From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3696BC3F6B0 for ; Tue, 26 Jul 2022 17:48:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S239404AbiGZRsW (ORCPT ); Tue, 26 Jul 2022 13:48:22 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:42542 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S239600AbiGZRsV (ORCPT ); Tue, 26 Jul 2022 13:48:21 -0400 Received: from verein.lst.de (verein.lst.de [213.95.11.211]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 181BF13CC0; Tue, 26 Jul 2022 10:48:21 -0700 (PDT) Received: by verein.lst.de (Postfix, from userid 2407) id C193D68AA6; Tue, 26 Jul 2022 19:48:17 +0200 (CEST) Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2022 19:48:17 +0200 From: Christoph Hellwig To: Eric Farman Cc: hch@lst.de, akrowiak@linux.ibm.com, alex.williamson@redhat.com, intel-gvt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org, jgg@nvidia.com, jjherne@linux.ibm.com, kvm@vger.kernel.org, kwankhede@nvidia.com, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, mjrosato@linux.ibm.com, pasic@linux.ibm.com, vneethv@linux.ibm.com, zhenyuw@linux.intel.com, zhi.a.wang@intel.com Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] vfio/ccw: Move mdev stuff out of struct subchannel Message-ID: <20220726174817.GB14002@lst.de> References: <20220720050629.GA6076@lst.de> <20220726153725.2573294-1-farman@linux.ibm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20220726153725.2573294-1-farman@linux.ibm.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-11-01) Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-s390@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Jul 26, 2022 at 05:37:25PM +0200, Eric Farman wrote: > Here's my swipe at a cleanup patch that can be folded in > to this series, to get the mdev stuff in a more proper > location for vfio-ccw. > > As previously described, the subchannel is a device-agnostic > structure that does/should not need to know about specific > nuances such as mediated devices. This is why things like > struct vfio_ccw_private exist, so move these details there. Should I resend the series with that folded in? At this point we're probably not talking about 5.20 anyway.