From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.8 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8DF66C33CB6 for ; Wed, 22 Jan 2020 08:31:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6DFDE24655 for ; Wed, 22 Jan 2020 08:31:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726083AbgAVIbf (ORCPT ); Wed, 22 Jan 2020 03:31:35 -0500 Received: from Galois.linutronix.de ([193.142.43.55]:37024 "EHLO Galois.linutronix.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1725868AbgAVIbf (ORCPT ); Wed, 22 Jan 2020 03:31:35 -0500 Received: from bigeasy by Galois.linutronix.de with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1iuBQA-0004NX-6D; Wed, 22 Jan 2020 09:31:30 +0100 Date: Wed, 22 Jan 2020 09:31:30 +0100 From: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior To: Steven Rostedt Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-rt-users , Thomas Gleixner , Carsten Emde , John Kacur , Julia Cartwright , Daniel Wagner , Tom Zanussi , Scott Wood Subject: Re: [PATCH RT 24/32] sched: migrate_enable: Use stop_one_cpu_nowait() Message-ID: <20200122083130.kuu3yppckhyjrr4u@linutronix.de> References: <20200117174111.282847363@goodmis.org> <20200117174131.019724236@goodmis.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20200117174131.019724236@goodmis.org> Sender: linux-rt-users-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org On 2020-01-17 12:41:35 [-0500], Steven Rostedt wrote: > 4.19.94-rt39-rc1 stable review patch. > If anyone has any objections, please let me know. I don't know how much of this patch and the previous is classified as "new feature" vs "bug fix". This patch requires patch 31 (of this series) as bug fix. I'm not against it, just pointing out. Sebastian