From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6030FC43334 for ; Tue, 19 Jul 2022 14:49:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S236884AbiGSOtn (ORCPT ); Tue, 19 Jul 2022 10:49:43 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:47236 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S239760AbiGSOtb (ORCPT ); Tue, 19 Jul 2022 10:49:31 -0400 Received: from verein.lst.de (verein.lst.de [213.95.11.211]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F1C6B5F4D; Tue, 19 Jul 2022 07:49:30 -0700 (PDT) Received: by verein.lst.de (Postfix, from userid 2407) id 561FC68AFE; Tue, 19 Jul 2022 16:49:28 +0200 (CEST) Date: Tue, 19 Jul 2022 16:49:28 +0200 From: Christoph Hellwig To: Eric Farman Cc: Alex Williamson , Christoph Hellwig , Kirti Wankhede , Tony Krowiak , Halil Pasic , Jason Herne , Matthew Rosato , Zhenyu Wang , Zhi Wang , Jason Gunthorpe , kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, intel-gvt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org, Vineeth Vijayan Subject: Re: simplify the mdev interface v6 Message-ID: <20220719144928.GB21431@lst.de> References: <20220709045450.609884-1-hch@lst.de> <20220718054348.GA22345@lst.de> <20220718153331.18a52e31.alex.williamson@redhat.com> <1f945ef0eb6c02079700a6785ca3dd9864096b82.camel@linux.ibm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1f945ef0eb6c02079700a6785ca3dd9864096b82.camel@linux.ibm.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-11-01) Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-s390@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Jul 18, 2022 at 10:01:40PM -0400, Eric Farman wrote: > I'll get the problem with struct subchannel [1] sorted out in the next > couple of days. This series breaks vfio-ccw in its current form (see > reply to patch 14), but even with that addressed the placement of all > these other mdev structs needs to be handled differently. Alex, any preference if I should just fix the number instances checking with either an incremental patch or a resend, or wait for this ccw rework?