAIL then talk to respective maintainers and ask them
what is the underlying reason.

See how that is a completely different and much more efficient way than
trying to make GFP_PGTABLE special and keep the code around?

-- 
Michal Hocko
SUSE Labs

_______________________________________________
linux-riscv mailing list
linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-riscv

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH V2] mm: Introduce GFP_PGTABLE
  2019-01-16 13:18       ` Matthew Wilcox
  2019-01-16 13:33         ` Michal Hocko
@ 2019-01-16 13:47         ` Christophe Leroy
  2019-01-16 14:20           ` Matthew Wilcox
  1 sibling, 1 reply; 17+ messages in thread
From: Christophe Leroy @ 2019-01-16 13:47 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Matthew Wilcox, Anshuman Khandual
  Cc: mark.rutland, christoffer.dall, linux-sh, peterz,
	catalin.marinas, palmer, will.deacon, Michal Hocko, linux-mm,
	linux-riscv, kvmarm, aneesh.kumar, linux, mingo,
	linux-arm-kernel, rientjes, dave.hansen, greentime, marc.zyngier,
	rppt, shakeelb, kirill, tglx, vbabka, ard.biesheuvel,
	linuxppc-dev, steve.capper, linux-kernel, james.morse, akpm,
	robin.murphy



Le 16/01/2019 à 14:18, Matthew Wilcox a écrit :
> On Wed, Jan 16, 2019 at 06:42:22PM +0530, Anshuman Khandual wrote:
>> On 01/16/2019 06:00 PM, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
>>> On Wed, Jan 16, 2019 at 07:57:03AM +0100, Michal Hocko wrote:
>>>> On Wed 16-01-19 11:51:32, Anshuman Khandual wrote:
>>>>> All architectures have been defining their own PGALLOC_GFP as (GFP_KERNEL |
>>>>> __GFP_ZERO) and using it for allocating page table pages. This causes some
>>>>> code duplication which can be easily avoided. GFP_KERNEL allocated and
>>>>> cleared out pages (__GFP_ZERO) are required for page tables on any given
>>>>> architecture. This creates a new generic GFP flag flag which can be used
>>>>> for any page table page allocation. Does not cause any functional change.
>>>>>
>>>>> GFP_PGTABLE is being added into include/asm-generic/pgtable.h which is the
>>>>> generic page tabe header just to prevent it's potential misuse as a general
>>>>> allocation flag if included in include/linux/gfp.h.
>>>>
>>>> I haven't reviewed the patch yet but I am wondering whether this is
>>>> really worth it without going all the way down to unify the common code
>>>> and remove much more code duplication. Or is this not possible for some
>>>> reason?
>>>
>>> Exactly what I suggested doing in response to v1.
>>>
>>> Also, the approach taken here is crazy.  x86 has a feature that no other
>>> architecture has bothered to implement yet -- accounting page tables
>>> to the process.  Yet instead of spreading that goodness to all other
>>> architectures, Anshuman has gone to more effort to avoid doing that.
>>
>> The basic objective for this patch is to create a common minimum allocation
>> flag that can be used by architectures but that still allows archs to add
>> on additional constraints if they see fit. This patch does not intend to
>> change functionality for any arch.
> 
> I disagree with your objective.  Making more code common is a great idea,
> but this patch is too unambitious.  We should be heading towards one or
> two page table allocation functions instead of having every architecture do
> its own thing.
> 
> So start there.  Move the x86 function into common code and convert one
> other architecture to use it too.

Are we talking about pte_alloc_one_kernel() and pte_alloc_one() ?

I'm not sure x86 function is the best common one, as it seems to 
allocate a multiple of PAGE_SIZE only.

Some arches like powerpc use pagetables which are smaller than a page, 
for instance powerpc 8xx uses 4k pagetables even with 16k pages, which 
means a single page can be used by 4 pagetables.

Therefore, I would suggest to start with powerpc functions.

Christophe

_______________________________________________
linux-riscv mailing list
linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-riscv

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH V2] mm: Introduce GFP_PGTABLE
  2019-01-16 13:47         ` Christophe Leroy
@ 2019-01-16 14:20           ` Matthew Wilcox
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 17+ messages in thread
From: Matthew Wilcox @ 2019-01-16 14:20 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Christophe Leroy
  Cc: mark.rutland, christoffer.dall, linux-sh, peterz,
	catalin.marinas, palmer, will.deacon, Michal Hocko, linux-mm,
	linux-riscv, kvmarm, aneesh.kumar, greentime, linux, mingo,
	linux-arm-kernel, rientjes, dave.hansen, Anshuman Khandual,
	marc.zyngier, rppt, shakeelb, kirill, tglx, vbabka,
	ard.biesheuvel, linuxppc-dev, steve.capper, linux-kernel,
	james.morse, akpm, robin.murphy

On Wed, Jan 16, 2019 at 02:47:16PM +0100, Christophe Leroy wrote:
> Le 16/01/2019 à 14:18, Matthew Wilcox a écrit :
> > I disagree with your objective.  Making more code common is a great idea,
> > but this patch is too unambitious.  We should be heading towards one or
> > two page table allocation functions instead of having every architecture do
> > its own thing.
> > 
> > So start there.  Move the x86 function into common code and convert one
> > other architecture to use it too.
> 
> Are we talking about pte_alloc_one_kernel() and pte_alloc_one() ?
> 
> I'm not sure x86 function is the best common one, as it seems to allocate a
> multiple of PAGE_SIZE only.

And that's the common case.  Most architectures use a single page for at
least one level of the pte/pmd/pud/p4d/pgd hierarchy.  Some use multiple
pages and some use a fraction of a page.

> Some arches like powerpc use pagetables which are smaller than a page, for
> instance powerpc 8xx uses 4k pagetables even with 16k pages, which means a
> single page can be used by 4 pagetables.

Those can be added later.  Note I said "one or two", and that's what I
had in mind; I think we want one function that allocates just a page
and another that allocates a page fragment.  Then we can have a good
discussion about what method we use; s390 and ppc use different techniques
today and there's really no good reason for that.

_______________________________________________
linux-riscv mailing list
linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-riscv

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH V2] mm: Introduce GFP_PGTABLE
  2019-01-16 12:30   ` Matthew Wilcox
                       ` (2 preceding siblings ...)
  2019-01-16 13:12     ` Anshuman Khandual
@ 2019-01-17  9:56     ` Michael Ellerman
  3 siblings, 0 replies; 17+ messages in thread
From: Michael Ellerman @ 2019-01-17  9:56 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Matthew Wilcox, Michal Hocko
  Cc: mark.rutland, linux-sh, peterz, catalin.marinas, dave.hansen,
	will.deacon, christoffer.dall, linux-mm, linux-riscv, kvmarm,
	aneesh.kumar, greentime, linux, mingo, vbabka, rientjes, palmer,
	Anshuman Khandual, marc.zyngier, rppt, shakeelb, kirill, tglx,
	linux-arm-kernel, ard.biesheuvel, robin.murphy, steve.capper,
	linux-kernel, james.morse, akpm, linuxppc-dev

Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org> writes:

> On Wed, Jan 16, 2019 at 07:57:03AM +0100, Michal Hocko wrote:
>> On Wed 16-01-19 11:51:32, Anshuman Khandual wrote:
>> > All architectures have been defining their own PGALLOC_GFP as (GFP_KERNEL |
>> > __GFP_ZERO) and using it for allocating page table pages. This causes some
>> > code duplication which can be easily avoided. GFP_KERNEL allocated and
>> > cleared out pages (__GFP_ZERO) are required for page tables on any given
>> > architecture. This creates a new generic GFP flag flag which can be used
>> > for any page table page allocation. Does not cause any functional change.
>> > 
>> > GFP_PGTABLE is being added into include/asm-generic/pgtable.h which is the
>> > generic page tabe header just to prevent it's potential misuse as a general
>> > allocation flag if included in include/linux/gfp.h.
>> 
>> I haven't reviewed the patch yet but I am wondering whether this is
>> really worth it without going all the way down to unify the common code
>> and remove much more code duplication. Or is this not possible for some
>> reason?
>
> Exactly what I suggested doing in response to v1.
>
> Also, the approach taken here is crazy.  x86 has a feature that no other
> architecture has bothered to implement yet -- accounting page tables
> to the process.

powerpc does __GFP_ACCOUNT for user page tables too. Shamelessly cribbed
from the x86 version of course :)

cheers

_______________________________________________
linux-riscv mailing list
linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-riscv

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2019-01-17  9:57 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 17+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2019-01-16  6:21 [PATCH V2] mm: Introduce GFP_PGTABLE Anshuman Khandual
2019-01-16  6:55 ` Mike Rapoport
2019-01-16 12:53   ` Anshuman Khandual
2019-01-16  6:57 ` Michal Hocko
2019-01-16 12:30   ` Matthew Wilcox
2019-01-16 12:34     ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-01-16 12:44     ` Michal Hocko
2019-01-16 13:27       ` Anshuman Khandual
2019-01-16 13:36         ` Michal Hocko
2019-01-16 13:12     ` Anshuman Khandual
2019-01-16 13:18       ` Matthew Wilcox
2019-01-16 13:33         ` Michal Hocko
2019-01-16 13:47         ` Christophe Leroy
2019-01-16 14:20           ` Matthew Wilcox
2019-01-17  9:56     ` Michael Ellerman
2019-01-16  7:10 ` Christophe Leroy
2019-01-16 12:39   ` Anshuman Khandual

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).