From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.8 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BE252C43603 for ; Thu, 12 Dec 2019 17:31:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A073B2173E for ; Thu, 12 Dec 2019 17:31:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1730155AbfLLRbT (ORCPT ); Thu, 12 Dec 2019 12:31:19 -0500 Received: from Galois.linutronix.de ([193.142.43.55]:46461 "EHLO Galois.linutronix.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1730023AbfLLRbT (ORCPT ); Thu, 12 Dec 2019 12:31:19 -0500 Received: from bigeasy by Galois.linutronix.de with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1ifSJ0-0007cV-Dj; Thu, 12 Dec 2019 18:31:14 +0100 Date: Thu, 12 Dec 2019 18:31:14 +0100 From: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior To: Daniel Wagner Cc: Uwe =?utf-8?Q?Kleine-K=C3=B6nig?= , Clark Williams , John Kacur , linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH rt-tests] queuelat: use ARM implementation of gettick also for all !x86 archs Message-ID: <20191212173114.cz3bq5eotczql5s2@linutronix.de> References: <20191208210625.5999-1-ukleinek@debian.org> <18a0be03-74dd-54f1-a0f0-4f4acdd061ad@monom.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <18a0be03-74dd-54f1-a0f0-4f4acdd061ad@monom.org> Sender: linux-rt-users-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org On 2019-12-09 10:40:29 [+0100], Daniel Wagner wrote: > Just wondering if the tool should print a warning if the fallback is used? > IIRC, the code wants to use the TSC and clock_gettime is probably not so > precise. clock_gettime() is precise but it might have more overhead. With VDSO support the overhead is quite low. > Thanks, > Daniel Sebastian