From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-8.7 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,INCLUDES_CR_TRAILER, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 84456C433E0 for ; Thu, 25 Feb 2021 03:37:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 32D2564EC4 for ; Thu, 25 Feb 2021 03:37:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S232469AbhBYDhK (ORCPT ); Wed, 24 Feb 2021 22:37:10 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:55028 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229466AbhBYDhI (ORCPT ); Wed, 24 Feb 2021 22:37:08 -0500 Received: from mail-qt1-x829.google.com (mail-qt1-x829.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::829]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C89CCC061574 for ; Wed, 24 Feb 2021 19:36:27 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-qt1-x829.google.com with SMTP id v3so3211254qtw.4 for ; Wed, 24 Feb 2021 19:36:27 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=sender:date:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:message-id:references :mime-version; bh=IrEb0F7OYml+nJPx65LMzHHSMVIxWD1WA63MLd09cbY=; b=GhQF+CNQPyXEGXnDstGk8GL8dNJTi6GculACZ0aowqD5jHK2FCi3/qhyeq3mDZ8aEU xUx8xKtwi2PZn/K9XEu3JvaUSmM8T07RKO2lzErSkpu0gev7GGKsoejIcz2D0/k3tqw0 RCebLIOMDjwL5+T9/Un7+GQzmXe/hIj23P8tjPOZzNuQy1+rsjgwyuHS8eod0nYAT46J 0UmCTjnPJcFAB5BzjxMPmeXy6lJhlSwgsTkHzXEKsOni5zWi+PBpbWSLlrzictMENJKr sXptcF8L9kA8FGsRaQolqyy38oQMsq/S9PrewOAyDi4n60RUhITLaW+p2M6Wnxg7wLNs 5/wQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:sender:date:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to :message-id:references:mime-version; bh=IrEb0F7OYml+nJPx65LMzHHSMVIxWD1WA63MLd09cbY=; b=PKqcE1WZjd8XkUD6kMmTyA6LviMVyJ/QqOORP8Z1ij9JYfDUKpP/O06XhWp+SfaWqe zbFokEqv00mzCOoS7llQdmG/Nrvbbrsl1/qcziUdkaGl0YIBV41jzXbAnaR1vBJGw+7J PpAAs4aIpk+MNsvFzE8f7RG9Eq3O2y/LqSVOGO9X/R8gXCpZkeBK4ISml+NRskRIDPx8 2lmjLMUNr9MxzCsf8cPctL8Zr1lVmUe7DZiuAoqXKqFeu+pzuSbXDFQ5ZavfA7RMIkGW L4sjT/uU6XWwmBoOeOtTralbB5OtPielQKjREmjrHjzzcvyCaUiX739jBXKwctflJyhs Qsbw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM5329O4+qrxD2GH55EsuJtmUOMYWVgESKyyk6tn/aqVDE1m4Jpcz3 4n9krtt9yl6iTCZI0SNBoD4= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxggDeqvycth5LA5ls5ONLDLsGmVQymGaxBuo7JMehEbDeesUSGGrBZD0AxQvlUxovN/iicYQ== X-Received: by 2002:a05:622a:cf:: with SMTP id p15mr874078qtw.276.1614224186866; Wed, 24 Feb 2021 19:36:26 -0800 (PST) Received: from fionn (bras-base-rdwyon0600w-grc-06-184-147-140-29.dsl.bell.ca. [184.147.140.29]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id m190sm3042625qkc.66.2021.02.24.19.36.25 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Wed, 24 Feb 2021 19:36:26 -0800 (PST) Sender: John Kacur Date: Wed, 24 Feb 2021 22:36:12 -0500 (EST) From: John Kacur To: Kurt Kanzenbach cc: RT , Christian Eggers , Daniel Wagner , Clark Williams , Sebastian Andrzej Siewior Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] Fix for machines without numa In-Reply-To: <87y2fdzujz.fsf@kurt> Message-ID: <5ececc53-c7db-422-ba86-2c9c3e957567@redhat.com> References: <20210222220750.12911-1-jkacur@redhat.com> <87y2fdzujz.fsf@kurt> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org On Wed, 24 Feb 2021, Kurt Kanzenbach wrote: > Hi John, > > On Mon Feb 22 2021, John Kacur wrote: > > Trying to return the code to a state where numa is required at compile > > time but not at runtime > > > > - The first patch should allow cyclictest to run on a machine > > without numa. > > > > - The second patch is a clean-up of some old code > > > > The code is pushed in git to branch unstable/devel/no-numa-runtime > > so that people can test before I integrate the code back in the main > > branch > > arm32 seems to work fine. > > Tested-by: Kurt Kanzenbach # arm32 > > Thanks, > Kurt > Thanks, I added your tested by and merged all the changes into unstable/devel/latest John