From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.8 required=3.0 tests=DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SIGNED_OFF_BY,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B2375C2D0DB for ; Thu, 30 Jan 2020 15:41:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7FC4B2082E for ; Thu, 30 Jan 2020 15:41:29 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=lists.infradead.org header.i=@lists.infradead.org header.b="WilriWlF"; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key) header.d=google.com header.i=@google.com header.b="R2tx+EnM" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 7FC4B2082E Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=reject dis=none) header.from=google.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-riscv-bounces+infradead-linux-riscv=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20170209; h=Sender:Cc:List-Subscribe: List-Help:List-Post:List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:Mime-Version:Message-ID:References: In-Reply-To:To:Subject:From:Date:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description: Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID: List-Owner; bh=IzeuyLNwcHGeqDrPxY0hfInJ/Fb4wBiuy591zoPKvm4=; b=WilriWlFJ2dcw1 eA/9kjnDRqkBcKs1awEX0jc12UgrHPjfOX/4YEVr2lK67lq9b5ZsUuC57o6PyBa0qg/mm6aaT+ily 7jU59rLH/VYDZdPzHdVXYNnM7u835o1Z2H+gJBejvGssRUb/86hP9qgT9pXD/FV/4JVN1KRX9wCV6 MDNYBdpkyfMwFHp7tc2G890BPCG2cp92MwK8UlUi9hacNcOJ8JniocWeyoBteiqnevjy0XaFw6J2L f+/MCEDwzVvrXWDGNeA9ahWYZyyuxWosTqtJpuuHBc/QagwGTbk680sAZqWc550BNeAhxAd7FP3Rr KfyuGSMw5ugwP2WTwjQg==; Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92.3 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1ixBwb-00078q-1g; Thu, 30 Jan 2020 15:41:25 +0000 Received: from mail-wm1-x341.google.com ([2a00:1450:4864:20::341]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.92.3 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1ixBwY-00077Y-Jz for linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org; Thu, 30 Jan 2020 15:41:23 +0000 Received: by mail-wm1-x341.google.com with SMTP id b17so4807891wmb.0 for ; Thu, 30 Jan 2020 07:41:17 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20161025; h=date:from:subject:cc:to:in-reply-to:references:message-id :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=IzeuyLNwcHGeqDrPxY0hfInJ/Fb4wBiuy591zoPKvm4=; b=R2tx+EnM5ZzTjItg0Tg5V2axHD+nEJ5NjMp2Ev7oVIqipAnp4Y0ybqeCE1+HZKApwi KtfNJ/pVQcuWLA5f3+oquh9bNNGdnUfvrm003U/iJwPSY9OKPQdesACoQ0vyzqmOI+ss ZXLtlAc0d/YLG538qIKqO9yhW3N6aTx7Cu038skXnDed81IvwIGxRMTjffMdjkcmQPzt riTl3yrRfqJkrWLNGsPkQrm4osqzs5qR2VNSzceFYPZxoqGgBZEOjkz5aWhlUQJBeQHZ FeoJcDzrcMt4Q6hVAFCAKTe53mHYD54QPk/GdByiOm2dFhH6YpuxiTBjOiOkqncMOYfw lMKQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:subject:cc:to:in-reply-to:references :message-id:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=IzeuyLNwcHGeqDrPxY0hfInJ/Fb4wBiuy591zoPKvm4=; b=QR8De1v9WhiaNcvAMXb53FQ7hnMF4/wm4p2/zLESlIB8i3zLdaXrz3X8l36JBPS7YX j7dBiNY396PuoO07cjvqRsZa6aF0xCSj56wRMpaMFH6yfsZXUIonXLe8y/WtxQfQUHtG J8vGaAeLAtQvVrJXRnpCRJCDtHKdDU4x0jsYRCyXuRZo7FFB6ljPMiY3t5k49cfyBEqG KZwHcoGAhIyQDeeStE4rbHEkJd+Cl0q5H0d/UjH8kgOfZivKG5o+0L152gzdUqY6heNg O3XtOdjCborU6ZoKyKB4sSc4wGR7Z2nPp7YTvavDwGupQfavQRuJd3ysc9WZd64q8rUa aGPA== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAU/EPQ/cgDKJrzJ6a4pFmpdFsJQiZMHVKVZTMthWlYbrlDjsvsV uP9tMM/dSEYQrIiXboqCr2vt3w== X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqyqINQ1Dub9uL0itvcPYMPK8EFOKgs62EfLhNvh8oAS/swT1ioulL8RsQiM/8PP3tVGifFHNg== X-Received: by 2002:a7b:c183:: with SMTP id y3mr6326916wmi.0.1580398872454; Thu, 30 Jan 2020 07:41:12 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost ([2a00:79e0:d:11:1da2:3fd4:a302:4fff]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id w22sm6652544wmk.34.2020.01.30.07.41.11 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Thu, 30 Jan 2020 07:41:11 -0800 (PST) Date: Thu, 30 Jan 2020 07:41:11 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Original-Date: Thu, 30 Jan 2020 15:24:25 GMT (+0000) From: Palmer Dabbelt X-Google-Original-From: Palmer Dabbelt Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 4/4] RISC-V: Select Goldfish RTC driver for QEMU virt machine To: Paul Walmsley In-Reply-To: References: <20191203034909.37385-1-anup.patel@wdc.com> <20191203034909.37385-5-anup.patel@wdc.com> Message-ID: Mime-Version: 1.0 (MHng) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20200130_074122_652788_DEDB7F1A X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 10.79 ) X-BeenThere: linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: aou@eecs.berkeley.edu, anup@brainfault.org, Anup Patel , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Atish Patra , Alistair Francis , linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org, Christoph Hellwig Sender: "linux-riscv" Errors-To: linux-riscv-bounces+infradead-linux-riscv=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org On Wed, 22 Jan 2020 19:49:54 GMT (+0000), Paul Walmsley wrote: > On Tue, 3 Dec 2019, Anup Patel wrote: > >> We select Goldfish RTC driver using QEMU virt machine kconfig option >> to access RTC device on QEMU virt machine. >> >> Signed-off-by: Anup Patel >> Reviewed-by: Atish Patra >> Reviewed-by: Palmer Dabbelt > > I just grepped for Goldfish through the QEMU git tree, and it didn't come > up with anything. Per our discussion last year: as a general matter of > policy, until QEMU merges support for a simulated hardware device into > their master branch, we shouldn't speculatively enable support for it. > So, NAK from me on this one until that happens. Thanks, I thought they were going in through a hw/rtc tree and forgot about them. I've queued them up for QEMU via the RISC-V tree, there's still some other patches I'd like to batch up but I'll send them up soon. I don't see any reason why the Linux patches can't go in via an early-ish RC, so we shoul be fine.