linux-s390.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Brian Foster <bfoster@redhat.com>
To: linux-s390@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, geraldsc@de.ibm.com
Subject: [PATCH] s390: fix double free of GS and RI CBs on fork() failure
Date: Tue, 16 Aug 2022 11:54:07 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220816155407.537372-1-bfoster@redhat.com> (raw)

The pointers for guarded storage and runtime instrumentation control
blocks are stored in the thread_struct of the associated task. These
pointers are initially copied on fork() via arch_dup_task_struct()
and then cleared via copy_thread() before fork() returns. If fork()
happens to fail after the initial task dup and before copy_thread(),
the newly allocated task and associated thread_struct memory are
freed via free_task() -> arch_release_task_struct(). This results in
a double free of the guarded storage and runtime info structs
because the fields in the failed task still refer to memory
associated with the source task.

This problem can manifest as a BUG_ON() in set_freepointer() (with
CONFIG_SLAB_FREELIST_HARDENED enabled) or KASAN splat (if enabled)
when running trinity syscall fuzz tests on s390x. To avoid this
problem, clear the associated pointer fields in
arch_dup_task_struct() immediately after the new task is copied.
Note that the RI flag is still cleared in copy_thread() because it
resides in thread stack memory and that is where stack info is
copied.

Signed-off-by: Brian Foster <bfoster@redhat.com>
---

Hi all,

Note that I'm not subscribed to the list so please CC on reply. Further,
I'm not terribly familiar with these associated features and so have not
run any kind of functional testing here. My testing was purely around
producing/preventing the double free issue. Any thoughts, reviews or
further testing is appreciated. Thanks.

Brian

 arch/s390/kernel/process.c | 22 ++++++++++++++++------
 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/s390/kernel/process.c b/arch/s390/kernel/process.c
index 89949b9f3cf8..d5119e039d85 100644
--- a/arch/s390/kernel/process.c
+++ b/arch/s390/kernel/process.c
@@ -91,6 +91,18 @@ int arch_dup_task_struct(struct task_struct *dst, struct task_struct *src)
 
 	memcpy(dst, src, arch_task_struct_size);
 	dst->thread.fpu.regs = dst->thread.fpu.fprs;
+
+	/*
+	 * Don't transfer over the runtime instrumentation or the guarded
+	 * storage control block pointers. These fields are cleared here instead
+	 * of in copy_thread() to avoid premature freeing of associated memory
+	 * on fork() failure. Wait to clear the RI flag because ->stack still
+	 * refers to the source thread.
+	 */
+	dst->thread.ri_cb = NULL;
+	dst->thread.gs_cb = NULL;
+	dst->thread.gs_bc_cb = NULL;
+
 	return 0;
 }
 
@@ -150,13 +162,11 @@ int copy_thread(struct task_struct *p, const struct kernel_clone_args *args)
 	frame->childregs.flags = 0;
 	if (new_stackp)
 		frame->childregs.gprs[15] = new_stackp;
-
-	/* Don't copy runtime instrumentation info */
-	p->thread.ri_cb = NULL;
+	/*
+	 * Clear the runtime instrumentation flag after the above childregs
+	 * copy. The CB pointer was already cleared in arch_dup_task_struct().
+	 */
 	frame->childregs.psw.mask &= ~PSW_MASK_RI;
-	/* Don't copy guarded storage control block */
-	p->thread.gs_cb = NULL;
-	p->thread.gs_bc_cb = NULL;
 
 	/* Set a new TLS ?  */
 	if (clone_flags & CLONE_SETTLS) {
-- 
2.37.1


             reply	other threads:[~2022-08-16 15:57 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-08-16 15:54 Brian Foster [this message]
2022-08-17 11:09 ` [PATCH] s390: fix double free of GS and RI CBs on fork() failure Gerald Schaefer
2022-08-17 18:39   ` Brian Foster
2022-08-24  8:01 ` Heiko Carstens
2022-08-24  9:59   ` Vasily Gorbik

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20220816155407.537372-1-bfoster@redhat.com \
    --to=bfoster@redhat.com \
    --cc=geraldsc@de.ibm.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).