linux-s390.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Waiman Long <Waiman.Long@hpe.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, x86@kernel.org,
	linux-alpha@vger.kernel.org, linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, Davidlohr Bueso <dave@stgolabs.net>,
	Jason Low <jason.low2@hp.com>, Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>,
	Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>,
	Scott J Norton <scott.norton@hpe.com>,
	Douglas Hatch <doug.hatch@hpe.com>,
	Waiman Long <Waiman.Long@hpe.com>
Subject: [RFC PATCH-tip/locking/core v3 09/10] locking/rwsem: Enable reactivation of reader spinning
Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2016 11:41:35 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1466178096-5623-10-git-send-email-Waiman.Long@hpe.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1466178096-5623-1-git-send-email-Waiman.Long@hpe.com>

Reader optimistic spinning will be disabled once the rspin_enabled
count reaches 0. After that, it cannot be re-enabled. This may cause
an eligible rwsem locked out of reader spinning because of a series
of unfortunate events.

This patch looks at the regular writer-on-writer spinning history. If
there are sufficient more successful spin attempts than failed ones,
it will try to reactivate reader spinning.

Signed-off-by: Waiman Long <Waiman.Long@hpe.com>
---
 include/linux/rwsem.h       |   12 ++++++++----
 kernel/locking/rwsem-xadd.c |   27 +++++++++++++++++++++++++--
 2 files changed, 33 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/include/linux/rwsem.h b/include/linux/rwsem.h
index 8978f87..98284b4 100644
--- a/include/linux/rwsem.h
+++ b/include/linux/rwsem.h
@@ -32,7 +32,11 @@ struct rw_semaphore {
 	raw_spinlock_t wait_lock;
 #ifdef CONFIG_RWSEM_SPIN_ON_OWNER
 	struct optimistic_spin_queue osq; /* spinner MCS lock */
-	int rspin_enabled;	/* protected by osq lock */
+	/*
+	 * Reader optimistic spinning fields protected by osq lock
+	 */
+	uint16_t rspin_enabled;
+	int16_t  wspin_cnt;
 
 	/*
 	 * Write owner. Used as a speculative check to see
@@ -74,10 +78,10 @@ static inline int rwsem_is_locked(struct rw_semaphore *sem)
 /*
  * Each successful reader spin will increment the rspin_enabled by 1.
  * Each unsuccessful spin, on the other hand, will decrement it by 2.
- * Reader spinning will be permanently disabled when it reaches 0.
+ * Reader spinning will be disabled when it reaches 0.
  */
 #ifndef RWSEM_RSPIN_ENABLED_DEFAULT
-# define RWSEM_RSPIN_ENABLED_DEFAULT	40
+# define RWSEM_RSPIN_ENABLED_DEFAULT	30
 #endif
 #define RWSEM_RSPIN_ENABLED_MAX		1024
 
@@ -87,7 +91,7 @@ static inline int rwsem_is_locked(struct rw_semaphore *sem)
 
 #ifdef CONFIG_RWSEM_SPIN_ON_OWNER
 #define __RWSEM_OPT_INIT(lockname) , .osq = OSQ_LOCK_UNLOCKED, .owner = NULL, \
-		.rspin_enabled = RWSEM_RSPIN_ENABLED_DEFAULT
+		.rspin_enabled = RWSEM_RSPIN_ENABLED_DEFAULT, .wspin_cnt = 0
 #else
 #define __RWSEM_OPT_INIT(lockname)
 #endif
diff --git a/kernel/locking/rwsem-xadd.c b/kernel/locking/rwsem-xadd.c
index 42c8dda..c6b6105 100644
--- a/kernel/locking/rwsem-xadd.c
+++ b/kernel/locking/rwsem-xadd.c
@@ -108,6 +108,7 @@ void __init_rwsem(struct rw_semaphore *sem, const char *name,
 #ifdef CONFIG_RWSEM_SPIN_ON_OWNER
 	sem->owner = NULL;
 	sem->rspin_enabled = RWSEM_RSPIN_ENABLED_DEFAULT;
+	sem->wspin_cnt = 0;
 	osq_lock_init(&sem->osq);
 #endif
 }
@@ -466,10 +467,32 @@ static bool rwsem_optimistic_spin(struct rw_semaphore *sem,
 		if (taken && (sem->rspin_enabled < RWSEM_RSPIN_ENABLED_MAX)) {
 			sem->rspin_enabled++;
 		} else if (!taken) {
-			if  (sem->rspin_enabled > 2)
+			if  (sem->rspin_enabled > 2) {
 				sem->rspin_enabled -= 2;
-			else
+			} else if (sem->rspin_enabled) {
 				sem->rspin_enabled = 0;
+				/*
+				 * Reset wspin_cnt so that it won't get
+				 * re-enabled too soon.
+				 */
+				if (sem->wspin_cnt > -30)
+					sem->wspin_cnt = -30;
+			}
+		}
+	} else if (type == RWSEM_WAITING_FOR_WRITE) {
+		/*
+		 * Every 10 successful writer-on-writer spins more than failed
+		 * spins will increment rspin_enabled to encourage more
+		 * writer-on-reader spinning attempts.
+		 */
+		if (taken) {
+			if ((++sem->wspin_cnt >= 10) &&
+			    (sem->rspin_enabled < RWSEM_RSPIN_ENABLED_MAX)) {
+				sem->wspin_cnt = 0;
+				sem->rspin_enabled++;
+			}
+		} else if (sem->wspin_cnt > -100) {
+			sem->wspin_cnt--;
 		}
 	}
 	osq_unlock(&sem->osq);
-- 
1.7.1

  parent reply	other threads:[~2016-06-17 15:41 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <20160617154126.71Vh8a1JOORZu3aHkOcixTGNFjmD5alLAem_RcYrOKU@z>
2016-06-17 15:41 ` [RFC PATCH-tip/locking/core v3 00/10] locking/rwsem: Enable reader optimistic spinning Waiman Long
2016-06-17 15:41   ` [RFC PATCH-tip/locking/core v3 01/10] locking/osq: Make lock/unlock proper acquire/release barrier Waiman Long
     [not found]   ` <20160617154128.dZjcIpfk8ojrKoAz90paHLdLQe4gogrYQfQRsy6J9G0@z>
2016-06-17 15:41     ` [RFC PATCH-tip/locking/core v3 02/10] locking/rwsem: Stop active read lock ASAP Waiman Long
2016-06-17 15:41   ` [RFC PATCH-tip/locking/core v3 03/10] locking/rwsem: Make rwsem_spin_on_owner() return a tri-state value Waiman Long
2016-06-17 15:41   ` [RFC PATCH-tip/locking/core v3 04/10] locking/rwsem: Enable count-based spinning on reader Waiman Long
2016-06-17 15:41   ` [RFC PATCH-tip/locking/core v3 05/10] locking/rwsem: move down rwsem_down_read_failed function Waiman Long
2016-06-17 15:41   ` [RFC PATCH-tip/locking/core v3 06/10] locking/rwsem: Move common rwsem macros to asm-generic/rwsem_types.h Waiman Long
2016-06-17 15:41   ` [RFC PATCH-tip/locking/core v3 07/10] locking/rwsem: Change RWSEM_WAITING_BIAS for better disambiguation Waiman Long
2016-06-17 15:41   ` [RFC PATCH-tip/locking/core v3 08/10] locking/rwsem: Enable spinning readers Waiman Long
2016-06-17 15:41   ` Waiman Long [this message]
2016-06-17 15:41   ` [RFC PATCH-tip/locking/core v3 10/10] locking/rwsem: Add a boot parameter to reader spinning threshold Waiman Long

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1466178096-5623-10-git-send-email-Waiman.Long@hpe.com \
    --to=waiman.long@hpe.com \
    --cc=corbet@lwn.net \
    --cc=dave@stgolabs.net \
    --cc=david@fromorbit.com \
    --cc=doug.hatch@hpe.com \
    --cc=jason.low2@hp.com \
    --cc=linux-alpha@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=scott.norton@hpe.com \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).