From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.8 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A3AA8C43461 for ; Sat, 12 Sep 2020 12:02:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: from merlin.infradead.org (merlin.infradead.org [205.233.59.134]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1B60B214D8 for ; Sat, 12 Sep 2020 12:02:33 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=lists.infradead.org header.i=@lists.infradead.org header.b="msDzc9nm" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 1B60B214D8 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=sntech.de Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-rockchip-bounces+linux-rockchip=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=merlin.20170209; h=Sender:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-Type:Cc:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post:List-Archive: List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:MIME-Version:References:In-Reply-To:Message-ID:Date: Subject:To:From:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date: Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Owner; bh=Xi3+60XVLtA0lfiM/l5y8RPXsGwM/KqpjTriDIqoiic=; b=msDzc9nmJ69E/hEIiovpmlg+V 0AN4Q36Oj4w4ze1NEKItiKMiNnjyO9n4o+ase+c9GCZxJTeRwBrzC2+HF3Sg53lraZ7cIhAmNHhyn 1hOA6l8XhmNpHcg0tpQIGQT5Ro2G05KrMnGGPnxQu9Yjwoab4lP7ssHOBHoTfs+o+03ts195FfKXG lohK9reqctMsmgQcekgPYRinmP702Hcq7YG4ktk3Xg2DwfUi9j0+qZRl5rPlxNBE/OEJ66uxQcePl oS51C6Uqh27wCnW7RS91cIifFvIEIZZlMxktkuHNClnQxC42c68KvyCNyPHIyS9DhzEzRgPecmsIT wg4NImZ7g==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=merlin.infradead.org) by merlin.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92.3 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1kH4Ee-0003Hv-CK; Sat, 12 Sep 2020 12:02:28 +0000 Received: from gloria.sntech.de ([185.11.138.130]) by merlin.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.92.3 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1kH4Ec-0003HU-A6 for linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org; Sat, 12 Sep 2020 12:02:26 +0000 Received: from ip5f5aa64a.dynamic.kabel-deutschland.de ([95.90.166.74] helo=diego.localnet) by gloria.sntech.de with esmtpsa (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1kH4EY-0000A2-Tt; Sat, 12 Sep 2020 14:02:22 +0200 From: Heiko =?ISO-8859-1?Q?St=FCbner?= To: Jianqun Xu , Linus Walleij Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] pinctrl: rockchip: codingstyle for pinctrl-rockchip Date: Sat, 12 Sep 2020 14:02:22 +0200 Message-ID: <1646119.L9t6MPyLfv@diego> In-Reply-To: References: <20200117081358.5772-1-jay.xu@rock-chips.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20200912_080226_363479_B69C6EDD X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 14.87 ) X-BeenThere: linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Upstream kernel work for Rockchip platforms List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: "open list:ARM/Rockchip SoC..." , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "open list:GPIO SUBSYSTEM" , Kever Yang , David Wu Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "Linux-rockchip" Errors-To: linux-rockchip-bounces+linux-rockchip=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org Hi Linus, Am Samstag, 12. September 2020, 13:27:44 CEST schrieb Linus Walleij: > Jianqun, Heiko, > > On Fri, Jan 17, 2020 at 9:14 AM Jianqun Xu wrote: > > > Do codingstyle for pinctrl-rockchip by spliting driver by SoC types. > > > > Convenienty for reviewing, the first patch only moving > > pinctrl-rockchip.c from driver/pinctrl to driver/pinctrl/rockchip/ . > > > > Jianqun Xu (2): > > pinctrl: rockchip: new rockchip dir for pinctrl-rockchip > > pinctrl: rockchip: split rockchip pinctrl driver by SoC type > > Why were these patches never applied? Is it my fault? It's not your fault :-) > I don't even have patch 2/2 in my mailbox, possibly it was > too big! > > Heiko if you're OK with this change can Jianqun just send a > rebased version? We agreed to split it into smaller chunks which I think is the 13-patch series you mentioned elsewhere today. But I guess that fell through the cracks in my review :-( . So I guess we should do the current GKI thingy first to get that module build and after that maybe Jianqun can find the time to rebase the per-soc split on top of that. Heiko _______________________________________________ Linux-rockchip mailing list Linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-rockchip