From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.8 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9DC5EC4361B for ; Wed, 9 Dec 2020 10:33:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5929923B6C for ; Wed, 9 Dec 2020 10:33:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1730084AbgLIKd0 (ORCPT ); Wed, 9 Dec 2020 05:33:26 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:56476 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1729808AbgLIKd0 (ORCPT ); Wed, 9 Dec 2020 05:33:26 -0500 Received: from galois.linutronix.de (Galois.linutronix.de [IPv6:2a0a:51c0:0:12e:550::1]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B3FDCC061794; Wed, 9 Dec 2020 02:32:45 -0800 (PST) Date: Wed, 9 Dec 2020 11:32:42 +0100 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linutronix.de; s=2020; t=1607509964; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=LzKQzqHnyqgXWi0FI8XkH1ss7UHxBo4fD7Jw9hl39p0=; b=KhoVoXnDEJfhwAohGpEJifQjjCeePnVAvSPX/X6by8IHgn1xwmElfsSCXjODykoJe6l2wj 5jq2n0p3p6B1m6FOU+Jw1JbHCgQq/DyWxW+DNcinRwPTsF/ljJjncYVqCHNsixX5nFATAX Vcz3eWVl64V7aHBo83ncmmJE4KUcfk7b5m+Qa1KLYH6g2kQBXMboEdWMG8vP78+8sIT8zH ui5FJz4EHNrEhIToUMWnB3NQ++JI3qPpdRPtHj86Dm5urCqfZcP7nLfVDHXtadmHCTudxs Ak3cOglDEW+6HaZlTxcAiT01Eyr4nGJY3mnxTaDV/FKXdxRxD+OtO5TZQ6D7Bw== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linutronix.de; s=2020e; t=1607509964; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=LzKQzqHnyqgXWi0FI8XkH1ss7UHxBo4fD7Jw9hl39p0=; b=Ct6g3LZSM7017/ntvI/lg+A2kblacYV29i/2+tHFPfYCoOlVNLe2Ji5yiPKCKANmqX4099 qiQG3T6SnoNQOsAw== From: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior To: Mike Galbraith Cc: Peter Zijlstra , tglx@linutronix.de, linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org, lkml , Boqun Feng , Ingo Molnar , Will Deacon Subject: Re: [RT] 5.9-rt14 softirq_ctrl.lock vs listening_hash[i].lock lockdep splat Message-ID: <20201209103242.loklx4lmgqbafvhc@linutronix.de> References: <12d6f9879a97cd56c09fb53dee343cbb14f7f1f7.camel@gmx.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org On 2020-12-09 11:25:34 [+0100], Mike Galbraith wrote: > Sebastian fixed this via... We still look if we go that road or update lockdep. Sebastian