From: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>
To: Hsin-hsiung Wang <hsin-hsiung.wang@mediatek.com>
Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
Kate Stewart <kstewart@linuxfoundation.org>,
Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Richard Fontana <rfontana@redhat.com>,
linux-rtc@vger.kernel.org,
Nicolas Boichat <drinkcat@chromium.org>,
linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
Frank Wunderlich <frank-w@public-files.de>,
Ran Bi <ran.bi@mediatek.com>, Sean Wang <sean.wang@mediatek.com>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org,
Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@gmail.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Eddie Huang <eddie.huang@mediatek.com>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
Alessandro Zummo <a.zummo@towertech.it>,
Josef Friedl <josef.friedl@speed.at>,
srv_heupstream@mediatek.com, Sebastian Reichel <sre@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v12 1/6] mfd: mt6397: Modify suspend/resume behavior
Date: Mon, 20 Apr 2020 12:15:22 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200420111522.GB3612@dell> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1587379959.6297.2.camel@mtksdaap41>
On Mon, 20 Apr 2020, Hsin-hsiung Wang wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Thu, 2020-04-16 at 09:49 +0100, Lee Jones wrote:
> > On Wed, 08 Apr 2020, Hsin-Hsiung Wang wrote:
> >
> > > Some pmics don't need backup interrupt settings, so we change to use
> > > pm notifier for the pmics which are necessary to store settings.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Hsin-Hsiung Wang <hsin-hsiung.wang@mediatek.com>
> > > ---
> > > drivers/mfd/mt6397-core.c | 30 ------------------------------
> > > drivers/mfd/mt6397-irq.c | 35 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
> > > include/linux/mfd/mt6397/core.h | 2 ++
> > > 3 files changed, 36 insertions(+), 31 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/drivers/mfd/mt6397-core.c b/drivers/mfd/mt6397-core.c
> > > index 0437c85..d2e70d8 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/mfd/mt6397-core.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/mfd/mt6397-core.c
> > > @@ -100,35 +100,6 @@ static const struct mfd_cell mt6397_devs[] = {
> > > }
> > > };
> > >
> > > -#ifdef CONFIG_PM_SLEEP
> > > -static int mt6397_irq_suspend(struct device *dev)
> > > -{
> > > - struct mt6397_chip *chip = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
> > > -
> > > - regmap_write(chip->regmap, chip->int_con[0], chip->wake_mask[0]);
> > > - regmap_write(chip->regmap, chip->int_con[1], chip->wake_mask[1]);
> > > -
> > > - enable_irq_wake(chip->irq);
> > > -
> > > - return 0;
> > > -}
> > > -
> > > -static int mt6397_irq_resume(struct device *dev)
> > > -{
> > > - struct mt6397_chip *chip = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
> > > -
> > > - regmap_write(chip->regmap, chip->int_con[0], chip->irq_masks_cur[0]);
> > > - regmap_write(chip->regmap, chip->int_con[1], chip->irq_masks_cur[1]);
> > > -
> > > - disable_irq_wake(chip->irq);
> > > -
> > > - return 0;
> > > -}
> > > -#endif
> > > -
> > > -static SIMPLE_DEV_PM_OPS(mt6397_pm_ops, mt6397_irq_suspend,
> > > - mt6397_irq_resume);
> > > -
> > > struct chip_data {
> > > u32 cid_addr;
> > > u32 cid_shift;
> > > @@ -238,7 +209,6 @@ static struct platform_driver mt6397_driver = {
> > > .driver = {
> > > .name = "mt6397",
> > > .of_match_table = of_match_ptr(mt6397_of_match),
> > > - .pm = &mt6397_pm_ops,
> > > },
> > > .id_table = mt6397_id,
> > > };
> > > diff --git a/drivers/mfd/mt6397-irq.c b/drivers/mfd/mt6397-irq.c
> > > index b2d3ce1..2924919 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/mfd/mt6397-irq.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/mfd/mt6397-irq.c
> > > @@ -9,6 +9,7 @@
> > > #include <linux/of_irq.h>
> > > #include <linux/platform_device.h>
> > > #include <linux/regmap.h>
> > > +#include <linux/suspend.h>
> > > #include <linux/mfd/mt6323/core.h>
> > > #include <linux/mfd/mt6323/registers.h>
> > > #include <linux/mfd/mt6397/core.h>
> > > @@ -81,7 +82,7 @@ static struct irq_chip mt6397_irq_chip = {
> > > static void mt6397_irq_handle_reg(struct mt6397_chip *mt6397, int reg,
> > > int irqbase)
> > > {
> > > - unsigned int status;
> > > + unsigned int status = 0;
> >
> > This looks like an unrelated change, no?
> >
>
> It is to fix the coverity defect.
Which isn't mentioned in the commit log and doesn't have anything to
do with this patch. Thus it should be in a separate patch, but I'm
not going to lose any sleep over it.
> > > int i, irq, ret;
> > >
> > > ret = regmap_read(mt6397->regmap, reg, &status);
> > > @@ -128,6 +129,36 @@ static const struct irq_domain_ops mt6397_irq_domain_ops = {
> > > .map = mt6397_irq_domain_map,
> > > };
> >
> > Other than that.
> >
> > For my own reference:
> > Acked-for-MFD-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>
> >
> Thanks for your review. I will add it in the next version.
>
--
Lee Jones [李琼斯]
Linaro Services Technical Lead
Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-04-20 11:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-04-08 8:12 [PATCH v12 0/6] Add Support for MediaTek PMIC MT6358 Hsin-Hsiung Wang
2020-04-08 8:12 ` [PATCH v12 1/6] mfd: mt6397: Modify suspend/resume behavior Hsin-Hsiung Wang
2020-04-16 8:49 ` Lee Jones
2020-04-20 10:52 ` Hsin-hsiung Wang
2020-04-20 11:15 ` Lee Jones [this message]
2020-04-20 11:55 ` Hsin-hsiung Wang
2020-04-08 8:12 ` [PATCH v12 2/6] mfd: mt6397: Trim probe function to support different chips more cleanly Hsin-Hsiung Wang
2020-04-16 8:52 ` Lee Jones
2020-04-08 8:12 ` [PATCH v12 3/6] dt-bindings: mfd: Add compatible for the MediaTek MT6358 PMIC Hsin-Hsiung Wang
2020-04-08 8:12 ` [PATCH v12 4/6] mfd: Add support " Hsin-Hsiung Wang
2020-04-16 9:10 ` Lee Jones
2020-04-08 8:12 ` [PATCH v12 5/6] rtc: mt6397: Add support for the MediaTek MT6358 RTC Hsin-Hsiung Wang
2020-04-16 9:14 ` Lee Jones
2020-04-17 8:29 ` Ran Bi
2020-04-17 8:49 ` Ran Bi
2020-04-20 7:37 ` Lee Jones
2020-04-20 7:36 ` Lee Jones
2020-04-08 8:12 ` [PATCH v12 6/6] arm64: dts: mt6358: add PMIC MT6358 related nodes Hsin-Hsiung Wang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200420111522.GB3612@dell \
--to=lee.jones@linaro.org \
--cc=a.zummo@towertech.it \
--cc=alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=drinkcat@chromium.org \
--cc=eddie.huang@mediatek.com \
--cc=frank-w@public-files.de \
--cc=hsin-hsiung.wang@mediatek.com \
--cc=josef.friedl@speed.at \
--cc=kstewart@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-rtc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=matthias.bgg@gmail.com \
--cc=ran.bi@mediatek.com \
--cc=rfontana@redhat.com \
--cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=sean.wang@mediatek.com \
--cc=sre@kernel.org \
--cc=srv_heupstream@mediatek.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).