From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=3.0 tests=DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, USER_AGENT_SANE_2 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1C022C11D2F for ; Mon, 24 Feb 2020 15:34:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D6A4720828 for ; Mon, 24 Feb 2020 15:34:53 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1582558494; bh=MNQ1UVYC0Mn/mwU5T91zK1An5TUeYxUPkvlyAHEUoHQ=; h=Subject:From:To:Cc:Date:In-Reply-To:References:List-ID:From; b=wlmHCnTpMrBxW6O9X7UOiFZH9LmpBaDXI2bCffqybFbC20YuHFJswt+a41sTjMvA0 9UwYN/uh4BrNjEnpOBGHY6rAn0FNETZEmsvOsp/1wDBKzYNXNaQUkll7/K9xFk0QkJ oCmeOjCJj/9DF+1gJGdZJI9fAH4xwAelWOOnsVQI= Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727693AbgBXPex (ORCPT ); Mon, 24 Feb 2020 10:34:53 -0500 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:48414 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1727359AbgBXPex (ORCPT ); Mon, 24 Feb 2020 10:34:53 -0500 Received: from tzanussi-mobl7 (c-98-220-238-81.hsd1.il.comcast.net [98.220.238.81]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 382C620714; Mon, 24 Feb 2020 15:34:52 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1582558492; bh=MNQ1UVYC0Mn/mwU5T91zK1An5TUeYxUPkvlyAHEUoHQ=; h=Subject:From:To:Cc:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=DoaFobJmGFl441Ocv2uQKWc+qbEjG1zTcPi+8jqa2ogNge036u3te0ReU+g3Zunsm nwVMUp8PplERgkQOZExShC3gg/Gog5C2Uw9RdkYlv2j2VWH5iagZb2WSs9/bzb5DH5 OKEaCsHDokmCNw0gayR99PJ9OblSNqtpZeLtL+NQ= Message-ID: <1582558491.12738.36.camel@kernel.org> Subject: Re: [PATCH RT 21/25] smp: Use smp_cond_func_t as type for the conditional function From: Tom Zanussi To: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior Cc: LKML , linux-rt-users , Steven Rostedt , Thomas Gleixner , Carsten Emde , John Kacur , Daniel Wagner Date: Mon, 24 Feb 2020 09:34:51 -0600 In-Reply-To: <20200224095227.kfzl2lhonpmderlj@linutronix.de> References: <20200224095227.kfzl2lhonpmderlj@linutronix.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.26.1-1 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-rt-users-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org On Mon, 2020-02-24 at 10:52 +0100, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote: > On 2020-02-21 15:24:49 [-0600], zanussi@kernel.org wrote: > > From: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior > > > > v4.14.170-rt75-rc1 stable review patch. > > If anyone has any objections, please let me know. > > This alone makes no sense. I had this in the devel tree as part of a > three patch series to remove a limitation in on_each_cpu_cond_mask(). > This does not apply to the v4.14 series due to lack of the > on_each_cpu_cond_mask() function. > Yeah, I did drop the on_each_cpu_cond_mask() versions, but the typedef itself seemed like a nice innocuous cleanup. Will drop though as it's really unnecessary. Thanks, Tom > Sebastian