linux-rtc.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Nicolas Boichat <drinkcat@chromium.org>
To: Hsin-Hsiung Wang <hsin-hsiung.wang@mediatek.com>
Cc: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>,
	Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
	Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@gmail.com>,
	Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com>,
	Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
	Sean Wang <sean.wang@mediatek.com>,
	Sebastian Reichel <sre@kernel.org>,
	Eddie Huang <eddie.huang@mediatek.com>,
	Alessandro Zummo <a.zummo@towertech.it>,
	Kate Stewart <kstewart@linuxfoundation.org>,
	Richard Fontana <rfontana@redhat.com>,
	Frank Wunderlich <frank-w@public-files.de>,
	Josef Friedl <josef.friedl@speed.at>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Ran Bi <ran.bi@mediatek.com>,
	Devicetree List <devicetree@vger.kernel.org>,
	linux-arm Mailing List <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
	"moderated list:ARM/Mediatek SoC support" 
	<linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org>,
	lkml <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"open list:THERMAL" <linux-pm@vger.kernel.org>,
	linux-rtc@vger.kernel.org,
	srv_heupstream <srv_heupstream@mediatek.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v11 3/5] mfd: Add support for the MediaTek MT6358 PMIC
Date: Tue, 31 Mar 2020 15:36:43 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CANMq1KBqeUHj0gKcknPDvgzRzGMt26pq-_rt_ZM89phCHO9jqQ@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1585627657-3265-4-git-send-email-hsin-hsiung.wang@mediatek.com>

On Tue, Mar 31, 2020 at 12:07 PM Hsin-Hsiung Wang
<hsin-hsiung.wang@mediatek.com> wrote:
>
> This adds support for the MediaTek MT6358 PMIC. This is a
> multifunction device with the following sub modules:
>
> - Regulator
> - RTC
> - Codec
> - Interrupt
>
> It is interfaced to the host controller using SPI interface
> by a proprietary hardware called PMIC wrapper or pwrap.
> MT6358 MFD is a child device of the pwrap.
>
> Signed-off-by: Hsin-Hsiung Wang <hsin-hsiung.wang@mediatek.com>
> Reviewed-by: Nicolas Boichat <drinkcat@chromium.org>

This is missing a few comments from Lee Jones on v10, actually, repeated below:
https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/11431239/#23244041

> ---
>  drivers/mfd/Makefile                 |   2 +-
>  drivers/mfd/mt6358-irq.c             | 236 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  drivers/mfd/mt6397-core.c            |  55 ++++++-
>  include/linux/mfd/mt6358/core.h      | 158 ++++++++++++++++++++
>  include/linux/mfd/mt6358/registers.h | 282 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  include/linux/mfd/mt6397/core.h      |   3 +
>  6 files changed, 731 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>  create mode 100644 drivers/mfd/mt6358-irq.c
>  create mode 100644 include/linux/mfd/mt6358/core.h
>  create mode 100644 include/linux/mfd/mt6358/registers.h
>
> diff --git a/drivers/mfd/Makefile b/drivers/mfd/Makefile
> index b83f172..9af1414 100644
> --- a/drivers/mfd/Makefile
> +++ b/drivers/mfd/Makefile
> @@ -238,7 +238,7 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_INTEL_SOC_PMIC)        += intel-soc-pmic.o
>  obj-$(CONFIG_INTEL_SOC_PMIC_BXTWC)     += intel_soc_pmic_bxtwc.o
>  obj-$(CONFIG_INTEL_SOC_PMIC_CHTWC)     += intel_soc_pmic_chtwc.o
>  obj-$(CONFIG_INTEL_SOC_PMIC_CHTDC_TI)  += intel_soc_pmic_chtdc_ti.o
> -mt6397-objs    := mt6397-core.o mt6397-irq.o
> +mt6397-objs                    := mt6397-core.o mt6397-irq.o mt6358-irq.o
>  obj-$(CONFIG_MFD_MT6397)       += mt6397.o
>  obj-$(CONFIG_INTEL_SOC_PMIC_MRFLD)     += intel_soc_pmic_mrfld.o
>
> diff --git a/drivers/mfd/mt6358-irq.c b/drivers/mfd/mt6358-irq.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000..022e5f5
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/drivers/mfd/mt6358-irq.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,236 @@
> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
> +//
> +// Copyright (c) 2019 MediaTek Inc.

2020

> +
> +#include <linux/interrupt.h>
> +#include <linux/mfd/mt6358/core.h>
> +#include <linux/mfd/mt6358/registers.h>
> +#include <linux/mfd/mt6397/core.h>
> +#include <linux/module.h>
> +#include <linux/of.h>
> +#include <linux/of_device.h>
> +#include <linux/of_irq.h>
> +#include <linux/platform_device.h>
> +#include <linux/regmap.h>
> +
> +static struct irq_top_t mt6358_ints[] = {
> +       MT6358_TOP_GEN(BUCK),
> +       MT6358_TOP_GEN(LDO),
> +       MT6358_TOP_GEN(PSC),
> +       MT6358_TOP_GEN(SCK),
> +       MT6358_TOP_GEN(BM),
> +       MT6358_TOP_GEN(HK),
> +       MT6358_TOP_GEN(AUD),
> +       MT6358_TOP_GEN(MISC),
> +};
> +
> +static void pmic_irq_enable(struct irq_data *data)
> +{
> +       unsigned int hwirq = irqd_to_hwirq(data);
> +       struct mt6397_chip *chip = irq_data_get_irq_chip_data(data);
> +       struct pmic_irq_data *irqd = chip->irq_data;
> +
> +       irqd->enable_hwirq[hwirq] = true;
> +}
> +
> +static void pmic_irq_disable(struct irq_data *data)
> +{
> +       unsigned int hwirq = irqd_to_hwirq(data);
> +       struct mt6397_chip *chip = irq_data_get_irq_chip_data(data);
> +       struct pmic_irq_data *irqd = chip->irq_data;
> +
> +       irqd->enable_hwirq[hwirq] = false;
> +}
> +
> +static void pmic_irq_lock(struct irq_data *data)
> +{
> +       struct mt6397_chip *chip = irq_data_get_irq_chip_data(data);
> +
> +       mutex_lock(&chip->irqlock);
> +}
> +
> +static void pmic_irq_sync_unlock(struct irq_data *data)
> +{
> +       unsigned int i, top_gp, gp_offset, en_reg, int_regs, shift;
> +       struct mt6397_chip *chip = irq_data_get_irq_chip_data(data);
> +       struct pmic_irq_data *irqd = chip->irq_data;
> +
> +       for (i = 0; i < irqd->num_pmic_irqs; i++) {
> +               if (irqd->enable_hwirq[i] == irqd->cache_hwirq[i])
> +                       continue;
> +
> +               /* Find out the IRQ group */
> +               top_gp = 0;
> +               while ((top_gp + 1) < irqd->num_top &&
> +                      i >= mt6358_ints[top_gp + 1].hwirq_base)
> +                       top_gp++;
> +
> +               /* Find the irq registers */

From Lee Jones: 'Nit: "IRQ"'

> +               gp_offset = i - mt6358_ints[top_gp].hwirq_base;
> +               int_regs = gp_offset / MT6358_REG_WIDTH;
> +               shift = gp_offset % MT6358_REG_WIDTH;
> +               en_reg = mt6358_ints[top_gp].en_reg +
> +                        (mt6358_ints[top_gp].en_reg_shift * int_regs);
> +
[...]
> +static const struct irq_domain_ops mt6358_irq_domain_ops = {
> +       .map = pmic_irq_domain_map,
> +       .xlate = irq_domain_xlate_twocell,
> +};
> +
> +int mt6358_irq_init(struct mt6397_chip *chip)
> +{
> +       int i, j, ret;
> +       struct pmic_irq_data *irqd;
> +
> +       irqd = devm_kzalloc(chip->dev, sizeof(struct pmic_irq_data *),

From Lee Jones: 'sizeof(*irqd)'

> +                           GFP_KERNEL);
> +       if (!irqd)
> +               return -ENOMEM;
> +
> +       chip->irq_data = irqd;
> +
[...]
> @@ -154,19 +184,33 @@ static int mt6397_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>         if (pmic->irq <= 0)
>                 return pmic->irq;
>
> -       ret = mt6397_irq_init(pmic);
> -       if (ret)
> -               return ret;
> -
>         switch (pmic->chip_id) {
>         case MT6323_CHIP_ID:
> +               ret = mt6397_irq_init(pmic);
> +               if (ret)
> +                       return ret;
> +
>                 ret = devm_mfd_add_devices(&pdev->dev, PLATFORM_DEVID_NONE,
>                                            mt6323_devs, ARRAY_SIZE(mt6323_devs),
>                                            NULL, 0, pmic->irq_domain);
>                 break;
>
> +       case MT6358_CHIP_ID:
> +               ret = mt6358_irq_init(pmic);
> +               if (ret)
> +                       return ret;
> +
> +               ret = devm_mfd_add_devices(&pdev->dev, PLATFORM_DEVID_NONE,
> +                                          mt6358_devs, ARRAY_SIZE(mt6358_devs),
> +                                          NULL, 0, pmic->irq_domain);
> +               break;

From Lee Jones: "In a subsequent patch you can choose the correct
mtXXXX_devs structure to pass and call devm_mfd_add_devices() only
once below the switch()."

Can you look into that as a follow-up patch?


> +
>         case MT6391_CHIP_ID:
>         case MT6397_CHIP_ID:
> +               ret = mt6397_irq_init(pmic);
> +               if (ret)
> +                       return ret;
> +
>                 ret = devm_mfd_add_devices(&pdev->dev, PLATFORM_DEVID_NONE,
>                                            mt6397_devs, ARRAY_SIZE(mt6397_devs),
>                                            NULL, 0, pmic->irq_domain);

[snip]

  reply	other threads:[~2020-03-31  7:36 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-03-31  4:07 [PATCH v11 0/5] Add Support for MediaTek PMIC MT6358 Hsin-Hsiung Wang
2020-03-31  4:07 ` [PATCH v11 1/5] mfd: mt6397: modify suspend/resume behavior Hsin-Hsiung Wang
2020-03-31  4:07 ` [PATCH v11 2/5] dt-bindings: mfd: Add compatible for the MediaTek MT6358 PMIC Hsin-Hsiung Wang
2020-03-31  4:07 ` [PATCH v11 3/5] mfd: Add support " Hsin-Hsiung Wang
2020-03-31  7:36   ` Nicolas Boichat [this message]
2020-03-31  8:28     ` Hsin-hsiung Wang
2020-03-31  4:07 ` [PATCH v11 4/5] rtc: mt6397: Add support for the MediaTek MT6358 RTC Hsin-Hsiung Wang
2020-03-31  7:38   ` Nicolas Boichat
2020-03-31  8:06   ` Alexandre Belloni
2020-04-05  0:43   ` Sebastian Reichel
2020-04-07  4:01   ` Yingjoe Chen
2020-03-31  4:07 ` [PATCH v11 5/5] arm64: dts: mt6358: add PMIC MT6358 related nodes Hsin-Hsiung Wang

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=CANMq1KBqeUHj0gKcknPDvgzRzGMt26pq-_rt_ZM89phCHO9jqQ@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=drinkcat@chromium.org \
    --cc=a.zummo@towertech.it \
    --cc=alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com \
    --cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=eddie.huang@mediatek.com \
    --cc=frank-w@public-files.de \
    --cc=hsin-hsiung.wang@mediatek.com \
    --cc=josef.friedl@speed.at \
    --cc=kstewart@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=lee.jones@linaro.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-rtc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=matthias.bgg@gmail.com \
    --cc=ran.bi@mediatek.com \
    --cc=rfontana@redhat.com \
    --cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
    --cc=sean.wang@mediatek.com \
    --cc=sre@kernel.org \
    --cc=srv_heupstream@mediatek.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --subject='Re: [PATCH v11 3/5] mfd: Add support for the MediaTek MT6358 PMIC' \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).