From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.8 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 722D0C433DB for ; Mon, 22 Feb 2021 22:11:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 43E6B64E31 for ; Mon, 22 Feb 2021 22:11:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S231594AbhBVWLh (ORCPT ); Mon, 22 Feb 2021 17:11:37 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:45676 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S231706AbhBVWLU (ORCPT ); Mon, 22 Feb 2021 17:11:20 -0500 Received: from mail-qt1-x82e.google.com (mail-qt1-x82e.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::82e]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5A6DCC061574 for ; Mon, 22 Feb 2021 14:10:40 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-qt1-x82e.google.com with SMTP id b24so10494851qtp.13 for ; Mon, 22 Feb 2021 14:10:40 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=sender:date:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:message-id:references :mime-version; bh=YPoUWFNS69CaekEtDXqtipCR4CYRjq3b0Q8boydNnJ0=; b=gTX6wi9vxwzwxV6XRBFIho1AvJSFehI+I3MVLVKyr0NtYEBQxLsoWT4Qpo9gSrk40z DrCkxBL0ARLu7iZgfeYmbuRxExqyLgCycXX54uBDRClkFOusiamQr62Tao//crZW+tnX 4soLpArLTeU2evAnWJZNiwSJMkdCL/LoQA1DmRCWlrX1pMzD/cLkgAh3ZFyNl0ufEMff HXAiTxEiBVCyW2zeUXEK/eDwqEnBItG3d9v/D8i1JLQXzD5DkmBea+RwqpeeS1+ryb30 DqOU6Jqna5NcIParGS7kNOekBXu4wV5o51nVdnCd8D7uX1vSEtCEMsFt/ZoAdPTCGl1w tR2A== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:sender:date:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to :message-id:references:mime-version; bh=YPoUWFNS69CaekEtDXqtipCR4CYRjq3b0Q8boydNnJ0=; b=MuK4d+n0JuX6qD9IATK0FrcV2HfD5RZqDyWMp1oXydfe3UQJdSaBVibVgeeIQGSCqj ycKQjZJbkaZTGUoNDv8IzbevV9aYWJ4FWhdvWEAE8qsuTj9sZiBTlWkEUv8UMZYD3yNH v8g1OCI+YoR4Iwi0uqc3uH66iShWPMZCYkObKeZ76Eo7XxbZ3FK8k8fAADngiHD1vpVy aWlOi1QcJhsJASjqDFngc8Kh/AmgzkMl7AzvBB8sw36HNWCmRhg5hPYZKDnGwRnjcdcF uVkF3FrmA/ps9c82mZkCsRgZw3mzqTq3FmlBCOAa4aTZXa5i0yjM3dywL+nYl6ljsx7Y i5Yg== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530HDqDRfA7ZG4lN2PWi0JwDSFcN7AzdFv/oWmBrmK8ODYxIi8iS A79BsYBYmXsmwZYf5bG0cGk= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyvMO5yHo254LWCZfHhkhU6Y31WDQfoZt2L+HpbXVSbOjDJ6316lwQBXVb7M84rc1r3j6Ipog== X-Received: by 2002:ac8:d0f:: with SMTP id q15mr22536387qti.3.1614031839632; Mon, 22 Feb 2021 14:10:39 -0800 (PST) Received: from fionn (bras-base-rdwyon0600w-grc-06-184-147-140-29.dsl.bell.ca. [184.147.140.29]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id x6sm13203045qkj.118.2021.02.22.14.10.38 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Mon, 22 Feb 2021 14:10:39 -0800 (PST) Sender: John Kacur Date: Mon, 22 Feb 2021 17:10:38 -0500 (EST) From: John Kacur To: Daniel Wagner cc: Christian Eggers , RT , Daniel Wagner , Sebastian Andrzej Siewior , Kurt Kanzenbach , Clark Williams Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] Revert always use libnuma patches In-Reply-To: <20210222082503.b2u3s2ftv3os474f@beryllium.lan> Message-ID: <2d2a7ea-ecb7-555e-ae80-83e791de7cad@redhat.com> References: <20210219184801.13905-1-jkacur@redhat.com> <2188166.ElGaqSPkdT@n95hx1g2> <59d08654-a23c-a880-b78a-43c64b1fd16d@redhat.com> <20210222082503.b2u3s2ftv3os474f@beryllium.lan> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org On Mon, 22 Feb 2021, Daniel Wagner wrote: > On Fri, Feb 19, 2021 at 04:30:39PM -0500, John Kacur wrote: > > I think I see the problem, the patch > > rt-numa: Move thread placement code to rt-numa library > > > > added the fatal if numa_failed. > > Sorry about the mess, I thought we can relay on libnuma. The concept to > depend on compile time on a library and not during runtime escaped my > attention. No problem, I should have caught this myself in code review. I had honestly forgotten that when we made numa a compile time requirement that we made it so that it was not a runtime requirement, even though I wrote most of the code to achieve that. > > > Thanks for testing. I'll send a patch to put it back the old way. > > Thanks John! >