linux-rockchip.lists.infradead.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [PATCH v4 1/2] dt-bindings: rockchip: Add DesignWare based PCIe controller
@ 2021-01-27  2:24 Simon Xue
  2021-01-27  2:25 ` [PATCH v4 2/2] PCI: rockchip: add " Simon Xue
                   ` (2 more replies)
  0 siblings, 3 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Simon Xue @ 2021-01-27  2:24 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Bjorn Helgaas, Lorenzo Pieralisi
  Cc: devicetree, Heiko Stuebner, linux-pci, linux-rockchip, robh+dt,
	Johan Jonker, Simon Xue

Document DT bindings for PCIe controller found on Rockchip SoC.

Signed-off-by: Simon Xue <xxm@rock-chips.com>
---
 .../bindings/pci/rockchip-dw-pcie.yaml        | 141 ++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 141 insertions(+)
 create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pci/rockchip-dw-pcie.yaml

diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pci/rockchip-dw-pcie.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pci/rockchip-dw-pcie.yaml
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..916eff09332c
--- /dev/null
+++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pci/rockchip-dw-pcie.yaml
@@ -0,0 +1,141 @@
+# SPDX-License-Identifier: (GPL-2.0 OR BSD-2-Clause)
+%YAML 1.2
+---
+$id: http://devicetree.org/schemas/pci/rockchip-dw-pcie.yaml#
+$schema: http://devicetree.org/meta-schemas/core.yaml#
+
+title: DesignWare based PCIe RC controller on Rockchip SoCs
+
+maintainers:
+  - Shawn Lin <shawn.lin@rock-chips.com>
+  - Simon Xue <xxm@rock-chips.com>
+  - Heiko Stuebner <heiko@sntech.de>
+
+description: |+
+  RK3568 SoC PCIe host controller is based on the Synopsys DesignWare
+  PCIe IP and thus inherits all the common properties defined in
+  designware-pcie.txt.
+
+allOf:
+  - $ref: /schemas/pci/pci-bus.yaml#
+
+# We need a select here so we don't match all nodes with 'snps,dw-pcie'
+select:
+  properties:
+    compatible:
+      contains:
+        const: rockchip,rk3568-pcie
+  required:
+    - compatible
+
+properties:
+  compatible:
+    items:
+      - const: rockchip,rk3568-pcie
+      - const: snps,dw-pcie
+
+  reg:
+    items:
+      - description: Data Bus Interface (DBI) registers
+      - description: Rockchip designed configuration registers
+      - description: Config registers
+
+  reg-names:
+    items:
+      - const: dbi
+      - const: apb
+      - const: config
+
+  clocks:
+    items:
+      - description: AHB clock for PCIe master
+      - description: AHB clock for PCIe slave
+      - description: AHB clock for PCIe dbi
+      - description: APB clock for PCIe
+      - description: Auxiliary clock for PCIe
+
+  clock-names:
+    items:
+      - const: aclk_mst
+      - const: aclk_slv
+      - const: aclk_dbi
+      - const: pclk
+      - const: aux
+
+  msi-map: true
+
+  num-lanes: true
+
+  phys:
+    maxItems: 1
+
+  phy-names:
+    const: pcie-phy
+
+  power-domains:
+    maxItems: 1
+
+  ranges:
+    maxItems: 2
+
+  resets:
+    maxItems: 1
+
+  reset-names:
+    const: pipe
+
+  vpcie3v3-supply: true
+
+required:
+  - compatible
+  - reg
+  - reg-names
+  - clocks
+  - clock-names
+  - msi-map
+  - num-lanes
+  - phys
+  - phy-names
+  - power-domains
+  - resets
+  - reset-names
+
+unevaluatedProperties: false
+
+examples:
+  - |
+
+    bus {
+        #address-cells = <2>;
+        #size-cells = <2>;
+
+        pcie3x2: pcie@fe280000 {
+            compatible = "rockchip,rk3568-pcie", "snps,dw-pcie";
+            reg = <0x3 0xc0800000 0x0 0x390000>,
+                  <0x0 0xfe280000 0x0 0x10000>,
+                  <0x3 0x80000000 0x0 0x100000>;
+            reg-names = "dbi", "apb", "config";
+            bus-range = <0x20 0x2f>;
+            clocks = <&cru 143>, <&cru 144>,
+                     <&cru 145>, <&cru 146>,
+                     <&cru 147>;
+            clock-names = "aclk_mst", "aclk_slv",
+                          "aclk_dbi", "pclk",
+                          "aux";
+            device_type = "pci";
+            linux,pci-domain = <2>;
+            max-link-speed = <2>;
+            msi-map = <0x2000 &its 0x2000 0x1000>;
+            num-lanes = <2>;
+            phys = <&pcie30phy>;
+            phy-names = "pcie-phy";
+            power-domains = <&power 15>;
+            ranges = <0x81000000 0x0 0x80800000 0x3 0x80800000 0x0 0x100000>,
+                     <0x83000000 0x0 0x80900000 0x3 0x80900000 0x0 0x3f700000>;
+            resets = <&cru 193>;
+            reset-names = "pipe";
+            #address-cells = <3>;
+            #size-cells = <2>;
+        };
+    };
+...
-- 
2.25.1




_______________________________________________
Linux-rockchip mailing list
Linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-rockchip

^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v4 2/2] PCI: rockchip: add DesignWare based PCIe controller
  2021-01-27  2:24 [PATCH v4 1/2] dt-bindings: rockchip: Add DesignWare based PCIe controller Simon Xue
@ 2021-01-27  2:25 ` Simon Xue
  2021-02-22  0:59   ` xxm
  2021-02-22  2:28   ` Krzysztof Wilczyński
  2021-02-22  0:59 ` [PATCH v4 1/2] dt-bindings: rockchip: Add DesignWare based PCIe controller xxm
  2021-02-22  2:37 ` Krzysztof Wilczyński
  2 siblings, 2 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Simon Xue @ 2021-01-27  2:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Bjorn Helgaas, Lorenzo Pieralisi
  Cc: devicetree, Heiko Stuebner, linux-pci, Shawn Lin, linux-rockchip,
	robh+dt, Johan Jonker, Simon Xue

pcie-dw-rockchip is based on DWC IP. But pcie-rockchip-host
is Rockchip designed IP which is only used for RK3399. So all the following
non-RK3399 SoCs should use this driver.

Signed-off-by: Simon Xue <xxm@rock-chips.com>
Signed-off-by: Shawn Lin <shawn.lin@rock-chips.com>
---
 drivers/pci/controller/dwc/Kconfig            |   9 +
 drivers/pci/controller/dwc/Makefile           |   1 +
 drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-dw-rockchip.c | 285 ++++++++++++++++++
 3 files changed, 295 insertions(+)
 create mode 100644 drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-dw-rockchip.c

diff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/Kconfig b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/Kconfig
index 22c5529e9a65..aee408fe9283 100644
--- a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/Kconfig
+++ b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/Kconfig
@@ -214,6 +214,15 @@ config PCIE_ARTPEC6_EP
 	  Enables support for the PCIe controller in the ARTPEC-6 SoC to work in
 	  endpoint mode. This uses the DesignWare core.
 
+config PCIE_ROCKCHIP_DW_HOST
+	bool "Rockchip DesignWare PCIe controller"
+	select PCIE_DW
+	select PCIE_DW_HOST
+	depends on ARCH_ROCKCHIP || COMPILE_TEST
+	depends on OF
+	help
+	  Enables support for the DW PCIe controller in the Rockchip SoC.
+
 config PCIE_INTEL_GW
 	bool "Intel Gateway PCIe host controller support"
 	depends on OF && (X86 || COMPILE_TEST)
diff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/Makefile b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/Makefile
index a751553fa0db..30eef8e9ee8a 100644
--- a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/Makefile
+++ b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/Makefile
@@ -13,6 +13,7 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_PCI_LAYERSCAPE_EP) += pci-layerscape-ep.o
 obj-$(CONFIG_PCIE_QCOM) += pcie-qcom.o
 obj-$(CONFIG_PCIE_ARMADA_8K) += pcie-armada8k.o
 obj-$(CONFIG_PCIE_ARTPEC6) += pcie-artpec6.o
+obj-$(CONFIG_PCIE_ROCKCHIP_DW_HOST) += pcie-dw-rockchip.o
 obj-$(CONFIG_PCIE_INTEL_GW) += pcie-intel-gw.o
 obj-$(CONFIG_PCIE_KIRIN) += pcie-kirin.o
 obj-$(CONFIG_PCIE_HISI_STB) += pcie-histb.o
diff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-dw-rockchip.c b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-dw-rockchip.c
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..5aca32452e40
--- /dev/null
+++ b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-dw-rockchip.c
@@ -0,0 +1,285 @@
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
+/*
+ * PCIe host controller driver for Rockchip SoCs
+ *
+ * Copyright (C) 2021 Rockchip Electronics Co., Ltd.
+ *		http://www.rock-chips.com
+ *
+ * Author: Simon Xue <xxm@rock-chips.com>
+ */
+
+#include <linux/clk.h>
+#include <linux/gpio/consumer.h>
+#include <linux/mfd/syscon.h>
+#include <linux/module.h>
+#include <linux/of_device.h>
+#include <linux/phy/phy.h>
+#include <linux/platform_device.h>
+#include <linux/regmap.h>
+#include <linux/reset.h>
+
+#include "pcie-designware.h"
+
+/*
+ * The upper 16 bits of PCIE_CLIENT_CONFIG are a write
+ * mask for the lower 16 bits.
+ */
+#define HIWORD_UPDATE(mask, val) (((mask) << 16) | (val))
+#define HIWORD_UPDATE_BIT(val)	HIWORD_UPDATE(val, val)
+
+#define to_rockchip_pcie(x) dev_get_drvdata((x)->dev)
+
+#define PCIE_CLIENT_RC_MODE		HIWORD_UPDATE_BIT(0x40)
+#define PCIE_CLIENT_ENABLE_LTSSM	HIWORD_UPDATE_BIT(0xc)
+#define PCIE_SMLH_LINKUP		BIT(16)
+#define PCIE_RDLH_LINKUP		BIT(17)
+#define PCIE_L0S_ENTRY			0x11
+#define PCIE_CLIENT_GENERAL_CONTROL	0x0
+#define PCIE_CLIENT_GENERAL_DEBUG	0x104
+#define PCIE_CLIENT_HOT_RESET_CTRL      0x180
+#define PCIE_CLIENT_LTSSM_STATUS	0x300
+#define PCIE_LTSSM_ENABLE_ENHANCE       BIT(4)
+
+struct rockchip_pcie {
+	struct dw_pcie			pci;
+	void __iomem			*apb_base;
+	struct phy			*phy;
+	struct clk_bulk_data		*clks;
+	unsigned int			clk_cnt;
+	struct reset_control		*rst;
+	struct gpio_desc		*rst_gpio;
+	struct regulator                *vpcie3v3;
+};
+
+static int rockchip_pcie_readl_apb(struct rockchip_pcie *rockchip,
+					     u32 reg)
+{
+	return readl(rockchip->apb_base + reg);
+}
+
+static void rockchip_pcie_writel_apb(struct rockchip_pcie *rockchip,
+						u32 val, u32 reg)
+{
+	writel(val, rockchip->apb_base + reg);
+}
+
+static void rockchip_pcie_enable_ltssm(struct rockchip_pcie *rockchip)
+{
+	rockchip_pcie_writel_apb(rockchip, PCIE_CLIENT_ENABLE_LTSSM,
+				 PCIE_CLIENT_GENERAL_CONTROL);
+}
+
+static int rockchip_pcie_link_up(struct dw_pcie *pci)
+{
+	struct rockchip_pcie *rockchip = to_rockchip_pcie(pci);
+	u32 val = rockchip_pcie_readl_apb(rockchip, PCIE_CLIENT_LTSSM_STATUS);
+
+	if ((val & (PCIE_RDLH_LINKUP | PCIE_SMLH_LINKUP)) == 0x30000 &&
+	    (val & GENMASK(5, 0)) == PCIE_L0S_ENTRY)
+		return 1;
+
+	return 0;
+}
+
+static int rockchip_pcie_start_link(struct dw_pcie *pci)
+{
+	struct rockchip_pcie *rockchip = to_rockchip_pcie(pci);
+
+	/* Reset device */
+	gpiod_set_value_cansleep(rockchip->rst_gpio, 0);
+	msleep(100);
+	gpiod_set_value_cansleep(rockchip->rst_gpio, 1);
+
+	rockchip_pcie_enable_ltssm(rockchip);
+
+	return 0;
+}
+
+static void rockchip_pcie_fast_link_setup(struct rockchip_pcie *rockchip)
+{
+	u32 val;
+
+	/* LTSSM EN ctrl mode */
+	val = rockchip_pcie_readl_apb(rockchip, PCIE_CLIENT_HOT_RESET_CTRL);
+	val |= PCIE_LTSSM_ENABLE_ENHANCE | (PCIE_LTSSM_ENABLE_ENHANCE << 16);
+	rockchip_pcie_writel_apb(rockchip, val, PCIE_CLIENT_HOT_RESET_CTRL);
+}
+
+static int rockchip_pcie_host_init(struct pcie_port *pp)
+{
+	struct dw_pcie *pci = to_dw_pcie_from_pp(pp);
+	struct rockchip_pcie *rockchip = to_rockchip_pcie(pci);
+
+	rockchip_pcie_fast_link_setup(rockchip);
+
+	rockchip_pcie_writel_apb(rockchip, PCIE_CLIENT_RC_MODE,
+				 PCIE_CLIENT_GENERAL_CONTROL);
+
+	return 0;
+}
+
+static const struct dw_pcie_host_ops rockchip_pcie_host_ops = {
+	.host_init = rockchip_pcie_host_init,
+};
+
+static int rockchip_pcie_clk_init(struct rockchip_pcie *rockchip)
+{
+	struct device *dev = rockchip->pci.dev;
+	int ret;
+
+	ret = devm_clk_bulk_get_all(dev, &rockchip->clks);
+	if (ret < 0)
+		return ret;
+
+	rockchip->clk_cnt = ret;
+
+	ret = clk_bulk_prepare_enable(rockchip->clk_cnt, rockchip->clks);
+	if (ret)
+		return ret;
+
+	return 0;
+}
+
+static int rockchip_pcie_resource_get(struct platform_device *pdev,
+				      struct rockchip_pcie *rockchip)
+{
+	rockchip->apb_base = devm_platform_ioremap_resource_byname(pdev, "apb");
+	if (IS_ERR(rockchip->apb_base))
+		return PTR_ERR(rockchip->apb_base);
+
+	rockchip->rst_gpio = devm_gpiod_get_optional(&pdev->dev, "reset",
+						     GPIOD_OUT_HIGH);
+	if (IS_ERR(rockchip->rst_gpio))
+		return PTR_ERR(rockchip->rst_gpio);
+
+	return 0;
+}
+
+static int rockchip_pcie_phy_init(struct rockchip_pcie *rockchip)
+{
+	int ret;
+	struct device *dev = rockchip->pci.dev;
+
+	rockchip->phy = devm_phy_get(dev, "pcie-phy");
+	if (IS_ERR(rockchip->phy))
+		return dev_err_probe(dev, PTR_ERR(rockchip->phy),
+				     "missing phy\n");
+
+	ret = phy_init(rockchip->phy);
+	if (ret < 0)
+		return ret;
+
+	phy_power_on(rockchip->phy);
+
+	return 0;
+}
+
+static void rockchip_pcie_phy_deinit(struct rockchip_pcie *rockchip)
+{
+	phy_exit(rockchip->phy);
+	phy_power_off(rockchip->phy);
+}
+
+static int rockchip_pcie_reset_control_release(struct rockchip_pcie *rockchip)
+{
+	struct device *dev = rockchip->pci.dev;
+	int ret;
+
+	rockchip->rst = devm_reset_control_array_get_exclusive(dev);
+	if (IS_ERR(rockchip->rst))
+		return dev_err_probe(dev, PTR_ERR(rockchip->rst),
+				     "failed to get reset lines\n");
+
+	ret = reset_control_deassert(rockchip->rst);
+
+	return ret;
+}
+
+static const struct dw_pcie_ops dw_pcie_ops = {
+	.link_up = rockchip_pcie_link_up,
+	.start_link = rockchip_pcie_start_link,
+};
+
+static int rockchip_pcie_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
+{
+	struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
+	struct rockchip_pcie *rockchip;
+	struct pcie_port *pp;
+	int ret;
+
+	rockchip = devm_kzalloc(dev, sizeof(*rockchip), GFP_KERNEL);
+	if (!rockchip)
+		return -ENOMEM;
+
+	platform_set_drvdata(pdev, rockchip);
+
+	rockchip->pci.dev = dev;
+	rockchip->pci.ops = &dw_pcie_ops;
+
+	pp = &rockchip->pci.pp;
+	pp->ops = &rockchip_pcie_host_ops;
+
+	ret = rockchip_pcie_resource_get(pdev, rockchip);
+	if (ret)
+		return ret;
+
+	/* DON'T MOVE ME: must be enable before phy init */
+	rockchip->vpcie3v3 = devm_regulator_get_optional(dev, "vpcie3v3");
+	if (IS_ERR(rockchip->vpcie3v3))
+		return dev_err_probe(dev, PTR_ERR(rockchip->rst),
+				     "failed to get vpcie3v3 regulator\n");
+
+	if (rockchip->vpcie3v3) {
+		ret = regulator_enable(rockchip->vpcie3v3);
+		if (ret) {
+			dev_err(dev, "fail to enable vpcie3v3 regulator\n");
+			return ret;
+		}
+	}
+
+	ret = rockchip_pcie_phy_init(rockchip);
+	if (ret)
+		goto disable_regulator;
+
+	ret = rockchip_pcie_reset_control_release(rockchip);
+	if (ret)
+		goto deinit_phy;
+
+	ret = rockchip_pcie_clk_init(rockchip);
+	if (ret)
+		goto deinit_phy;
+
+	ret = dw_pcie_host_init(pp);
+	if (ret)
+		goto deinit_clk;
+
+	return 0;
+
+deinit_clk:
+	clk_bulk_disable_unprepare(rockchip->clk_cnt, rockchip->clks);
+deinit_phy:
+	rockchip_pcie_phy_deinit(rockchip);
+disable_regulator:
+	if (rockchip->vpcie3v3)
+		regulator_disable(rockchip->vpcie3v3);
+
+	return ret;
+}
+
+MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, rockchip_pcie_of_match);
+
+static const struct of_device_id rockchip_pcie_of_match[] = {
+	{ .compatible = "rockchip,rk3568-pcie", },
+	{ /* sentinel */ },
+};
+
+static struct platform_driver rockchip_pcie_driver = {
+	.driver = {
+		.name	= "rockchip-dw-pcie",
+		.of_match_table = rockchip_pcie_of_match,
+		.suppress_bind_attrs = true,
+	},
+	.probe = rockchip_pcie_probe,
+};
+
+builtin_platform_driver(rockchip_pcie_driver);
-- 
2.25.1




_______________________________________________
Linux-rockchip mailing list
Linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-rockchip

^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH v4 2/2] PCI: rockchip: add DesignWare based PCIe controller
  2021-01-27  2:25 ` [PATCH v4 2/2] PCI: rockchip: add " Simon Xue
@ 2021-02-22  0:59   ` xxm
  2021-02-22  2:28   ` Krzysztof Wilczyński
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: xxm @ 2021-02-22  0:59 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Bjorn Helgaas, Lorenzo Pieralisi
  Cc: devicetree, Heiko Stuebner, linux-pci, Shawn Lin, linux-rockchip,
	robh+dt, Johan Jonker

Hi all,

It has been nearly a month since last V4 patch, any new comments?

在 2021/1/27 10:25, Simon Xue 写道:
> pcie-dw-rockchip is based on DWC IP. But pcie-rockchip-host
> is Rockchip designed IP which is only used for RK3399. So all the following
> non-RK3399 SoCs should use this driver.
>
> Signed-off-by: Simon Xue <xxm@rock-chips.com>
> Signed-off-by: Shawn Lin <shawn.lin@rock-chips.com>
> ---
>   drivers/pci/controller/dwc/Kconfig            |   9 +
>   drivers/pci/controller/dwc/Makefile           |   1 +
>   drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-dw-rockchip.c | 285 ++++++++++++++++++
>   3 files changed, 295 insertions(+)
>   create mode 100644 drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-dw-rockchip.c
>
> diff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/Kconfig b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/Kconfig
> index 22c5529e9a65..aee408fe9283 100644
> --- a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/Kconfig
> +++ b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/Kconfig
> @@ -214,6 +214,15 @@ config PCIE_ARTPEC6_EP
>   	  Enables support for the PCIe controller in the ARTPEC-6 SoC to work in
>   	  endpoint mode. This uses the DesignWare core.
>   
> +config PCIE_ROCKCHIP_DW_HOST
> +	bool "Rockchip DesignWare PCIe controller"
> +	select PCIE_DW
> +	select PCIE_DW_HOST
> +	depends on ARCH_ROCKCHIP || COMPILE_TEST
> +	depends on OF
> +	help
> +	  Enables support for the DW PCIe controller in the Rockchip SoC.
> +
>   config PCIE_INTEL_GW
>   	bool "Intel Gateway PCIe host controller support"
>   	depends on OF && (X86 || COMPILE_TEST)
> diff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/Makefile b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/Makefile
> index a751553fa0db..30eef8e9ee8a 100644
> --- a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/Makefile
> +++ b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/Makefile
> @@ -13,6 +13,7 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_PCI_LAYERSCAPE_EP) += pci-layerscape-ep.o
>   obj-$(CONFIG_PCIE_QCOM) += pcie-qcom.o
>   obj-$(CONFIG_PCIE_ARMADA_8K) += pcie-armada8k.o
>   obj-$(CONFIG_PCIE_ARTPEC6) += pcie-artpec6.o
> +obj-$(CONFIG_PCIE_ROCKCHIP_DW_HOST) += pcie-dw-rockchip.o
>   obj-$(CONFIG_PCIE_INTEL_GW) += pcie-intel-gw.o
>   obj-$(CONFIG_PCIE_KIRIN) += pcie-kirin.o
>   obj-$(CONFIG_PCIE_HISI_STB) += pcie-histb.o
> diff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-dw-rockchip.c b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-dw-rockchip.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..5aca32452e40
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-dw-rockchip.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,285 @@
> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
> +/*
> + * PCIe host controller driver for Rockchip SoCs
> + *
> + * Copyright (C) 2021 Rockchip Electronics Co., Ltd.
> + *		http://www.rock-chips.com
> + *
> + * Author: Simon Xue <xxm@rock-chips.com>
> + */
> +
> +#include <linux/clk.h>
> +#include <linux/gpio/consumer.h>
> +#include <linux/mfd/syscon.h>
> +#include <linux/module.h>
> +#include <linux/of_device.h>
> +#include <linux/phy/phy.h>
> +#include <linux/platform_device.h>
> +#include <linux/regmap.h>
> +#include <linux/reset.h>
> +
> +#include "pcie-designware.h"
> +
> +/*
> + * The upper 16 bits of PCIE_CLIENT_CONFIG are a write
> + * mask for the lower 16 bits.
> + */
> +#define HIWORD_UPDATE(mask, val) (((mask) << 16) | (val))
> +#define HIWORD_UPDATE_BIT(val)	HIWORD_UPDATE(val, val)
> +
> +#define to_rockchip_pcie(x) dev_get_drvdata((x)->dev)
> +
> +#define PCIE_CLIENT_RC_MODE		HIWORD_UPDATE_BIT(0x40)
> +#define PCIE_CLIENT_ENABLE_LTSSM	HIWORD_UPDATE_BIT(0xc)
> +#define PCIE_SMLH_LINKUP		BIT(16)
> +#define PCIE_RDLH_LINKUP		BIT(17)
> +#define PCIE_L0S_ENTRY			0x11
> +#define PCIE_CLIENT_GENERAL_CONTROL	0x0
> +#define PCIE_CLIENT_GENERAL_DEBUG	0x104
> +#define PCIE_CLIENT_HOT_RESET_CTRL      0x180
> +#define PCIE_CLIENT_LTSSM_STATUS	0x300
> +#define PCIE_LTSSM_ENABLE_ENHANCE       BIT(4)
> +
> +struct rockchip_pcie {
> +	struct dw_pcie			pci;
> +	void __iomem			*apb_base;
> +	struct phy			*phy;
> +	struct clk_bulk_data		*clks;
> +	unsigned int			clk_cnt;
> +	struct reset_control		*rst;
> +	struct gpio_desc		*rst_gpio;
> +	struct regulator                *vpcie3v3;
> +};
> +
> +static int rockchip_pcie_readl_apb(struct rockchip_pcie *rockchip,
> +					     u32 reg)
> +{
> +	return readl(rockchip->apb_base + reg);
> +}
> +
> +static void rockchip_pcie_writel_apb(struct rockchip_pcie *rockchip,
> +						u32 val, u32 reg)
> +{
> +	writel(val, rockchip->apb_base + reg);
> +}
> +
> +static void rockchip_pcie_enable_ltssm(struct rockchip_pcie *rockchip)
> +{
> +	rockchip_pcie_writel_apb(rockchip, PCIE_CLIENT_ENABLE_LTSSM,
> +				 PCIE_CLIENT_GENERAL_CONTROL);
> +}
> +
> +static int rockchip_pcie_link_up(struct dw_pcie *pci)
> +{
> +	struct rockchip_pcie *rockchip = to_rockchip_pcie(pci);
> +	u32 val = rockchip_pcie_readl_apb(rockchip, PCIE_CLIENT_LTSSM_STATUS);
> +
> +	if ((val & (PCIE_RDLH_LINKUP | PCIE_SMLH_LINKUP)) == 0x30000 &&
> +	    (val & GENMASK(5, 0)) == PCIE_L0S_ENTRY)
> +		return 1;
> +
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static int rockchip_pcie_start_link(struct dw_pcie *pci)
> +{
> +	struct rockchip_pcie *rockchip = to_rockchip_pcie(pci);
> +
> +	/* Reset device */
> +	gpiod_set_value_cansleep(rockchip->rst_gpio, 0);
> +	msleep(100);
> +	gpiod_set_value_cansleep(rockchip->rst_gpio, 1);
> +
> +	rockchip_pcie_enable_ltssm(rockchip);
> +
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static void rockchip_pcie_fast_link_setup(struct rockchip_pcie *rockchip)
> +{
> +	u32 val;
> +
> +	/* LTSSM EN ctrl mode */
> +	val = rockchip_pcie_readl_apb(rockchip, PCIE_CLIENT_HOT_RESET_CTRL);
> +	val |= PCIE_LTSSM_ENABLE_ENHANCE | (PCIE_LTSSM_ENABLE_ENHANCE << 16);
> +	rockchip_pcie_writel_apb(rockchip, val, PCIE_CLIENT_HOT_RESET_CTRL);
> +}
> +
> +static int rockchip_pcie_host_init(struct pcie_port *pp)
> +{
> +	struct dw_pcie *pci = to_dw_pcie_from_pp(pp);
> +	struct rockchip_pcie *rockchip = to_rockchip_pcie(pci);
> +
> +	rockchip_pcie_fast_link_setup(rockchip);
> +
> +	rockchip_pcie_writel_apb(rockchip, PCIE_CLIENT_RC_MODE,
> +				 PCIE_CLIENT_GENERAL_CONTROL);
> +
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static const struct dw_pcie_host_ops rockchip_pcie_host_ops = {
> +	.host_init = rockchip_pcie_host_init,
> +};
> +
> +static int rockchip_pcie_clk_init(struct rockchip_pcie *rockchip)
> +{
> +	struct device *dev = rockchip->pci.dev;
> +	int ret;
> +
> +	ret = devm_clk_bulk_get_all(dev, &rockchip->clks);
> +	if (ret < 0)
> +		return ret;
> +
> +	rockchip->clk_cnt = ret;
> +
> +	ret = clk_bulk_prepare_enable(rockchip->clk_cnt, rockchip->clks);
> +	if (ret)
> +		return ret;
> +
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static int rockchip_pcie_resource_get(struct platform_device *pdev,
> +				      struct rockchip_pcie *rockchip)
> +{
> +	rockchip->apb_base = devm_platform_ioremap_resource_byname(pdev, "apb");
> +	if (IS_ERR(rockchip->apb_base))
> +		return PTR_ERR(rockchip->apb_base);
> +
> +	rockchip->rst_gpio = devm_gpiod_get_optional(&pdev->dev, "reset",
> +						     GPIOD_OUT_HIGH);
> +	if (IS_ERR(rockchip->rst_gpio))
> +		return PTR_ERR(rockchip->rst_gpio);
> +
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static int rockchip_pcie_phy_init(struct rockchip_pcie *rockchip)
> +{
> +	int ret;
> +	struct device *dev = rockchip->pci.dev;
> +
> +	rockchip->phy = devm_phy_get(dev, "pcie-phy");
> +	if (IS_ERR(rockchip->phy))
> +		return dev_err_probe(dev, PTR_ERR(rockchip->phy),
> +				     "missing phy\n");
> +
> +	ret = phy_init(rockchip->phy);
> +	if (ret < 0)
> +		return ret;
> +
> +	phy_power_on(rockchip->phy);
> +
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static void rockchip_pcie_phy_deinit(struct rockchip_pcie *rockchip)
> +{
> +	phy_exit(rockchip->phy);
> +	phy_power_off(rockchip->phy);
> +}
> +
> +static int rockchip_pcie_reset_control_release(struct rockchip_pcie *rockchip)
> +{
> +	struct device *dev = rockchip->pci.dev;
> +	int ret;
> +
> +	rockchip->rst = devm_reset_control_array_get_exclusive(dev);
> +	if (IS_ERR(rockchip->rst))
> +		return dev_err_probe(dev, PTR_ERR(rockchip->rst),
> +				     "failed to get reset lines\n");
> +
> +	ret = reset_control_deassert(rockchip->rst);
> +
> +	return ret;
> +}
> +
> +static const struct dw_pcie_ops dw_pcie_ops = {
> +	.link_up = rockchip_pcie_link_up,
> +	.start_link = rockchip_pcie_start_link,
> +};
> +
> +static int rockchip_pcie_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> +{
> +	struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
> +	struct rockchip_pcie *rockchip;
> +	struct pcie_port *pp;
> +	int ret;
> +
> +	rockchip = devm_kzalloc(dev, sizeof(*rockchip), GFP_KERNEL);
> +	if (!rockchip)
> +		return -ENOMEM;
> +
> +	platform_set_drvdata(pdev, rockchip);
> +
> +	rockchip->pci.dev = dev;
> +	rockchip->pci.ops = &dw_pcie_ops;
> +
> +	pp = &rockchip->pci.pp;
> +	pp->ops = &rockchip_pcie_host_ops;
> +
> +	ret = rockchip_pcie_resource_get(pdev, rockchip);
> +	if (ret)
> +		return ret;
> +
> +	/* DON'T MOVE ME: must be enable before phy init */
> +	rockchip->vpcie3v3 = devm_regulator_get_optional(dev, "vpcie3v3");
> +	if (IS_ERR(rockchip->vpcie3v3))
> +		return dev_err_probe(dev, PTR_ERR(rockchip->rst),
> +				     "failed to get vpcie3v3 regulator\n");
> +
> +	if (rockchip->vpcie3v3) {
> +		ret = regulator_enable(rockchip->vpcie3v3);
> +		if (ret) {
> +			dev_err(dev, "fail to enable vpcie3v3 regulator\n");
> +			return ret;
> +		}
> +	}
> +
> +	ret = rockchip_pcie_phy_init(rockchip);
> +	if (ret)
> +		goto disable_regulator;
> +
> +	ret = rockchip_pcie_reset_control_release(rockchip);
> +	if (ret)
> +		goto deinit_phy;
> +
> +	ret = rockchip_pcie_clk_init(rockchip);
> +	if (ret)
> +		goto deinit_phy;
> +
> +	ret = dw_pcie_host_init(pp);
> +	if (ret)
> +		goto deinit_clk;
> +
> +	return 0;
> +
> +deinit_clk:
> +	clk_bulk_disable_unprepare(rockchip->clk_cnt, rockchip->clks);
> +deinit_phy:
> +	rockchip_pcie_phy_deinit(rockchip);
> +disable_regulator:
> +	if (rockchip->vpcie3v3)
> +		regulator_disable(rockchip->vpcie3v3);
> +
> +	return ret;
> +}
> +
> +MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, rockchip_pcie_of_match);
> +
> +static const struct of_device_id rockchip_pcie_of_match[] = {
> +	{ .compatible = "rockchip,rk3568-pcie", },
> +	{ /* sentinel */ },
> +};
> +
> +static struct platform_driver rockchip_pcie_driver = {
> +	.driver = {
> +		.name	= "rockchip-dw-pcie",
> +		.of_match_table = rockchip_pcie_of_match,
> +		.suppress_bind_attrs = true,
> +	},
> +	.probe = rockchip_pcie_probe,
> +};
> +
> +builtin_platform_driver(rockchip_pcie_driver);



_______________________________________________
Linux-rockchip mailing list
Linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-rockchip

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH v4 1/2] dt-bindings: rockchip: Add DesignWare based PCIe controller
  2021-01-27  2:24 [PATCH v4 1/2] dt-bindings: rockchip: Add DesignWare based PCIe controller Simon Xue
  2021-01-27  2:25 ` [PATCH v4 2/2] PCI: rockchip: add " Simon Xue
@ 2021-02-22  0:59 ` xxm
  2021-02-22  2:37 ` Krzysztof Wilczyński
  2 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: xxm @ 2021-02-22  0:59 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Bjorn Helgaas, Lorenzo Pieralisi
  Cc: devicetree, Heiko Stuebner, linux-pci, linux-rockchip, robh+dt,
	Johan Jonker

Hi all,

It has been nearly a month since last V4 patch, any new comments?

在 2021/1/27 10:24, Simon Xue 写道:
> Document DT bindings for PCIe controller found on Rockchip SoC.
>
> Signed-off-by: Simon Xue <xxm@rock-chips.com>
> ---
>   .../bindings/pci/rockchip-dw-pcie.yaml        | 141 ++++++++++++++++++
>   1 file changed, 141 insertions(+)
>   create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pci/rockchip-dw-pcie.yaml
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pci/rockchip-dw-pcie.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pci/rockchip-dw-pcie.yaml
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..916eff09332c
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pci/rockchip-dw-pcie.yaml
> @@ -0,0 +1,141 @@
> +# SPDX-License-Identifier: (GPL-2.0 OR BSD-2-Clause)
> +%YAML 1.2
> +---
> +$id: http://devicetree.org/schemas/pci/rockchip-dw-pcie.yaml#
> +$schema: http://devicetree.org/meta-schemas/core.yaml#
> +
> +title: DesignWare based PCIe RC controller on Rockchip SoCs
> +
> +maintainers:
> +  - Shawn Lin <shawn.lin@rock-chips.com>
> +  - Simon Xue <xxm@rock-chips.com>
> +  - Heiko Stuebner <heiko@sntech.de>
> +
> +description: |+
> +  RK3568 SoC PCIe host controller is based on the Synopsys DesignWare
> +  PCIe IP and thus inherits all the common properties defined in
> +  designware-pcie.txt.
> +
> +allOf:
> +  - $ref: /schemas/pci/pci-bus.yaml#
> +
> +# We need a select here so we don't match all nodes with 'snps,dw-pcie'
> +select:
> +  properties:
> +    compatible:
> +      contains:
> +        const: rockchip,rk3568-pcie
> +  required:
> +    - compatible
> +
> +properties:
> +  compatible:
> +    items:
> +      - const: rockchip,rk3568-pcie
> +      - const: snps,dw-pcie
> +
> +  reg:
> +    items:
> +      - description: Data Bus Interface (DBI) registers
> +      - description: Rockchip designed configuration registers
> +      - description: Config registers
> +
> +  reg-names:
> +    items:
> +      - const: dbi
> +      - const: apb
> +      - const: config
> +
> +  clocks:
> +    items:
> +      - description: AHB clock for PCIe master
> +      - description: AHB clock for PCIe slave
> +      - description: AHB clock for PCIe dbi
> +      - description: APB clock for PCIe
> +      - description: Auxiliary clock for PCIe
> +
> +  clock-names:
> +    items:
> +      - const: aclk_mst
> +      - const: aclk_slv
> +      - const: aclk_dbi
> +      - const: pclk
> +      - const: aux
> +
> +  msi-map: true
> +
> +  num-lanes: true
> +
> +  phys:
> +    maxItems: 1
> +
> +  phy-names:
> +    const: pcie-phy
> +
> +  power-domains:
> +    maxItems: 1
> +
> +  ranges:
> +    maxItems: 2
> +
> +  resets:
> +    maxItems: 1
> +
> +  reset-names:
> +    const: pipe
> +
> +  vpcie3v3-supply: true
> +
> +required:
> +  - compatible
> +  - reg
> +  - reg-names
> +  - clocks
> +  - clock-names
> +  - msi-map
> +  - num-lanes
> +  - phys
> +  - phy-names
> +  - power-domains
> +  - resets
> +  - reset-names
> +
> +unevaluatedProperties: false
> +
> +examples:
> +  - |
> +
> +    bus {
> +        #address-cells = <2>;
> +        #size-cells = <2>;
> +
> +        pcie3x2: pcie@fe280000 {
> +            compatible = "rockchip,rk3568-pcie", "snps,dw-pcie";
> +            reg = <0x3 0xc0800000 0x0 0x390000>,
> +                  <0x0 0xfe280000 0x0 0x10000>,
> +                  <0x3 0x80000000 0x0 0x100000>;
> +            reg-names = "dbi", "apb", "config";
> +            bus-range = <0x20 0x2f>;
> +            clocks = <&cru 143>, <&cru 144>,
> +                     <&cru 145>, <&cru 146>,
> +                     <&cru 147>;
> +            clock-names = "aclk_mst", "aclk_slv",
> +                          "aclk_dbi", "pclk",
> +                          "aux";
> +            device_type = "pci";
> +            linux,pci-domain = <2>;
> +            max-link-speed = <2>;
> +            msi-map = <0x2000 &its 0x2000 0x1000>;
> +            num-lanes = <2>;
> +            phys = <&pcie30phy>;
> +            phy-names = "pcie-phy";
> +            power-domains = <&power 15>;
> +            ranges = <0x81000000 0x0 0x80800000 0x3 0x80800000 0x0 0x100000>,
> +                     <0x83000000 0x0 0x80900000 0x3 0x80900000 0x0 0x3f700000>;
> +            resets = <&cru 193>;
> +            reset-names = "pipe";
> +            #address-cells = <3>;
> +            #size-cells = <2>;
> +        };
> +    };
> +...



_______________________________________________
Linux-rockchip mailing list
Linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-rockchip

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH v4 2/2] PCI: rockchip: add DesignWare based PCIe controller
  2021-01-27  2:25 ` [PATCH v4 2/2] PCI: rockchip: add " Simon Xue
  2021-02-22  0:59   ` xxm
@ 2021-02-22  2:28   ` Krzysztof Wilczyński
  2021-02-22  4:52     ` [PATCH v4 2/2] PCI: rockchip: add DesignWare based PCIe controller【请注意,邮件由kswilczynski@gmail.com代发】 xxm
  1 sibling, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread
From: Krzysztof Wilczyński @ 2021-02-22  2:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Simon Xue
  Cc: devicetree, Lorenzo Pieralisi, Heiko Stuebner, linux-pci,
	Shawn Lin, linux-rockchip, robh+dt, Bjorn Helgaas, Johan Jonker

Hi Simon,

The subject should start with a capital letter.

[...]
> pcie-dw-rockchip is based on DWC IP. But pcie-rockchip-host
> is Rockchip designed IP which is only used for RK3399. So all the following
> non-RK3399 SoCs should use this driver.

You might need to wrap the long line in the above.

The commit message above could use some polish in terms of wording and
adding more context - what are you adding, what is this driver going to
support.  For example, what are the "all the following" SoCs?  Should
there be a list?  Or did you mean "all the other (...)", etc.

[...]
> +config PCIE_ROCKCHIP_DW_HOST
> +	bool "Rockchip DesignWare PCIe controller"
> +	select PCIE_DW
> +	select PCIE_DW_HOST
> +	depends on ARCH_ROCKCHIP || COMPILE_TEST
> +	depends on OF
> +	help
> +	  Enables support for the DW PCIe controller in the Rockchip SoC.

Perhaps replacing "DW" with "DesignWare" would be better.  Also, do you
want to mention here - for the sake of the future user - that this not
intended to support RK3399 as per the commit message.

[...]
> +/*
> + * PCIe host controller driver for Rockchip SoCs

A nitpick.  Missing period at the end of the sentence.

[...]
> +static int rockchip_pcie_link_up(struct dw_pcie *pci)
> +{
> +	struct rockchip_pcie *rockchip = to_rockchip_pcie(pci);
> +	u32 val = rockchip_pcie_readl_apb(rockchip, PCIE_CLIENT_LTSSM_STATUS);
> +
> +	if ((val & (PCIE_RDLH_LINKUP | PCIE_SMLH_LINKUP)) == 0x30000 &&
[...]

A suggestion.  Would it make sense to add a definition for this
open-coded value of 0x30000 above?

> +static void rockchip_pcie_fast_link_setup(struct rockchip_pcie *rockchip)
> +{
> +	u32 val;
> +
> +	/* LTSSM EN ctrl mode */
[...]

Does this comment above stands for "LTSSM enable control mode"?

> +static int rockchip_pcie_phy_init(struct rockchip_pcie *rockchip)
> +{
> +	int ret;
> +	struct device *dev = rockchip->pci.dev;

These two variables should swap place to keep order of use, and to match
how it has been done everywhere else in this drivers.

> +
> +	rockchip->phy = devm_phy_get(dev, "pcie-phy");
> +	if (IS_ERR(rockchip->phy))
> +		return dev_err_probe(dev, PTR_ERR(rockchip->phy),
> +				     "missing phy\n");

I would be "PHY" here.

> +	ret = phy_init(rockchip->phy);
> +	if (ret < 0)
> +		return ret;
> +
> +	phy_power_on(rockchip->phy);
[...]

We should probably check phy_power_on() for a possible failure.  Some
platforms also clean up on a failure from phy_init() and phy_power_on(),
but I am not sure if this particular platform would require anything.

[...]
> +	/* DON'T MOVE ME: must be enable before phy init */

It would be "PHY" here.

> +	rockchip->vpcie3v3 = devm_regulator_get_optional(dev, "vpcie3v3");
> +	if (IS_ERR(rockchip->vpcie3v3))
> +		return dev_err_probe(dev, PTR_ERR(rockchip->rst),
> +				     "failed to get vpcie3v3 regulator\n");
> +
> +	if (rockchip->vpcie3v3) {
> +		ret = regulator_enable(rockchip->vpcie3v3);
> +		if (ret) {
> +			dev_err(dev, "fail to enable vpcie3v3 regulator\n");

It would be "failed" here.

[...]
> +static const struct of_device_id rockchip_pcie_of_match[] = {
> +	{ .compatible = "rockchip,rk3568-pcie", },
> +	{ /* sentinel */ },
> +};

We could probably drop the comment about the "sentinel" from the above.

Krzysztof

_______________________________________________
Linux-rockchip mailing list
Linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-rockchip

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH v4 1/2] dt-bindings: rockchip: Add DesignWare based PCIe controller
  2021-01-27  2:24 [PATCH v4 1/2] dt-bindings: rockchip: Add DesignWare based PCIe controller Simon Xue
  2021-01-27  2:25 ` [PATCH v4 2/2] PCI: rockchip: add " Simon Xue
  2021-02-22  0:59 ` [PATCH v4 1/2] dt-bindings: rockchip: Add DesignWare based PCIe controller xxm
@ 2021-02-22  2:37 ` Krzysztof Wilczyński
  2021-02-22  4:19   ` [PATCH v4 1/2] dt-bindings: rockchip: Add DesignWare based PCIe controller【请注意,邮件由kswilczynski@gmail.com代发】 xxm
  2 siblings, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread
From: Krzysztof Wilczyński @ 2021-02-22  2:37 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Simon Xue
  Cc: devicetree, Lorenzo Pieralisi, Heiko Stuebner, linux-pci,
	linux-rockchip, robh+dt, Bjorn Helgaas, Johan Jonker

Hi Simon,

[...]
> +# SPDX-License-Identifier: (GPL-2.0 OR BSD-2-Clause)

The driver is only based on GPL v2.0, should this be the same, or is
there a reason for dual-license?

[...]
> +title: DesignWare based PCIe RC controller on Rockchip SoCs
[...]

What does the "RC" here stands for?  Would it be "Rockchip"?  If so,
then perhaps dropping it would be fine to do, as rest of the title
mentions "Rockchip SoCs"."  What do you think?

Krzysztof

_______________________________________________
Linux-rockchip mailing list
Linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-rockchip

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH v4 1/2] dt-bindings: rockchip: Add DesignWare based PCIe controller【请注意,邮件由kswilczynski@gmail.com代发】
  2021-02-22  2:37 ` Krzysztof Wilczyński
@ 2021-02-22  4:19   ` xxm
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: xxm @ 2021-02-22  4:19 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Krzysztof Wilczyński
  Cc: devicetree, Lorenzo Pieralisi, Heiko Stuebner, linux-pci,
	linux-rockchip, robh+dt, Bjorn Helgaas, Johan Jonker

Hi Krzysztof,

在 2021/2/22 10:37, Krzysztof Wilczyński 写道:
> Hi Simon,
>
> [...]
>> +# SPDX-License-Identifier: (GPL-2.0 OR BSD-2-Clause)
> The driver is only based on GPL v2.0, should this be the same, or is
> there a reason for dual-license?
Will remove BSD-2-Clause
> [...]
>> +title: DesignWare based PCIe RC controller on Rockchip SoCs
> [...]
>
> What does the "RC" here stands for?  Would it be "Rockchip"?  If so,
> then perhaps dropping it would be fine to do, as rest of the title
> mentions "Rockchip SoCs"."  What do you think?

RC = Root Complex, just to distinguish "EP"(End Point), but drop "RC" 
seems fine.

Simon

> Krzysztof
>
>
>



_______________________________________________
Linux-rockchip mailing list
Linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-rockchip

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH v4 2/2] PCI: rockchip: add DesignWare based PCIe controller【请注意,邮件由kswilczynski@gmail.com代发】
  2021-02-22  2:28   ` Krzysztof Wilczyński
@ 2021-02-22  4:52     ` xxm
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: xxm @ 2021-02-22  4:52 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Krzysztof Wilczyński
  Cc: devicetree, Lorenzo Pieralisi, Heiko Stuebner, linux-pci,
	Shawn Lin, linux-rockchip, robh+dt, Bjorn Helgaas, Johan Jonker

Hi Krzysztof,

All your comments will be fixed in next patch, thanks for your review.

在 2021/2/22 10:28, Krzysztof Wilczyński 写道:
> Hi Simon,
>
> The subject should start with a capital letter.
>
> [...]
>> pcie-dw-rockchip is based on DWC IP. But pcie-rockchip-host
>> is Rockchip designed IP which is only used for RK3399. So all the following
>> non-RK3399 SoCs should use this driver.
> You might need to wrap the long line in the above.
>
> The commit message above could use some polish in terms of wording and
> adding more context - what are you adding, what is this driver going to
> support.  For example, what are the "all the following" SoCs?  Should
> there be a list?  Or did you mean "all the other (...)", etc.
>
> [...]
>> +config PCIE_ROCKCHIP_DW_HOST
>> +	bool "Rockchip DesignWare PCIe controller"
>> +	select PCIE_DW
>> +	select PCIE_DW_HOST
>> +	depends on ARCH_ROCKCHIP || COMPILE_TEST
>> +	depends on OF
>> +	help
>> +	  Enables support for the DW PCIe controller in the Rockchip SoC.
> Perhaps replacing "DW" with "DesignWare" would be better.  Also, do you
> want to mention here - for the sake of the future user - that this not
> intended to support RK3399 as per the commit message.
>
> [...]
>> +/*
>> + * PCIe host controller driver for Rockchip SoCs
> A nitpick.  Missing period at the end of the sentence.
>
> [...]
>> +static int rockchip_pcie_link_up(struct dw_pcie *pci)
>> +{
>> +	struct rockchip_pcie *rockchip = to_rockchip_pcie(pci);
>> +	u32 val = rockchip_pcie_readl_apb(rockchip, PCIE_CLIENT_LTSSM_STATUS);
>> +
>> +	if ((val & (PCIE_RDLH_LINKUP | PCIE_SMLH_LINKUP)) == 0x30000 &&
> [...]
>
> A suggestion.  Would it make sense to add a definition for this
> open-coded value of 0x30000 above?
>
>> +static void rockchip_pcie_fast_link_setup(struct rockchip_pcie *rockchip)
>> +{
>> +	u32 val;
>> +
>> +	/* LTSSM EN ctrl mode */
> [...]
>
> Does this comment above stands for "LTSSM enable control mode"?
>
>> +static int rockchip_pcie_phy_init(struct rockchip_pcie *rockchip)
>> +{
>> +	int ret;
>> +	struct device *dev = rockchip->pci.dev;
> These two variables should swap place to keep order of use, and to match
> how it has been done everywhere else in this drivers.
>
>> +
>> +	rockchip->phy = devm_phy_get(dev, "pcie-phy");
>> +	if (IS_ERR(rockchip->phy))
>> +		return dev_err_probe(dev, PTR_ERR(rockchip->phy),
>> +				     "missing phy\n");
> I would be "PHY" here.
>
>> +	ret = phy_init(rockchip->phy);
>> +	if (ret < 0)
>> +		return ret;
>> +
>> +	phy_power_on(rockchip->phy);
> [...]
>
> We should probably check phy_power_on() for a possible failure.  Some
> platforms also clean up on a failure from phy_init() and phy_power_on(),
> but I am not sure if this particular platform would require anything.
>
> [...]
>> +	/* DON'T MOVE ME: must be enable before phy init */
> It would be "PHY" here.
>
>> +	rockchip->vpcie3v3 = devm_regulator_get_optional(dev, "vpcie3v3");
>> +	if (IS_ERR(rockchip->vpcie3v3))
>> +		return dev_err_probe(dev, PTR_ERR(rockchip->rst),
>> +				     "failed to get vpcie3v3 regulator\n");
>> +
>> +	if (rockchip->vpcie3v3) {
>> +		ret = regulator_enable(rockchip->vpcie3v3);
>> +		if (ret) {
>> +			dev_err(dev, "fail to enable vpcie3v3 regulator\n");
> It would be "failed" here.
>
> [...]
>> +static const struct of_device_id rockchip_pcie_of_match[] = {
>> +	{ .compatible = "rockchip,rk3568-pcie", },
>> +	{ /* sentinel */ },
>> +};
> We could probably drop the comment about the "sentinel" from the above.
>
> Krzysztof
>
>



_______________________________________________
Linux-rockchip mailing list
Linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-rockchip

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2021-02-22  4:52 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2021-01-27  2:24 [PATCH v4 1/2] dt-bindings: rockchip: Add DesignWare based PCIe controller Simon Xue
2021-01-27  2:25 ` [PATCH v4 2/2] PCI: rockchip: add " Simon Xue
2021-02-22  0:59   ` xxm
2021-02-22  2:28   ` Krzysztof Wilczyński
2021-02-22  4:52     ` [PATCH v4 2/2] PCI: rockchip: add DesignWare based PCIe controller【请注意,邮件由kswilczynski@gmail.com代发】 xxm
2021-02-22  0:59 ` [PATCH v4 1/2] dt-bindings: rockchip: Add DesignWare based PCIe controller xxm
2021-02-22  2:37 ` Krzysztof Wilczyński
2021-02-22  4:19   ` [PATCH v4 1/2] dt-bindings: rockchip: Add DesignWare based PCIe controller【请注意,邮件由kswilczynski@gmail.com代发】 xxm

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).