From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.2 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3265BC7618F for ; Tue, 16 Jul 2019 20:24:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 14BB220659 for ; Tue, 16 Jul 2019 20:24:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S2388666AbfGPUYR (ORCPT ); Tue, 16 Jul 2019 16:24:17 -0400 Received: from Galois.linutronix.de ([193.142.43.55]:51065 "EHLO Galois.linutronix.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1728340AbfGPUYR (ORCPT ); Tue, 16 Jul 2019 16:24:17 -0400 Received: from pd9ef1cb8.dip0.t-ipconnect.de ([217.239.28.184] helo=nanos) by Galois.linutronix.de with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA256:256) (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1hnTzj-0003CD-Bk; Tue, 16 Jul 2019 22:24:15 +0200 Date: Tue, 16 Jul 2019 22:24:14 +0200 (CEST) From: Thomas Gleixner To: Paul Thomas cc: linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org, dunc.mcphie@gmail.com Subject: Re: poor cyclictest results with 5.0 series rt for arm64 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: User-Agent: Alpine 2.21 (DEB 202 2017-01-01) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII X-Linutronix-Spam-Score: -1.0 X-Linutronix-Spam-Level: - X-Linutronix-Spam-Status: No , -1.0 points, 5.0 required, ALL_TRUSTED=-1,SHORTCIRCUIT=-0.0001 Sender: linux-rt-users-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org Paul, On Fri, 12 Jul 2019, Paul Thomas wrote: > We've tried to make the configs as simple as possible, and for the 5.0 > config we start with the 4.19 .config and say N to anything new. (I had > an issue with the first email I'll follow up with the configs if this goes > through). > > We do have trace data for a instance where cyclictest hit 5000 uS, but > the file is large 11MB, and I wasn't sure if I should directly attach > it to the email. What is the best way to post or send this? Can you upload the trace to some place? If you don't have storage, just use bugzilla.kernel.org and open a bug, attach it and post a reference. Thanks, tglx