From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.0 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SIGNED_OFF_BY,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ADFB7C04EBF for ; Thu, 6 Dec 2018 09:13:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 82E8220892 for ; Thu, 6 Dec 2018 09:13:57 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 82E8220892 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux-m68k.org Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-rtc-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1728930AbeLFJN5 (ORCPT ); Thu, 6 Dec 2018 04:13:57 -0500 Received: from mail-ua1-f66.google.com ([209.85.222.66]:37731 "EHLO mail-ua1-f66.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1727575AbeLFJN5 (ORCPT ); Thu, 6 Dec 2018 04:13:57 -0500 Received: by mail-ua1-f66.google.com with SMTP id u19so8145342uae.4; Thu, 06 Dec 2018 01:13:56 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=v9Kr3rS5jNT2kWWHAh17twyvh/2cKZm9OQjwkrM7v6U=; b=iij5pXVvI2C089mQf1kJTuv/NR7bPGhPfP8gww4ePO2tUPgdyTMRig4zCRXoAKoOOh ywdRlAIiFB5jF3/p6TI6JqJvFiVurZuabLvT/ylHbuM9X92lQLG1DCrDrKFLCTLhpol2 IVWlmjW2P7wbhm6BmT+U/LvEoP4+5hBQGUHO357MLwzrYDqV8Ve0+JkgBGGngx5seujG PuAoYTL5to3f5e9H2i1aJKqWffmG3cvERM+tBtil7AR87rquOH+hL9kx5WIHJBJSRLbj ovrtBP4Dh2LGEHfaAvmZJytkkxNbo8mKe5nZxrZOMbnTYOZ3+NpX7abOJS03l+zUUeRo Z+Lw== X-Gm-Message-State: AA+aEWaBk2EBI3tK2jnpQl3DKUMkhoWKyTgdpGBovvW3wmWHg91UZP3a KzJPLfU0FFK3cocuQd4VW0XJ9eNeMJcjSWPDFmo= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AFSGD/X7KIDLd4G/qptgh1XX3FH6qEhEdaOQwVFzhubmKvCF3FomrJTwOdOFoOjazP/r613Xdgb1J/plv7CeHjwUyxk= X-Received: by 2002:ab0:465:: with SMTP id 92mr12636210uav.28.1544087635889; Thu, 06 Dec 2018 01:13:55 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <1544086559-47141-1-git-send-email-biju.das@bp.renesas.com> <1544086559-47141-2-git-send-email-biju.das@bp.renesas.com> In-Reply-To: <1544086559-47141-2-git-send-email-biju.das@bp.renesas.com> From: Geert Uytterhoeven Date: Thu, 6 Dec 2018 10:13:43 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/4] dt-bindings: rtc: pcf85363: Document pcf85263 real-time clock To: Biju Das Cc: Alessandro Zummo , Alexandre Belloni , Rob Herring , Mark Rutland , linux-rtc@vger.kernel.org, "open list:OPEN FIRMWARE AND FLATTENED DEVICE TREE BINDINGS" , Simon Horman , Geert Uytterhoeven , Chris Paterson , Fabrizio Castro , Linux-Renesas Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Sender: linux-rtc-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-rtc@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Dec 6, 2018 at 10:04 AM Biju Das wrote: > The pcf85263 RTC is compatible with the pcf85363 RTC. > > The difference between the pcf85263 and pcf85363 RTC is that the latter has > 64 bytes more RAM. This renders them incompatible from a DT point of view. > > Signed-off-by: Biju Das Reviewed-by: Geert Uytterhoeven Gr{oetje,eeting}s, Geert -- Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@linux-m68k.org In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that. -- Linus Torvalds