linux-s390.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>
To: Claudio Imbrenda <imbrenda@linux.ibm.com>, kvm@vger.kernel.org
Cc: cohuck@redhat.com, frankja@linux.ibm.com, thuth@redhat.com,
	pasic@linux.ibm.com, david@redhat.com,
	linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Ulrich.Weigand@de.ibm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 02/14] KVM: s390: pv: avoid double free of sida page
Date: Tue, 5 Oct 2021 15:38:05 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1cd7259e-ab4c-1c3e-6846-e3c5ff26bda1@de.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210920132502.36111-3-imbrenda@linux.ibm.com>


Am 20.09.21 um 15:24 schrieb Claudio Imbrenda:
> If kvm_s390_pv_destroy_cpu is called more than once, we risk calling
> free_page on a random page, since the sidad field is aliased with the
> gbea, which is not guaranteed to be zero.
> 
> This can happen, for example, if userspace calls the KVM_PV_DISABLE
> IOCTL, and it fails, and then userspace calls the same IOCTL again.
> This scenario is only possible if KVM has some serious bug or if the
> hardware is broken.
> 
> The solution is to simply return successfully immediately if the vCPU
> was already non secure.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Claudio Imbrenda <imbrenda@linux.ibm.com>
> Fixes: 19e1227768863a1469797c13ef8fea1af7beac2c ("KVM: S390: protvirt: Introduce instruction data area bounce buffer")

makes sense.

Reviewed-by: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>

> ---
>   arch/s390/kvm/pv.c | 19 +++++++++----------
>   1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/s390/kvm/pv.c b/arch/s390/kvm/pv.c
> index c8841f476e91..0a854115100b 100644
> --- a/arch/s390/kvm/pv.c
> +++ b/arch/s390/kvm/pv.c
> @@ -16,18 +16,17 @@
>   
>   int kvm_s390_pv_destroy_cpu(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u16 *rc, u16 *rrc)
>   {
> -	int cc = 0;
> +	int cc;
>   
> -	if (kvm_s390_pv_cpu_get_handle(vcpu)) {
> -		cc = uv_cmd_nodata(kvm_s390_pv_cpu_get_handle(vcpu),
> -				   UVC_CMD_DESTROY_SEC_CPU, rc, rrc);
> +	if (!kvm_s390_pv_cpu_get_handle(vcpu))
> +		return 0;
> +
> +	cc = uv_cmd_nodata(kvm_s390_pv_cpu_get_handle(vcpu), UVC_CMD_DESTROY_SEC_CPU, rc, rrc);
> +
> +	KVM_UV_EVENT(vcpu->kvm, 3, "PROTVIRT DESTROY VCPU %d: rc %x rrc %x",
> +		     vcpu->vcpu_id, *rc, *rrc);
> +	WARN_ONCE(cc, "protvirt destroy cpu failed rc %x rrc %x", *rc, *rrc);
>   
> -		KVM_UV_EVENT(vcpu->kvm, 3,
> -			     "PROTVIRT DESTROY VCPU %d: rc %x rrc %x",
> -			     vcpu->vcpu_id, *rc, *rrc);
> -		WARN_ONCE(cc, "protvirt destroy cpu failed rc %x rrc %x",
> -			  *rc, *rrc);
> -	}
>   	/* Intended memory leak for something that should never happen. */
>   	if (!cc)
>   		free_pages(vcpu->arch.pv.stor_base,
> 

  parent reply	other threads:[~2021-10-05 13:38 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-09-20 13:24 [PATCH v5 00/14] KVM: s390: pv: implement lazy destroy for reboot Claudio Imbrenda
2021-09-20 13:24 ` [PATCH v5 01/14] KVM: s390: pv: add macros for UVC CC values Claudio Imbrenda
2021-10-05 13:08   ` Janosch Frank
2021-09-20 13:24 ` [PATCH v5 02/14] KVM: s390: pv: avoid double free of sida page Claudio Imbrenda
2021-10-05 13:11   ` Janosch Frank
2021-10-05 13:38   ` Christian Borntraeger [this message]
2021-09-20 13:24 ` [PATCH v5 03/14] KVM: s390: pv: avoid stalls for kvm_s390_pv_init_vm Claudio Imbrenda
2021-10-05 13:20   ` Janosch Frank
2021-09-20 13:24 ` [PATCH v5 04/14] KVM: s390: pv: avoid stalls when making pages secure Claudio Imbrenda
2021-10-06 15:54   ` Christian Borntraeger
2021-10-06 16:14     ` Claudio Imbrenda
2021-10-12  7:43   ` Janosch Frank
2021-10-12  8:59   ` Christian Borntraeger
2021-09-20 13:24 ` [PATCH v5 05/14] KVM: s390: pv: leak the topmost page table when destroy fails Claudio Imbrenda
2021-10-12  7:58   ` Janosch Frank
2021-10-12  8:33     ` Claudio Imbrenda
2021-09-20 13:24 ` [PATCH v5 06/14] KVM: s390: pv: properly handle page flags for protected guests Claudio Imbrenda
2021-10-12  7:59   ` Janosch Frank
2021-10-26 11:53   ` Christian Borntraeger
2021-09-20 13:24 ` [PATCH v5 07/14] KVM: s390: pv: handle secure storage violations " Claudio Imbrenda
2021-09-20 13:24 ` [PATCH v5 08/14] KVM: s390: pv: handle secure storage exceptions for normal guests Claudio Imbrenda
2021-10-12  8:16   ` Janosch Frank
2021-10-12  8:35     ` Claudio Imbrenda
2021-10-12 12:31       ` Janosch Frank
2021-09-20 13:24 ` [PATCH v5 09/14] KVM: s390: pv: refactor s390_reset_acc Claudio Imbrenda
2021-09-20 13:24 ` [PATCH v5 10/14] KVM: s390: pv: usage counter instead of flag Claudio Imbrenda
2021-09-20 13:24 ` [PATCH v5 11/14] KVM: s390: pv: add export before import Claudio Imbrenda
2021-09-20 13:25 ` [PATCH v5 12/14] KVM: s390: pv: module parameter to fence lazy destroy Claudio Imbrenda
2021-09-20 13:25 ` [PATCH v5 13/14] KVM: s390: pv: lazy destroy for reboot Claudio Imbrenda
2021-09-20 13:25 ` [PATCH v5 14/14] KVM: s390: pv: avoid export before import if possible Claudio Imbrenda
2021-10-05 13:26 ` [PATCH v5 00/14] KVM: s390: pv: implement lazy destroy for reboot Janosch Frank
2021-10-05 14:15   ` Christian Borntraeger

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1cd7259e-ab4c-1c3e-6846-e3c5ff26bda1@de.ibm.com \
    --to=borntraeger@de.ibm.com \
    --cc=Ulrich.Weigand@de.ibm.com \
    --cc=cohuck@redhat.com \
    --cc=david@redhat.com \
    --cc=frankja@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=imbrenda@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pasic@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=thuth@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).