From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-9.9 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, MENTIONS_GIT_HOSTING,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 10594C2D0A8 for ; Sat, 26 Sep 2020 17:51:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: from merlin.infradead.org (merlin.infradead.org [205.233.59.134]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 972D5206E5 for ; Sat, 26 Sep 2020 17:51:16 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=lists.infradead.org header.i=@lists.infradead.org header.b="qm86tsjX"; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key) header.d=dabbelt-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com header.i=@dabbelt-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com header.b="YTQoH/ZP" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 972D5206E5 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=dabbelt.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-riscv-bounces+linux-riscv=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=merlin.20170209; h=Sender:Content-Type: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Cc:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post:List-Archive: List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:Mime-Version:Message-ID:To:From:In-Reply-To:Subject: Date:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From: Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:References:List-Owner; bh=77WWEmgdacnOpEsr7cnJ0s/UBSuzkDuEKT0H08JobjM=; b=qm86tsjXI9rphnvNOzWXtVFAs koZJrGZjf/4iGtBgOuWp20vbyMV/NhXd63gweBt2Q6cyKBYFWA7F4XOY4phIcU/J0Unyq5kc6ymo3 NlsFaWWSulDxho4qwYrs8vm4hBzTbRET73AYN1rgAbj4AG9zEekqhgN7ZmNyIZl9+fQ+WZLIyf3uk zsEt/aopp4dP1ncQVA73kgb1xG8lI5JdythKFYz6EkCX2eBpdRifOrl1JVJDoYE+HYYeOKfKoNeT/ oUWg2FkckZ2z8uhRKV5SVaugSZIQCQQCTb+LHs0PNKBEniF9W/DCqANEBnugHxW8tVX/J+aPNqxIq nY9Gs6d9A==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=merlin.infradead.org) by merlin.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92.3 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1kMELb-0007Lp-Ey; Sat, 26 Sep 2020 17:50:59 +0000 Received: from mail-pg1-x544.google.com ([2607:f8b0:4864:20::544]) by merlin.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.92.3 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1kMELZ-0007L1-Eh for linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org; Sat, 26 Sep 2020 17:50:58 +0000 Received: by mail-pg1-x544.google.com with SMTP id 197so4948620pge.8 for ; Sat, 26 Sep 2020 10:50:55 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=dabbelt-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=date:subject:in-reply-to:cc:from:to:message-id:mime-version :content-transfer-encoding; bh=hTdWakHiHp9Vlr0UcT3ntAxXSZRAAFha6FtskJko8Jw=; b=YTQoH/ZPZdj0DZHE9slEFw8q8+yyJ9RzJbYifN3Ucgx/DTLM0FjB9VMp0WUnu8Fo4+ PepP4szgSee/u9o/rZUz5w4EdvFNwMgZMo9tc36/8AbqiOwDHt9YGDBlUppMgJpBfzYg 7AYr35Btmhq6fY/v1TxRh+eJI7r5vi/cmmXxwRzbSJABMWSkAqD6IFTaIS0HEHgp/Cfp tN55uKlV211JLSUPzCQU+lJ1q5hf4iMfO9eE6wAPjJetSUryuCCuOG3Th3Cb8D67Ylgp a08soHTvJAjhcXT3/C8o9EBOgZnEWPcMYHNgcsfXBIcjjylqjvM7KtPG4MQeXrBGk9Iq +Eeg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:subject:in-reply-to:cc:from:to:message-id :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=hTdWakHiHp9Vlr0UcT3ntAxXSZRAAFha6FtskJko8Jw=; b=bpbIcP4/tJ1RBwyRoLdgo9IaraWG83vk/CtvBWff3+gVzjgFXP6C2ir27LyqyJ1o4C gvla+vBszK1mH7g+0aELwk8IyXNMpek3LDqB0roglU6G5YiS7kVWNDoQXoE2fPhIvkOy 37PsJgMKvXiRqNqSHOjZnjKZwUSrJpH+Aviwpb5MC86CyfSgIltN4dXrCyAsKwPpl4nc h8hRCoSWQsSzF8uEcsFfusI7JHa/Vstrj2dxg2MBmOTcjqyAq10fwkr/QVWWdSqrXB6l YdHpFgCFR35FGqjP5capNKqoMXhsua9eAhiI+8XjQa3yZ5yo1xd8HEcZ2zG/6Za8qANB inLQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532+ySAT69RoIr7+EW3LqJDXfhekA96DWvTaci3MA3yGdSAkIO2X wR3nnDZzQ84PJoETnkf7+Wwo2w== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzfmrgaHodK6b5xlg8OXYJn9Q34MTXKO9hZBFMHRHq1Kp+6jQlqwc2rhCTpfcPOuGwpd2mh7A== X-Received: by 2002:a63:6306:: with SMTP id x6mr3566849pgb.161.1601142653517; Sat, 26 Sep 2020 10:50:53 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (76-210-143-223.lightspeed.sntcca.sbcglobal.net. [76.210.143.223]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id v10sm2328987pjf.34.2020.09.26.10.50.52 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Sat, 26 Sep 2020 10:50:52 -0700 (PDT) Date: Sat, 26 Sep 2020 10:50:52 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Original-Date: Sat, 26 Sep 2020 10:50:51 PDT (-0700) Subject: Re: remove set_fs for riscv v2 In-Reply-To: <20200922043752.GA29151@lst.de> From: Palmer Dabbelt To: Christoph Hellwig , viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk, Arnd Bergmann Message-ID: Mime-Version: 1.0 (MHng) X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20200926_135057_603833_D0AA8D8C X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 20.09 ) X-BeenThere: linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org, Christoph Hellwig , Paul Walmsley Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed" Sender: "linux-riscv" Errors-To: linux-riscv-bounces+linux-riscv=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org On Mon, 21 Sep 2020 21:37:52 PDT (-0700), Christoph Hellwig wrote: > Given tht we've not made much progress with the common branch, > are you fine just picking this up through the riscv tree for 5.10? > > I'll defer other architectures that depend on the common changes to > 5.11 then. I'm OK taking it, but there's a few things I'd like to sort out. IIRC I put it on a temporary branch over here https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/palmer/linux.git/log/?h=riscv-remove_set_fs under the assumption it might get lost otherwise, but let me know if that's not what you were looking for. Arnd: Are you OK with the asm-generic stuff? I couldn't find anything in my mail history, so sorry if I just missed it. Al: IIRC the plan here was to have me merge in a feature branch with this stuff, but it'd have to be based on your for-next as there are some dependencies over there. I see 5ae4998b5d6f ("powerpc: remove address space overrides using set_fs()") in vfs/for-next so I think we should be OK, but let me know if I'm doing something wrong. > On Wed, Sep 09, 2020 at 08:55:15AM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote: >> now that we've sorted out a remaining issue base.set_fs should not >> be rebased any more, so you could pull it into the riscv tree or a topic >> branch. >> >> The first four patch should go into base.set_fs, though. Arnd, can you >> re-review the updated patches? > ---end quoted text--- _______________________________________________ linux-riscv mailing list linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-riscv