linux-rtc.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu>
To: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com>,
	He Ying <heying24@huawei.com>
Cc: mpe@ellerman.id.au, benh@kernel.crashing.org, paulus@samba.org,
	a.zummo@towertech.it, npiggin@gmail.com, msuchanek@suse.de,
	tglx@linutronix.de, peterz@infradead.org,
	geert+renesas@glider.be, kernelfans@gmail.com,
	frederic@kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-rtc@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 -next] powerpc: kernel/time.c - cleanup warnings
Date: Wed, 24 Mar 2021 07:14:59 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <95cd80c5-40ff-1316-9c89-2e8e7836fb6a@csgroup.eu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <YFp0Qc2P61V+3bm0@piout.net>



Le 24/03/2021 à 00:05, Alexandre Belloni a écrit :
> On 23/03/2021 23:18:17+0100, Alexandre Belloni wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> On 23/03/2021 05:12:57-0400, He Ying wrote:
>>> We found these warnings in arch/powerpc/kernel/time.c as follows:
>>> warning: symbol 'decrementer_max' was not declared. Should it be static?
>>> warning: symbol 'rtc_lock' was not declared. Should it be static?
>>> warning: symbol 'dtl_consumer' was not declared. Should it be static?
>>>
>>> Declare 'decrementer_max' and 'rtc_lock' in powerpc asm/time.h.
>>> Rename 'rtc_lock' in drviers/rtc/rtc-vr41xx.c to 'vr41xx_rtc_lock' to
>>> avoid the conflict with the variable in powerpc asm/time.h.
>>> Move 'dtl_consumer' definition behind "include <asm/dtl.h>" because it
>>> is declared there.
>>>
>>> Reported-by: Hulk Robot <hulkci@huawei.com>
>>> Signed-off-by: He Ying <heying24@huawei.com>
>>> ---
>>> v2:
>>> - Instead of including linux/mc146818rtc.h in powerpc kernel/time.c, declare
>>>    rtc_lock in powerpc asm/time.h.
>>>
>>
>> V1 was actually the correct thing to do. rtc_lock is there exactly
>> because chrp and maple are using mc146818 compatible RTCs. This is then
>> useful because then drivers/char/nvram.c is enabled. The proper fix
>> would be to scrap all of that and use rtc-cmos for those platforms as
>> this drives the RTC properly and exposes the NVRAM for the mc146818.
>>
>> Or at least, if there are no users for the char/nvram driver on those
>> two platforms, remove the spinlock and stop enabling CONFIG_NVRAM or
>> more likely rename the symbol as it seems to be abused by both chrp and
>> powermac.
>>
> 
> Ok so rtc_lock is not even used by the char/nvram.c driver as it is
> completely compiled out.
> 
> I guess it is fine having it move to the individual platform as looking
> very quickly at the Kconfig, it is not possible to select both
> simultaneously. Tentative patch:
> 

Looking at it once more, it looks like including linux/mc146818rtc.h is the thing to do, at least 
for now. Several platforms are defining the rtc_lock exactly the same way as powerpc does, and 
including mc146818rtc.h

I think that to get it clean, this change should go in a dedicated patch and do a bit more and 
explain exactly what is being do and why. I'll try to draft something for it.

He Y., can you make a version v3 of your patch excluding the rtc_lock change ?

Christophe

  reply	other threads:[~2021-03-24  6:15 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-03-23  9:12 [PATCH v2 -next] powerpc: kernel/time.c - cleanup warnings He Ying
2021-03-23 22:18 ` Alexandre Belloni
2021-03-23 23:05   ` Alexandre Belloni
2021-03-24  6:14     ` Christophe Leroy [this message]
2021-03-24  6:22       ` Christophe Leroy
2021-03-24  8:29         ` heying (H)
2021-03-24  1:58   ` heying (H)
2021-03-24  8:19   ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2021-03-24  9:09     ` Alexandre Belloni

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=95cd80c5-40ff-1316-9c89-2e8e7836fb6a@csgroup.eu \
    --to=christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu \
    --cc=a.zummo@towertech.it \
    --cc=alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com \
    --cc=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
    --cc=frederic@kernel.org \
    --cc=geert+renesas@glider.be \
    --cc=heying24@huawei.com \
    --cc=kernelfans@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-rtc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
    --cc=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
    --cc=msuchanek@suse.de \
    --cc=npiggin@gmail.com \
    --cc=paulus@samba.org \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).