From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-9.6 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_INVALID,DKIM_SIGNED, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,INCLUDES_PATCH,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SIGNED_OFF_BY, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_GIT autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 98FABC35E1D for ; Thu, 27 Feb 2020 18:31:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 75A4A246A9 for ; Thu, 27 Feb 2020 18:31:57 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (1024-bit key) header.d=kemnade.info header.i=@kemnade.info header.b="ikeq+xAP" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1729577AbgB0Sbq (ORCPT ); Thu, 27 Feb 2020 13:31:46 -0500 Received: from mail.andi.de1.cc ([85.214.55.253]:51256 "EHLO mail.andi.de1.cc" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1729169AbgB0Sbp (ORCPT ); Thu, 27 Feb 2020 13:31:45 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kemnade.info; s=20180802; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:MIME-Version: References:In-Reply-To:Message-Id:Date:Subject:Cc:To:From:Sender:Reply-To: Content-Type:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From: Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help: List-Unsubscribe:List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=8SjkA7IjCSGUMcfzL6sRgrvmSd1UEQES9jRtvIHJjUo=; b=ikeq+xAP9lfBDtKGFrUYfx9qBZ Ufa+EkO2/tOOozira4f65iZ+IGAYNyDdadVB0U4LbKItdAMg9huqxg0iNSEcdhr6eW4qUX7LFOHJe UhXfgZG+r9rYKi/RfGX3ZKRX4ZwHBNWG6no5AVyzPgV4yquYduX4K9Z5ZZ4tKOvGc3AA=; Received: from p200300ccff13fd00e2cec3fffe93fc31.dip0.t-ipconnect.de ([2003:cc:ff13:fd00:e2ce:c3ff:fe93:fc31] helo=eeepc) by mail.andi.de1.cc with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1j7Nwa-0006yr-6y; Thu, 27 Feb 2020 19:31:32 +0100 Received: from andi by eeepc with local (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1j7NwZ-0003oa-LF; Thu, 27 Feb 2020 19:31:31 +0100 From: Andreas Kemnade To: lee.jones@linaro.org, robh+dt@kernel.org, mark.rutland@arm.com, a.zummo@towertech.it, alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-rtc@vger.kernel.org, stefan@agner.ch, b.galvani@gmail.com, phh@phh.me, letux-kernel@openphoenux.org, knaack.h@gmx.de, lars@metafoo.de, pmeerw@pmeerw.net, linux-iio@vger.kernel.org, jic23@kernel.org Cc: Andreas Kemnade Subject: [PATCH v6 4/7] mfd: rn5t618: add more subdevices Date: Thu, 27 Feb 2020 19:31:09 +0100 Message-Id: <20200227183112.14512-5-andreas@kemnade.info> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.20.1 In-Reply-To: <20200227183112.14512-1-andreas@kemnade.info> References: <20200227183112.14512-1-andreas@kemnade.info> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: linux-rtc-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-rtc@vger.kernel.org Since the RC5T619 has a RTC, use a separate subdevice list for that. The ADC should be the same as in the RN5T618, according to drivers in the wild, but since it is not tested, the ADC is only added for the RC5T619. Signed-off-by: Andreas Kemnade --- Changes in v6: - squashed with patch from former ADC patchset Changes in v3: - alignment cleanup drivers/mfd/rn5t618.c | 20 ++++++++++++++++++-- 1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/mfd/rn5t618.c b/drivers/mfd/rn5t618.c index 30fed9ab3d04..321836f78120 100644 --- a/drivers/mfd/rn5t618.c +++ b/drivers/mfd/rn5t618.c @@ -14,6 +14,7 @@ #include #include #include +#include #include #include @@ -22,6 +23,13 @@ static const struct mfd_cell rn5t618_cells[] = { { .name = "rn5t618-wdt" }, }; +static const struct mfd_cell rc5t619_cells[] = { + { .name = "rn5t618-adc" }, + { .name = "rn5t618-regulator" }, + { .name = "rc5t619-rtc" }, + { .name = "rn5t618-wdt" }, +}; + static bool rn5t618_volatile_reg(struct device *dev, unsigned int reg) { switch (reg) { @@ -174,8 +182,16 @@ static int rn5t618_i2c_probe(struct i2c_client *i2c, return ret; } - ret = devm_mfd_add_devices(&i2c->dev, -1, rn5t618_cells, - ARRAY_SIZE(rn5t618_cells), NULL, 0, NULL); + if (priv->variant == RC5T619) + ret = devm_mfd_add_devices(&i2c->dev, PLATFORM_DEVID_NONE, + rc5t619_cells, + ARRAY_SIZE(rc5t619_cells), + NULL, 0, NULL); + else + ret = devm_mfd_add_devices(&i2c->dev, PLATFORM_DEVID_NONE, + rn5t618_cells, + ARRAY_SIZE(rn5t618_cells), + NULL, 0, NULL); if (ret) { dev_err(&i2c->dev, "failed to add sub-devices: %d\n", ret); return ret; -- 2.20.1