Re: [PATCH v3 06/15] mfd: Add ROHM BD71815 ID

[Matti Vaittinen <matti.vaittinen@fi.rohmeurope.com>]

On Wed, 2021-03-10 at 11:17 +0000, Lee Jones wrote:
> On Wed, 10 Mar 2021, Vaittinen, Matti wrote:
> 
> > Hello Lee,
> > 
> > On Wed, 2021-03-10 at 10:36 +0000, Lee Jones wrote:
> > > On Mon, 08 Mar 2021, Matti Vaittinen wrote:
> > > 
> > > > Add chip ID for ROHM BD71815 and PMIC so that drivers can
> > > > identify
> > > > this IC.
> > > > 
> > > > Signed-off-by: Matti Vaittinen <
> > > > matti.vaittinen@fi.rohmeurope.com>
> > > > Acked-for-MFD-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>
> > > > ---
> > > >  include/linux/mfd/rohm-generic.h | 1 +
> > > >  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
> > > > 
> > > > diff --git a/include/linux/mfd/rohm-generic.h
> > > > b/include/linux/mfd/rohm-generic.h
> > > > index 66f673c35303..e5392bcbc098 100644
> > > > --- a/include/linux/mfd/rohm-generic.h
> > > > +++ b/include/linux/mfd/rohm-generic.h
> > > > @@ -14,6 +14,7 @@ enum rohm_chip_type {
> > > >  	ROHM_CHIP_TYPE_BD71828,
> > > >  	ROHM_CHIP_TYPE_BD9571,
> > > >  	ROHM_CHIP_TYPE_BD9574,
> > > > +	ROHM_CHIP_TYPE_BD71815,
> > > 
> > > Is there a technical reason why these can't be re-ordered?
> > 
> > No, I don't think so.
> > 
> > BTW. there will probably be a (trivial) conflict here as both this
> > series and the BD9576/BD9573 series add an ID here. Let me guess,
> > you'd
> 
> That's fine.  I will resolve that manually.

Thanks :)

> 
> > like to see them sorted?
> 
> Wouldn't that be nice? :)
Aesthetics is not really my cup of tea. OTOH, if amount of IDs grow,
then sorting helps spotting whether some IC has an ID here. So yes, it
kind of makes sense.

Can you do sorting while resolving the conflict between series or do
you want me to
a) do sorting if (when) I re-spin the series
b) send separate sorting patch as a part of this series
c) send sepatate sorting patch after all the pending patches touching
these IDs have been merged?

--Matti