Linux-rt-users Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / Atom feed
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: Mel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net>
Cc: Linux-MM <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
	Linux-RT-Users <linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com>,
	Jesper Dangaard Brouer <brouer@redhat.com>,
	Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>, Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>,
	Oscar Salvador <osalvador@suse.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 02/11] mm/page_alloc: Convert per-cpu list protection to local_lock
Date: Fri, 9 Apr 2021 20:55:39 +0200
Message-ID: <YHCjK8OOhmxTbKu0@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210409133256.GN3697@techsingularity.net>

On Fri, Apr 09, 2021 at 02:32:56PM +0100, Mel Gorman wrote:
> That said, there are some curious users already.
> fs/squashfs/decompressor_multi_percpu.c looks like it always uses the
> local_lock in CPU 0's per-cpu structure instead of stabilising a per-cpu
> pointer. 

I'm not sure how you read that.

You're talking about this:

  local_lock(&msblk->stream->lock);

right? Note that msblk->stream is a per-cpu pointer, so
&msblk->stream->lock is that same per-cpu pointer with an offset on.

The whole think relies on:

	&per_cpu_ptr(msblk->stream, cpu)->lock == per_cpu_ptr(&msblk->stream->lock, cpu)

Which is true because the lhs:

	(local_lock_t *)((msblk->stream + per_cpu_offset(cpu)) + offsetof(struct squashfs_stream, lock))

and the rhs:

	(local_lock_t *)((msblk->stream + offsetof(struct squashfs_stream, lock)) + per_cpu_offset(cpu))

are identical, because addition is associative.

> drivers/block/zram/zcomp.c appears to do the same although for
> at least one of the zcomp_stream_get() callers, the CPU is pinned for
> other reasons (bit spin lock held). I think it happens to work anyway
> but it's weird and I'm not a fan.

Same thing.

  reply index

Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-04-07 20:24 [PATCH 0/11 v2] Use local_lock for pcp protection and reduce stat overhead Mel Gorman
2021-04-07 20:24 ` [PATCH 01/11] mm/page_alloc: Split per cpu page lists and zone stats Mel Gorman
2021-04-12 17:43   ` Vlastimil Babka
2021-04-13 13:27     ` Mel Gorman
2021-04-07 20:24 ` [PATCH 02/11] mm/page_alloc: Convert per-cpu list protection to local_lock Mel Gorman
2021-04-08 10:52   ` Peter Zijlstra
2021-04-08 17:42     ` Mel Gorman
2021-04-09  6:39       ` Peter Zijlstra
2021-04-09  7:59         ` Mel Gorman
2021-04-09  8:24           ` Peter Zijlstra
2021-04-09 13:32             ` Mel Gorman
2021-04-09 18:55               ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2021-04-12 11:56                 ` Mel Gorman
2021-04-12 21:47                   ` Thomas Gleixner
2021-04-13 16:52                     ` Mel Gorman
2021-04-07 20:24 ` [PATCH 03/11] mm/memory_hotplug: Make unpopulated zones PCP structures unreachable during hot remove Mel Gorman
2021-04-07 20:24 ` [PATCH 04/11] mm/vmstat: Convert NUMA statistics to basic NUMA counters Mel Gorman
2021-04-14 12:56   ` Vlastimil Babka
2021-04-14 15:18     ` Mel Gorman
2021-04-14 15:56       ` Vlastimil Babka
2021-04-15 10:06         ` Mel Gorman
2021-04-07 20:24 ` [PATCH 05/11] mm/vmstat: Inline NUMA event counter updates Mel Gorman
2021-04-07 20:24 ` [PATCH 06/11] mm/page_alloc: Batch the accounting updates in the bulk allocator Mel Gorman
2021-04-07 20:24 ` [PATCH 07/11] mm/page_alloc: Reduce duration that IRQs are disabled for VM counters Mel Gorman
2021-04-07 20:24 ` [PATCH 08/11] mm/page_alloc: Remove duplicate checks if migratetype should be isolated Mel Gorman
2021-04-07 20:24 ` [PATCH 09/11] mm/page_alloc: Explicitly acquire the zone lock in __free_pages_ok Mel Gorman
2021-04-07 20:24 ` [PATCH 10/11] mm/page_alloc: Avoid conflating IRQs disabled with zone->lock Mel Gorman
2021-04-07 20:24 ` [PATCH 11/11] mm/page_alloc: Update PGFREE outside the zone lock in __free_pages_ok Mel Gorman
2021-04-08 10:56 ` [PATCH 0/11 v2] Use local_lock for pcp protection and reduce stat overhead Peter Zijlstra
2021-04-08 17:48   ` Mel Gorman
2021-04-14 13:39 [PATCH 0/11 v3] " Mel Gorman
2021-04-14 13:39 ` [PATCH 02/11] mm/page_alloc: Convert per-cpu list protection to local_lock Mel Gorman

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=YHCjK8OOhmxTbKu0@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net \
    --to=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=brouer@redhat.com \
    --cc=chuck.lever@oracle.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mgorman@techsingularity.net \
    --cc=mhocko@kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=osalvador@suse.de \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=willy@infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link

Linux-rt-users Archive on lore.kernel.org

Archives are clonable:
	git clone --mirror https://lore.kernel.org/linux-rt-users/0 linux-rt-users/git/0.git

	# If you have public-inbox 1.1+ installed, you may
	# initialize and index your mirror using the following commands:
	public-inbox-init -V2 linux-rt-users linux-rt-users/ https://lore.kernel.org/linux-rt-users \
		linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org
	public-inbox-index linux-rt-users

Example config snippet for mirrors

Newsgroup available over NNTP:
	nntp://nntp.lore.kernel.org/org.kernel.vger.linux-rt-users


AGPL code for this site: git clone https://public-inbox.org/public-inbox.git