From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.3 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D7F3FC3A59E for ; Wed, 21 Aug 2019 14:42:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AEE85206BA for ; Wed, 21 Aug 2019 14:42:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1729385AbfHUOmf (ORCPT ); Wed, 21 Aug 2019 10:42:35 -0400 Received: from Galois.linutronix.de ([193.142.43.55]:55868 "EHLO Galois.linutronix.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1728995AbfHUOme (ORCPT ); Wed, 21 Aug 2019 10:42:34 -0400 Received: from bigeasy by Galois.linutronix.de with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1i0Rol-00074o-0s; Wed, 21 Aug 2019 16:42:31 +0200 Date: Wed, 21 Aug 2019 16:42:30 +0200 From: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior To: Alexandre Belloni Cc: Alexander Dahl , linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org, Thomas Gleixner , LKML , Steven Rostedt Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCE] v5.2.9-rt3 Message-ID: <20190821144230.knlyrnxz62d75hcb@linutronix.de> References: <20190816153616.fbridfzjkmfg4dnr@linutronix.de> <2182739.9IRgZpf3R8@ada> <20190820154418.GM3545@piout.net> <20190821132553.gjvya5lu6j2dfyo5@linutronix.de> <20190821142110.GC27031@piout.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20190821142110.GC27031@piout.net> User-Agent: NeoMutt/20180716 Sender: linux-rt-users-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org On 2019-08-21 16:21:10 [+0200], Alexandre Belloni wrote: > I'm not sure it is worth it as the issue is introduced by > clocksource-tclib-allow-higher-clockrates.patch. Shouldn't we fix it > directly? you want to get rid of CONFIG_ATMEL_TCB_CLKSRC_USE_SLOW_CLOCK and use the highest possible frequency by default? Sebastian