From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.5 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4A7C6C4727D for ; Mon, 5 Oct 2020 16:40:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: from merlin.infradead.org (merlin.infradead.org [205.233.59.134]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 80E7F2076E for ; Mon, 5 Oct 2020 16:40:06 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=lists.infradead.org header.i=@lists.infradead.org header.b="XBkzXRWD"; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key) header.d=google.com header.i=@google.com header.b="l6LKrMfj" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 80E7F2076E Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=reject dis=none) header.from=google.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-riscv-bounces+linux-riscv=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=merlin.20170209; h=Sender:Content-Type: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Cc:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post:List-Archive: List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:Mime-Version:Message-ID:To:From:In-Reply-To:Subject: Date:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From: Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:References:List-Owner; bh=TR2EWZJLFvHjQr1KoKp2iKJKNcam3FLcM1ThIubOd1s=; b=XBkzXRWDdYvCdnUUzuG/ZfyHS xuUvDkLLIrGnnss4t8ZMPqBfqd34w1zxbkDK3J5W3tWmtaJykgwsapOdGJip32poFDMpmJH8rPTen ahjMgm3A0XYP9jGNx91ixcseYMBACxVxiBKvsh0n+KnSKmjEsBymzPZG0WB63kphVHwFfn6yEsGT8 os+RMIJUAJnyVA/1Qgi3s2wZ2YX0Tmb7UGBL/hAiZfhONxw3h6lrCEpGGwBxj2jRvDxzcR25VyL/R Ob59tk5+ijCPgnYQFTehGW9cvRI/84aAoxEGeY4repnUfhkjLAgAm8zSMJdXpuI/yChA0PkQwT1BJ 4LHoDNmhQ==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=merlin.infradead.org) by merlin.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92.3 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1kPTWm-0000x2-5B; Mon, 05 Oct 2020 16:39:56 +0000 Received: from mail-pf1-x442.google.com ([2607:f8b0:4864:20::442]) by merlin.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.92.3 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1kPTWk-0000wP-NN for linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org; Mon, 05 Oct 2020 16:39:55 +0000 Received: by mail-pf1-x442.google.com with SMTP id e10so6726227pfj.1 for ; Mon, 05 Oct 2020 09:39:54 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20161025; h=date:subject:in-reply-to:cc:from:to:message-id:mime-version :content-transfer-encoding; bh=bgKuiZru+fzYOW+rknHpx1Qb/5rCkL8zdBgqBiopZMo=; b=l6LKrMfjBVohHwxF9jv9cqtVCwnHkEr5vlQIuvPbeEgaOLBzDUY+wRtP25s/t70Hhk 5kWV73hIpokOwi1l3tHFPB2vRCReQJOQ4ip2SfbDgwGkEVVTeChIsI38ZzqFLsIBYJ54 Co2LtOtfJKXU4ezUVwnCkRZlXHoLRNgYZANjYnRB2g2PAYqQGWe+iLcKStDvNMwo9wl4 2IEPUjd/4a30CwRyaXqR5Y/7BZTsWDS/rqJ5l9ENklSFMXLNAF4CIFlDSZ3Q4xVN9M0O H3omOE7p1NxvhbLbxwFC1f0wKnxwTlqnG1HOfQuubft5h5kKaYf0aCI7hgPx+yG0l8YJ X32g== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:subject:in-reply-to:cc:from:to:message-id :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=bgKuiZru+fzYOW+rknHpx1Qb/5rCkL8zdBgqBiopZMo=; b=Bq0nzhW5Kgl8eh5xqxvz00uIi3zkzEhArdb54PF1H/PRp5V4TxIm7RkZnKVnz4BOIP EOsbLND0YGXUV/uete/KLH1gIyjq/g/aJX0wKkKw0SdvA82IJUMRyw6BBh/AOIdoF/jw Hf617TgUc3kfj63xpJ3cK3WEB7TtFNYoob63Un3r1IZh/937MW8RMW3/G7jTBsn8TIST d0hJYaM/7Gi35mULEGWs9Q2vU53hOckZPNYewamhUeOabCX+dGJFoCTanMH9U3wea7On iH6R9dcAmXWswjNCwDLCStNMzxu2HtrML10lAAAcgmfHLB/7rgjm05isyjzpCOvAzc7b 7ddg== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530ovg+NpwSgDNtAItYnQJLeyxMtenrsQCKAXWw+xq/aUUgak241 V1y04ZVfFwJmufw1gpbqYbaL0A== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzscDCmybkxTYMeNPHRJvgED0ZxQ648JzxM13dAod0j3fjEo4NfbnuwNAzcN1JII0PYa0oCnw== X-Received: by 2002:a05:6a00:1356:b029:13e:5203:fba3 with SMTP id k22-20020a056a001356b029013e5203fba3mr565585pfu.3.1601915992319; Mon, 05 Oct 2020 09:39:52 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (76-210-143-223.lightspeed.sntcca.sbcglobal.net. [76.210.143.223]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id z9sm418686pfk.118.2020.10.05.09.39.47 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Mon, 05 Oct 2020 09:39:51 -0700 (PDT) Date: Mon, 05 Oct 2020 09:39:51 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Original-Date: Mon, 05 Oct 2020 09:39:45 PDT (-0700) Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 1/3] riscv: Fixup static_obj() fail In-Reply-To: <87lfglt6z1.fsf@igel.home> From: Palmer Dabbelt To: schwab@linux-m68k.org Message-ID: Mime-Version: 1.0 (MHng) X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20201005_123954_780157_109669FB X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 14.76 ) X-BeenThere: linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: tycho@tycho.ws, aou@eecs.berkeley.edu, nickhu@andestech.com, anup@brainfault.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-csky@vger.kernel.org, guoren@linux.alibaba.com, guoren@kernel.org, zong.li@sifive.com, Paul Walmsley , greentime.hu@sifive.com, tglx@linutronix.de, linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed" Sender: "linux-riscv" Errors-To: linux-riscv-bounces+linux-riscv=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org On Mon, 05 Oct 2020 01:25:22 PDT (-0700), schwab@linux-m68k.org wrote: > On Sep 14 2020, Aurelien Jarno wrote: > >> How should we proceed to get that fixed in time for 5.9? For the older >> branches where it has been backported (so far 5.7 and 5.8), should we >> just get that commit reverted instead? > > Why is this still broken? Sorry, I hadn't seen this. I'm not seeing a boot failure on 5.9-rc8 with just CONFIG_HARDENED_USERCPOY=y in addition to defconfig (on QEMU, though I doubt that's relevant here). It looks like the fix is to essentially revert this, which I'm fine with, but I'd prefer to have a failing test to make sure this doesn't break again. Guo: I don't see an actual patch (signed off and such) posted for this, do you mind posting one? Otherwise I'll take a crack at constructing the revert myself. _______________________________________________ linux-riscv mailing list linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-riscv